Is it not possible to observe the motion of the celestial bodies independent of a secondary influence?
The motion of the celestial bodies we observe are affected by secondary influences.
I don't see the connection with this question and the baseless claim in the article.
Thanks for sharing.
The article boasts some baseless claims, however.
This is Einstein’s theory that supposedly “explains” gravity, but which does no such thing.
Einstein's GR field equations predicts the movement of light and matter when exposed to the force of gravity. It does a pretty good job of it up to a point.
The statement in the article is misleading and not true, and nowhere else in the paper is any explanation of why this statement is truthful.
Can you show me the evidence of this? I have seen no such theory.
The best evidence is the application of the GR field equations to predict the orbit of the planet Mercury, which before GR had an unexplained anomaly with it's perihelion precession. Any good book on GR will walk you through it. It's probably the strongest test of GR and considered a hallmark proof that the equations do accurately predict planetary orbits around our Sun.
He released enough raw data for the red team to spend 2 weeks on.
What he did release was validated by the red team, including swamp rat Josh, to be from the 2020 election.
The rest of the data is available in viewable form on frankspeech.com. All you're missing is the actual packet captures that produced the data being shown, which Mike has locked up in a secure place, waiting for its day in court.
My understanding is that Tesla didn't refute Einstein because his theory didn't marry E&M with gravity, but because he couldn't comprehend the math behind it.
Which is too bad since the math has been shown to be an accurate model for our solar system, better than what existed before.
Also, Einstein didn't base his theory on the principle that spacetime is deformable/warped/curved/etc. That was only an insight that came to him while he struggled to integrate gravity into special relativity. But I would submit that just because he leveraged Riemann's equations to help him with his own, it doesn't necessarily mean that spacetime is curved or anything (even though he concluded it did), but instead it shows that Riemann's equations, which were developed for measuring distances in a manifold of any dimensions, works for spacetime. It could be that nothing is curved, but the effects that gravity has on light behaves as if it is curved. There could be another reason for it we have yet to understand fully.
As for Tesla, I'm disappointed. He had an opportunity to build upon some great work, but he didn't. It seems to me he was the only one sporting any ego.
Until Einstein proposed his equations, none of the existing theories/laws used for planetary orbits was able to explain why Mercury's orbit wasn't recessing the way it should. If it wasn't for this, Einstein's gravity theories probably wouldn't have been so widely accepted.
What math are you referring to?
Whether it's physically curved or not is debatable, however the equations predict the motion of gravity much better than what was in place before, at least up to the the mass of the Sun.
I always thought Tesla was against Einstein's theories because he didn't understand the math behind it.
Yahoo is fake news. Larry said he's challenging it and continuing the count.
I keep hearing people say "insert a poison pill" and I have no idea what that is supposed to mean.
What would have happened, if Mike had released more data, is Josh was poised to copy and steal it, in violation of his NDA. Then, either he or someone he passed the data off to would insert the "poison pill". This would happen before the fake news would get their hands on the data.
The "poison pill" would be a corruption of the data somehow, could be anything, but it would render the data invalid if scrutinized closely.
Then the poisoned data would be handed to the fake news media, who would then scrutinize the data, find that it is corrupted and invalid (thanks to the inserted poison pill) and then the fake news would blast it out on every channel and outlet that Mike's data is invalid.
Mike would of course still have a copy of the un-corrupted data, but he would be spending the next 3 months in an uphill battle fighting the fake news and their false accusations that his data was invalid. This would be extra hard for Mike because he is censored almost everywhere.
Everything worked out because in the end, the data is still safe and secure, and the whole episode exposed a few swamp rats like Josh and fake news journalist Zachary Petrizzo.
Mike was about to drop the stuff that proves the connections were from China, but swamp rat Josh Merrit was going to steal it and insert a poison pill into it. Mike's CI team caught wind of it so Mike cut off access.
Mike has a phone recording of Josh selling lies to the media and admitting he was stealing data from Mike. You can check it out at frankspeech.com, go to select your state and see all the votes that were flipped from Trump to Biden in every county there was a voting machine.
No matter, the data is still with Mike and it will be used in court.
Good times comin'!
From what I remember, Mike got this data back on January 9th of this year, and he received it from 4 different sources. Two he has named and two he hasn't, because the media smears them when he does.
He then spent the next 4-5 months having it all validated, and all 4 sources match exactly. The red team he hired at the Cyber Symposium also validated that his data was from the 2020 election.
Sounds like he has the goods. At least the states he's working with, such as Missouri, believe it enough to do a forensic audit. If you want to get caught up, check out the Lindell report at frankspeech.com at 11am and 6pm central.
It would seem so.
Great exchange though, thank you.