You straight up said you don't grow vegetables. You said you need a degree in organic chemistry for your crops to have the minerals they should which shows you have zero experience with growing food, and also said that you achieve your sustenance by trading with farmers [buying from a store].
Very convinient of you to simply deny that you meant what you posted, but I don't buy it, especially in the context and the example of growing zucchini shows how out of touch you are with growing your own food. . And yes your right most military personnel join because the socialist conditions will provide everything they need. It is in no way "productive" by definition of whatnot means to produce something.
The military is full of people who can't handle the challenges of civilian life and who simply want free college. It's absolutely the case that the military takes alot of the work out of existing in this system because you sign up, show up and get a studynpay check, and are fed, and even a place to live. You don't have to wake up and forge your own way.
Many of them are duped into thinking what they are doing has to do with establishing freedom , but their actual motivation underneath what they tell themselves is they find the provisions comforting, and besides, I would have to ask you for an example of a war that has happened in my lifetime that was actually about my freedom or anyone's freedom? They are all special interests or even started by NWO like the Bushes. Even Ww2 wasn't about American freedom and was largely a launch pad for communism in the long run.
As far as you saying you would fight someone, well you responded to my communicating to someone else as though you were them without introducing yourself as someone else, so yes, inwas under the impression that you were the same poster who you were answering for as if you were them.
However no, you don't grow up our own food, you admitted to it directly and left a trail of statements that directly imply that you don't.
And then because you are caught in your lie you call me 'glowie' oh my goodness!!! I've been called a glowie, clearly that intelligent rebuttal by the guy who was just caught in his lie completely destroys my argument. LMAO
Then why the fuck are you talking about fighting the guy at the grocery store. Smells like bullshit. You already defined yourself as someone who does NOT do those things.
You already said that you don't grow your own because you do what you do and farmers do what they do "best" so you trade/buy your food from stores. Your a liar because you're pathetic and your realizing that. Lying about yourself in order to save face in an internet discussion.
Even more disgraceful and disgusting, and frankly, exactly what I'd expect from someone threatening the grocery.
Military personnel are literally and legally government property. They belong to a socialist institutions and generally get their food by way of consumerism, and /or a socialist means of distribution.
Military personnel do not produce commodities or produce, but instead get their technology and tools from corporations.
They didn't pick a fight with fellow colonist wich would be equal to your picking a fist fight with the store workers. Unlike the men of those days your playing right into your overlords hands by talking about becoming riotous and fighting with store employees of they don't sell you your groceries. The corporations own you because they own your food source.
So yes, they did pick a fight, but with their overlords. They could do that because they were already FUNDAMENTALLY independent, which is how they were able to declare independence and fight their overlords back.
You need your overlords because you would starve without them so instead of fighting them by becoming independent you are talking about turning in your countrymen.
The consumer system is slavery, and your saying if they don't sell you rations you are going to become riotous is proof of that. You are an owned slave and it is pathetic and sad to see you defend your being owned by corporations and the system that they created.
And your argument that you need to be a chemistry expert inorder to not kill mineral solbalizing bacteria is an argument bass on consumerism anyway. Before consumerism people didn't buy shitty soil in bags, they made compost in their yards and used chicken manure from their chicken houses. They didn't buy shitty synthetic fertilizers either. .they hey word you are basing your argument on is "buy" as in consume. What you are talking about is a consumerist attempt at growing vegetables and relying on consumerism to grow things. That's another form of dependence where the needy need stores to provide things for them other wise they are both helpless and worthless like you confessed to being.
Yes the founding fathers were able to declare independence because they were dependent. They were not like you whining that if they don't get what they want they will pick fights. They through the tea overboard and said "fuck you we don't need you" bit you can't say that can you? You are needy and dependent.
You don't need to know organic chemistry to ensure your plants have the minerals they are supposed to.
The reason the big farms owned by corporations who higher chemist to work for them don't have produce that has minerals is because they till the earth, and use massive amounts of chemical fertilizers that cause nutrient lock up and kill microbes in the soil that solubilize minerals from the rocks and sand that is already in the soil.
Most people who know nothing about plants who grow their own vegetables are yeilding produce that is more nutrient dense than anything that can be purchased in the store .
Farmland is some of the least fertile and abused earth on the planet. They have come to rely completely on synthetic fertilizers,npestacides and fungicides to get a "successful harvest" and grow varieties for size rather than anything else.
There is nothing contradicting aboutbit. They were not consumers as a means of sustenance. They bought things but they we're basicly self sufficient as a culture and as I dividual households.
You can buy things and not be dependent on that for your sustenance, but this country except for a few odd cases has more and more taken up the attitude and mindset that you have espoused which is to become a sharpened stone, good for one thing and to become completely reliant on others for just about anything. As a country we do not really produce much of anything. The US is not known for manufacturing anything. Even American made automobiles only have their corporate headquarters here while other countries actually make the products. Clothing is all made over seas but they so the buttons on here and say it was made in the USA. Almost everything is from China and the reason that is so is precisely because of what you said when you outlined how the system worked when explaining why you would pick a fight with the cashier when your dependency on corporations and consumerism inevitably bites you in the ass in the near future. .
Again, the founding fathers and the rest of the culture here produced all the food they needed. They fed themselves and also sold things so they were independent, but also had money to buy extras. That does not make them consumers or qualify them as a consumer society.
Consumerism really started taking over in the early mid 1900s. Prior to that people would at least grow SOME of their own food even in places with fairly dense population and often times had chickens
As a country the IS does not produce much. We are a nation of consents. It is not an effective system. It has led to the US having being the most obese and unhealthy of nations.
Farmers did what they do, but the farming practices are.lousy, produce food thatjid.covered in poising and lacking essential vitamins and minerals.
Almost everyone in this country is suffering from vitamin and mineral deficiency even the people that eat vegetables because of the farming practices are good at producing lots of product but it is of poor quality.
The fact that over the last 1.5 years you have done nothing to become more self sufficient, and self reliant but are completely dependent on the consumer system and instead of being ready you are threatening to resort to violence is my point about an unproductive consumer nation.
The founding fathers were literally independent when they declared their independence, how ever they also made money and bought things Consumers by definition ar not independent, they are dependant.
It would not schick me if they started doing that some time in the next couple of years. They do have a plan that they are unrolling to completely take over and change everything. But more likely they will go door to door with heavy pressure to vaccinate and threatening pressure. They will show up with police, or a vetted national guard. They are not going to give up and rollover. This is a global agenda that every nation is in on, not just put corrupt government
I'm sure it does UV sterilization is common for surfaces of things. The UV denatures genetic materiel in cell nuclei, that's why it would be a bad idea to put it into someone's lungs. Lungs are full of your own cells that would be damaged.
But as far as sunlight and going to the beach, there is really probably no better place to be in this pandemic . I can't believe they banned people from that, except I CAN believe it unfortunately.
But where did you hear he was talking about peroxide when he said to inject disinfectant?
Who are you going to fight? The manager, or the guy at the door, or the cops or who? Do you think that will cause them to sell you the groceries? Stock up now. I saw this coming from day one and have been growing food. Your waiting til the last minute and then talking about picking fights?
This is what happens l, and frankly what a nation deserves when they've become unproductive consumers.
That's pretty interesting. Where did you hear that's what he was talking about?
As far as I knew his PR team or whatever was saying that all that stuff was just a joke. The UV lights in the lungs sounds like a bad idea to me because what UV does to cells, but the H2O2 idea sounds like that might actually work.
He did say to inject it, not spray, but there is already an IV H2O2 therapy for emphysema in practice. Definitly not conventional or practiced in hospitals, but people have done IV peroxide when it is brought to the lungs via blood circulation. Apparently it makes it to the surface and can brake up tar etc from smoking if I remember correctly. I read about it years ago when I was ingesting food grade peroxide for health benifits
Antibiotics are for fungus, bacteria or possibly yeasts, not viruses. They are useless against viruses. Not to mention, that's not the terminology used. I'm sure trump knows what antibiotics are.
The terminology used for stopping infections in the body is antibiotic. The terminology used for cleaning is disinfectant. Disnfectants such as lysol generally kill viruses.
I'm just correcting what Psaki said with the truth. The context was Trump was making references to how it could be almost like a cleaning which leads me more to believe he was talking about a disinfectant spray.
"I see the disinfectant that knocks it out in a minute, one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning? As you see, it gets in the lungs, it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it would be interesting to check that."
Trump rattles stuff off sometimes and he's imperfect.
But he wasn't suggesting people inject poison.
It's because of poor souls that have been destroyed by farming practices that no consumers don't use at home.
Even in the poor souls the minerals are there aplenty but they have been rendered unavailable because the mineral solbalizing bacteria have been killed by modern farming practices.
Again, farmers don't do what they do best if their soildls become worse instead of improve. You clearly aren't a home food producer.