That's pretty interesting and you're right about the dates. While intriguing, I have arrived at the conclusion that these videos have had their titles and descriptions edited to reflect Q subjects after-the-fact. The videos themselves don't actually talk about Q and they contain subjects that were already often talked about in conspiracy circles in 2017. You can edit YouTube video titles and descriptions any time. The videos also do not convey enough cohesive information beyond generalities, imo.
I agree with you and User6395 that this is a very likely possibility, but I find it very interesting that the channel's first video is from October of the month that Q began, along with a video being posted on October 17.
But maybe they used to have more videos and they deleted their backlog to look more convincing and fit the Q narrative.
Do we know if there are any ways to mine metadata or look through archives to see what these video titles and descriptions were back when they were posted?
Yes there is even a commenter that stated something about the channel having deleted a bunch of their videos and maybe even changing their name. I already looked through archive.is on these videos and they weren't archived until July 2020, so they are of no help to prove what they looked like in 2017. You could try his channel's video index in the archive to check that or you could try the wayback machine or another archive site. I wouldn't waste your time though...there is no new information in the videos and it is so easy to change the titles and descriptions that anybody could do it. IMO the videos are not "smart enough" to be Q.
I'm sure anyone on YT can modify the metadata (i.e. time and date). The metadata cannot be proof of anything; because it's not a financial app, YT does not need to guarantee that stuff is not modified. A YT insider could stage something, to attract folks like us.
I guess someone should watch the vids and tell us if they are any good.
Q says no outside comms, so I would just say it is definitely not Q.
Right, and I hear that, but wasn't Q's first post October 28, 17?
The first video on this channel is from October 9, 2017. It's called Q Riots = Soros Obama.
Its description? Look below...
Deep State Riots
Don't allow their dark energy to negatively influence you.
Soros (tick tock)...
Stay on course...
(End of Description)
Their second video is titled "Q P(l)andemic." Their third video, called "Q Deep State Virus," was posted on October 17, 2017.
So, "no outside comms," but then how do we explain this? How could these videos be about Q stuff before Q started posting if it wasn't Q?**
That's pretty interesting and you're right about the dates. While intriguing, I have arrived at the conclusion that these videos have had their titles and descriptions edited to reflect Q subjects after-the-fact. The videos themselves don't actually talk about Q and they contain subjects that were already often talked about in conspiracy circles in 2017. You can edit YouTube video titles and descriptions any time. The videos also do not convey enough cohesive information beyond generalities, imo.
I agree with you and User6395 that this is a very likely possibility, but I find it very interesting that the channel's first video is from October of the month that Q began, along with a video being posted on October 17.
But maybe they used to have more videos and they deleted their backlog to look more convincing and fit the Q narrative.
Do we know if there are any ways to mine metadata or look through archives to see what these video titles and descriptions were back when they were posted?
Yes there is even a commenter that stated something about the channel having deleted a bunch of their videos and maybe even changing their name. I already looked through archive.is on these videos and they weren't archived until July 2020, so they are of no help to prove what they looked like in 2017. You could try his channel's video index in the archive to check that or you could try the wayback machine or another archive site. I wouldn't waste your time though...there is no new information in the videos and it is so easy to change the titles and descriptions that anybody could do it. IMO the videos are not "smart enough" to be Q.
I'm sure anyone on YT can modify the metadata (i.e. time and date). The metadata cannot be proof of anything; because it's not a financial app, YT does not need to guarantee that stuff is not modified. A YT insider could stage something, to attract folks like us.
I guess someone should watch the vids and tell us if they are any good.
Go right ahead, friend. I've already watched several of them. You should, too.
Who knows? You might be right.
What's so hard to understand about Q announcing no comms outside the board?