A miniscule minority! (Can we work Mary Poppins into this somehow? Lol)
We are a Nation of laws, not of men.
Exhibit 9,327,146 of our founding fathers rolling over in their graves ...
Semantic tip: you don't want to say vast minority. Tiny minority?
Here it doesn't matter, in hostile territory they'll use anything they can to tar and feather you.
👍
That's the name, Dr Coburn. Thank you :)
Incest is rape. In every case. Consent is impossible.
There's no reason to turn those into separate categories.
The only medical condition requiring killing the baby to save the life of the Mother is when the fetus is stuck in the filopian tube. (According to Dr Rand Paul and some notable others anyway) That can never possibly result in a live birth and WI State law doesn't even consider it an abortion.
Yes these exceptions must be allowed for. Just like the Mother who chooses to give birth to the product of rape must be given that choice.
Allowing abortion for any cause up to 70 - 90 days is a standard a LOT of Countries use; it's a horrible compromise but a LOT better than the last 70 years in the US.
It's true that reason needs to prevail.
It's NOT true whatever is being told to you about election result, or whatever you're saying about an election that hasn't happened.
The only possible true statement happens after every legal vote has been counted, and every illegal vote discounted.
Thank you for the ping. It's definitely a development to keep an eye on ...
Thank you!
Consider me skeptical that it amounts to anything, but it's a step ...
Damned straight.
We're also questioning its sexuality, as aberrant.
Because the British aren't coming?
You're an Aussie, and an anarchist? Voting is required by law, right? If so, that's a reasonable reaction ...
Yay!!
The nursing home thing is probably easier to convict but before that he prevented all but 1,100 New Yorkers from getting HCQ, and millions panicked and fled. Then 40+ Governors followed his precedent.
There's an inherent contradiction in your claim:
all our rights have been violated, yet we haven't taken any shot at all, much less the first one.
Unfortunately I do not have a ready solution to this dilemma that I can present, although I have seen something to the effect that libtards have already admitted it wasn't MAGA that made death threats to death threats were made. Just like all the lawsuits it's just propaganda to show people, agitprop.
Clipazine
It's a reference to Nuremberg laws, and quite apt.
You can't prosecute anybody. They were all born over 100 years ago, and it has no relevance to our dilemma now.
Those saying it was fake say they were all innocent and nazis never killed any Jews. Be careful ...
;)
You're very welcome, Fren
Interesting history that some may not know: if you've ever even heard of a "tent revival," those started in the Methodist church, and came out of the Great Awakening in the US.
Here's a really fun video that captures that essence of Americana in a way that I find incredibly moving:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dNiQO1oY1tc&pp=ygULQ2F0bWFuIDE5NTU%3D
See my comment upthread.
Please see my comment upthread.
Look at some facts:
On April 3, 1949, the Near East Broadcasting Station (Cyprus) said: "It must not be forgotten that the Arab Higher Committee encouraged the refugees' flight from their homes in Jaffa, Haifa and Jerusalem."
What happened is the Arab armies convinced the Palestinians to leave. The plan was to destroy Israel on its first day of existence, then these former residents would take possession of everything.
More sources:
"The Arab States encouraged the Palestine Arabs to leave their homes temporarily in order to be out of the way of the Arab invasion armies," according to the Jordanian newspaper Filastin (February 19, 1949).
One refugee quoted in the Jordan newspaper, Ad Difaa (September 6, 1954), said: "The Arab government told us: Get out so that we can get in. So we got out, but they did not get in."
These are just the very succinct statements. There are many more that are longer. The basic idea remains: those who start war, abandon territory, and then lose the war they started have no rights or claims to anything.
That's your nakba.
Notice that's neither pro Israel nor anti Pali. It's simply historical fact. You can still make the case that the Balfour Declaration was whack, and that Palis aren't refugees but still deserve better. Arab Nations should've been hosting them all along though, they're the ones who made promises and failed to deliver.
Israel doesn't need our money.
You are speaking against Solomon. That's I'll advised. Jesus descends from David and sits on his throne.