How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?...
How did Q Predict Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium 3 years ago, TO THE DAY?...
How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?...
This is highly impossible — unless the plans were prepared many, MANY years ago!...
FUTURE PROVES PAST...
u/#q1839
What about this relates in any way whatsoever to lindell’s symposium?
Seems to be it has the word "PACKET" and the date coincides with the date of the cyber symposium, in which they are focusing on tcp/ip packets.
ok
that means nothing
what does this mean?
Interesting how a search on that number pulls up a link to a headquarters of Epstein Global... not sure how that would tie into the symposium though.
I always used qanon.pub for Q drops. When I search “packet” nothing is found.
Is the qanon.pub search busted?
I contend that taking the country over via this last election was in the deep state playbook. At least from the minute Hils lost if not before. Not winning the election, taking the country, the election was just the tool they chose for what they were going to do one way or another. Trump knew, everything he did leads up to now.
I get goose bumps thinking how God brought President Trump down that escalator and into our lives - to wake us the heck up before we became a bunch of cooked frogs in the boiling water!!!! I'm the most awake I've ever been and ready to get this show rolling!!! God Bless!!!!
I've said it before and I'll say it again. GEOTUS' election was straight the fuck up divine intervention.
Yes it was.... and God is not done with him yet!!!!! God Bless President Trump and God Bless AMERICA!!!!!!! :)
Amen!
I agree but I wish more people were awake!
I talk to the ones I think will listen - the rest are on their own!!! I did get some good conversations in with a very blue co-worker!! So, there is still hope! God Bless!
I think that is where we are at. Some of the people I know are "too well informed" or "too proud" to ever admit they were wrong, or that someone might know something they don't.
Those aren't the hopelessly lost, but it's going to take them a while to accept that real change is real.
As a wise colleague of mine used to say..."It's not the things we don't know that are the problem. The problem is the things we know for certain that just aren't so."
was your colleague Ronald Reagan? 😆
And was never more appropriate than present day.
I find the libtards are softening a bit. Good. It'll help when the red pill gets shoved straight up their asses. Then I'll welcome them....after they are thoroughly humbled.
I've cut a few out of my circle for good. I don't care about the fact they are brainwashed. They treated me very poorly.
The ones that weren't real assholes I will talk to after the red suppository. I'll try and be humble myself. It will take work to do so. I hope I can do it with out malice in my heart. Even the ones that were ok, were still rude as fuck to me.
I’m awake, but most of my friends are fast asleep. I’m working on my parents.
Absolutely! What a time to be alive!
AMEN!!!!
Yep. Exactly this. I am so thankful that the eyes of myself and so many others have been opened! It honestly makes me angry that I was blind for so long. Never again…..
You said it fren... What a time to be alive!
Exactly...
Just randomly checked this as well -
(730) 921-7392
Located in Alton, Illinois
Did white hats have access to looking glass?
There is no looking glass. Made up diversion. What you are witnessing is chess at a level rarely seen. You can predict the future, when you've planned the future, 12 moves out (or in this case, 5 or more years).
If you're asking us to choose between SciFi / Magic vs. Military Planning and Operations that have been ongoing apparently for decades Occam's razor dictates that we should choose the simplest explanation. I so want aliens, light body beings, angels, whatever to be real and to have given us super advanced technology, but I haven't yet swallowed that redpill.
The rapid speed that technology has been able to develop over the course of just a couple generations really makes you wonder. It took 60 years to go from "Hm we can fly" to "Hm we can leave the atmosphere completely"
Basic rocket technology was around hundreds of years before NASA, but heavier-than-air, winged aircraft, technology was definitely a big new thing (although even that was essentially taking what was known about sails, and putting them horizontal instead of vertical :) ).
The shit they have captured on radar is real and out of the range of current tech AS WE UNDERSTAND IT. Doesn't mean that stuff isn't something they haven't been able to design but the reason I don't think it is, is because these radar captures have been going on for decades and covered up. So the ability to shoot 10 miles in an instant or go from 60,000ft to wave level in seconds and stop on a dime is beyond our current understanding of physics and certainly outside our human physiology to withstand (although could be remote controlled). But it's the fact that these anomalies have been with us since radar was developed is the tell. Guess we'll see what happens.
That's just what the Air Force wants you to think.
yh there's no way of knowing what is alien and what is simply mega advanced secret MILITARY tech indistinguishable from each other.
Just like magic is indistinguishable from advanced tech.
I’ve witnessed these craft you describe. I had five other people there alongside me when we saw them back in 2018. The tech is very real. We stood in amazement as we witnessed two of these craft dance across the Southern California skyline. They weren’t “off the shelf drones” - I mean they couldn’t have been manned - no visible wings, no exhaust, no visible propulsion. They were large, one would take up enough space in a two car garage and poke out the rooftop. From what we could see they weren’t flat but egg shaped. From our vantage point they flew across the sky in what would take an airliner 20-30 seconds they’d travel the same distance in a blink of an eye. They flew so high that you would mistake them for the stars in the sky.
If these were weaponized they would be unbeatable. You couldn’t launch anything fast enough. They were nimble, and would stop on a dime from full speed. It was insane to witness. I’m sure there will be a time when this tech is unveiled to the public. I do believe they were used to broker peace deals during Trump’s first term. You show up to Saudi Arabia and say “I want to show you something, you have two options, try and fight or surrender.”
What a time to be alive!
Why Space Force if no aliens?
Cyber Space
...how did I miss that? I feel so dumb right now. Is that a guess or they’re legit cyber space force? I feel ever dumber having to ask lol.
A lot of what space travel, telecommunication, and everything that goes with space is high level computation, transmitting encrypted signals wireless, intercepting signals and decoding, etc you can safely assume that cyber space is an integral component of the branch.
Space is becoming a legitimately militarized domain. Although it does cover cyber space as well which is also militarized.
Weaponized space.
Critical communications satellites, spy satellites and directed energy weaponized satellites.
https://qagg.news/?read=2606
u/#q2606
This. They war game things extensively.
Also, honestly with how much they talk about God and praying, I truly believe God has approached them through dreams or visions, and guides them with their decision-making throughout the day through his Holy Spirit. May sound nuts but I've seen him move and powerful ways and I'm just an ordinary man, I can't imagine the fate of humanity and fighting the greatest cabal in history. God visited Kings, prophets, why not a group (at least one or two) who truly need His direction?
There's probably a bunch of folks sitting in a room, constantly spitballing ideas and possible cause/effect relationships. Branching ideas and paths to "predict the future".
War Games with a side of infinite timelines/multi-dimensional thinking
In fact it isn't so complicated if you begin planning from the end.
Just recognise the way + optimalisation.
That.
And thank you for the 💉of sanity here, cats. 👍
Future proves past, which obviously already happened.
The future is to wake us up. But everything being done in the future is planned based on the outcome having been decided years ago.
"They are 5 steps away from realizing I am 10 steps ahead"
Looking Glass + Q = Trump
I believe they have a quantum computer.
Yes
Obviously Q posted many times about rigged elections. Q predicted this election would be rigged. Clearly Colonel Phil Waldron has Qish connections, he claims to have worked with a team of 12-15 mostly ex military to investigate the election. So this could have all been planned years in advance
Absolutely..."We have it all" keeps coming to mind. Its how to get it out to the masses in a way that they can believe it...That's the Hard part...
Memes for example.I think everything is already in Q posts. But despite of packets being directly 3 years after Q post... That alone wouldn't be enough for all (but anyway even thing what we have here is "accident" big enough to spread it).
What is those number 7309217392 ? It should be related. Must be. If we recognise the connection then it would be more useful I guess.
When I typed in PACKET HDQ-7309217392 I found a Rather Curios video on YT...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD_zYpcFEUY
I ended up pausing at the 55 second mark to look at the image. An IT tech's work bench with a beer that is labeled Celebration 2020, about a dozen hard drives (one has "wiped" labeled on it), a note that says 12/24/20 and I believe /pol/ and a couple of dominoes in the background standing on end. The one you can see clearly is 11 and 4 with a red wire (red line?) crossing it. Frog statuette of course.
I might be looking through that again slow-mo later. Lots of other flashes of things to look at closer.
Let me know if you see anything...
Will do. I suspect it's the uploaded personal image littered with Q references but still be interesting to see what else is interspersed throughout the rest of the video.
There are other videos hosted by those account.Interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk8AYiTWulk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4huU9YhSc0Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqmxaTd1pC0 Restricted (requires to log in)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtGH8b-2cOc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3l_rfmAI31A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3l_rfmAI31A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2_SMUsKKM0
Yeah...I liked this one;
https://youtu.be/QtGH8b-2cOc
The channel is The Baron of Arizona. There was a flash of Austin Steinlarp and a flash of the info for the postcard campaign for him. Wasn't he from Arizona? Could this maybe be his channel?
I spend two hours going through it 1/10 second frame by frame (yes, I'm a loser). I found some very interesting symbolism, and that symbolism framed within a QR code for quick split second screen flashes. Also Q post ... cant find it right now.
I tried to get an online reader to read it but it didn't read.
Tons of symbolism.
You are NOT a loser for being curious and using your time to take a closer look. I think it's awesome you've done so already. We're in the boat we're in because far too many do not have this curiosity or desire to look deeper. If you're a loser for this than so am I and I'll wear that label proudly.
Saw the QR code. Not surprised it didn't return anything. May have too much digital artifacts on it. It seems clear but it doesn't take much to render them useless. Just a speck! I'll give it a try too when I get on pc later. I hate doing anything other than reading while on mobile.
I figure the video is just from a Q follower but because of the title and timing, worth a deeper look. But then I am one that thinks most everything is worth a deeper look. Better to have wasted a little time to find it's nothing than to not look at all and miss something important or even merely interesting.
Qr code returns something. Webpage. https://us.awp.autotask.net/6/filelink/caxaa-ti2rk2-xscloha4
I agree with having the curiosity to investigate. I spend most of my free time taking my dog on walks and listening to either red pill news or "those co spiracy guys" that give excellent insights into events and the theories that surround them.
They bring in a lot of details and observations that I had never heard about. Currently finishing up the Dyatlov Pass incident and it's fascinating.
Could just as easily be an anon being a fag and trolling.
Whoa. Put out three days ago. I'm left thinking Jason Bourne from the future is going to reset us like never before.
What the actual fark!!!
That was weird but a lot of curious things in there.
AWESOME WORK u/purkiss80!!!!!
Thanks man...
Any idea what 7309217392 references?
As an IP address, it maps to Concord, CA. As a phone number, it maps to southern Illinois.
Can't find any agency or other DS corporation that has headquarters in either of those locations.
Anyone have insights into this?
"Packet Capture is a networking term for intercepting a data packet that is crossing a specific point in a data network. Once a packet is captured in real-time, it is stored for a period of time so that it can be analyzed, and then either be downloaded, archived or discarded."...So IMO its referring to that packet number that was captured...
Forgive me for asking, but I'm technologically-challenged.
Does the 'packet' ever reach its original destination? If it doesn't wouldn't the destined receiver know it was intercepted and someone was on to them?
Packet captures basically work as a logger. It'd be like writing down the license plate of every car to drive down a roadway and what time it happened and additional details about that given vehicle, origin, destination, etc. As it passes through, you capture the information about it, and then it continues on its way. The 'capture' doesn't actually stop anything; just records what's happening.
That's a great explanation of packet captures, I think I'm going to snatch that for my less tech inclined friends.
We have the best network analogists.
Ah, I see. Thank you for the explanation!
Capturing process does not alter the packet in anyway. It gets copied. The correct original terminology was Packet Sniffing. But Capture became widely accepted in the industry.
Always changing the language, the better to obfuscate!
Come to think of it, in the original Unix/Linux days it was always sniffing / dumping /logging. The capture came into usage when Windows started being used to do this stuff, first with Ethereum and then Wireshark - the driver was called Packet Capture Driver (PCAP) - not sure if it was intentional obfuscation. Never actually thought of it that way ...
These terms are pretty straight forward in regards to the action.
You don't say.
Well, we are talking Bill Gates, so it wouldn't surprise me.
Your router "sees" every byte of data you send and receive by necessity. Several more routers in the world must also "see" your data to get it where you intended. Every single one of these routers could be saving(capturing) copies of your data. This is why encryption is so important. If you are wireless, I can capture all your data if I'm in wireless signal range of you.
Wouldn't the 'packets' that Mike and the gang got be encrypted? How were they able to un-encrypt the data to see what they had?
All this new-fangled tech stuff is so confusing for an old dinosaur like me! 🤪😄
I keep saying this.
this is why Q freaks me out.
What is that packet HDQ number mean?
It probably refers to a "block" or a "timeframe" or a section of Data in that particular packet...I'm not entirely sure...
https://www.thousandeyes.com/learning/glossary/packet-capture
See project Looking Glass, is 1 theory, goes with Project Blue Book, and Roswell. There is another theory that will gain strength soon. Look up Quantum Computer Bundling, and the very new theory of Quantum Echos. Quantum Echos can be piggy backed on Quantum Bundling across time/space. Which can attest to Future Proves Past.
explain whatever that is like i'm a 5 year old mongoloid
Project blue book was a program started right after Roswell incident for tracking people's reporting of UFO sightings that they would report.
i know what bluebook is that's entry level shit - i mean quantum echos. wtf
You’ll need to do your own research. It may take a page to explain
A Q post that contains the word "packet" and a symposium that uses the word "packet" means absolutely nothing.
The symposium would need to make a reference to that exact packet number.
So I suppose its Just another Fantastic Coincidence with absolutely no bearing on the matters at hand...OK
Consider how many habbenings were actually false, yes, it's safe to say this is yet another
Q did not say anything about a symposium...All he posted was PACKET HDQ-7309217392...It just happens to be that 3 years later to the day we are where we are and watching Lindell talk about PACKETS which relate to the Fraudulent Election...And you trying to tell me its a coincidence...?!
I'm not so it doesn't bother me ...I've been called worse things in my life...lol
They both happened on August 10. Q must have had that specific packet captured 3 years ago and it's likely very significant.
We don't know that. So this isn't that big of a coincidence at all.
It's like yesterday when a bunch of Dems tweeted the U.N. "code red" article that had just been published. Doesn't mean shit. It's like a bunch of us tweeting about a new story about election fraud.
I wonder if “HDQ 7309217392” may refer to a Patent#? I don’t think that angle has been looked into? Or a medicine ie Vaccine ID, or protein synthesis?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD_zYpcFEUY
Post above.More videos under those account. Release date within one day.
It does, BUT the medical abbreviation is HCQ.
Hydroxy—H
Chloro—C
Quine—Q
Hey, look a little ways above and checkout what OP & others found ref YT video;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD_zYpcFEUY
Yeah NO DOUBT!!!
Except HCQ is the correct abbreviation.
Packet capture is his whole thing about how they stole it.
Cripes. Found this when searching for that packet number: http://www.discerningthemystery.com/2018/08/q-anon-august-9-10-11-12-relationships.html
Can you share for the non-techie patriots what this 'packet' means and how it is a 3 yr delta? thx
They are not predictions. It was all planned.
This isn't really surprising since we know pillow man has been in the inner circle and could possibly be one of the few non-mil involved in the op.
Project looking glass.
That’s exactly what it is. There should be no more doubts.
You mean it’s not possible that Mike chose this day, knowing it’d make a 3 year delta?
How do we know that this is reference to Mike Lindell ? Not shilling genuinely asking
Do you know of any Other important Packets that relate to the election going on anywhere...?
Hmm that doesn’t seem like a reasonable assumption though, no offense. I wonder what the HDQ stands for
McCoffee-- let me help you understand how we do things here.
If Q has a post from a date years ago you look for one of the words or something in it and see if the words appear anywhere else in any news or online then you say that it's a Q prediction. That's called "deltas"
So for instance, on Aug 19, 2020 Q posts drop #4622 and he uses the words "censored, banned, or attacked." So anytime between now and, say, August 23 we can find an example of libs saying we are bad and then we say "Q predicted this. It's the one year delta of post 4622."
So if Q has a post that says the word "packet" and Mike Lindell talks about a packet then they are related and Q predicted or made it happen.
Just to kind of explain how research works. Now you can do your own research by looking at the old drops!
What was the prediction? Can you explain?
-Q posted the drop on 8/10/2018.
-the drop mentioned 'PACKET'
-3 years later, to the exact day, Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium is talking about 'packets'.
AND to add more surreal crumbs to the mix...
the 1997 Survival Guide to the Future Edition of George Magazine featured South Dakota on the Cover.
so SD was definitely a part of the 'plan' going way back...
https://archive.org/details/george-magazine-february-1997-survival-guide-to-the-future-bill-gates-interview
What you're saying is TOTALLY surreal. Wow. Food for thought.
exactly. it's out of this world. and there's SO much more once you start analyzing the George Magaziness/JFK Jr.s speeches. overwhelming, but also reassuring, knowing that the whitehats have such an intricate plan.
this is the fictional story with crisis in 2020. notice the president looks just like HRC. so that was the black hat's plan, which Q interrupted.
https://youtu.be/wFXqojg4juI
It all came together for me when I started understanding how George Magazine played into the vast and greater picture. The picture is larger (space and time) than we realize.
My guess would have to be time travel or a a looking glass into the future?
http://www.discerningthemystery.com/2018/08/q-anon-august-9-10-11-12-relationships.html
This is an easy one. Lindell planned it to coincide with the q post
Where are the shills who think Q is a LARP?
It's more likely Q directed it than predicted it.
Because we're in a sim, a digital sim.
No we are not
Did they release what was contained in the packet?
Wheres the proofs?
I've been away all day - can someone explain how the Q post relates? What packet or are you just speaking in general?
Mike Lindell has 'packet captures' from the election, and people to analyze them at the symposium. quite a coincidence that Q talked about a 'packet' on 8/10/18.
Or unless "Q" is an AI from the future. (I watch a lot of sci-fi movies)
Why does it need to be from the future? Have you not seen the TV show DEVS?
Watch that show and then you'll understand. DEVS is what "Q" actually is. I'm sure of it.
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/12hl0Y2DNT/
I’m confused. Is the Q proof that Lindell is claiming to have packets and Q used the word packet 3 years ago? What’s the detail I’m missing?
Yes. I don't think you're missing any detail, and yet I still think this is a very curious connection.
I am frequently skeptical of some desperate, LARPing attempts to sleuth out tenuous connections between Q posts and minutiae, but this connection (based on the exact 3 year date delta) seems strongly, specifically predictive of the start day of this Lindell symposium, which essentially revolves around discussion of "packets".
YMMV, but this one is compelling for me.
I can see how it would be if you're already inclined to believe that Q connects to things in strange ways. Deltas have never been convincing to me. If Q had only posted ten times, perhaps, but not for thousands of posts. And certainly not for an indefinite number of annual anniversaries forever. A year ago, did this delta mean anything? Two years? Will it next year? Or are we just sticking with this delta because we happened to find a connection in this one this year?
Now, if you can correlate that number into something very specific going on today with the symposium, I can be open to using the word "compelling" for this. But it's got to be something more direct than doing Magic Math on it, because randomly assigning mathematical processes to it until you get something vaguely interesting is possible with literally any number and any event.
I think if you watch deltas every single day as some of us do, you can answer your own question.
The problem with those proofs is already they are never 100% reliable,rather alone look like "coincidences". But how many coincidences shall happen before it is mathematically "impossible" ? That's the problem with Q. "Coincidences" happen so many times (and such kind of it) it simply couldn't be only pareidolia...
Those coincidences alone work such way that in the same time assure plausible deniability for every part too. What purpose it have ?
In case of those Q post: 08/10/18 is release date. Lindel starts talking about packets: 08/10/21. 3 years delta.
And explaining the rest for you ? Well,the problem is we are already stupid enough to probably not decode all the communication available. Frustrating and other people would be angry for me after I say that - but it is the dire truth that we recognise probably only tip of the iceberg. So GA purpose maybe is what it is,but majority of us have problem with explaining things happening even to ourselves...
Lets take space force photos months ago. While there were already interesting things indicating there might be possible steganography or some message at the end we NOT achieved wanted results then. Q mentioning pixelknot app was not the indicator alone, we used also this method: https://ia.binghamton.edu/publication/FridrichPDF/f5.pdf and result suggested it is possible there was something. Also there were strange 'typos" in exif. We were too stupid however,no progress. So at the end we were unable to get the message (or at least I gave up,I have no contact with those team anymore,maybe they are still trying - or gave up too ?) Simply if there was something it is level of autist anons and bakers from 4chan and 8kun not level of average people here. You can of course laugh at us because of that... But something is happening clearly. Sometimes we know and sometimes we have too no fucking clue.
Honestly: The lame lead the blind.Or something like that. ¯|(ツ)/¯
But are the people from reddit forum you moderate different ? Mostly they have no clue what we even are doing here and almost have claims like they would know all about us,when they know so much like Jon Snow knew...
So for deltas and the idea that enough coincidences can be mathematically proven to be impossible... that's not true in an open system. Which real life typically is.
I've explained before how this works. Imagine flipping a coin 100 times, and getting heads 98 times. How do we know that's improbable? Well, because we know how many times we should have failed. We can define each trial discretely, we know and are tracking the fail conditions, etc.
You can't do that with random coincidences or deltas pushed into the real world. Here's why:
Imagine instead, you walk around the city for a week and pick up only quarters made in the 70's. After a week, you've found 100 of them.
You say, "That seems like a LOT, doesn't it? 100 quarters all from the same decade?"
Well, no. Because there was no fail condition. You don't know how many such quarters should have been found. You weren't keeping track of how many times you didn't find a quarter from the 70's, because that wasn't of interest to you. You were only interested in success conditions, which meant you were only looking for and tracking the quarters that met your conditions. Everything else is ignored.
Have you checked how many deltas that Q has with Obama? Q and Neil deGrasse Tyson? Q and Nicki Minaj? Have you correlated whether Donald Trump has ever used the same hand sign as Hillary Clinton? Ever check to see if the first letter from each word of Mike Flynn's speech can be rearranged to spell out something from the Satanic Bible?
That would be silly to look for those associations, right? But that's equally important data, because it may turn out that when someone posts as much and as vaguely as Q, you can find associations between him and pretty much anyone, IF you look for it.
But you aren't. You're ONLY looking for associations that would make sense to you, which is between Q and Trump, or Q and Lindell. Because you've accepted that Q must be part of this plan, and therefore must be associating with other people you consider part of the plan. And therefore must have associations.
That circle? That's confirmation bias.
And that's why it's simply not true that you can track a bunch of different associations and coincidences and do any sort of mathematical work on them. It's not a closed mathematical system. You don't have fail conditions in order to measure a probability. You don't have anything except the data that YOU have chosen to include, and you've only chosen to include data that indicates an association exists.
This is hard to wrap your head around at first, but once it clicks, it clicks. That single saying by Q is probably more damaging to the concept of critical thinking than anything else he's said, because he has encouraged you to actively seek confirmation biases and act like an impossible math equation justifies it.
That's my opinion, at least.
However it is generally working in those area. And if there would be pure randomness it still shouldn't. Peaks of order in random environment happen but are unusual. Therefore despite it isn't proof of Q being all real it is absolute proof of relation between Q posts and associated persons activity.
Exactly and it SHOULD normally fail in case of Trump,Lindell and so on. Therefore if it isn't usually failing there is relation to Trump.Lindell and so on. Of course it isn't still proving Q,but it is proving strong link.And that are not only one proved links.
Were you reading what I wrote ? So in short: Clues are still not the system. And most of anons not understand it, I guess wouldn't agree/believe in explanation.
This is physical "equation" NOT mathematical one. Quantum one. Common sense derivative of: dE*dt=1/2ħ (instead of counting all results you can count or find kind of limes from all result - it is such thing achieved experimentally.)
So you are correct and also not correct. What is "objective reality" and does it really exist ? Schrodinger cat is the answer as he is both alive and not,what has nothing with "common sense" or "critical thinking".
So here's an example: Watch the Water.
What does that mean? Who knows?
Just off the top of my head, "watch the water" has been murmured in relation to Charles Flynn, the Evergiven, the hospital ships off the coast, Puerto Rico, Taiwan, tweets from the Navy, flooding in Europe, and even the Texas ice storm, where someone here suggested it might refer to frozen water.
All Q gave us was the prediction that somewhere on the 70% of this planet that is water, something will happen, at some point in the future. Or, maybe in a sink or a bathtub. Or maybe it needs to be decoded more esoterically.
"Watch the water" means whatever is convenient. And when that doesn't pan out with a Deep State arrest, it gets memory holed.
But it still counts as a potential Q prediction, and is kept in your back pocket.
"Watch the water" predictions make up a pretty good chunk of what used to get discussed around here, and it still comes up whenever literally anything wet shows up in the news.
Each time it's cited, it feels like a victory. Maybe the Evergiven will eventually pan out. Maybe Charles Flynn will lead the military to reinstate Trump. Maybe maybe maybe.
And when I point out how you guys are just shotgunning this prediction at everything, the response I've gotten was that Q talks in multiple timelines, and that it can apply to multiple events. Because Q apparently doesn't talk in linear time.
Now, can you even imagine exactly what kind of an equation would be necessary to do math on this? We already have a single input with multiple unconfirmed outputs, which mathematically makes this a non-function equation, which already pretty much kills our ability to do any real statistical math with it. Beyond that, we have to take into account the possibility that we can twist this to not even mean water, not even mean watch, maybe it's all letter-substituted and is code for something else...
That's a non-falsifiable assertion.
I've watched Q stuff for a long time, and the only popular sayings of his are non-falsifiable. The ones that ARE falsifiable haven't panned out (like his first). Those are the only ones we can actually take data on, because there was a fail condition on whether or not Clinton would be indicted.
There is no fail condition on "watch the water."
Also, quantum equations are math. Literal college students do equations with quanta. It's not really as unreachable and unknowable as you're crediting it. Things that exist beyond math are generally considered religious, because even logical and philosophical arguments are often translated into mathematical expressions. Religion requires faith, and faith can exist safely beyond the reach of math.
And unless some shitty research is done (yes such too is done on GA,not everybody would be glad from thing I said) water would not be enough alone. "Watch the water" alone means "watch the water" (look for unusual things on the water).
Of course you and many people have law to be disappointed after some of anons fuck up researching sometimes. I really don't want to piss out people here more,so I would say only this: probably less than 10% things on GA are valid. Probably more than 10% are also purposeful deception done by maleficent people.But more than 0% for sure,and for me those more than 0% matters more than peoples fuckups. Fuckups are usually result of "picking" Q posts when we have only one or two coincidences together. But real Qincidences are like good (c)lock - opened by many simultaneous coincidences. There are such ones too.
We are unfortunately only people here.No supermen,no batman and so on on GA I guess...
Let's say... - how would you comment rather that: https://greatawakening.win/p/12jvuCphdi/codemonkeyz-just-confirmed/
By the way:
XD Math is language,physics is reality described by language. Not all equations with quanta have sense too... It is not faith but physical phenomena: there are rarely peaks of coincidences likewise peaks of high energy fluctuations.
First of all, its not a Claim...! Secondly you're always confused when you come here...
Yep. The Great Awakening involves guiding the normies. So here I am with my question. Which you haven’t answered yet.
Just woke up, Did Mike’s pcap contain this exact packet number??
So far I’ve gotten no alerts. 🤔
Wow, that's certainly interesting.
Planning!!! As in Q said we are in control. because what you see moving against the deepnstatenis NOT organic, it's been being planned for 50 years. Players and all.