Have you watched The Social Dilemma? It will deepen your understanding.
What the movie fails to mention is that people in misery spend more money than those with a sense of well-being. The business model of facebook google twitter and reddit is thought and behavioral modification on its users - "brainwashing", more accurately brain hacking, and better known as advertising.
Oxytocin deprivation - the absence of genuine human connection - creates a plethora of mental problems. People misidentify the cause of their misery, and blame it on circumstances beyond their direct experience, and their favorite demon strawman ("ebul white supremacist trumpers" for example). They seek pleasure-causing sensations as a way to improve their moods, but it exacerbates the problem. All this depravity just to cultivate a single form of pleasure-seeking: buying stuff. They want to install a pathological consumerism in social media users: first for the experience of the platform, then for the advertisers.
Tearing people's faces off and wearing them as a mask while they get tortured to death in the most adrenaline-producing experience a body is capable of. For example.
They've researched how to produce the most adrenaline. It's not pretty.
I come as a friend, but I've long distanced myself from Q.
The topics of the shadow government that he introduced you all too, I was researching 15 years ago.
The movement cannot be about a man, because men are fallible. We need strength that comes from unity. The unity of a people who DEMAND freedom in among the people of their nation, and will oppose its enemies.
You're not arguing in good faith. You're simply reasserting your original beliefs which you arrived at without reason or evidence, but on the trust and authority of known liars. What do you think you'll get, being a good boy believer? Why suck up to these crafters of illusions? What do you get out of it?
Are you so afraid to confront the idea the world isn't as you're told? Too cowardly to honestly consider evidence with your own eyes?
You'd unquestioningly believe the sky was green, if the media concocted an eloquent explanation and told you it's not visible to human eyes. Someone would say the sky is blue and you'd say "ACKshully..."
You know Epstein, NXIVM, and China have been running sexual blackmail rings in order to control politicians and elites all over the world... right? This is publicly available knowledge, even Hunter's laptop stuff isn't that hard to find.
So we know beyond any doubt that this is happening. What we don't know is the extent. Is it 5% of the powerful who are controlled by blackmail? 50%? 99%? That's what we can't determine with precision.
We deserve to know. It doesn't take ANY kind of conspiracy to demonstrate that some of the worst child molestors are being handed lighter sentences than thieves and rapists. There's a laundry list of light sentences. What's up with that? Molesting dozens and getting less than 2 years?
Come on man, you can think of more.
They want to gloat. They want to feel superior. They've been hoping to salt mine us but it's just not manifesting.
Don't trap yourself into small thinking like that, stay flexible.
Who doesn't have the Biden tapes?
Blackmail doesn't work as well when the people who have copies want opposite things.
Blackmail doesn't work as well when it's illegal to show to the public, who would be denied knowledge by the echo chamber monopoly.
Have you been seeing folks getting the "deep shock"? You know, that sense of reality floating off and fragmenting as you realize important members of the government would kill thousands of its own people without a second thought? That it had dozens if not hundreds or thousands of such important members?
Well Q is a persuasion vehicle for pre-existing knowledge. Future events aside, what's been called attention to isn't news, it's olds. People were already digging into the demon cult pedophile stuff for decades.
All beliefs and speculation aside, the Q vehicle is a fascinating phenomenon.
Jeez, I don't know, start recognizing our own authority as supreme and stop acting like we have any say over "our" government? Establishing a rightful government by, for, and of the people, with leaders that have the consent of the governed, and and faithfully represent us?
I have a slightly modified constitution that would be fantastic, requiring military training for every able-bodied man, a "freedom of reach" clause in the first amendment, a clarified 2nd amendment that will revoke citizenship rather than prevent the purchase of ANY weapon, and a LARGE house of representatives (1 per 30,000 citizens) determined by lottery, in order to prevent lawyers from walking away with our laws and making it their own.
Let's have a convention and we can debate over the details.
Unless he knows he'll be engaging in activity that will trigger it.
Who's going to oversee the homosexual orgies at the vatican, if not the anti-pope himself?