0
GeoffreyDoorknob 0 points ago +1 / -1

Most of that time is spent writing funding applications, finding enough trial participants, chasing up paperwork that hasn’t been returned, all in a work environment that is slightly understaffed. It doesn’t actually take that long if everything you need is in place.

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they should do safety test? Give half the people the vaccine and half the people an alternative that we already know is safe (to disguise the placebo effect). And then compare how many people get ill from Covid/ how many hospitalisation etc..and how many people get side effects so bad they die or are seriously damaged. I wonder what results that might throw up.. would be good evidence one way or the other..?

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm should be careful about reading too much into specific dates but certainly interesting.

0
GeoffreyDoorknob 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’ve heard it gives you an extremely long penis but cone-shaped. Sharp as a needle.

0
GeoffreyDoorknob 0 points ago +2 / -2

If these vaccines do give people autism then by the time everything opens up and we’re free to socialize again, none of us will know how to.

0
GeoffreyDoorknob 0 points ago +2 / -2

I’ve read some of the papers released as part of the trials (AZ and JJ). I’ve have in the past read many similar papers of pre-Covid trials of other medicines, which are now available, some of which have safety data far more problematic than anything with the Covid vaccines. Have you? Or have you reflexively dismissed the conclusions of actual scientists.

-1
GeoffreyDoorknob -1 points ago +2 / -3

Yes I have, and none of what’s above stands up to serious intellectual scrutiny. It does however reinforce a particular narrative to those who are genuinely concerned, those who are neurotic or those who are psychopathically malicious.

-6
GeoffreyDoorknob -6 points ago +2 / -8

That’s arguing over something totally different. I’m talking about the safety of the vaccines, which is overwhelmingly proven despite the ranting of a very shouty lady with a broken caps lock. If you want businesses to be totally regulation free then fine, they’ll be free to sack anti-vaxxers in the work place, and customers are free to punish them for this unforgivable transgression by shopping elsewhere. Pure free market.

-1
GeoffreyDoorknob -1 points ago +4 / -5

Look, I know that you’re scared but really try to calm down. It’s not healthy.

-11
GeoffreyDoorknob -11 points ago +4 / -15

Over 28 million people have had one of the vaccines in the US so far. Over 10 million in the UK. So if you looking for evidence there’s a problem with them you have to compare and individual case with these numbers. We’d be seeing hundreds of thousands of people with serious aftereffects (at least) but we’re not. Nor did we with previous vaccines you’re all petrified of. Some of the other points are out of date too for example: The Astra-Zeneca vaccine has been shown to cut transmission, as would be expected considering it’s similarity in design to previous vaccines. It would be extremely strange if the others didn’t. I’m in the Janssen trial testing the effectiveness of the two dose regime, any side effects I’ve experienced were so mild that it made me really unsure whether I got the placebo, which I guess is the point. Both my parents have had the AZ vaccine, no problems. Other relatives work in hospitals and had the Pfizer without any problems (mild side effects, bit of a headache for a few hours, although others have had worse but they pass same with AZ and moderna). I genuinely don’t know whether you’re actually sincere about your concerns about safety or that you’re all just beta pussies afraid of needles trying to stir up trouble to hide your own fears.

8
GeoffreyDoorknob 8 points ago +8 / -0

Haven’t had a TV for over a decade

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s taking “senior status” on April 3rd which means he has the option to cut back from full time cases. (It’s a kind of semi-retirement/promotion that removes the limit on earning outside income from lectureships and suchlike) He’s indicated though that he will continue full time as much as before, so hardly a retirement in his case, and it will leave his current position free for a new judge to be appointed.

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well yes. The disclaimer they were showing was useless and could well make it worse for them.

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where are they now though?

2
GeoffreyDoorknob 2 points ago +2 / -0

They’re absolute pussies cowering over a dumb lawsuit.

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is that’s not going to work. They need some better lawyers because that disclaimer is useless.

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Our efforts will not be wasted. The whole purpose is to create this information as readily as possible for the public and so they can find what they need to know and so as quickly as possible. Q was right about this for an extremely long time. It was a game of computer code, not a game of human chess.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›