I've been thinking about the Sessions hire for a long time. I've discussed it with a couple of in tune Q friends. The conclusion is that there is a lot more going on than we know. When Sessions was AG, there were no leaks, almost zero public appearances. I have a feeling he was setting up things for Barr, Durham, and the other investigations to be successful. Jeff Sessions isn't a stupid man by any stretch,
How many times have we been told "you are watching a movie"? Personally I feel the public scolding from Trump about Sessions is just that, for public viewing. I don't recall Sessions ever responding to the jabs, as though it was a set up.
On the other hand if Sessions was a place holder, he played his part in that as far as we know. Q said trust Sessions, was that for us, or for the "others" listening in on the message board? If could be total misdirection and misinformation. Trust Sessions was the public message, while they were working on getting Barr on board, hell who knows, there might even be a 3rd in line who will really bring the hammer down after the re-election. We've seen Trump bring in people that were meant to expose the deep state, with him knowing full well who and what they represented.
Possibly bringing Sessions in later for something? I don't know honestly, perhaps Sessions really didn't follow through on his responsibilities. Maybe Sessions will have to testify for a case down the road. Unfortunately, there is more speculation than solid facts with this.
I've been thinking about the Sessions hire for a long time. I've discussed it with a couple of in tune Q friends. The conclusion is that there is a lot more going on than we know. When Sessions was AG, there were no leaks, almost zero public appearances. I have a feeling he was setting up things for Barr, Durham, and the other investigations to be successful. Jeff Sessions isn't a stupid man by any stretch,
How many times have we been told "you are watching a movie"? Personally I feel the public scolding from Trump about Sessions is just that, for public viewing. I don't recall Sessions ever responding to the jabs, as though it was a set up.
On the other hand if Sessions was a place holder, he played his part in that as far as we know. Q said trust Sessions, was that for us, or for the "others" listening in on the message board? If could be total misdirection and misinformation. Trust Sessions was the public message, while they were working on getting Barr on board, hell who knows, there might even be a 3rd in line who will really bring the hammer down after the re-election. We've seen Trump bring in people that were meant to expose the deep state, with him knowing full well who and what they represented.
Possibly bringing Sessions in later for something? I don't know honestly, perhaps Sessions really didn't follow through on his responsibilities. Maybe Sessions will have to testify for a case down the road. Unfortunately, there is more speculation than solid facts with this.