Fell into it while looking up antarctica after ww2.. Very suspicious after operation high jump, Gen Byrd died, then space program was started and antarctica was off limits only allowed to go if you're military or approved/carefully selected science expeditions.. Rabbit hole is deep.
No, it is because the air is less dense than the ball and has ample viscosity to allow the ball to flow downward and settle naturally below the air because of it's density.
He was a free mason
Ok. so based on your gravity belief and heliocentric theory, can we assume you also believe that the moon's gravitational pull is responsible for the waves of the ocean? In which case, that would debunk
The fact that we are on the Earth which has a humongous gravitational pull compared to the objects in question is why they fall to it instead of interacting with each other.>
Again nothing to do with gravity. Viscosity, buoyancy, and density perfectly explains this. If the object is able to flow around the heavier/lighter object, it will naturally arrange itself.
Don't feel sympathy for me. Objects don't attract to each other via gravity. I explained a steel pin needle (or any small object) will not gravitate to a 100,000 ton steel cargo ship. If gravity were true this would happen no? What are the pseudo science rules or circumstances then can you present me that would prove it?
**It has nothing to do with gravity because gravity does not exist..
It doesn't exist. It's all density, buoyancy, drag. Probable sciences unlike gravity. It's really that simple.
You're right about the density but gravity is non existent. Just apply density to your thought process there is absolutely no proof to gravity. Even the science priest Neil Degrassi stumbles and fumbles trying to sell this 500 year lie.
This has nothing to do with gravity.
Why a leaf falls from a tree is because air is less dense than the leaf. When the leaf becomes disconnected from the tree, it is no longer being suspended so it falls.
If gravity exists, does that mean helium has some sort of antigravity properties then because the earth would still have stronger gravity and force it to it's lowest point?
Water finds it's lowest point because of it's viscosity (it's ability to flow), and depending on what matter surrounds the water determines whether or not it reaches the lowest point based on the density of the materials. Test it yourself. Pour honey, milk, dish soap, then water in a cup. The honey will stay at the bottom, then the milk, then dish soap, then water will all seperate.
If you truly believe the earth is a sphere spinning on a rotating and tilting axis please do tell me how Polaris (the north star) is always always facing north directly above the north pole as if it were actually the central location of the earth, whilst all the other celestial bodies in the sky rotate around this one star? Explain this.. https://youtu.be/cvTTwApsY18
Based off gravity Theory and the heliocentric theory, the moon is 1/4 the size of the earth. So why can't I have let's say a tennis ball, throw it around a bowling ball then causing the tennis ball to orbit the bowling ball?
Can you confirm that Theory? No. Can you confirm mass, density, and buoyancy? Yes. The gravity Theory has many holes. Based off gravity Theory, objects with larger masses attract small mass objects. If this were true, then all kinds of random objects would just attract to each other no? Can a penny magically attract to say a large cargo ship, based off of gravity? No.
Nah. They were in -70° antarctica freeze not that mild colorado everyday snow
There are none. May be for good reason.
The entire ocean is level. Just like a level used in construction. Sea-level.
There is no curvature
George news is nothing
Not A Space Agency=NASA . It was a psyop. Germany won WW2.
Then how is the north star always perfectly centered north? Wouldn't it come out of alignment by the wobbling/tilting of the axis? And Also why do the other stars even rotate around this center point?