2
FightingSideOfMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Notice he doesn't link to an actual report saying 2.7 million votes were deleted.

1
FightingSideOfMe 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's one of the ways he is trying to manipulate his audience.

Remember this guy is not an expert in anything.

Here's orher bits of manipulation

Don't worry if there was another shooter. Bet on it.

This is key to his argument but he's telling people not to look at this evidence

Kid's teeth were blown out, not in. So means that he was shot from behind.

He has no way of knowing this.

The 29-min stand-down was intentional.

There's no evidence of a stand down

2
FightingSideOfMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not according to the US Constitution.

1
FightingSideOfMe 1 point ago +1 / -0

It mentions the countersniper lead texting about a suspicious person.

The Beaver County ESU team, the ones that were the ones who saw Crooks, were texting extensively.

To get info to Secret Service they had to communicate to a command post who then would contact the Secret Service Command Post.

5
FightingSideOfMe 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dies Chris Martensen still believe this?

He was on some other channel and I think he has changed his opinion on this

3
FightingSideOfMe 3 points ago +3 / -0

My point is if I'm a screenwriter, why would I know about folks in the Illinois State Senate? Seems like small potatoes

0
FightingSideOfMe 0 points ago +1 / -1

If you take look at the front over the past year, not much has changed. The defense has the advantage. Advances are much harder over the past year. Russia is advancing here, but the way Russia is advancing is costly.

They strategy is to just throw numbers at the front lines. Trying to overwhelm the attack drones of Ukraine. Knowing that many soldiers will die.

The Russians are not piercing our defence, they are pushing it back. They are advancing 100, 150, 200 metres every day using this tactic: dropping guided bombs, then a 'meat assault', (and if those are) repelled, dropping guided bombs again, a 'meat assault' again."

The risk Russia is taking is will there be enough people to hold the territory over time. I believe the past three months have had the highest Russian casualties of the whole war.

1
FightingSideOfMe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yearick looks like Crooks Not really though

https://images.app.goo.gl/LfqAqsXCs7i9WNro9

Yearick is also 17 years older than Crooks.

They only need to show up and take over the investigation and declare the dead whomever they want to name him and it's over.

How does this work?

Yearick goes to Butler climbs on the roof and shoots Trump.

Meanwhile Crooks goes about his day in Bethel Park and goes home that night and ......then what?

Seems like if Crooks is not the dead guy on the roof, there's some holes in this plan.

0
FightingSideOfMe 0 points ago +1 / -1

Omg , look at the bottom of the article

Look at their disclaimer.

They basically admit they're not real news.

1
FightingSideOfMe 1 point ago +1 / -0

How does the FBI do that?

We have local cops on the roof first. We have bodycam footage. We have several different departments and agencies who witness the dead body before the FBI gets there.

0
FightingSideOfMe 0 points ago +1 / -1

How do they switch the bodies?

Tracing Crooks body back to Crook's house is easy and straightforward.

How do you start with Yearick dead on the roof and trace back to Crook's house?

2
FightingSideOfMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correct. There's also a ton of evidence collected that we haven't seen. They would take a lot more photos for the autopsy.

For example if they did a normal evidence scene processing of the roof, it would not matter if they hosed it down later. They would have what they need.

The FBI would not confirm the name until they said they did biometric confirmation.

So they probably took blood from the site and then checked it against what they found in the house.

0
FightingSideOfMe 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's not a real news site.

I'm pretty sure it's AI written articles.

1
FightingSideOfMe 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-sets-aug-16-hearing-trumps-federal-election/story?id=112537104

Judge sets Aug. 16 hearing in Trump’s federal election interference case This will be the first time in seven months the parties appear in court.

Judge Chutkan will be responsible for applying the Supreme Court's decision to the allegations in Trump's criminal case, including whether Trump's actions were "official acts" or private conduct that can be prosecuted.

2
FightingSideOfMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm suggesting this claim is fake

No DNA found in the house and not even on the flatware.

If that family didn't truly live there all the people who lived on that street would be aware of it.

The house last sold in 1998.

The political contributions/voting registrations use that address.

The father's business license goes to that address, last updated in 2007.

All this took me 10 minutes.

All the evidence points to him living in that house his entire life.

He had to live somewhere, right?

2
FightingSideOfMe 2 points ago +2 / -0

They used Gulf War (Middle East) in 2004 because it is a tangential reference to Obama

I seriously doubt they knew who Obama was while they were writing this. Filming took place in 2003

3
FightingSideOfMe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump was hinting he would announce his VP pick.

It was the last rally before the convention

view more: Next ›