Q#4750 - The Great Awakening - Where We Go Qne, We Go All!

Q#4750 (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 4 years ago by 2020yall 4 years ago by 2020yall +40 / -0

9 comments download

9 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (9)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– 2020yall [S] 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

I went on a little trip again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huma_Abedin

At the age of two, Abedin moved with her family to Jeddah (Saudi Arabia), where she was raised and lived until returning to the United States for college.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Jarrett

Jarrett was born in Shiraz, Iran

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros

Doctor of Philosophy from University of London... Based on his early studies of philosophy, Soros formulated an application of Karl Popper's General Theory of Reflexivity to capital markets, which he claims renders a clear picture of asset bubbles and fundamental/market value of securities, as well as value discrepancies used for shorting and swapping stocks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper

Popper is known for his rejection of the classical inductivist views on the scientific method in favour of empirical falsification. According to Popper, a theory in the empirical sciences can never be proven, but it can be falsified, meaning that it can (and should) be scrutinised with decisive experiments. Popper was opposed to the classical justificationist account of knowledge, which he replaced with critical rationalism, namely "the first non-justificational philosophy of criticism in the history of philosophy"

Further reading:

permalink save report block reply

▲ 6 ▼

– 2020yall [S] 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

The Iranian and Saudi Arabian connections have been noticed by many people. It's strange, two countries that would appear to be enemies both have a common goal. In fact, that's the thread that connects all of these people: desire to destroy the United States of America

I can't help but be distracted by the most interesting character in all of this.

George Soros is the prime subject in all three of the email chains linked in this Qpost. I understand Arabians hating America. I understand Iranians hating America. But, WHAT IS THE DEAL WITH GEORGE SOROS?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– 2020yall [S] 5 points 4 years ago +6 / -1

Why does he support all of these strange causes?

There's something going on with:

emphasis should be put on a hierarchy of humanitarian values rather than advocacy of a free market as envisioned by classical liberalism.

What does that even mean? It sounds too polished. Too many big words. No simplicity here. Whaen I dig deeper I run into something as obscured and overly verbose as this: https://archive.is/KJ1lK Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian emergency assistance of the United Nations. Can anyone understand what the heck this is? I'm lost. Maybe, that's what they're trying to do here. Hide what they are saying so that no one can understand it but them.

Its $873 million budget in 2013, ranked as the second-largest private philanthropy budget in the United States, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation budget of $3.9 billion.[19] As of 2020, its budget increased to $1.2 billion.

Giving away SO MUCH money. Why? What are these guys getting out of this? Bill Gates has made much more money as a philanthropist than he ever made as a capitalist. Huge gains in the biotech sector. George Soros seems to weild massive political influence. He was known for destroying entire countries with his currency trading. Now, he appears to destroy countries by giving money away. How does one world government help him? What's his dog in this fight? Certainly we have a spiritual component here. But, what would an atheist want out of all this? What motivates these people? How much more money would you really need? Or even want?

In 2007, Nicolas Guilhot (a senior research associate of CNRS) wrote in Critical Sociology that the Open Society Foundations serve to perpetuate institutions that reinforce the existing social order, as the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation have done before them. Guilhot argues that control over the social sciences by moneyed interests has depoliticized this field and reinforced a capitalist view of modernization.

Nicolas Guilhot is incorrect here. Intentionally? To assume that scientists aren't motivated by money is absurd on the face of it. When everyone in a field of study is being funded by the same names over and over year after year, do you think their politics might start to align with their patrons? The academy is captured. Real education must be attained elsewhere.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– bubble_bursts 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Giving away SO MUCH money. Why?

Are are many videos that talk about this. They dont actually give away the money.

This is how it works:

Step 1: They create charitable foundations that they control.

Step 2: They "donate" their money to these foundations.

Step 3: Using tax loop holes, they use most of the money in these foundations to invest in their other ventures. These investments are tax-free

Step 4: They earn back profits from these investments and make back more than they put in

Step 5: Remaining money in the foundation is used as a leverage to bring about social/political/economic changes that ensure their investments are secure. Usually in the form of philanthrophic sounding projects (Open borders, Poverty Control, Female health, Vaccination etc) On top of all this, these foundations also raise money from others who actually believe they are donating to change the world. All they are doing is help these assholes get richer.