https://www.cookpolitical.com/ratings/house-race-ratings
I mostly agree with the Cook Report ratings at the above link, more so than the RCP ones. Cook has put in a lot more work than RCP this year on these, and they update it more frequently. I do, however, disagree with two DEM ratings and two REP ratings. I think the IL-17 race should be lean DEM, not likely, and the ME-2 race should be lean DEM, not toss up. I also think the IA-1 race should be lean REP, not toss up, and the PA-10 should also be lean REP, not toss up. Also, the AL-2 race should be safe DEM, not likely. That's a court-forced majority-black redistricting, so there's not a snowball's chance in hell it isn't going blue.
So, by my count, not theirs, that's 175 Safe DEM, 15 likely DEM, 14 lean DEM, and 10 toss up DEM; 191 safe REP, 10 likely REP, 8 lean REP, and 12 toss up REP. Assuming the leans etc. fall as expected, that's 204 to 209, with just about equal toss ups. I believe three DEM-held seats in 2020 Trump-voting districts are going to flip: AK, WA-3, and PA-8. I don't think any other 2020 Trump-voting district is going to go DEM, leaving only two such seats in the whole nation: ME-2 and OH-9. So to my mind, that takes 3 seats off the DEM toss up list, pushing the lead to 204 to 212. We're left with 7 toss up DEM vs 12 toss up REP. DEMs would have to take 14 out of the remaining 19 races to take a one-seat majority, more than 2/3rds, which is quite unlikely under the REP-favorable circumstances: that the winds are still at REPs' back, it's a presidential election with Trump running, and the recent flip of the RCP congressional generic poll. If, on the other hand, we just cut the chances in half, giving 9 to REPs and 10 to DEMs, we'd end up with 214 to 221, or the current number. Alternatively, if we just give the 7 DEM toss ups to DEMs and the 12 REP toss ups to REPs, we'd get 211 to 224.
However, there is a bit of a DEM advantage here once we boil everything down to 7 DEM toss ups and 12 REP toss ups: All 7 of these remaining DEM toss up seats are 2020 Biden-voting districts. Some of them are only Biden-voting by small margins, and three of them are lacking incumbency which makes things even harder to defend. On the other hand - and here's the DEM advantage - 10 of the 12 toss up REP seats are districts that went for Biden in 2020. So there's more defense being played by REPs in this toss up list. 4 of the 5 CA seats were 2020 Biden districts, including 3 of those 4 being >10 victory margins. Both NY seats were Biden 2020 districts, with 1 of the 2 being >10. In fact, the startling number of REP victories in >10 2020 Biden-voting districts was one of the unspoken, because too nuanced, facts of the 2022 midterms that actually made that election closer to the projected Red Wave than the biased media wanted to admit. The only DEM victory in 2022 that came close was the AK DEM winning a +10 Trump district, and that only because of the screwy ranked-choice system they were using for the first time. REPs actually won 3 >10 seats in CA and 2 in NY, though Santos got ejected and replaced by a DEM in the special election to replace him, thus leaving the 4 >10 seats we currently see in the REP toss up list (one more >10 NY seat held by a REP was created by the 2024 NY redistrcting, NY-22, which as you can see is slated to be eliminated easily). NY got redistricted again in 2024, so all the Biden-voting districts held by REPs got a little more precarious. So there's this >10 4-seat, >5 4-seat DEM advantage in those toss up 12 REP races. So, if instead of cutting things equally in half between the 12 REP toss ups and 7 DEM toss ups, lets account for this DEM advantage by subtracting 4 from the 12 REP toss ups and giving them to the DEMs, leaving us with 8 REP toss ups to 7 DEM toss ups. This then gives us a count of 208 to 212. Then, even on the off chance that each race falls the way of the current party incumbent or retiring incumbent, that would result in a final 215 to 220 REP majority, one less than currently. And, it should be added, those 3 Open DEM toss up races are not high-margin 2020 Biden-voting districts: 1 MI one was 2.0, 1 MI one was 0.5, and the VA one was 6.8. So at least 2 of those could very well pass to REPs. If that happened, we would finish 213 to 222, or 1 more REP seat than at present. But if we start again at 8 REP toss ups and 7 DEM toss ups and simply divide them randomly, we end up with the same 215 to 220, or 216 to 219 if you give the extra seat to DEMs because of dividing an odd number in half. However, If you give 2/3rds of those remaining toss ups to REPs, then you get 213 to 222, or the same number as if those two weaker Open DEM MI races flip to REP.
Therefore, if you want to define the range of prediction, start with the 208 to 212 number, with 8 REP toss ups and 7 DEM toss ups remaining, so that we get a range starting at the low end of 218 to 217 for DEMs if they win 2/3rds of those remaining 8 REP toss ups and 7 DEM toss ups, and a high end of 213 to 222 REP majority if REPs take 2/3rds of the remaining 8 REP toss ups and 7 DEM toss ups, a net gain of 1 or exactly back to where REPs started in January 2023. The median of the range sould be each party winning their respective current or retiring incumbent toss ups, making for a 215 to 220 REP majority, a net loss of 1 for REPs. Either way, you see by my method that it predicts REPs in all likelihood retain their majority. The low end of the range would give the DEMs a mere bare majority. The high range increases the REP current majority by 1. The final scale, therefore, is: REP -4 low end -- REP -1 median -- REP +1 high end. The very highest REPs could do, with any realism - let's call it the out of range high end - would be that 211 to 224 number we earlier calculated before subtracting those 4 >10 Biden-voting but REP-held districts. But those are going to be very hard to hold onto, especially with one of them being redistricted more DEM now than in 2022.
The relative inelasticity of potential swings, historically speaking, is due to a confluence of factors: the ever-tightening of redistricting that has reduced the number of competitive districts to record lows; the geographical partisan aggregations that continue to intensify, making even more possible such elimination of competitive distrcts by redistricting; and the record-low number of split-party voters, which is part and parcel with the ideological (conservative vs liberal) polarization of the parties. If each party were to win only the districts they won in the presidential vote of 2020, it would be 211 REP to 224 DEM. So if only 2 Trump-won districts remain DEM-controlled after 2024, it means that REPs will control somewhere in the range of 8 to 13 Biden-won districts, depending on what the final REP majority ends up being.
That's my House prediction. My Senate prediction of 52-48, flipping WV, MT and OH. But I can't make a Presdient prediction due to massive fraud potential.
But if my prediction comes true, then it's going to be a wild wild two years of a REP trifecta. RINO troublemaker Senators Murkowski and Collins won't be able to stop it. The blue islands are absolutely going to melt down. But Trump will have the mandate of the entire right of center and much of the slightly left of center (Musk, RFK, Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, etc.).
RFK, Jr. will not appear on 5 of the 7 battleground states: AZ, GA, NC, NV and PA, along with Nebraska's 2nd District (Omaha). MI and WI are the 2 battleground states that have denied his attempts to be removed. He has also been able to remove his name from the ballot in the potentially competitive states FL, ME, NH, OH, TX, and VA, while he will be forced to remain on the ballot in MN. At his campaign suspension speech, Kennedy said he was going to keep his name on the ballot in non-competitive states, and he encouraged his supporters in safe blue and red states to still vote for him. But on Friday, September 5, he changed his mind and encouraged his supporters in every state to vote for Trump.
Jill Stein is on the ballot in 6 of the 7 battleground states: AZ, GA, MI, NC, PA and WI, plus Omaha. She won't be on the ballot in NV. She's also on the ballot in the potentially competitive states: FL, ME, MN, NH, OH, TX and VA.
Cornel West is still out there. Tough to say whether his vote share will make any difference, even at the margins. He's on the ballot in GA, MI, NC, WI and Omaha, as well as in MN, ME and VA. He won't be on the ballot in AZ, NV and PA, as well as in FL, NH, OH and TX.
Finally, what about the Libertarian candidate, Chase Oliver? Well, the Libertarian Party has officially stuck its head up its ass. It nominated a complete degenerate this year, someone who is flaming queer and fully left libertarian. I think half the people who showed up at the Libertarian convention were disgusted at his nomination. So, I don't think he's going to pull many votes this year, probably the lowest of any LIbertarian candidate ever. Trump and RFK, Jr. both spoke at the Libertarian Party's nominating convention, so that was hopefully marginally productive. In any case, he is on the ballot in every state that is conceivably competitive.
Here's a brief piece on the Libertarian Party's nutjob nominee: nypost.com/2024/06/10/opinion/im-a-libertarian-but-the-party-has-turned-into-a-joke
RFK, Jr. will not appear on 5 of the 7 battleground states: AZ, GA, NC, NV and PA, along with Nebraska's 2nd District (Omaha). MI and WI are the 2 battleground states that have denied his attempts to be removed. He has also been able to remove his name from the ballot in the potentially competitive states FL, ME, NH, OH, TX, and VA, while he will be forced to remain on the ballot in MN. At his campaign suspension speech, Kennedy said he was going to keep his name on the ballot in non-competitive states, and he encouraged his supporters in safe blue and red states to still vote for him. But on Friday, September 5, he changed his mind and encouraged his supporters in every state to vote for Trump.
Jill Stein is on the ballot in 5 of the 7 battleground states: AZ, MI, NC, PA and WI, plus Omaha. Her status is currently under court challenge in GA and NV. She's also on the ballot in the potentially competitive states: FL, ME, MN, NH, OH, TX and VA.
Cornel West is still out there. Tough to say whether his vote share will make any difference, even at the margins. He's on the ballot in GA, MI, NC, WI and Omaha, as well as in MN, ME and VA. He is pending certification in FL and PA. He won't be on the ballot in AZ and NV, as well as in NH, OH and TX.
Finally, what about the Libertarian candidate, Chase Oliver? Well, the Libertarian Party has officially stuck its head up its ass. It nominated a complete degenerate this year, someone who is flaming queer and fully left libertarian. I think half the people who showed up at the Libertarian convention were disgusted at his nomination. So, I don't think he's going to pull many votes this year, probably the lowest of any LIbertarian candidate ever. Trump and RFK, Jr. both spoke at the Libertarian Party's nominating convention, so that was hopefully marginally productive. In any case, he is on the ballot in every state that is conceivably competitive.
Here's a brief piece on the Libertarian Party's nutjob nominee: nypost.com/2024/06/10/opinion/im-a-libertarian-but-the-party-has-turned-into-a-joke
RFK is not able to withdraw his name from the ballot in MI and WI. He is attempting to withdraw his name from the other 5 swing states. Still to be seen which ones he is able to clear his name from. It seems that he is going to keep his name on the ballot in non-swing states, as during his speech, he encouraged those in safe blue and red states to still vote for him.
Jill Stein is or will be on the ballot in all the states that matter: The 7 swing states and Omaha; plus OH, FL, VA, MN and ME for good measure. She won't be on the ballot in NH.
Cornel West is still out there. Tough to say whether his vote share will make any difference, even at the margins. He's on the ballot in MI, NC and Omaha; then pending certification in WI, PA, GA, as well as FL, VA, MN and ME. He won't be on the ballot in AZ and NV, nor in OH and NH.
Finally, what about the Libertarian candidate, Chase Oliver? Well, the Libertarian Party has officially stuck its head up its ass. It nominated a complete degenerate this year, someone who is flaming queer and fully left libertarian. I think half the people who showed up at the Libertarian convention left disgusted. So, I don't think he's going to pull many votes this year, probably the lowest of any LIbertarian candidate ever. Trump and RFK both spoke at their nominating convention, so that was hopefully marginally productive. Here's a brief piece on their nutjob nominee:
nypost.com/2024/06/10/opinion/im-a-libertarian-but-the-party-has-turned-into-a-joke
Sending the issue back to the states has nothing, legally speaking, to do with whether certain states broaden their abortion options. Under Roe, 6 states already allowed abortion up to birth, and any other state could have done so had it chosen to by legislature or referendum. Since Dobbs, 1 more state, Maine, has effectively opened up abortion to the point of birth. The only real effect that overturning Roe has had on states broadening their abortion options is by causing a counter reaction to Dobbs in blue states that has pushed them to do what they might have just as easily done before Dobbs. In other words, "sending abortion back to the states" has ended up providing a net lowering of abortions in red states, while either leaving the blue states in their status quo, or provoking one of them to broaden its abortion laws, which they might have just as easily done before Dobbs.
Trump's position, therefore, is an overall win for opponents of abortion of all kinds, though not an outright victory for those who want it banned outright. Based on polls around the country, including within red states, outright bans are not what the majority of the electorate wants. If state legislatures continue to enact restrictions more narrow than the majority of their electorates agree with, they risk backlash in the form of popular referendums that re-expand the limits of abortion out beyond what the majority agrees with, such as Ohio did and probably soon Florida and Arizona will do.
Here's how the Senate voted:
Tuberville and Paul would have voted against the bill, but for whatever reason didn't vote. Tim Scott didn't vote either, but said he supported the bill.
So we have 17 good Republican Senators, and 32 bad ones. That's a great improvement since Trump started the MAGA movement. We really should appreciate what a great achievement that is! And more than half of Republicans in the House voted against the bill. Also, more good Senators will come in after 2024. Sen. Braun, who voted against the bill, will be replaced by Rep. Banks who also voted against it in the House. MT and OH are going to gain Trump-endorsed, MAGA-aligned Republican Senators. Unfortunately, I think WV is going to get a RINO to replace Manchin. Assuming at minimum 3 Republican pickups, the ratio after 2024 of bad to good Republican Senators should be 19 to 33. Also, if Lake, Hovde and Brown get in from AZ, WI and NV, they will be good Senators, too.
These are very red states, and both Republican candidates were the current attorneys general and Trump-endorsed. Every other statewide office went heavily Republican. How is this happening?
AZ and MI are the only two states that have significantly degraded in terms of their vulnerability during another go around of medical totalitarianism. Specifically, AZ lost the Republican governorship through election fraud to the Democrat occupant named "Katie". But safeguards passed by the still-Republican state legislature in 2021 and 2022 place AZ in much less peril than what it otherwise would have been. For details, see this announcement by AZ state senator Shamp:
www.azsenaterepublicans.com/post/senator-shamp-reminds-arizonans-of-safeguards-enacted-to-protect-against-mask-mandates
In MI, the aptly nicknamed "Witchmer" occupant got reelected, while both chambers of the state legislature switched from Republican to Democrat control. These demonic totalitarians have already tried passing a law to make misgendering someone a felony. In addition, and contrary to AZ, MI has a state supreme court controlled by the same party as the other branches. Hence my prediction is that MI is the state next up to bat for circling the drain.
On the other hand, several states have significantly improved their political position since 2020, with the following specific changes: NH (Republican governor and both state Republican legislative chambers); VA (Republican governor and one Republican legislative chamber); MT (Republican governor and Republican state legislative supermajority); NV (Republican governor); LA (Republican state legislative supermajority, and a strong chance of replacing Dem. governor with a Rep. in 2023); KY (strong chance of replacing Dem. governor with a Rep. in 2023, and a legislative supermajority already in place since before 2020); NC (Republican state legislative supermajority, and a good chance of replacing Dem. governor with a Rep. in 2024); and AR (much better Republican governor than the terrible one called "Ada" in office during the scamdemic).
WI gained a slight improvement over 2020, having gained a Republican supermajority in the state senate, which enables impeachment of state executive officials including the governor. However, WI lost Republican control of its state supreme court, which might put in danger the several important Republican supreme court decisions during the scamdemic that allowed the fully Republican legislature to greatly limit the totalitarian attempts made by the lunatic Demonrat so-called governor "Evers".
Other states that have degraded in ways that should only be considered marginally significant are: MN (loss of Republican state senate, the last institution of Republican control); and PA (loss of Republican state house, but not Republican state senate); and to an even lesser degree MA and MD (RINO governors replaced by Demonrats).
I judge all other states, red and blue, to be more or less in an equal position politically compared to 2020. Many red states, however, have enacted sets of laws, taken judicial decisions, and/or enjoyed governor executive orders, designed to prevent 2020 from happening again. Based on these state-level efforts in the past three years, there are many red states - perhaps most or even all - that are in a significantly better statutory, judicial and administrative position over 2020. Like the testing of a submarine for depth capacity, it appears we are about to find out how well these new protections will hold up. Nevertheless, the totalitarian actions that can be taken within the federal jurisdiction (and of course in fully blue states) are numerous and significant, and I can see the battle being lost again on that front until the Election-Defrauder-in-Chief, Resident Xi-den is thrown out.
Thank God for constitutional federalism and state sovereignty! If you're in a red state, defend your territory. If you're in a blue state, God bless!
I learned today that just this year, two of the three largest truck stops in America were acquired by bad actors. Pilot / Flying J, a merger of the two previous big ones Pilot and Flying J, was majority-acquired by Berkshire Hathaway (Warren Buffett), while TA / Petro, a merger of the two previous big ones TA and Petro, was acquired by BP (British oil major). The only remaining big truck stop company is Love's, which is still privately held by its founding family, and it is still the largest of the remaining big three. I wonder if this is part of the strategic maneuvering to bring down domestic transport, in line with what's been done already to railroad shipping and to the supply chain in general.
That unrealistic victory margin was likely the result of cheating, and was done to make him look like the most dominant Republican of the 2022 election. With the recent elections law bill that passed, the elections cheating reigns have now passed into RINO hands (see this GAW sticked post: https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5zaa3vU/is-this-bs-or-is-desantis-doing-). RINOs will threaten to turn Florida blue as a bargaining chip to keep the RINOs in charge as the senior coalition partner of the Republican Party, rather than the ascending MAGA faction. Without Florida, no Republican can win the presidency, so whoever controls Florida elections has a powerful veto position over the whole party. Good sense dictates heeding the warning sign when you find out that DeSantis was a member of the St. Elmo Society, a student secret society at Yale related to Skull & Bones, not to mention the very large amount of establishment RINO support he's now getting from Jeb Bush, Paul Ryan, Karl Rove, etc.
Hopefully this adds perspective to the accomplishments we made. And don't forget, a huge portion of these winning candidates were Trump endorsements, meaning the MAGA infusion has made it possible to start to really take over the party and shape it according to the direction that will be good for each state where they have won. Ever since the Conjob 19 tyranny, we know how important the state and local officials have become in shielding us from the federal tyranny. So these state level races will prove vital to the protection of our rights going forward.
With few exceptions, red states got redder.
In AZ, Kari Lake looks virtually assured to become governor.
In NV, Joe Lombardo also is virtually assured to become governor.
NC state legislature gained 2 of 2 needed senate seats to achieve a supermajority, while its house gained 2 of 3 needed seats for a supermajority. Alas, only one seat short! Traitor DEM governor up for reeleciton in 2024.
NC supreme court flipped two DEM seats, for a 5 - 2 REP majority.
OH held its 4 - 3 supreme court REP majority, with all 3 REP incumbents gaining reelection.
MT senate achieved supermajority, while house maintained supermajority.
WI state legislature gained the 1 seat they needed to take senate supermajority, but fell short of the 5 they needed for a house supermajority.
IA REP Attorney General ousted the DEM incumbent, 51% - 49%. The incumbent was the longest-serving state AG in the nation's history, having been in office for 40 years!
NE legislature, which is unicameral, picked up one REP seat to achieve a REP supermajority. This is especially important in NE as they have a filibuster system similar to the US Senate, in which controversial bills only move forward on a 2/3 majority vote. Last session they tried advancing an abortion ban bill, but it lost by one vote. Also, constitutional concealed carry will now be able to be passed.
One bit of bad news was that the MN senate majority was reclaimed by DEMS, so the MN state legislature is no longer split betwen senate and house chambers. This final backstop removed, MN now embarks on a neverending one-way journey into outer space.
Virginia is now the only state with a split-party legislature between its two chambers. REPS took over the senate in 2021 and are 2 seats away from controlling the house. State elections are held in odd years, so won't be possible until 2023.
Dear [addressee's zip code],
The Democrat Party that I joined — the party of JFK and MLK, the ‘big tent’ inclusive party that fought for free speech, freedom of religion, civil liberties and peace —no longer exists. It is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers who oppose freedom and take every opportunity to undermine our Constitution. That’s why I can no longer call myself a Democrat.
And that’s also why I am doing all I can to send Joe Kent to Congress, and why I’m urging you to do the same by donating at https://JoeKentforCongress.com/Donate.
Like me, Joe is an army veteran. And like me, he understands the danger posed by complete control of our government by so-called ‘woke’ fanatical ideologues like Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi.
Joe’s opponent in this race, Marie Perez, is no different. She supports open borders, allowing fentanyl and cartels to continue to put American lives at risk. She supports new gun control laws that infringe on our Second Amendment rights and will prevent Americans from purchasing the same firearms she herself already owns.
Worst of all, she would be another so-called ‘woke’ Democrat voting in lock-step to push our country farther down the destructive path we’ve been on for the last two years: more record inflation, record gas prices, open borders, and rampant crime.
The only person standing in Marie Perez’s way is Joe Kent, and he needs your help. Join me in supporting him by contributing at JoeKentforCongress.com/Donate.
Thank you.
Tulsi Gabbard
PS: The same extremist Democrats that caused me to leave the party are trying to defeat a great American patriot, Joe Kent. Join me in sending my friend and fellow veteran, Joe Kent, to Washington by making a contribution today JoeKentforCongress.com/Donate.
Abe's "execution" didn't exactly look like a convincing take down with a gun, did it? First shot he didn't even whince, and nothing looked to be disturbed on his person or clothing. He then turns sideways, peering back at the shooter. Another shot fired, this time a little closer perhaps. Still no sign of distubrance to Abe's person, however. He was standing sideways at this point, as well. The only thing that could have killed him was a shot in the side of the gut (a very lucky shot when the target area has been made so small by being sideways), or else a head shot. In fact, the head is really the only exposed part of his body due to him standing on some pedestal while being mostly covered up by two bodyguards before the second shot. No visual evidence exists that either of these areas were injured. Even if he were hit in the side above the gut, it would have been in his shoulder, which would not have killed him. Nothing even happened to the bodyguards that covered him up before the second shot. Then Abe just steps down and forward, quite apparently under the strength of his own muscle power. But there was a hell of a lot of smoke, wasn't there? Smoke always makes for good theater. I'm smelling a rat. Did you see the "homemade" gun? With electrician's tape wrapped all around it? It had a bore the size of a shotgun. Whether it was a shot round or a slug, something that big being fired that close would have made a nice big juicy entry wound. The only effect I see on his clothing is that Abe's right shirt collar has a recoil effect from the shockwave of the second shot.
https://rumble.com/v1bjg3f-shinzo-abe-assassination-viewer-discretion-advised.html
Also available as an audiobook.
There are also many interviews of the author online talking about mass hypnosis.
Quick sample of his ideas:
https://rumble.com/v1brjhb-dr-mattias-desmet-on-people-who-are-in-mass-formation.html
Full interview:
https://rumble.com/v1b6tgr-the-psychology-of-totalitarianism-interview-with-mattias-desmet.html
Everyone hates Oz, so I'm not going to tell anyone they're wrong for turning up their nose to him. However, after looking into this issue, I've discovered a lot more nuance in this race than can be easily transmitted en masse.
For one, Trump's original endorsement - Sean Parnell, who would have made a great candidate - got out early on because of a divorce case in which his wife accused him of abuse. That left Trump with no good options. Kathy Barnette, who ran in the primary but lost, is an up-and-coming star, hopefully, in the Pennsylvania Republican Party. But she's an unknown at this point, which Trump pointed out. So he felt that she's unelectable for now. How is Trump's judgment in such matters to be taken lightly? McCormick is a boot-licking RINO. There's no way anyone can argue that he would be better than a Trump/MAGA-controlled Oz.
The thing with Oz is this: he's got huge name recognition and experience in the public eye, AND he can be marketed as sufficiently moderate to appeal in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania is the most purple and "swingiest" of current battleground states. This is no small consideration in a state where it is quite doubtful whether Mastriano, the Republican candidate for Governor, has much of a chance, being considered so deeply MAGA-Republican as he is. Anytime Pennsylvania has a Republican in statewide office, that person is always more of a mainstream Republican. We all know that they cheat in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, but even without cheating, no one can argue those are two very large and liberal obstacles to overcome.
Finally, because Oz's entire political career will be 100% beholden to Trump and to his endorsement (he only beat McCormick by a thousand votes!), no matter what Oz might personally think, he will be have no choice but to adopt the goals of the MAGA Movement. And now Oz stands a good chance of winning, with his opponent Fetterman having suffered a serious stroke (no ill will, just sayin').
To find out more, start watching videos with Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan, Jon Rappaport, Dr. Sam Bailey, Dr. Stefan Lanka, or Kevin Corbett.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DWqulaZuLuzw (Brief explanation)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EqwPajvIhivM (Longer explanation)
Watch the documentary called "The Viral Delusion":
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YYOsNZw1cjDq
Read, or listen to, the book "Virus Mania", 3rd edition: