Kind of looks like Frederick Douglass, but I can't find this painting

We're trying to get this information out to the public now. We've tried the legal routes unsuccessfully and we've tried our state legislatures unsuccessfully. We know SCOTUS has not been willing to hear these cases.

The reason it comes across as so casual, is that it was actually unscripted and was the first time Dr. Frank presented the full dataset to Mike. It was so compelling that they started recording and produced an hour-long segment. That's my understanding at least.

I think they have plans to continue breaking this down and getting this information out

I'm just happy to have been able to stand up for my Country and use my skillset to help identify and prove the fraud. It's the honor of my lifetime and I hope it makes a difference.

1. Can you provide a screenshot of the graphic you're referencing? I may be able to give you a better answer with that reference. However, I think I know what you're asking about, which if that's the case, then your assumption is correct. The "red" line that represents the number of ballots for each age group is derived from the registration data based on their having cast a vote on 11/3

2. I believe Dr. Frank has run his analysis on a half dozen states at this point, but he's aiming to run the analysis on as many states as feasible. Some states have an absurd cost associated with obtaining their voter rolls (EX: California: $15k, Alabama: $37k, Nevada: $20k, Wisconsin: $12.5k). I know with 100% certainty that he's run his analysis on Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, and Florida.

3. This is actually one of the pretty astounding discoveries that our team made internally in analyzing Pennsylvania. A few things -

   A) In Pennsylvania, all counties were forced to update their voting machines in 2019. Governor Wolf unconstitutionally mandated this and provided a list of voting machines for each county to choose from. I tried to raise the alarm at the time but wasn't able to change the outcome. All counties had new machines in place by the 2020 election.

   B) A precinct could run a fair election (I believe my precinct did!), however, once the results leave the precinct level there are multiple points of vulnerabilities. The precinct data goes to the county which is then sent to the Department of State.

   C) With the addition of mail ballots, the "votes" would circumvent the precincts and go straight to the counties. There's also no verification on the signatures or addresses. I found that thousands of ballots were sent to addresses in Pennsylvania that aren't associated with the voters. Who received those ballots and who sent the ballots back in?

   D) Agreed about being able to go back and total up the precincts. Our team has actually found that certain counties still have under/overcounts months after the election that they cannot reconcile. Our SoS (Boockvar) even certified wrong numbers (according to her own DOS values). Further, the registration databases show different numbers and I'm sure if we checked the actual ballots, we'd find a different number still! The issue has been trying to get all this information in front of people who could actually make a difference. SCOTUS won't hear it and we haven't found a court that's interested.

4. I don't believe so, but Dr. Frank has stated he wants to teach the public how to run this analysis on their own. The voter roll data (for most states) is easy to obtain from your county/state board of elections (generally for a small fee).

I hope I answered all your questions. Thanks for the thoughtful comment!

I've read the analysis before but never did a deep dive. The majority of the work we've done, we've tried to remain relatively unbiased by other reports/analyses.

Great question! Ohio was the second state that Dr. Frank ran, because that's his home state. He figured "My state handles elections pretty well, and Trump won my home state, let me show how well my state handled this election". In running the same algorithms, he discovered that Trump won Ohio but much larger numbers than were certified.

This actually makes a lot of sense, from what we saw in Pennsylvania on the county-by-county level. If a Red county flips blue overnight, then that's going to raise a lot of suspicions. So the cheating needs to be eased in over the course of years to not draw a lot of attention. This has been happening in counties around Philadelphia for years now, and many people just "accept" that those surrounding counties are now solidly Democrat just like Philadelphia.

I hope that explanation makes sense

I think that's from February and is talking about his last movie, Absolute Proof

I believe most states had their results altered in some way. In Pennsylvania, it's my belief that all counties were affected. In 2019, Governor Wolf had mandated all counties to "upgrade" their voting machines under the guise of "election security". The Governor unconstitutionally mandated this and provided the list for counties to choose from.

They planned this in advance.

I did data analysis for the campaign. Day after the election we noticed anomalies, which I personally dug into within the county/district. Found the anomalies checked out and oversaw the canvassing which yielded a 32% "phantom voter" result.

Dr. Frank came on to validate my findings in early January. Shortly afterward we began looking at Pennsylvania as a whole. I found a few hundred thousand invalid votes just by analyzing the publically available data here. During this period, Dr. Frank made the breakthrough in the data that's featured in this movie.

He found an algorithm at play that was causing the anomalies I had found by looking at the election data.

I've been working with Dr. Frank since January and was very excited when Mike got in touch with our team and wanted to feature Dr. Frank in an hour-long special.

It was a really good analogy.

There's essentially a "credit line", for which additional votes can be pulled from. The younger the age demographics of the credit line, the more unpredictable the actual voters are (no voting history means nothing to go off of). So you tend to see more "borrowing" from the older ages in the voter rolls

I trust the plan. I don't know when and I don't quite know how, but I firmly believe when everything needs to come together things will. We're on God's timeline and I believe Patriots Are In Control.

African or European swallow?

Facebook has taken his COVID page down twice from what I recall. I believe he's since set up alternative groups/pages on all social platforms, including telegram. I think this is his telegram "page" - https://t.me/FollowTheData

None that I'm aware of, although a good amount of our work has been behind the scenes until today. We've been trying our best to ensure that our work is as thorough as possible while exploring legal options and working with PA Congressmen/Senators, before making any kind of public announcements.

They've used the Bellweather Counties test for decades to indicate election outcome validity... Except for this election. It should be clear as day to anyone paying attention

That's awesome! Dr. Frank is really smart, yet humble and down to earth. I've had many long in-depth conversations with him and he's a great guy with a great family. Love him!

I don't, Dr. Frank's work isn't related to any IP-based analysis. His work is purely statistical and based on the actual voter data.

Yes. Dr. Frank came onto the team a few months into my work. Together we laid the basis for what Dr. Frank ultimately discovered to be algorithms controlling the election outcome.

I ran the canvassing endeavor he mentions early on into the video, as well as found a few hundred thousand invalid votes that were counted in Pennsylvania.

Except Democrat news headlines

I'm in a "blue" area too (in quotes, I'd wager it's more red if the elections were fair), and I've noticed among coworkers and "soft" Democrats that they're starting to question things or poke fun at the Democrat party. Throughout the past year, businesses that were Democrat have definitely become Republican, many in my area have certainly.

The entire pandemic in PA has been a disaster. Public sentiment has shifted far away from favoring the Democrats, however so long as election rigging is in place public sentiment can be circumvented

Is Bidan in a wheelchair in that picture?

I see plenty of religous posts get through and I'm glad they do.

With that being said, we need to stop forcing mods we trust to step down. I disagree with the immediate backlash. Start a conversation before demanding a resignation. If we lose all the mods that have been with us for a while, it only makes us weaker and more susceptible to infiltration.

Didn't realize he deleted his account today. That's a shame. I'm glad you made this post and I'm honored that someone like Evspra has done so much for this community. Gone, but never forgotten. Thank you Evspra

Dropping https://t.me/QFrogman5326 who I've found very reliable. He's been dark the past few days after giving us the heads up that some operations were underway.