Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

158
Anon Theatre: The Manchurian Candidate (2004) w/ Denzel Washington - remake of the 1962 film. (www.youtube.com) 💊 RED PILL 💊
posted 1 year ago by pugsan 1 year ago by pugsan +158 / -0
56 comments share
56 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (56)
sorted by:
▲ 19 ▼
– JizmJunky 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

Cant believe I've still not seen this flick.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– BasedWatcherWatching 16 points 1 year ago +16 / -0

Same here, yet once again I just thought to myself for the hundredth time, hey I need to watch this today. Think I'm going to commit, hell it's too hot to be mowing this afternoon anyway.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– JizmJunky 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Heck yeah it is. High of 108 today

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– doug1956 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

It's always great to discover a Denzel flick you.ve never seen before. I envy you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Rumsfeld 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

The guy never disappoints

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– MemeToDeath2021 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

FULL MOVIE: 'Manchurian Candidate' (2004, 129 min) [use "Server MegaCloud Server" under video]: https://moviesjoy.is/watch-movie/the-manchurian-candidate-16354.2519391

FULL MOVIE 'Manachurian Candidate' (1962, 126 min) [use "Server MegaCloud Server" under video]: https://moviesjoy.is/watch-movie/the-manchurian-candidate-13071.2520423

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– zanon 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

which one do you think is a more accurate depiction?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– pugsan [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

2004

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MemeToDeath2021 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The 1959 book or 1962 movie if you are applying it to LBJ (Israeli Zionist Foreign Agent), Edwin Walker (Neo Nazi/Zionist Agent), or other sleeper. 2004 movie if you are applying it to Obama. ‘Seven Days in May’ background possibly connected as “intel agency infiltration” sister plans:

In November 1961, President John F. Kennedy accepted the resignation of vociferously anti-communist general Edwin Walker, who had been indoctrinating the troops under his command with radical right-wing ideas and personal political opinions, including describing Harry S. Truman, Dean Acheson, Eleanor Roosevelt, and other active public figures as communist sympathizers.[4]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Days_in_May

Walker appears to be the son of a German Nazi who changed his last name and created a whole fake identity (similar to Bush Sr) with help of MI-6/CIA (Allen Dulles specifically) as a plant to conduct a “Far right” military coup in response to Communist agitators and protests also ginned up by MI-6/CIA. We saw the Communist protests play go live in 1968, but Kennedy had already neutralized 1961-3 all the Nazi sleepers in the military (undercutting both LBJ and Dulles). Not only was Walker removed, but nearly everyone he promoted were demoted or removed as precaution. George HW Bush Sr. restarted the Nazi sleeper infiltration into US military in 1985 (with Nazi children/grandchildren) after he took control on July 14.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– haddock 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Thank you. Watched it right away. Great film. Now I know why Obama was called a Manchurian candidate.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– 13ColoniesPatriot 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I havent seen it either.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– DarQ2light 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Same

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Trumpternal 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

I've watched this movie many times, the eerie feeling I get from it, has not been replicated by any other movie since. Underrated movie.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– BasedWatcherWatching 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Have you watched the first one? If so, which do you suggest?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Trumpternal 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Never watched the original, it's a little bit too old for me. I heard it was better than the newer one.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Mister_Winston 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

The original is a better film, but the remake reveals more truth about MK Ultra and is therefore more relevant.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Joys1Daughter 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I agree Winston. The original is a Classic film.

Angela Lansbury gives a tour de force performance, along with Frank Sinatra & Lawrence Harvey.

Too good to miss! 🍿

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Praise2G 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The first 4 min of the original is an occult ritual for the audience. So think mirror on that. These people... Yeah idk 🤷‍♀️ i dont have the stomach for it now, pass me the bottle mr jones

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BigJilm01 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I know what you mean about that eerie feeling. It’s unsettling. Great flick!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– BerlinWallCrosser 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

The Meryl Streep character is based on Hillary.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– MemeToDeath2021 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

A cunt playing a cunt?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Anon1970 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Naturally

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FightingSideOfMe 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Wouldn't it be like the same character from the first movie?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– LongTimeListener 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

The timing of this movie in 2004 is extremely interesting. This is one Decoding Symbols may what to look into.

Manchurian Candidate release date: July 30, 2004

Obama keynote address at the 2004 DNC convention: July 27, 2004

Before Obamas keynote he was an unknown by the majority of the American public. He was the junior Senator from Illinois in his first term. After his speech the legacy media mockingbirds spent weeks marking him as a future President and ultimately years slobbing his knob.

I had never heard of him, didnt see the DNC keynote, but knew from the fawning of the media he would be President and it wasnt going to be some grassroots, organic movement. They were working too hard to make it so. It just wasnt natural.

At the time, it did play to far more sheeple than it would today as they built him into black jesus. But blacks, especially the men now, wont be so easily fooled. They know Obama did squat for blacks. They know he actually made it harder for them. They know Obama widened divides that over the course of generations had been closing. Have no doubt pre Obama, race relations in this country had improved significantly. After Obama we got things like Ferguson and Freddie Gray and BLM.

I think this movie falls squarely in the realm of comms and Id love to see Decoding Symbols take a deep dive into it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Rootcause 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

I had the same response when Obama came out of no where! It definitely wasn't natural. He literally hadn't accomplished anything of note while a junior Senator from Illinois!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MemeToDeath2021 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Correct. He didn’t really “come out of nowhere”. He was selected by Chatham House in London in ~1992 to be “the first black President”. They had considered trying to run a black person in 1992, but decided the timing was not right, so they went with Bill Clinton in 1991, but decided to start calling Bill “the first black President” as narrative preparation.


Obama was heavily involved in Muslim Brotherhood operations in Middle East via MI-6 as a British citizen born in Kenya prior to its “Independence” which is in name only (this is how Bush Sr knew him via Saudi intel). In late 1990s MI-6 moved Obama under its subsidiary, the CIA in preparation for transition to “public identity” to place him into a national position. Chicago/IL was used because MI-6/CIA controls city of Chicago and state of Illinois completely with their Bankster allies (Bauer family, N. America Rothschilds) right across the border in Racine, WI.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– AlaskaMAGA 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Updoot for knob slobbing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– smartbaum 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Nice. Before seeing your comment, when I thought about the release year of this film I thought "Oh, well it must somehow have messaging related to the forever wars Bush regime, since Obama's ascent was not in purview yet." But lo and behod, you pinpoint theatrical release date with Obama's national debut.

Verrrry interdasting.

The question is why. We hear about predictive programming and revelation of the method. Is it that the collective social imaginary needed to become comfortable with some sort of notion of a political leader, a unifying agent, whose mission and allegiance are to some higher ideal than national interests. Humanistic / globalistic / idealistic / utopian greatness.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– queue-anon 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Thx, I'll watch this weekend, never got around to watching it

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MemeToDeath2021 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Links added above.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Anon1970 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Thank you!!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– queue-anon 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

torrented it already but ty!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 22LIBERTY22 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Definitely watch the original 2962 film with Frank Sinatra and Janet Leigh. We are living through a looking glass.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Anon1970 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Great! I'll tell my GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG Grandchildren to look for it! ;P

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Joys1Daughter 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I agree! The original is a Classic! Outstanding performances by all!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– pugsan [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

1962 is my favorite of the 2, but I think 2004 is more plausible.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– FightingSideOfMe 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

A problem I have with remakes is the loss of context. The original is called The Manchurian Candidate because he was in Manchuria. There's another Denzel remake called The Taking of pelm 123 that makes no sense post 9/11

From the book

Major Bennett Marco, Sergeant Raymond Shaw, and the rest of their infantry platoon are captured by an elite Soviet commando unit during the Korean War in 1952. They are taken to Manchuria, and brainwashed into believing Shaw saved their lives in combat

In the remake they are from the Gulf War.

The original was inspired by real events Us POWs were confessing to war crimes including germ, warfare in Chinese custody.

When you look into it "brainwashing" there's a whole rabbit hole there

The concept of brainwashing was first pushed by a Anti-Communist journalist in the US about 1959. He used the words brainwash based on his translation of Chinese words. However what he described was not how the words were actually used in China which has a positive connotation of self improvement or becoming modern. In fact, a good portion of it was about bringing new Western scientific ideas to China and replacing superstition. His version was skewed it into a new negative connotation of mind control. So much so, that the Chinese saw this as an American concept.

Another issue was this journalist, Edward Hunter, was actually a CIA agent. He wrote this book in 1951.

https://www.abebooks.com/signed/Brain-Washing-Red-China-Calculated-Destruction-Mens/31517864221/bd

A few years after this book came out Psychologist realized that what Hunter was proclaiming was fake and that level of control especially what we see in Manchurian Candidate was not an actual phenomenon, but the concept took off.

But Hunter testified to Congress in 1958 and
rhe novel came out the next year and the movie 3 yeas after that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MemeToDeath2021 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

They used Gulf War (Middle East) in 2004 because it is a tangential reference to Obama and his involvement in Muslim Brotherhood Middle East operations while on MI-6 payroll (a.k.a. Al-Queda, Isis, et. al.) the supposed perpetrators of 9-11 via Saudi (really MI-6/CIA/Mossad) support, and the initial justification for both Afghanistan AND Iraq invasion: “to stop the terrorists”.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– FightingSideOfMe 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

They used Gulf War (Middle East) in 2004 because it is a tangential reference to Obama

I seriously doubt they knew who Obama was while they were writing this. Filming took place in 2003

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MemeToDeath2021 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

They attempted to place him into the House of Representatives in 2000, then pivoted to the Senate later. His "platform" was Illinois State Senate seat acquired via questionable means and significant manipulation in 1996, shortly after being "selected" in 1992 by Chatham House in London.

In September 1999, Obama and fellow Senator Donne Trotter (neither faced re-election that year) both decided to seek the 2000 Democrat nomination for the U.S. House of Representatives seat, held by four term incumbent candidate Bobby Rush.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Senate_career_of_Barack_Obama

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– FightingSideOfMe 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

My point is if I'm a screenwriter, why would I know about folks in the Illinois State Senate? Seems like small potatoes

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MemeToDeath2021 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Agreed. Good point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– praying71 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

https://qalerts.app/?n=1662

u/#q1662

Link from the Q post:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/1/us-really-did-have-manchurian-candidate-white-hous/

I am struck by the realization that America really did have a Manchurian Candidate in The White House for eight years.

One more link from the .gov page:

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2021-04-27/html/CREC-2021-04-27-pt1-PgS2217.htm

U.S. Senate,

Washington, DC, July 24, 2020.

Brigadier General (ret.) Anthony J. Tata,

Senior Advisor, U.S. Department of Defense,

Washington, DC.

“Among dozens of clues, Obama supported Russian meddling in 2016 election & influenced Israeli elections to try to oust Netanyahu & help Hamas & Muslim brotherhood U.S. really did have Manchurian Candidate in White House.”

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MemeToDeath2021 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Clear reference to Obama, but Biden is more directly “Manchurian” with all the CCP bribe money.


I fear the real Manchurian Candidate is really JD Vance (VP matches actual plot) and he literally is from military unit that operated in Iraq 2005 with a very suspicious backstory that appears to show that his identity was stolen. Real JD probably died in 2005.

https://greatawakening.win/p/17teSPk4Gc/the-jd-vance-op-putting-a-maga-v/

https://greatawakening.win/p/17teSUJZxK/whitney-webb-jd-vance-worse-than/

On August 5, 2005, PFC Vance left Cherry Point and went to Al Assad Air Base to help with Operation Iraqi Freedom. As part of his Public Affairs job, he rotated to different forward bases controlled by US Marine Combat Forces. He went to Al Taqaddum, Al Qaim, and Al Ramadi, among others.

https://greatawakening.win/p/17teSS0rEy/looks-like-vance-might-actually-/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Trump4evergirl 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

I feel better after looking at the comments. I haven’t seen this yet, either. I’m not a big movie person. I think this may be required watching. Thank you, pugsan!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SuqamisLostPassport 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Denzel’s son John David Washington is the star of Tenet. Watch Tenet as NSA (John David Washington) finding and losing Algorithm (think Dominion fractional vote shaving algorithm) to lull the bad guy (Cabal head) into thinking he won because John David Washington failed to eradicate the Algorithm (vote fraud). But it was always the (NSA) plan to fail to diffuse the situation, because it’s the splinter group that wins the war by theatrical and emotional manipulation, and one final bullet from a blackmailed wife. Only the blackmail was no long blackmail but impetus to attempt revenge upon the Cabal.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– pugsan [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Great film. I watched it a little high after I had a weed cookie and it was even more awesome.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Vindicator63 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I remember the garden club scene from the original. Creepy in a way.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– UberLightBringer 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

If only it was just a movie. https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/nanobots-in-covid-19-unvaccinated If you take a look at what the heads of electrical and/or computer engineering have been up to at larger universities (and even smaller ones), you can see a steady progression where they've been hooking people up to the internet. Check this out and you get an idea: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/14/2/82 Searches point out they want us hooked up to the internet (I'm sure with the best of intentions /S). https://www.brown.edu/news/2021-08-12/neurograins

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– queue-anon 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Watched it yesterday, did not disappoint.

Any other recommendations?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– pugsan [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I forget about "3 Days of the Condor" (1975) with Robert Redford by Sydney Pollack.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– queue-anon 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

thx

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– pugsan [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I enjoyed "No Way Out" (1987) with Kevin Costner, "Fair Game" (2010), "Kill the Messenger" (2014) and "Enemy of the State" (1998). I'll make a thread.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– queue-anon 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Thanks! I've seen EotS, good movie!

Kill the messenger looks great, I like Jeremy Renner

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy