I agree. He made no negative comments about QAnon, said the group likes him, is gaining popularity, they don't like what is happening in Portland and NY the last six or seven months, and it was started four years ago (actually 4 years this Oct.), and the QAnon group loves their country. It sounds like he knows a lot more than he is saying,understandably. He made perfect statements regarding Q. He can't be condemned for his statements by the MSN, and he made them look like the bunch if idiots they are.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the first Q post was in late 2017. That would mean the timeline he was referring to, specifically the 4 years part, is about the stuff the radical left has been doing to cities, which makes sense in context.
Good analysis but I do not think he was talking about the history of the Q movement because that would slightly contradict his stance on plausible deniability.
I'm surprised the reporter actually asked about the pedophilia and cannibals. I didn't think that stuff would come up until well into his second term.
So are we going to see the treason arrests first or the human trafficking? This will be interesting either way. It's hard to get people to believe in Q if they can't even grasp the evil that has blossomed on this planet.
I agree. He made no negative comments about QAnon, said the group likes him, is gaining popularity, they don't like what is happening in Portland and NY the last six or seven months, and it was started four years ago (actually 4 years this Oct.), and the QAnon group loves their country. It sounds like he knows a lot more than he is saying,understandably. He made perfect statements regarding Q. He can't be condemned for his statements by the MSN, and he made them look like the bunch if idiots they are.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the first Q post was in late 2017. That would mean the timeline he was referring to, specifically the 4 years part, is about the stuff the radical left has been doing to cities, which makes sense in context.
Good analysis but I do not think he was talking about the history of the Q movement because that would slightly contradict his stance on plausible deniability.
Do you think Q team went live the same day the plan was hatched?
How much preparation must it have taken to pull this off? If it was decades of planning I wouldn't be at all surprised.
You're right. First Trump said the violence has been going on for 6 months, then he observed that it's actually been four years.
If his response was designed specifically to spread the word it absolutely worked. I never looked into Q until yesterday.
Trust yourself Anon. Dig in.
I'm surprised the reporter actually asked about the pedophilia and cannibals. I didn't think that stuff would come up until well into his second term.
So are we going to see the treason arrests first or the human trafficking? This will be interesting either way. It's hard to get people to believe in Q if they can't even grasp the evil that has blossomed on this planet.
Great Analysis. KMGA (Keep Making Great Analysis)!
Excellent insight.