2
Classical1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you, I read every word. I keep seeing that silver is more valuable than gold because silver has practical functions and is scarcer. Is this true? I find it hard to imagine. Also, what about platinum or copper? Or other metals? Or even gemstones? Do you have an opinion on these?

by Intuit
2
Classical1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, exactly. It was extremely sick cultural genocide. Against themselves. Extremely sick and bizarre. I can’t easily think of any other case where a culture self-genocides, although there are dangerous trends towards that in European/white culture.

I guess that’s why it comes so naturally for the CCP to genocide the Uighurs, they feel nothing. It’s just a sociopathic mafia with a satanic lust for money and power.

by Intuit
2
Classical1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. I’m really glad more people are finally getting it. CCP has such influence on Western culture and they tried to brainwash everyone that they are the representative of Chinese culture. Making it where if you speak against them you’re a racist.

Btw- when Asians call it the China virus is it racist? We have been calling it literally Wuhan pneumonia since January 2020 in TW.

I think 95% of msm/pop culture accusations of racism of ALL kinds is bs. It’s actually offensive. Just setting up a victim narrative. And, distracting attention from what’s really the issue.

3
Classical1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gotta stay relevant :p

16
Classical1 16 points ago +17 / -1

Let’s talk about your catfish

Edit- I swear to Sun Yat-Sen if anyone downvotes my comment they didn’t eat their collagen today.

1
Classical1 1 point ago +4 / -3

Let’s talk about catfish

Lol whoever down voted me has been dooming their butthurt so hard they don’t know how to snark.

7
Classical1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Whew glad we cleared that up, everybody we can go home now, last one close the door!

4
Classical1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hey here’s another one-

In regards to HIV, they push for social workers and advocates to adopt a “sex positive” attitude, in other words, don’t overly emphasize safe sex, be understanding about having a habit of one night stands with no protection, all of that is 100% okay. Feel good about yourself and expressing yourself sexually.

Now here’s Covid and suddenly they turn into your mom- make sure you wear a mask during sex! Just have phone sex instead. Try to reduce sex partners (!) actually when I saw that I was shocked- this is a REALLY touchy subject for them because it’s suggesting not to be promiscuous, which is a HUGE trigger for them. Morally judgmental and all.

So besides schizophrenia, how exactly do you account for this phenomenon because it’s baffling to me from a non-insane perspective.

2
Classical1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey... I know, it’s completely insane. You should check out that website because they post legal articles on there all the time, just search or filter for them. Kinda pisses me off. I understand how people with HIV deserve to be treated with humanity and live mostly normal lives but they are not entitled to endanger others.

I mean, [they] are accusing ordinary people of attempted murder for not wearing a mask, but then [they] argue that it’s fine to be HIV infected, have sex, not tell you, then you get infected, and that’s YOUR fault. Uhhh...

1
Classical1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Btw I had seen an article on that POZ site bitching about how people on Grindr were putting in their profile that they were clean, ie without HIV. But now they are saying it’s virtuous to advertise your Covid details. Wtf... actually “These people are STOOPID” too. Lol...

1
Classical1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again, thank you for your thoughtful reply. I really appreciate you taking the time to educate me. I was just in a sarcastic mood I guess haha. I have been noticing a lot of 17s and here is yet another one, so it caused me to feel a lack of credibility. I’m very wary of coincidences right now.

I think I have read reports from Cato before. I won’t deny that they put a lot of work into what they do but I think they are still capable of being compromised. Just my opinion. As for their ranking of Taiwan, I didn’t read why exactly they gave us that rank, so to be fair I should dig more. I really think we deserve a better one especially in light of the fact that in 2020 we didn’t have a single lockdown and never closed schools! But I’ll look at what they say. I’ve been distracted reading the Q drops. I’ve started reading all of them from the start, like a novel. It’s crazy stuff.

1
Classical1 1 point ago +1 / -0

If these people came to my birdwatching club-

“a guy who came to the bird watching club and continually stated that looking at small birds was stupid and all the good, large birds had left. Now imagine a bunch of his friends said that too. A group of them doing nothing but moaning that we should all go home now. That would be annoying...

.., Do you ban them from the club for having an annoying opinion that differs from yours?”

I think I would ban them from the club yes :)

1
Classical1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry for fagging around :P

1
Classical1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Btw this is the funniest thing I have seen today-

"a curated list of blocked accounts that we can elect to subscribe to"

really? I'm not sure there's a huge market for that. lol.

1
Classical1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you ever been to a club, like a birdwatching club? I'm a birdwatcher. I bring my binoculars and field guide. I don't bring an electric guitar. It's annoying to the birds. And it doesn't, you know, make sense? Maybe shills would be better served in forums where their opinions, you know, make more sense? Especially seeing as there are SO MANY other options and we really only have a few options for exclusively Q research. Just a thought.

1
Classical1 1 point ago +1 / -0

What concentration of shills is acceptable for you?

2
Classical1 2 points ago +3 / -1

So you feel like it's acceptable to post off topic information here?

No bans were made of discussion of GN. The parameters you mentioned

"With regard to George New, I think only those posts which attempt to decode Q messages and such using GN timestamps or content should be banned."

is what was going to be banned. Posts that were going to "ACTIVELY mislead people."

Should shills ever be banned? Or should they be allowed to spam their "Personal opinions, and posts which clearly express nothing more than a personal opinion" to the detriment of the forum?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›