36

I saw a post by u/cathole953 about tobacco (https://greatawakening.win/p/141En6FXWh/serious-question-do-you-guys-thi/) and it reminded me about an interesting article I read recently.

https://veilofreality.com/2017/09/05/the-health-benefits-of-tobacco-and-cutting-through-the-anti-smoking-propaganda/ (I HIGHLY RECOMMEND READING THIS ENTIRE ARTICLE)

I got to his thread a little late so I figured I'd open a new one.

The overarching question being asked is, "Is tobacco as bad as we've been told, or have we fallen victim to yet another massive propaganda campaign?"

The article further goes on to suggest that perhaps we've been completely brainwashed and programmed into fearing the tobacco plant, which has been used for thousands of years as a medicinal herb.

It really makes you wonder.

In short, the anti-smoking propaganda is based on lies and very corrupted science. There is also a HUGE difference between natural additive-free organic tobacco and commercial cigarettes. Commercial cigarettes are filled with hundreds of added chemicals that shouldn’t be in there, to begin with.

I discussed this topic with my family after first reading about this, and a question came to my mind that I never thought about before...

When your doctor says "smoking causes XYZ", do they EVER bother to make a distinction between smoking a raw tobacco leaf, and smoking commercial cigarettes loaded with hundreds chemicals? No they do not.

When you fill out paperwork at the doctor's office, and it asks "Are you a smoker?", does it ask "Are you a smoker of chemical-laden commercial cigarettes?" or "Are you a smoker of natural tobacco leaf?" No, it does not.

Does it make a difference? Hell yes it does. Even if commercial cigarettes had ONE synthetic chemical in them, it would make a difference. They have hundreds, and nobody is calling this massive oversight into question.

This is about as nonsensical as saying "food is bad for you" without making a distinction between fresh veggies and McDonalds.

Now there is, of course, a valid argument to be had about the carcinogenic properties of consuming all combusted material (grilled meat, joints, cigs, etc).. assuming that's not based on bullshit "science", too.

But combustion aside... are we being manipulated about tobacco? If so, why?

This is a discussion worth having.

214
203
18
32
453
142
323

Title. ☝️

I think this whole thing is set up to get people talking about federal regulation of speech, and making censorship the law.

Because, waaaaaah, Facebook isn't doing enough censoring 😭. Plz halp, big daddy government.

  1. They don't want us speaking the truth.

  2. They're trying to destroy the constitution.

  3. Facebook can't be held liable for censorship.

Listen for yourself, it's nauseating. Here's the 60 minutes interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Lx5VmAdZSI

16
Zuckerturd at the office this morning (www.youtube.com) 🐴 SHITPOST 💩
posted ago by BeKind ago by BeKind
16
19
173
199
202
187
21
227

For example, the Bill of Rights in the Texas Constitution

https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CN/htm/CN.1.htm

Sec. 19. DEPRIVATION OF LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY, ETC. BY DUE COURSE OF LAW. No citizen of this State shall be deprived of life, liberty, property, privileges or immunities, or in any manner disfranchised, except by the due course of the law of the land.

Mandates are not laws.

Mandates are not laws.

Mandates are not laws.

Mandates are not laws.

In this case, you don't need a religious exemption, rights are guaranteed by the state constitution.

Also... keep a close eye on your state Constitution, because the marxist left is trying to corrupt those too:

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro-2-2-3/ALDE_00000032/

Although the Framers' sought to preserve liberty by diffusing power, Justices and scholars have noted that federalism has other advantages, including that it allows individual states to experiment with novel government programs as "laboratories of democracy" and increases the accountability of elected government officials to citizens.

46
385
14

I was just going back through Q1182 (https://qalerts.app/?n=1182)

I never noticed this before:

EOs post ‘pen’ pics.

That sounds like we were supposed to keep track of executive orders given by GEOTUS just after each of Herridge's pen photos.

Connect.
Learn.

Do we have an archive of pen posts anywhere?

If we were able to find those pen posts, and dig up which EOs were signed shortly after, I wonder if this would line up with the Law of War manual theory.

u/#q1182

60
67
486
22
13
view more: Next ›