At the age of two, Abedin moved with her family to Jeddah (Saudi Arabia), where she was raised and lived until returning to the United States for college.
Doctor of Philosophy from University of London... Based on his early studies of philosophy, Soros formulated an application of Karl Popper's General Theory of Reflexivity to capital markets, which he claims renders a clear picture of asset bubbles and fundamental/market value of securities, as well as value discrepancies used for shorting and swapping stocks.
Popper is known for his rejection of the classical inductivist views on the scientific method in favour of empirical falsification. According to Popper, a theory in the empirical sciences can never be proven, but it can be falsified, meaning that it can (and should) be scrutinised with decisive experiments. Popper was opposed to the classical justificationist account of knowledge, which he replaced with critical rationalism, namely "the first non-justificational philosophy of criticism in the history of philosophy"
The Iranian and Saudi Arabian connections have been noticed by many people. It's strange, two countries that would appear to be enemies both have a common goal. In fact, that's the thread that connects all of these people: desire to destroy the United States of America
I can't help but be distracted by the most interesting character in all of this.
George Soros is the prime subject in all three of the email chains linked in this Qpost. I understand Arabians hating America. I understand Iranians hating America. But, WHAT IS THE DEAL WITH GEORGE SOROS?
IMHO Soros is just a psychopath who discovered his main talent while working with the Nazis. A psychopath has no real empathy, thus Soros empathy for mankind is just an artificial simulation or construct. Also, Soros is not at the top of the food chain, I believe he is about one step from the top of the food chain. He is just the ultimate evil operator for the elites, a person who delights in his talents and his work.
Rothschilds, Vanderbilts, those kinds of elites. They seem culturally different from Soros. Old rich families mostly do things in private, operate in the shadows. Whereas Soros operates somewhat openly and gives interviews. Perhaps they are cooperating factions, and Soros is a self-made faction (having peddled his talents well, like the Clinton mafia) hence appears culturally different. I don't believe Soros uses all his own money in funding America's destabilization; he is just doing what he does best.
emphasis should be put on a hierarchy of humanitarian values rather than advocacy of a free market as envisioned by classical liberalism.
What does that even mean? It sounds too polished. Too many big words. No simplicity here. Whaen I dig deeper I run into something as obscured and overly verbose as this: https://archive.is/KJ1lK Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian emergency assistance of the United Nations. Can anyone understand what the heck this is? I'm lost. Maybe, that's what they're trying to do here. Hide what they are saying so that no one can understand it but them.
Its $873 million budget in 2013, ranked as the second-largest private philanthropy budget in the United States, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation budget of $3.9 billion.[19] As of 2020, its budget increased to $1.2 billion.
Giving away SO MUCH money. Why? What are these guys getting out of this? Bill Gates has made much more money as a philanthropist than he ever made as a capitalist. Huge gains in the biotech sector. George Soros seems to weild massive political influence. He was known for destroying entire countries with his currency trading. Now, he appears to destroy countries by giving money away. How does one world government help him? What's his dog in this fight? Certainly we have a spiritual component here. But, what would an atheist want out of all this? What motivates these people? How much more money would you really need? Or even want?
In 2007, Nicolas Guilhot (a senior research associate of CNRS) wrote in Critical Sociology that the Open Society Foundations serve to perpetuate institutions that reinforce the existing social order, as the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation have done before them. Guilhot argues that control over the social sciences by moneyed interests has depoliticized this field and reinforced a capitalist view of modernization.
Nicolas Guilhot is incorrect here. Intentionally? To assume that scientists aren't motivated by money is absurd on the face of it. When everyone in a field of study is being funded by the same names over and over year after year, do you think their politics might start to align with their patrons? The academy is captured. Real education must be attained elsewhere.
Are are many videos that talk about this. They dont actually give away the money.
This is how it works:
Step 1: They create charitable foundations that they control.
Step 2: They "donate" their money to these foundations.
Step 3: Using tax loop holes, they use most of the money in these foundations to invest in their other ventures. These investments are tax-free
Step 4: They earn back profits from these investments and make back more than they put in
Step 5: Remaining money in the foundation is used as a leverage to bring about social/political/economic changes that ensure their investments are secure. Usually in the form of philanthrophic sounding projects (Open borders, Poverty Control, Female health, Vaccination etc)
On top of all this, these foundations also raise money from others who actually believe they are donating to change the world. All they are doing is help these assholes get richer.
I went on a little trip again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huma_Abedin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Jarrett
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper
Further reading:
The Iranian and Saudi Arabian connections have been noticed by many people. It's strange, two countries that would appear to be enemies both have a common goal. In fact, that's the thread that connects all of these people: desire to destroy the United States of America
I can't help but be distracted by the most interesting character in all of this.
George Soros is the prime subject in all three of the email chains linked in this Qpost. I understand Arabians hating America. I understand Iranians hating America. But, WHAT IS THE DEAL WITH GEORGE SOROS?
IMHO Soros is just a psychopath who discovered his main talent while working with the Nazis. A psychopath has no real empathy, thus Soros empathy for mankind is just an artificial simulation or construct. Also, Soros is not at the top of the food chain, I believe he is about one step from the top of the food chain. He is just the ultimate evil operator for the elites, a person who delights in his talents and his work.
Who do you think is the top? Why?
Rothschilds, Vanderbilts, those kinds of elites. They seem culturally different from Soros. Old rich families mostly do things in private, operate in the shadows. Whereas Soros operates somewhat openly and gives interviews. Perhaps they are cooperating factions, and Soros is a self-made faction (having peddled his talents well, like the Clinton mafia) hence appears culturally different. I don't believe Soros uses all his own money in funding America's destabilization; he is just doing what he does best.
Why does he support all of these strange causes?
There's something going on with:
What does that even mean? It sounds too polished. Too many big words. No simplicity here. Whaen I dig deeper I run into something as obscured and overly verbose as this: https://archive.is/KJ1lK Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian emergency assistance of the United Nations. Can anyone understand what the heck this is? I'm lost. Maybe, that's what they're trying to do here. Hide what they are saying so that no one can understand it but them.
Giving away SO MUCH money. Why? What are these guys getting out of this? Bill Gates has made much more money as a philanthropist than he ever made as a capitalist. Huge gains in the biotech sector. George Soros seems to weild massive political influence. He was known for destroying entire countries with his currency trading. Now, he appears to destroy countries by giving money away. How does one world government help him? What's his dog in this fight? Certainly we have a spiritual component here. But, what would an atheist want out of all this? What motivates these people? How much more money would you really need? Or even want?
Nicolas Guilhot is incorrect here. Intentionally? To assume that scientists aren't motivated by money is absurd on the face of it. When everyone in a field of study is being funded by the same names over and over year after year, do you think their politics might start to align with their patrons? The academy is captured. Real education must be attained elsewhere.
Are are many videos that talk about this. They dont actually give away the money.
This is how it works:
Step 1: They create charitable foundations that they control.
Step 2: They "donate" their money to these foundations.
Step 3: Using tax loop holes, they use most of the money in these foundations to invest in their other ventures. These investments are tax-free
Step 4: They earn back profits from these investments and make back more than they put in
Step 5: Remaining money in the foundation is used as a leverage to bring about social/political/economic changes that ensure their investments are secure. Usually in the form of philanthrophic sounding projects (Open borders, Poverty Control, Female health, Vaccination etc) On top of all this, these foundations also raise money from others who actually believe they are donating to change the world. All they are doing is help these assholes get richer.
^^this precisely
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/10757501.html#10758211
https://qalerts.app/?n=4750
https://qposts.online/post/4750
https://qanon.pub/#4750