The various Antarctica trips by different world leaders, celebs, religious leaders, etc have been touched upon by Q and then Anons, but not much deep digging due to the lack of info re: Antarctica and it's secrets.
Some of you are about to have your minds totally blown. I was waiting for someone to open this door, and here we are.
Just remember, when this door finally opens completely:
if you're here at GAW, you probably have an open mind towards some of the craziest sounding theories out there. Nothing is as it seems. We are watching a movie. We know that, are ok with it, and can readily point out the inconsistencies in what we're being shown (in the political sphere).
if nothing is as it seems, and we truly do have open minds, and the cabal playbook doesn't change drastically, and they continue to rely on fake news/images/videos/body doubles/etc, then
We must allow for the possibility that nothing we've been told about earth is true. Antarctica, gravity, curvature, moon landings, etc. All of it can be, and probably has been, faked and/or made up. There has been a significant effort undertaken to make sure we don't discover that this subject has been a vatican/cabal psyop for almost 500 years.
Antarctica is interesting. Why is no one allowed to go there? One theory is that Antarctica is actually an ice wall forming the outer boundary of earth (not a continent) that holds earth's waters and upon which the firmament rests (the dome of the earth). Making it off-limits is how they keep us from discovering what's really there. Discovering the dome (of one is there) would ask and answer too many questions. Dig up info on old ships navigating the antarctic coast, Admiral Richard Byrd, cosmology before Copernicus (~500 years ago). What you find down this rabbit hole will address questions about earth's shape/the curvature question/what the sun, moon, and stars actually are and where they are/planets/etc.
if one is to go digging on this, one must open your mind to who and what God might be as well. The two subjects are hand in glove. The problem is, like with the political world right now, can the normies (and some of you) get past the considerable cognitive dissonance connected to this info? The great awakening will have to include this stuff, imo.
Couple of starting points to get you warmed up (sorry for yt). Take it for what it's worth:
thank you. I honest to God cannot figure out for the fucking life of me how some of these hardcore indoctrinated Christians think that a book thousands of years old, translated many times from its original language, and with PLENTY OF TIME for manipulation and changes, is the main proof of a "flat" earth. a big floating rock in the middle of space? with a fucking dome over it and fake projected stars? how do these people not see how retarded that is? Antarctica is not simply a wall, there is a lot of shit down there it is basically the cabal's labs and havens and who knows what else. the amount of easily proven elementary science flat earthers straight up ignore is ridiculously embarrassing. IT LOOKS FLAT SO ITS FLAT DUHRRR. lately I have been seeing more and more of them and it deeply undermines our mission of exposing the cabal and the most important thing - the human trafficking/abuse aspect. I have had multiple people on the fence that I was almost getting on board that saw flat earth shit on some pages & reverse red pilled them entirely. if the earth is fucking flat, then where is an amateur satellite pic HUH!? cant get out of the DOME? for fucks sake i have seriously had it with these idiots.
Can you confirm that Theory? No. Can you confirm mass, density, and buoyancy? Yes. The gravity Theory has many holes. Based off gravity Theory, objects with larger masses attract small mass objects. If this were true, then all kinds of random objects would just attract to each other no? Can a penny magically attract to say a large cargo ship, based off of gravity? No.
Based off gravity Theory and the heliocentric theory, the moon is 1/4 the size of the earth. So why can't I have let's say a tennis ball, throw it around a bowling ball then causing the tennis ball to orbit the bowling ball?
A bowling ball doesn't have enough mass for felt gravity.
If you don't believe in gravity, please explain why a leaf falls from a tree.
There's another massive hole with the flat earth theory... Why is the north pole colder than the equated? As a Canadian, I can assure you that the further north you travel, the colder it gets. If the planet is an ellipse, why is it colder in the center.... And on the perimeter.
Flat Earth theory was created by the CIA to try to distract from the real crimes. It's purely disinfo.
Why a leaf falls from a tree is because air is less dense than the leaf. When the leaf becomes disconnected from the tree, it is no longer being suspended so it falls.
Don't feel sympathy for me. Objects don't attract to each other via gravity. I explained a steel pin needle (or any small object) will not gravitate to a 100,000 ton steel cargo ship. If gravity were true this would happen no? What are the pseudo science rules or circumstances then can you present me that would prove it?
Again nothing to do with gravity. Viscosity, buoyancy, and density perfectly explains this. If the object is able to flow around the heavier/lighter object, it will naturally arrange itself.
No, it is because the air is less dense than the ball and has ample viscosity to allow the ball to flow downward and settle naturally below the air because of it's density.
Ok. so based on your gravity belief and heliocentric theory, can we assume you also believe that the moon's gravitational pull is responsible for the waves of the ocean? In which case, that would debunk
The fact that we are on the Earth which has a humongous gravitational pull compared to the objects in question is why they fall to it instead of interacting with each other.>
Fell into it while looking up antarctica after ww2.. Very suspicious after operation high jump, Gen Byrd died, then space program was started and antarctica was off limits only allowed to go if you're military or approved/carefully selected science expeditions.. Rabbit hole is deep.
If you truly believe the earth is a sphere spinning on a rotating and tilting axis please do tell me how Polaris (the north star) is always always facing north directly above the north pole as if it were actually the central location of the earth, whilst all the other celestial bodies in the sky rotate around this one star? Explain this.. https://youtu.be/cvTTwApsY18
Then how is the north star always perfectly centered north? Wouldn't it come out of alignment by the wobbling/tilting of the axis? And Also why do the other stars even rotate around this center point?
That's because of gravity. Water always finds its lowest point. Before us carpenters had building levels, they used a clear tube with a mark in the very center of it. The tube would have a few drops of water in it, and when both opposite ends of tube are raised in the air, the water will flow to the lowest point. When the water and center mark align, the ends of the tube is level.
Water will always flow toward the lowest point because of gravity. The center of the planet would be the lowest point, which is why the oceans appear level. Sea level is just the measurement of zero in elevation
Water finds it's lowest point because of it's viscosity (it's ability to flow), and depending on what matter surrounds the water determines whether or not it reaches the lowest point based on the density of the materials. Test it yourself. Pour honey, milk, dish soap, then water in a cup. The honey will stay at the bottom, then the milk, then dish soap, then water will all seperate.
You're right about the density but gravity is non existent. Just apply density to your thought process there is absolutely no proof to gravity. Even the science priest Neil Degrassi stumbles and fumbles trying to sell this 500 year lie.
If gravity exists, does that mean helium has some sort of antigravity properties then because the earth would still have stronger gravity and force it to it's lowest point?
I try not to believe ANYTHING. It's not always easy because my "education" consisted of various adults drilling their beliefs into my head for years on end. I came out of the school system believing a bunch of things and went decades before the wheels started to wobble and fall off of some of these theories. Now I'm deprogramming myself and rather than "correcting" those beliefs, I'm just accumulating data, theories, personal observations and many new questions.
What I see in this discussion is one user posing questions that challenge our beliefs and several users responding emotionally in defense of their beliefs. Remember, science is never "settled", it is always open to a challenge, otherwise it is "belief".
The various Antarctica trips by different world leaders, celebs, religious leaders, etc have been touched upon by Q and then Anons, but not much deep digging due to the lack of info re: Antarctica and it's secrets.
Yes. Antarctica remains enigmatic. I'd love to see a deep dive on that.
They are hiring now
There are none. May be for good reason.
Yep the redpilling is intense when they throw in stuff that even we are not fully familiar with!
The Thing is loose.
We are indeed watching a movie, and they're dredging the 80s for scripts.
Some of you are about to have your minds totally blown. I was waiting for someone to open this door, and here we are.
Just remember, when this door finally opens completely:
if you're here at GAW, you probably have an open mind towards some of the craziest sounding theories out there. Nothing is as it seems. We are watching a movie. We know that, are ok with it, and can readily point out the inconsistencies in what we're being shown (in the political sphere).
if nothing is as it seems, and we truly do have open minds, and the cabal playbook doesn't change drastically, and they continue to rely on fake news/images/videos/body doubles/etc, then
We must allow for the possibility that nothing we've been told about earth is true. Antarctica, gravity, curvature, moon landings, etc. All of it can be, and probably has been, faked and/or made up. There has been a significant effort undertaken to make sure we don't discover that this subject has been a vatican/cabal psyop for almost 500 years.
Antarctica is interesting. Why is no one allowed to go there? One theory is that Antarctica is actually an ice wall forming the outer boundary of earth (not a continent) that holds earth's waters and upon which the firmament rests (the dome of the earth). Making it off-limits is how they keep us from discovering what's really there. Discovering the dome (of one is there) would ask and answer too many questions. Dig up info on old ships navigating the antarctic coast, Admiral Richard Byrd, cosmology before Copernicus (~500 years ago). What you find down this rabbit hole will address questions about earth's shape/the curvature question/what the sun, moon, and stars actually are and where they are/planets/etc.
Couple of starting points to get you warmed up (sorry for yt). Take it for what it's worth:
https://youtu.be/Ih1LPFqHSSM https://youtu.be/JkWS3RlnFIg https://youtu.be/xNyeHzO1oEc https://youtu.be/p9kM14keqNo
https://youtu.be/BW_8GoM4A1Y
Just say it: flat earth.
Fuck that dumb shit.
thank you. I honest to God cannot figure out for the fucking life of me how some of these hardcore indoctrinated Christians think that a book thousands of years old, translated many times from its original language, and with PLENTY OF TIME for manipulation and changes, is the main proof of a "flat" earth. a big floating rock in the middle of space? with a fucking dome over it and fake projected stars? how do these people not see how retarded that is? Antarctica is not simply a wall, there is a lot of shit down there it is basically the cabal's labs and havens and who knows what else. the amount of easily proven elementary science flat earthers straight up ignore is ridiculously embarrassing. IT LOOKS FLAT SO ITS FLAT DUHRRR. lately I have been seeing more and more of them and it deeply undermines our mission of exposing the cabal and the most important thing - the human trafficking/abuse aspect. I have had multiple people on the fence that I was almost getting on board that saw flat earth shit on some pages & reverse red pilled them entirely. if the earth is fucking flat, then where is an amateur satellite pic HUH!? cant get out of the DOME? for fucks sake i have seriously had it with these idiots.
Why would all the other planets be spheres but the earth flat? I just don't get it.
Because earth is not a planet i.e. not the same thing
The sky is fake like in the Truman Show apparently
I'll say this, it's a very hard to swallow red pill..
Weren't they transported just a few miles away (Colorado / show)? Why Garrison was able to use a sled to pull Mr White to the city in a few minutes.
Nah. They were in -70° antarctica freeze not that mild colorado everyday snow
It's like you don't understand how gravity works.
Can you confirm that Theory? No. Can you confirm mass, density, and buoyancy? Yes. The gravity Theory has many holes. Based off gravity Theory, objects with larger masses attract small mass objects. If this were true, then all kinds of random objects would just attract to each other no? Can a penny magically attract to say a large cargo ship, based off of gravity? No.
Gravity requires mass. It's clear you don't understand how gravity works.
Based off gravity Theory and the heliocentric theory, the moon is 1/4 the size of the earth. So why can't I have let's say a tennis ball, throw it around a bowling ball then causing the tennis ball to orbit the bowling ball?
Their Gravity feeds off each other.
A bowling ball doesn't have enough mass for felt gravity.
If you don't believe in gravity, please explain why a leaf falls from a tree.
There's another massive hole with the flat earth theory... Why is the north pole colder than the equated? As a Canadian, I can assure you that the further north you travel, the colder it gets. If the planet is an ellipse, why is it colder in the center.... And on the perimeter.
Flat Earth theory was created by the CIA to try to distract from the real crimes. It's purely disinfo.
Why a leaf falls from a tree is because air is less dense than the leaf. When the leaf becomes disconnected from the tree, it is no longer being suspended so it falls.
Because gravity is pulling on it constantly!
It doesn't exist. It's all density, buoyancy, drag. Probable sciences unlike gravity. It's really that simple.
Bouyancy is directly related to gravity. If an item is more dense than water, it sinks. If it is less dense than water, it floats.
I'm gonna stop arguing with you now. It's not fun any more. I feel sympathy for you.
Don't feel sympathy for me. Objects don't attract to each other via gravity. I explained a steel pin needle (or any small object) will not gravitate to a 100,000 ton steel cargo ship. If gravity were true this would happen no? What are the pseudo science rules or circumstances then can you present me that would prove it?
Again nothing to do with gravity. Viscosity, buoyancy, and density perfectly explains this. If the object is able to flow around the heavier/lighter object, it will naturally arrange itself.
Pick up a ball, then let go of it....
You'll notice that an invisible force pulled the ball towards the ground.
Now before you say that invisible forces don't exist, remember that magnets do exist.
No, it is because the air is less dense than the ball and has ample viscosity to allow the ball to flow downward and settle naturally below the air because of it's density.
Ok. so based on your gravity belief and heliocentric theory, can we assume you also believe that the moon's gravitational pull is responsible for the waves of the ocean? In which case, that would debunk
Here's some videos https://www.bitchute.com/playlist/hGA5kiBdzZze/
https://rumble.com/vdlujt-flat-earth-psuedo-science-through-a-fish-lens.html
Fell into it while looking up antarctica after ww2.. Very suspicious after operation high jump, Gen Byrd died, then space program was started and antarctica was off limits only allowed to go if you're military or approved/carefully selected science expeditions.. Rabbit hole is deep.
The earth is not round. Its not flat but its deff not round
It's spherical
That's disputed. https://rumble.com/vcdkfe-flat-earth-blue-origin-gh2-lens-correction-nod-documentation-to-disprove-th.html
If you truly believe the earth is a sphere spinning on a rotating and tilting axis please do tell me how Polaris (the north star) is always always facing north directly above the north pole as if it were actually the central location of the earth, whilst all the other celestial bodies in the sky rotate around this one star? Explain this.. https://youtu.be/cvTTwApsY18
The earth spins on its axis in the opposite direction of which it rotates around our sun.
Our seasons are created by the wobbling of the axis on a 23 degree incline over a 365 day period
Then how is the north star always perfectly centered north? Wouldn't it come out of alignment by the wobbling/tilting of the axis? And Also why do the other stars even rotate around this center point?
There is no curvature
The entire ocean is level. Just like a level used in construction. Sea-level.
That's because of gravity. Water always finds its lowest point. Before us carpenters had building levels, they used a clear tube with a mark in the very center of it. The tube would have a few drops of water in it, and when both opposite ends of tube are raised in the air, the water will flow to the lowest point. When the water and center mark align, the ends of the tube is level.
Water will always flow toward the lowest point because of gravity. The center of the planet would be the lowest point, which is why the oceans appear level. Sea level is just the measurement of zero in elevation
Where do you think mathematic formulas originate? They're discovered, by man
Why is it cold at both the north and south poles? Because they are further away from the sun.
Water finds it's lowest point because of it's viscosity (it's ability to flow), and depending on what matter surrounds the water determines whether or not it reaches the lowest point based on the density of the materials. Test it yourself. Pour honey, milk, dish soap, then water in a cup. The honey will stay at the bottom, then the milk, then dish soap, then water will all seperate.
Yes, because of gravity, the more dense material will gravitate to the bottom. This is why oil floats on water.
Water has a density of 1.0 Oil has a density of 0.7
This has nothing to do with gravity.
What do you mean? You already said gravity doesn't exist.
Does gravity exist or not? If gravity does exist in your world, please define it, so a simpleton like me can understand
**It has nothing to do with gravity because gravity does not exist..
You're right about the density but gravity is non existent. Just apply density to your thought process there is absolutely no proof to gravity. Even the science priest Neil Degrassi stumbles and fumbles trying to sell this 500 year lie.
If gravity exists, does that mean helium has some sort of antigravity properties then because the earth would still have stronger gravity and force it to it's lowest point?
I try not to believe ANYTHING. It's not always easy because my "education" consisted of various adults drilling their beliefs into my head for years on end. I came out of the school system believing a bunch of things and went decades before the wheels started to wobble and fall off of some of these theories. Now I'm deprogramming myself and rather than "correcting" those beliefs, I'm just accumulating data, theories, personal observations and many new questions.
What I see in this discussion is one user posing questions that challenge our beliefs and several users responding emotionally in defense of their beliefs. Remember, science is never "settled", it is always open to a challenge, otherwise it is "belief".