What are you talking about? This isn't on Twatter. It's a Gab post.
This is a separate case set for a future conference.
You can see all the supreme court cases which were set for the Feb 19th conference here.
I sorta looked into this awhile ago. All cases eventually end up at a conference by default if action is not taken beforehand, so this doesn't necessarily mean anything.
Cases can be relisted for another conference multiple times, dismissed, denied, granted a hearing, etc. I believe most cases are automatically denied if they don't even discuss them at said conference.
I'll admit I was late to Q and I'm not actively chasing things down related to Q.
I mostly just browse this site, The Donald, etc looking to absorb info and contribute when appropriate. Hell, my first comment here was related to Dave after I listened to a couple of his videos for the first time. I recognized the grift right away. It's pretty blatant. I've listened to a couple more since then out of curiosity, but I didn't anymore convincing.
Sadly, this shit just keeps getting promoted and stickied. People make the "let's talk about your health" jokes, but god forbid you point out the obvious grift.
I agree. If people wanna listen to Dave, then it's whatever. I'm not going to go out of my way to shit on them for listening to him, but a ton of people praise and promote this jackass.
I don't know how someone can hear his rampant ads and not question the guy's intent. When you understand his motives, I would think most people would then logically question what he's peddling.
OFC he puts out daily videos. Why wouldn't he?
JFC, the levels you guys will go to defend this type of practice. Inserting excess ads and offering ad free versions for a price, when operating costs are low, lacks authenticity. I don't know why that's so hard for you to understand. I would think authenticity matters when it comes to spreading Q research and theories, but apparently it does not.
I have no problem with people who listen to his videos, but a lot of people put this dipshit on a pedestal and they shouldn't. You can act like he's doing us all some great service if you want, but it doesn't change the fact he's employing aggressive tactics to "capitalize" on this movement.
If you can't see that, than I don't know what else to tell you.
I've been in the affiliate marketing space since 2009 utilizing SEO, PPC, etc. I have several domains and hosts. I know the space. Jealous? Hardly.
I just call it like I see it. Reading Q posts and scouring the "boards" to peddle hopium for money is hardly noble in my book. I listen to a number of channels and Dave's level of advertising is cringe. It's pretty damn obvious what he's about.
He makes A LOT of cash doing this.
It's pretty sad that most people here praise this dude and don't seem to understand this.
I've seen many "he's got bills to pay" comments when they have no idea how cheap a domain and hosting actually is.
Especially when the bulk of the bandwidth and resources being consumed from his "reports" costs him absolutely nothing when he offloads them to rumble and the like.
I did check the WayBackMachine, but it hadn't been saved or automatically crawled. Same with Bing. Bing either hadn't crawled that post or it did again after it was removed and it fell out of the search index.
There's all sorts of bots (like the WayBackMachine, Google, Bing, etc) out there crawling websites, but not everything gets picked up.
There's ways to speed up the search engine bots to crawl specific URLs, but that's usually done by the site owners. As a user, it would make more sense using the WayBackMachine to manually crawl and save an URL (assuming the owner doesn't block that bot).
Site owners can also tell Google, Bing, etc to not save cached versions of their entire website too. Many of them just have no idea on how to do this or how to block bots. You would think people who like to edit their set of "facts" would be aware of this, but these people are stupid.
No problem.
I knew the exact post you were referring to cuz I've had DMs with Nekroziz and follow him pretty closely, especially now with the Maricopa County bs going on.
Yeah I believe tagging him should do the trick, but I haven't actually ever used it myself on any of the .win communites.
That post was from Nekroziz, but I don't believe he's into the Q stuff much and he hasn't ever posted here.
But the guy that helped him posted here once 2 days ago and is 8thGenPatriot if you wanted to send him a message or something.
The original thread has been deleted or lost. I was able to pull a cached version from google though.
Seems DISTRIBUTED for Conference is just another way of saying piss off.
"Does this mean the Court will discuss each petition distributed during their conference? Absolutely not! Although this is a very closely guarded secret, I would estimate that, at best, only 20-25% of the petitions distributed for a given conference are actually discussed during that conference and few, if any, of those discussed, are granted. Those which aren’t discussed, become automatically denied." Sauce.
Perhaps I could have replied a bit better, but I believe this action vs order wording is getting blown way out of proportion.
Like I said, they have always said Executive Order on whitehouse.gov and show the same on the 9 EOs that have been uploaded to the Federal Register.
Who gives a flying fuck what Biden or MSM said? What does it say on the documents uploaded to the Federal Register awaiting publication? What does it say on whitehouse.gov?
The way it works from the looks of it. Trump's EOs from 01/18/2021 weren't published until today.
His final 3 were signed on the 19th and 20th and are in this same batch as 9 of Pedo Joe's.
Right and the link I supplied is from the Federal Register. They just won't show up on the other link everyone is passing around until they are published.
They will be published there in due time. Here are Trump's final 3 and 9 of Pedo Joe's Executive Orders set to be published on 01/25/2021.
Look, I want this nightmare to end as much as anyone, but a whole bunch of people here keep saying things without actually doing any research.
They have always said Executive Order on whitehouse.gov and show Executive Order on the newly uploaded docs on the federal register which are set to be published on 01/25/2021. I don't think him using the word action vs order means anything. He's a dementia ridden imbecile.
You guys are getting hung up on a word. Whitehouse.gov shows Executive Order for all 17 of Biden's.
As of this moment, Trump's last 3 EOs and 9 of Biden EOs have been uploaded to the federal register and are scheduled to be published on 01/25/2021. Source.
The link I provided in the OP has been updated and guess what? There are 9 of Biden's Executive ORDERS right now.
Check it yourself: https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/search?conditions%5Btype%5D%5B%5D=PRESDOCU
Sigh, why am I not surprised to see you link drop your capital clone wars link here? I've seen you do it on at least a dozen posts now.
The point of my post is everyone here keeps acting like the fact it's not on the federal register right now means anything, when it obviously does NOT. If it still isn't there in a weeks time, yeah blast that shit, but now is not the time.
Show me then retard.
https://ecfr.federalregister.gov/recent-changes
Where's EO 13982-13984 from Jan 19th and Jan 20th.
Already showed you 3 which are not on the website at all.
Possibly people are referring to Presidential Actions? That's the category that they are under on the whitehouse.gov website:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/
Fairly certain John Solomon is referring to this from JustTheNews.
Here's a quote from the article: