Trump said that making Sessions his AG was the single biggest/worst mistake of his presidency. It tells us something when the people of Alabama rejected Sessions in favor of a candidate who has not always been staunch on illegal immigration.
Sessions appointed Durham the exact same day Q dropped his first post on chans. Durham is in charge of indictments against the co conspirators in the coup against president Trump. Q even said Trump would not be commenting about this specifically for optics reasons. Trump has distanced himself (wisely) from John Durham's prosecutorial discretion, even as far as to publicly fued with the AG that originally appointed him, Sessions.
I've been thinking about the Sessions hire for a long time. I've discussed it with a couple of in tune Q friends. The conclusion is that there is a lot more going on than we know. When Sessions was AG, there were no leaks, almost zero public appearances. I have a feeling he was setting up things for Barr, Durham, and the other investigations to be successful. Jeff Sessions isn't a stupid man by any stretch,
How many times have we been told "you are watching a movie"? Personally I feel the public scolding from Trump about Sessions is just that, for public viewing. I don't recall Sessions ever responding to the jabs, as though it was a set up.
On the other hand if Sessions was a place holder, he played his part in that as far as we know. Q said trust Sessions, was that for us, or for the "others" listening in on the message board? If could be total misdirection and misinformation. Trust Sessions was the public message, while they were working on getting Barr on board, hell who knows, there might even be a 3rd in line who will really bring the hammer down after the re-election. We've seen Trump bring in people that were meant to expose the deep state, with him knowing full well who and what they represented.
Possibly bringing Sessions in later for something? I don't know honestly, perhaps Sessions really didn't follow through on his responsibilities. Maybe Sessions will have to testify for a case down the road. Unfortunately, there is more speculation than solid facts with this.
Could be the game of letting the left think they are in charge, all the while watching them, and then letting them hang themselves. Q has said many times how do you get evidence out there? How do you get the proof in the legal arena. You get the real authorization to spy via FISA, then you pretend to lose or be weak and the snakes come slithering in doing to do their dirty work. All the while there we are watching, recording and building the cases against them as they commit crimes.
So maybe there is something to trust sessions. We will just have to see, but thats one possible scenario.
That is exactly what everyone is supposed to think. Pretty soon John Durham and Barr are going to come under attack by the usual democrat freaks due to the russia hoax coup indictments. Durham's origin will be under suspicion. Does it help or hurt Trump that the public thinks Sessions was a horrible AG for Trump but who also conveniently appointed Durham, who would later become the Deepstate's nightmare?
It is a very good thing that most people also believe this. Just keep that in mind when Durham's character is assassinated and they try to link him to Trump as if he is attempting to send the DOJ after his enemies directly.
"Trust Sessions" is an interesting meme because it's become a real division point in the community. It's really up to each of us to understand the context around it and make a judgement.
For me, "Trust Sessions" is both disinfo and a lesson on comms and the nature of disinfo. On a surface MSM level take it's false. Sessions was a dud. But we know that sometimes you need a dud to misdirect as you achieve another purpose (remember when Scarramucci was dud of the day but got rid of Reince Preibus?). Perhaps then on another level Q wasn't instructing us to trust Sessions himself, but rather to trust their judgement and motives for allowing Sessions to play the role he ultimately played (keeping in mind we still don't have a resolution to this).
Sessions is the only one really pushed for trust on, and he's really the only early ally that seems to have been a fuckup. It could turn out that we discover secret cabal initiations are called "Trust Sessions". I think we need more information for this one.
while i knew Sessions would never do anything from the start, i also cant say what would have happened if Sessions had jumped into the fight guns blazing. none of us has a time machine (except John Titor), so we dont know what the alternative outcome would have been.
maybe Sessions pulled strings to shut down Mueller before it dragged out Russia Hoax for 3 years. then the Bolshevik Coup plotters would have used Sessions' interference to do to Trump what they did to Nixon in Watergate. the Coup plotters were looking for any excuse to frame Trump for a crime to then justify impeaching him. including setting up Trump to create the crime.
maybe if we could see that alt Timeline, where Sessions crushed the coup plotters and inadvertently triggered the "Saturday Night Masaacre" like under Nixon, where Nixon's AG was indicted and all of Nixon's top staffers were forced to resign, leaving Nixon alone and weak and vulnerable, then maybe we could see what Sessions avoided by recusing himself.
regardless of Trust Sessions, i am furious and beyond Blackpilled that here we are 5 years later and not one co-conspirator who attempted to overthrow the President has been indicted or jailed.
Sessions snuck John Durham in on october 28 2017 (Q's first post date too coincidentally) and now John Durham has the fates of every deep state coup plotter in his hand. This really isnt that complicated....
Another thing to consider is that Q has said to TRUST different people throughout the drops. Would it be logical to infer Q might be reassuring us to trust certain people who would appear to be UNtrustworthy based on the visible optics?
Each one of Q Trust figures has been under scrutiny from the conservative position including Sessions (for recusal), Wray (for dragging feet on FBI cooperation), Pompeo (Iran war, NK policy, China).
Why would Q tell us to Trust if it was already plainly obvious that these players were with the plan?
Or Q could be throwing fake news in there to make it seem like Trump was trusting the wrong people to his enemies watching the drops. Not sure it matters to me either way except Im leaning toward the former explanation.
I trust not a one. Especially the loud ones we see tweeting and interviewing on TV. I find it interesting that both Trey Gowdy and Chafferz (our biggest hound dogs from the late Obama years) were both pressed out by the Trumplicans. So much shit I wish we had access to the true information and happenings.
Yep yep. good stuff to have posted on here for passing readers. Q at one point plainly said, "anyone retiring early or not seeking re-election" was forced out by the Q group. Others he said have specific roles to fill and to rest assured they would "vote with Trump" whatever the fuck that means lol.
Maybe Senate republicans protecting POTUS? Swamp is deep.
Trump said that making Sessions his AG was the single biggest/worst mistake of his presidency. It tells us something when the people of Alabama rejected Sessions in favor of a candidate who has not always been staunch on illegal immigration.
Sessions appointed Durham the exact same day Q dropped his first post on chans. Durham is in charge of indictments against the co conspirators in the coup against president Trump. Q even said Trump would not be commenting about this specifically for optics reasons. Trump has distanced himself (wisely) from John Durham's prosecutorial discretion, even as far as to publicly fued with the AG that originally appointed him, Sessions.
I've been thinking about the Sessions hire for a long time. I've discussed it with a couple of in tune Q friends. The conclusion is that there is a lot more going on than we know. When Sessions was AG, there were no leaks, almost zero public appearances. I have a feeling he was setting up things for Barr, Durham, and the other investigations to be successful. Jeff Sessions isn't a stupid man by any stretch,
How many times have we been told "you are watching a movie"? Personally I feel the public scolding from Trump about Sessions is just that, for public viewing. I don't recall Sessions ever responding to the jabs, as though it was a set up.
On the other hand if Sessions was a place holder, he played his part in that as far as we know. Q said trust Sessions, was that for us, or for the "others" listening in on the message board? If could be total misdirection and misinformation. Trust Sessions was the public message, while they were working on getting Barr on board, hell who knows, there might even be a 3rd in line who will really bring the hammer down after the re-election. We've seen Trump bring in people that were meant to expose the deep state, with him knowing full well who and what they represented.
Possibly bringing Sessions in later for something? I don't know honestly, perhaps Sessions really didn't follow through on his responsibilities. Maybe Sessions will have to testify for a case down the road. Unfortunately, there is more speculation than solid facts with this.
"What makes a movie GOOD?
GREAT actors?"
Could be the game of letting the left think they are in charge, all the while watching them, and then letting them hang themselves. Q has said many times how do you get evidence out there? How do you get the proof in the legal arena. You get the real authorization to spy via FISA, then you pretend to lose or be weak and the snakes come slithering in doing to do their dirty work. All the while there we are watching, recording and building the cases against them as they commit crimes.
So maybe there is something to trust sessions. We will just have to see, but thats one possible scenario.
That is exactly what everyone is supposed to think. Pretty soon John Durham and Barr are going to come under attack by the usual democrat freaks due to the russia hoax coup indictments. Durham's origin will be under suspicion. Does it help or hurt Trump that the public thinks Sessions was a horrible AG for Trump but who also conveniently appointed Durham, who would later become the Deepstate's nightmare?
It is a very good thing that most people also believe this. Just keep that in mind when Durham's character is assassinated and they try to link him to Trump as if he is attempting to send the DOJ after his enemies directly.
"Trust Sessions" is an interesting meme because it's become a real division point in the community. It's really up to each of us to understand the context around it and make a judgement.
For me, "Trust Sessions" is both disinfo and a lesson on comms and the nature of disinfo. On a surface MSM level take it's false. Sessions was a dud. But we know that sometimes you need a dud to misdirect as you achieve another purpose (remember when Scarramucci was dud of the day but got rid of Reince Preibus?). Perhaps then on another level Q wasn't instructing us to trust Sessions himself, but rather to trust their judgement and motives for allowing Sessions to play the role he ultimately played (keeping in mind we still don't have a resolution to this).
Sessions is the only one really pushed for trust on, and he's really the only early ally that seems to have been a fuckup. It could turn out that we discover secret cabal initiations are called "Trust Sessions". I think we need more information for this one.
I must be misremembering. I'm sure one of the pluses of Scarramucci was clearing him and other rats out.
Is Preibus actually on Trump 2020 or is he part of the GOPs Trump campaign?
Edit: I might be being unkind, but it looks like Preibus last appointment was as head of the interns. Seems like a demotion.
Ah ok, I was mixing stories up then. Thanks.
while i knew Sessions would never do anything from the start, i also cant say what would have happened if Sessions had jumped into the fight guns blazing. none of us has a time machine (except John Titor), so we dont know what the alternative outcome would have been.
maybe Sessions pulled strings to shut down Mueller before it dragged out Russia Hoax for 3 years. then the Bolshevik Coup plotters would have used Sessions' interference to do to Trump what they did to Nixon in Watergate. the Coup plotters were looking for any excuse to frame Trump for a crime to then justify impeaching him. including setting up Trump to create the crime.
maybe if we could see that alt Timeline, where Sessions crushed the coup plotters and inadvertently triggered the "Saturday Night Masaacre" like under Nixon, where Nixon's AG was indicted and all of Nixon's top staffers were forced to resign, leaving Nixon alone and weak and vulnerable, then maybe we could see what Sessions avoided by recusing himself.
regardless of Trust Sessions, i am furious and beyond Blackpilled that here we are 5 years later and not one co-conspirator who attempted to overthrow the President has been indicted or jailed.
TRUST GUILLOTINE
I will trust military intelligence and the rest of the staff with all of the political gymnastics.
Sessions snuck John Durham in on october 28 2017 (Q's first post date too coincidentally) and now John Durham has the fates of every deep state coup plotter in his hand. This really isnt that complicated....
Yep. Could it be a coincidence? Hmm
Another thing to consider is that Q has said to TRUST different people throughout the drops. Would it be logical to infer Q might be reassuring us to trust certain people who would appear to be UNtrustworthy based on the visible optics?
Each one of Q Trust figures has been under scrutiny from the conservative position including Sessions (for recusal), Wray (for dragging feet on FBI cooperation), Pompeo (Iran war, NK policy, China).
Why would Q tell us to Trust if it was already plainly obvious that these players were with the plan?
Or Q could be throwing fake news in there to make it seem like Trump was trusting the wrong people to his enemies watching the drops. Not sure it matters to me either way except Im leaning toward the former explanation.
I trust not a one. Especially the loud ones we see tweeting and interviewing on TV. I find it interesting that both Trey Gowdy and Chafferz (our biggest hound dogs from the late Obama years) were both pressed out by the Trumplicans. So much shit I wish we had access to the true information and happenings.
Yep yep. good stuff to have posted on here for passing readers. Q at one point plainly said, "anyone retiring early or not seeking re-election" was forced out by the Q group. Others he said have specific roles to fill and to rest assured they would "vote with Trump" whatever the fuck that means lol.
Maybe Senate republicans protecting POTUS? Swamp is deep.