Send this story to all your liberal friends and ask them why they support fascism. Be sure to thank them for protecting our "precious Democracy," because this is totally what "Democracy" should look like.

Thank goodness Trump didn't win, or else uppity journalists would be all idealistic and thinking they have no restrictions on truth telling.

And while you're at it, ask your liberal friends how this is different from what they accuse Putin of doing to journalists.

"BuT PuTiN kiLLs JoUrNaLiStS!"

Well that makes this ok then! Now watch many on the left shift their arguments to "It's totally cool, it's not like he's dead." Sure, give it some time.

You'll also hear something from them about "blah blah disinformation blah blah." Ask them if that means we can now arrest every talking head who knowingly pushed the Russia Hoax. Igor Danchenko admitted he made it up, so why isn't Rachel Maddow in handcuffs?

Ask them to show you the "But Trump!" clause in the first amendment. Do we get to make up exceptions to the Bill of Rights based on politicians we don't like?

Any liberal who supports this needs to defend their position.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/blaze-news-investigative-writer-steve-baker-says-fbi-wants-him-to-self-surrender-friday-in-dallas-over-his-jan-6-reporting

EDIT: The DOJ finally published the charges. Misdemeanors. Of course they're made up, but still, who gets cuffed and perp walked by the FBI and DOJ for the equivalent of a speeding ticket while career felons can assault cops and not even be detained?

I do believe Biden is an actor, but the left doesn't, so make them defend this.

u/#q1164

Remember that Taibbi isn't a conservative partisan or a Q follower. He leans left but had demonstrated enough integrity to be trusted by Elon Musk to break the Twitter Files.

Yesterday, he guest wrote a Substack article accusing Obama and Five Eyes of spying on the Trump campaign. Bringing this news into Normie World is huge. The smoking gun is not available yet, but we're getting close.

...Multiple credible sources tell Public and Racket that the United States Intelligence Community (IC), including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), illegally mobilized foreign intelligence agencies to target Trump advisors long before the summer of 2016.

After Public and Racket had been told that President Barack Obama’s CIA Director, John Brennan, had identified 26 Trump associates for the Five Eyes to target, a source confirmed that the IC had “identified [them] as people to ‘bump,’ or make contact with or manipulate. They were targets of our own IC and law enforcement — targets for collection and misinformation.”

Unknown details about the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign and raw intelligence related to the IC’s surveillance of the Trump campaign are in a 10-inch binder that Trump ordered to be declassified at the very end of his term

https://public.substack.com/p/cia-had-foreign-allies-spy-on-trump

When the contents of that binder are released, it may be the most convincing Q proof to date.

EDIT: Jesse Walters interviewed Matt Taibbi about this tonight on his Fox News show: https://twitter.com/JesseBWatters/status/1757943583078826232

Prior to the interview, his summary of the report elaborates on the narrative and spells out what "bumping" the 26 targets means. It's basically entrapment. His summary begins around 2 minutes into the video, but here's a transcript:

Obama's CIA director John Brennan asked our English speaking allies to target the Trump campaign, handing these foreign intelligence agencies a target list of 26 Trump associates. The 26 Trump associates were to be "bumped," meaning they would be approached by assets -- bumped into -- and these interactions and relationships would be reported to the FBI as suspicious. These were people the CIA considered easy marks. George Papadopoulos, 20 year old.

Not mentioned by Taibbi -- though we know his name will drop soon -- is former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort. This is who Q was referring to as "campaign insertions" in post 1164 above.

Also consider how Papadopoulos was "bumped" by a hot Russian redhead honeypot. She hit on him at the bar and they chatted, which was enough for the FBI to spy on Papadopoulos and later try to ruin his life.

Watters continues explaining how this hoax snared innocent people, then ended up in a House investigation that had its findings sealed by the CIA:

Foreign spies didn't "discover" evidence of Trump/Russia collusion and turn it over to the feds; Foreign spies were assigned by Obama's CIA to create a false impression of collusion, to trigger an FBI counter-intelligence investigation. Obama's CIA worked with Hillary's foreign agents in London to hatch the hoax which led to the FBI investigation, the illegal wire-tapping, the Mike Flynn sting, and then when Trump caught wind of it, the Comey firing. And then Comey leaks the memos which triggered the Mueller investigation. Now the Mueller investigation was designed to cover up for Obama and Hillary, and tee up impeachment. It failed on impeachment, but the coverup worked until now. New reporting by Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger reveal that House investigators had discovered the root causes, but their investigations and all of their documents were confined to secure rooms in Langley. And when Trump was leaving office in those hectic final days, he attempted to declassify this material, which started a battle between former CIA director Gina Haspel, the Department of Justice, and the National Archives.

Trump tweeted about these House documents in May 2018. On this tweet, Q said "Follow the pen." Could Catherine Herridge have FOIA'd the House findings long ago, remained silent due to suppression by CBS, then leak it to Taibbi and Schellenberg after her firing?

u/#q1415

Also, in 2019-2020, could Haspel have been fighting for declassification on behalf of Trump and collecting evidence for Durham? Consider post# 3762

u/#q3762

Back to Watters:

The report says someone may have taken this binder of material exposing the entire intelligence community out of Langley, and** it may have been what the FBI was looking for when they raided Mar-a-Lago**. Others say that's not true, but the point remains: The Obama/Biden White House, their CIA and FBI director, launched an illegal pre-emptive war against Democracy, got caught, and have been covering it up for eight years. Schellenberger and Taibbi also say redacted FOIA documents suggest that Biden has been conspiring against Donald Trump with the intelligence community to prosecute the former president in federal court, which would be an impeachable offense.

Who wants to bet the "others" who say that's not true are the same people who pushed Russia Collusion? I know what my money is on.

u/#q2026

Maybe the UFO whistleblowing isn't really about UFO's. Maybe it's about lifting the veil of secrecy that has allowed 70 years of illicit transferal of nuclear secrets and material.

TLDR: The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 created a legal iron curtain between Congress and our military-industrial complex, aka the Deep State, which allowed them to operate under zero scrutiny. This barrier was fundamentally unconstitutional, but was tolerated because of Cold War era sentiments around national security.

Here's Tucker's interview on X: http://tinyurl.com/59jcutdu

At the 15:40 mark in the interview, Grusch explains how the vague wording in Section 51 of the Atomic Energy Act not only blocks congressional oversight of DOE and DOD activities related to possible UFO's, but also to activities involving physical material considered to have radioactive properties. Materials like Uranium transferred by Hillary Clinton to Canada.

TUCKER: What about the executive? Do you believe they withheld information from sitting presidents?

GRUSCH: Yeah it's funny you ask that. So the executive was initially involved in the secrecy on the UAP topic. They transposed the Manhattan project secrecy construct onto this eventually, and then they formed the Atomic Energy Act, what was the McMahon Act of '46, then the Atomic Energy Act of '54, and they purposely diluted the definition of "special nuclear material", if you actually read Section 51 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 it says "Besides normal nuclear material, we can also protect stuff that is similar," and it's a very broad definition. And that's basically the justification for the secrecy on this topic, is the material that we recover sometimes does have radioactive properties, and so they legally and gymnastically twisted the public law to justify the secrecy.

What he just explained is exactly why the Q level of security clearance was created within the Department of Energy. The definition of "special nuclear material" --a deliberately vague description-- triggers a secrecy clause which restricts visibility outside of the DOE, specifically the representatives of the US citizenry.

Here's an accurate and thorough explanation of Q clearance from Wikipedia:

Q clearance or Q access authorization is the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) security clearance required to access Top Secret Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, and National Security Information, as well as Secret Restricted Data. Restricted Data (RD) is defined in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and covers nuclear weapons and related materials.

Let's consider post# 39. Note the question: "Why wasn't Congress notified?"

u/#q39

Now post 199. Note the question: "Why was the Iran deal kept from Congress and placed at the highest level of classification? Meaning, a United States Senator could NOT review the deal but other foreign powers could."

u/#q199

And finally, how the DOE's secrecy laws relate to the UFO question:

u/#q2222

Is it possible that this whistleblower is a white hate op who's baiting the public with sensational UFO talk, then leads the public toward facts about Hillary, U1, and Iran?

Before we get to the sexual assault stuff, I just want to point out that this guy and Snoop Dog are the two primary examples of how pop culture is forced on us from the top down. Alan Watt used to often mention that Plato wrote in his dialogue The Republic that culture is forced on us by the ruling class. Whenever a real culture begins developing among the grassroots, the ruling class commandeers it, then uses it to control the populace. This is exactly how the music and film industries work. Nothing has changed in 2300 years.

So anyway, back to this garbage tier rapper Puff Diddly... Here's what his ex-girlfriend, Cassandra Ventura, is accusing him of:

• Raped Ms. Ventura in her own home after she tried to leave him;

• Often punched, beat, kicked and stomped on Ms. Ventura, resulting in bruises, burst lips, black eyes and bleeding;

• Blew up a man’s car after he learned that he was romantically interested in Ms. Ventura;

• Forced Ms. Ventura to engage in sex acts with male sex workers while masturbating and filming the encounters;

• Ran out of his apartment with a firearm in pursuit of a rival industry executive whom he learned was nearby;

• Demanded that Ms. Ventura to carry his firearm in her purse just to make her uncomfortable and demonstrate how dangerous he is; and

• Introduced Ms. Ventura to a lifestyle of excessive alcohol and substance abuse and required her to procure illicit prescriptions to satisfy his own addictions.

Full story here: https://deadline.com/2023/11/sean-combs-rape-lawsuit-cassie-1235615463/

It seems that every fake-culture institution set up by the deep state is crumbling. If this guy ends up in prison like R Kelly, it'll be a milestone in the dismantling of the DS matrix.

Waking up normies is a delicate process. Do it wrong and they'll build a psychological resistance to your arguments. I speak from experience. I was a normie who encountered posts about Hillary and Obama trafficking children and going to Gitmo, and I immediately said "Nope, I'm out." Years later, the stolen election led me back to Q.

We've all discovered by now that we cannot dump data on normies and expect them to process it and shed their lifelong worldview. Unraveling a worldview requires a strategy, of which I've determined there are two types: Customized and generalized. A customized strategy would focus like on a laser on a single issue that the normie is sensitive to, like JFK, 9/11, or the 2020 election. Here's a quick and overly-optimistic dramatization of that: https://tinyurl.com/5yexs38u

For a generalized strategy, no matter how many normies are targeted (as in a forum), the first tactic to keep in mind is that the process of waking up must occur in stages or layers. If you skip a layer or drop some advanced information too soon, your normie target may no longer be receptive.

With this layering approach in mind, here is a rough draft of a strategy for waking up normies to Q:

Layer 1 would involve the recognition that our government is a corrupted uniparty that actively collaborates against us. Q proofs involving FISA abuse are useful for this layer. For me, the foundational proof was the Republicans in Georgia aiding in the steal of the 2020 election. If your audience involves libs, you could refer to congressional Democrats joining with Republicans to vote for the Iraq war, or TARP 1 and 2 to bail out the banks.

Layer 2 would involve the recognition that the uniparty is controlled by elites and banking families through the use of bribes, blackmail, and trafficking of children. Epstein is the foundational proof for this layer. Useful Q posts include the long list of Republicans (4632) and Democrats (4630) who've been busted for pedo stuff. Another useful example is Republican Dennis Hastert and the Democrats who associated with him. There are sadly numerous examples that can be used to make this point.

From here, the normie would be more receptive to Q proofs. In this early stage, it's important to use only the strongest and most simple Q proofs, not complicated decodes with colored lines running to timestamps all over the page. Examples of strong proofs would be "Blunt and Direct Time" (325), or "Chain of command" (521 with the military tweet), or Suicide Weekend with the calendar (700), or the always popular Tippy Top (991). It'd be important to include proofs that play off Trump's tweets to prove Q is coordinating with Trump. For me, the Q proofs about Kushner visiting bin Salman and the ensuing Saudi coup were a nuclear bomb to my worldview.

I would recommend keeping the normie in Layer 2 for a long time to build up trust in Q. This trust will be necessary before moving on to Layer 3 and especially Layer 4.

Layer 3 is where the normie would learn the truth about our intelligence community, secret societies, and Q as a military operation. Some difficult to accept revelations would be North Korea as a CIA black site, or the truth about the Titanic and the Fed Reserve. For me, the proof that gave me chills was "No name returning to headlines" (1706) that synchronized his time of death down to the minute. The proofs about Trump freeing Kim Jong un who then travelled outside NK for the first time in his life were very powerful.

By this time, if the target is still invested in learning, they are no longer a normie, but rather a newbie. Yet still, Layer 4 would be a test of their trust in Q.

Layer 4 would be where the newbie is challenged to make sense of overwhelming information involving ancient esoteric religions and Luciferians ruling the entire world. They'd have to accept that the Nazis were never defeated, but continued their plan in diaspora. They'd learn that the centuries old "Great work" of Freemasonry has always had as its goal a one-world government, that our governments were always controlled, that we never had true representation, and the decline of our culture has been secretly managed. The newbie would have to accept that these people intended to genocide us through a war that America would lose, as outlined in Q's post about the 16 year plan (570). The other side of these revelations would be the corrective action by the military to throw much of our political class in Guantanamo, which is equally overwhelming to process and accept.

So that is my rough draft of the layering of the awakening process. Feel free to stratify your own layers as long as you recognize that information must be classified according to the mindset of your target. However you categorize it, here are some tips:

• Never skip ahead to advanced information. This could backfire and cause your target to reject additional arguments or proofs, so remain disciplined.

• Do not ever try to provide a literal answer to the question "What is Q?" Simply say that Q was basically a White House leaker who became very popular.

• Do not try to correct a normie who says "Q Anon." They do not care about the correction. Let them use the incorrect term until they learn on their own not to.

• Tell the normie to forget everything they've heard about Q, whether by a supporter or a critic. This is because only sensational descriptions of Q have been circulated.

• Tell the normie it's best that you not try to explain Q, but to show it to them.

Algorithms. The information war is fought on a battlefield of so much data that AI and algorithms are relied upon by all parties to stay above water.

Algorithms are just a set of instructions which can be executed through formulas or stringers like the ones Q revealed.

These stringers and formulas must have their values defined before they can be executed. But when the value is undefined, it's a variable written as X.

So when blackhat AI tries to execute an algorithmic attack against Twitter like a bot campaign or internal sabotage, it fails because it cannot define the target value. Its template formula already uses X as a variable, so how can it recognize a target called X? This creates a blind spot for any AI using universal algebraic rules.

Let me know your thoughts, especially you math or programming nerds.

I bet most of you didn't remember we had two holidays this week which commemorated liberty over tyranny. One year ago today, the Georgia Guidestones were blow'd up by a precisely directed shape charge. Unknown to the vast majority of people, the Guidestones weren't just New Agey public art. They were the plainly stated intentions and strategy of a powerful global cult to mass murder us and blend our surviving population into an unrecognizable homogenous uni-culture of drones.

And that was just phase one of the plan.

When you recognize the plan, you then recognize the significance of both the creation and destruction of the Guidestones. As a medium, stone had been chosen to archive the cult's holy commandments not for style purposes, but because it's the only medium capable of lasting for thousands of years. All other media degrade rapidly and require its data to be repeatedly transferred to new media until the cycle fails and the data is lost forever. The cult expected the Guidestones to be guiding future Satanic priests and tyrants for many millennia.

But now the Guidestones are just shards and dust. Another win for non-psychopaths.

Concerning the commandments themselves, they were so poorly written and hokey that they could've been dismissed as cringey hippy daydreams if not for the fact its writers had the resources and unwavering commitment to genocide us and our children. If you want to see the supplemental illustrations of these holy stories they were going to read to their children at bedtime, refer to the murals in the Denver airport.

Enough commentary, here's the people's interpretation of the Georgia Guidestones, which, by the grace of God, are now pulverized into granite dust.

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

Self explanatory. There are too many of you poors lugging about.

Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.

Eugenics. One-child policy. Baby curation (selection) involving abortion or euthanasia.

Unite humanity with a living new language.

This one isn't really about language, it's about culture. It's the NWO version of Russification. The greatest preserver of culture is language. They need to eliminate cultural boundaries and blend us all together with felons, goat herders, and child molesters until we stop bitterly clinging to our values, traditions, and beliefs.

Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.

This one is a continuation of the commandment above. THEIR reasoning governs YOUR passions, your faith, your traditions. None of these tenets of culture would have grassroots origins from the people ever again. They would only be prescribed to you from the top by the elites.

I can hear Obama himself saying it: "If you like your religion, you can keep your religion!" as they take away your religion.

Would an example of passion involve the recognition of inalienable rights? lol, go back to the gulag, sucker. That kind of nationalism talk gave us the white privileged law-of-the-jungle inequality and eco destruction that necessitated Building Back Better to begin with.

Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.

Think of all the times that leftists have imposed their definition of "fair" unto innocent citizens. Like when a Soros funded DA decides it's perfectly fair that whitey got carjacked and the DA refuses to press charges. In an NWO future where we will own nothing and "LOVE IT," fairness has a new meaning much like a "just court" does.

Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.

Like all these bogus commandments that don't really mean what they say, this is supposed to give the appearance of the reasonable localization of power. But it means the opposite. It means the world government will push their laws and standards all the way down through what used to be your country, your state, and into your local government. This is how the EU currently functions.

Avoid petty laws and useless officials.

This is an overt advocation of global rule by authoritarian fiat rather than rule by law.

You see, laws are just petty. Laws like those protecting property rights, free speech, and all inalienable rights.

Only a god-king and his priest class are enlightened enough to provide an inspired order, just as we achieved during the divine eras of Babylon and Egypt.

And officials are just useless. Officials like state and local representatives. Useless eaters and human cattle don't need representation. They are just animals who can talk. Imagine animals having a seat at the table and making their own laws. Absurd.

Balance personal rights with social duties.

This is the same tired counterargument against God-given inalienable rights going back before Karl Marx cashed his first trust fund check. Here are some contemporary examples:

"Freedom does not mean you're free to forego mRNA vaccinations and go out in public."

"Free speech does not mean freedom to spread dangerous misinformation."

"Freedom does not mean you're free to destroy the planet for others."

"Freedom does not mean you're free to exploit the have-nots."

This template is used for every leftist destabilization argument.

Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.

Occult/Satanism nonsense. "Harmony with the infinite" is Owl Cult talk for celebrating mass euthanization. The predictive programming for this was the movie Logan's Run.

Be not a cancer on the Earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

More occult/Satanism/Gaia Earth worship. See, Gaia is a loving and just goddess... Until the World Government's Council on Carbon Emissions decides you and your town need to be sarin-gassed and bulldozed to restore the earthly balance to your sector on their grid.

---

It all makes more sense now, right? Happy Guidestone Destruction Day. Now go make some babies and buy some land to celebrate.

The way this is unfolding is entertaining. I'm not just comfy, I'm amused. Maybe some of these white hats writing this script are moonlighting at the Babylon Bee.

https://news.yahoo.com/rescuers-last-desperate-push-final-040243936.html

The Coast Guard's post on Twitter gave no details, such as whether officials believe the debris is connected to the Titan

Within five hours of John Hinckley Jr. shooting president Ronald Reagan, George HW Bush and his cabinet determined Hinckley was a lone nut who had no association to any conspiracy. This should have drawn immediate suspicion, considering the Bush and Hinckley families had been friends for over a decade. George HW Bush's son, Neil, had planned to have dinner with John Hinckley's brother, Scott, the night after the assassination attempt. This was confirmed by multiple mainstream news organizations at the time.

Here's a compilation of some national news broadcasts from March 31, 1981, the day after the attempt. The interesting part starts at 2:27.

https://rumble.com/v2fwfyo-the-bush-hinkley-connection.html

Key points from those broadcasts:

• Prior to the assassination attempt, Hinckley stayed in a hotel and would wait for a phone call at an outdoor pay phone every morning. This despite having a phone in his hotel room. This fact conflicts with the hasty conclusion by investigators that Hinckley acted alone.

• Hinckley was a member of the Chicago Nazi party for a year. They kicked him out when he began encouraging acts of domestic terrorism. This behavior is consistent with methods used today by undercover FBI informants who try to recruit and position outlier groups as patsies.

• Vice President George HW Bush's son, Neil Bush, and his wife had planned to have dinner with Scott Hinckley in their residential city of Denver the night after the assassination attempt took place.

This article reveals surprising facts that coalesce into an undeniable connection of George HW Bush to Hinckley and the attempted assassination: https://whowhatwhy.org/politics/government-integrity/bush-angle-reagan-shooting-still-unresolved-hinckley-walks/

Key points from that article:

• The FBI will not release 22 pages of documents on John Hinkley Jr, which included names and organizations linked to Hinckley, along with details of his psychiatric records.

• The story of Hinckley's association to the Bush family was first reported by the now defunct Houston Post, then picked up by the AP and UPI. The MSM then memory holed the story despite this explosive fact.

• George HW Bush never commented on his family's connection to the Hinckleys, and denied they contributed to his campaigns.

• Despite a history money transactions and glaring evidence, none of the Bush family members were ever questioned about their connection to the Hinckleys by the FBI, Secret Service, or any other investigative body.

• The friendship between the Hinckley and Bush families had gone back more than a decade to their shared conquest of oilfields in Texas. George HW Bush's company was Zapata Oil. The Hinckley's oil company was Vanderbilt Energy Corps.

• The Hinckleys were donors to George HW Bush's political campaigns for years.

• The Hinckleys were the first to support and donate to the young George W Bush's failed congressional campaign in 1978. The Hinckleys made these contributions while their son, John Hinckley Jr., and George W Bush's brother and campaign manager, Neil Bush, were both living in Lubbock, Texas.

• The day after the shooting, at a press conference, Neil Bush confirmed Scott Hinkley had also been present at his Denver home a couple of months prior for Neil's surprise birthday party. But he claimed Scott was only there as the date of a friend of Neil's wife. Neil Bush, like his father, played ignorant about his decades-long connection to the Hinckleys.

• In 1980, John Hinckley Jr. had been arrested with three guns at the Nashville airport when candidate Jimmy Carter arrived in the city. Carter was running against Reagan and Bush at the time. Strangely, Hinckley was released without being charged or fingerprinted. This suggests Hinckley had been serving as a CIA resource on retainer.

• After the shooting, while John Hinckley Jr. was in prison, his cell was searched. Found were notes he had written that described a conspiracy of multiple people to assassinate a president. His parents said this conspiracy was imaginary, so the notes were disregarded.

• After a jury quickly determined Hinckley had been acting alone, he was sent to St Elizabeth's mental hospital near Washington DC. The hospital has a history of accommodating the CIA's MK Ultra experiments.

• The MK Ultra program was active while George HW Bush was head of the CIA. His tenure began five years before Reagan was shot.

• Around the time of the Kennedy assassination, John Hinckley Sr. and his son, Scott Hinckley, were operating their oil company out of the Republic Bank Building in Dallas, Texas. This building housed many entities connected to the CIA, including the office of Russian "baron" George de Mohrenschildt, who was close friends with both George HW Bush and Lee Harvey Oswald.

• John Hinckley Sr. was deeply involved in a non-profit called World Vision. It was funded by USAID, a government program long associated with the CIA. Another employee of World Vision was Mark David Chapman, the man who murdered John Lennon.

• Right after the shooting, a cooked-up scandal about Secretary of State Alexander Haig taking control of the presidency was used by the national media to distract public attention away from news reports about the Bush/Hinckley connection.

• The Hinckley's oil company was warned, just hours before the shooting, that it faced a $2 million fine for overpricing oil. After the assassination attempt by John Hinckley Jr., the charges were never again mentioned or pursued.

This page contains more material and analysis on this subject, including a copy pasta of news articles from 1981 that support the points above: http://www.voxfux.com/features/hinckley_bush_connection.html

Here's a literal money quote from an AP article on March 31st, 1981:

From what I know and I've heard, they (the Hinckleys) are a very nice family and have given a lot of money to the Bush campaign.

-- Sharon Bush, wife of Neil Bush

On that same date, this was printed by UPI: "Neil Bush told the Houston Post he knew the Hinckley family because they had made large contributions to the vice president's campaign."

Then the next day, April 1st, this was in an AP article: "In Washington, an aide to Vice President George Bush disputed a Houston Post report that the Hinckleys made large contributions to Bush's presidential campaign. The aide, Shirley Green, said no record of such a contribution could be found."

A journalism professor in Montana, Nathaniel Blumberg, observed that the national media was inexcusably negligent in covering the Bush/Hinckley connection. He said "…The press had submitted to this in a way I find unprecedented." He went on to say that the dinner between Neil Bush and Scott Hinckley was "The most remarkable assassination coincidence in the history of this country."

The page also contains a traceable genealogy asserting that John Hinckley Jr. and VP George HW Bush were distant cousins, and were descended from a governor of Connecticut. It also states that The Washington Star newspaper reported that George HW Bush and Hinckley were 9th cousins. Like the Houston Post, the Washington Star shut down a year later.

Based on the material above, we can extract the following points that are consistent with CIA tools and strategies that we see today. Note that many apply to mass shootings:

• A mentally disturbed subject is utilized for violent action against a political target. (Hinckley)

• The identity of the mental health professional(s) who had been tending to the violent actor is withheld by law enforcement. (Redacted by FBI in their report)

• An attempt is made to infiltrate an outlier group and persuade them to participate in political violence, thus positioning them as patsies. (Nazi party of Chicago)

• The investigation by law enforcement is hasty, concludes too quickly, and disregards inconvenient evidence. These conclusions always determine the perpetrator is a nutjob or extremist, which severs any connection a broader government conspiracy.

• A distraction narrative is used to draw public attention away from troublesome facts. (Alexander Haig)

• The media abandons all journalistic standards and practices in order to drive the preferred political narrative. (Coverup of Hinckley/Bush connection and campaign donations)

My conclusion: This coverup is comparable to those of the JFK assassination, 9/11, and covid. If John Hinckley Jr. had used any bullet larger than a .22 caliber, Reagan would not have survived. It would be a reasonable assumption that George HW Bush faced military justice for this crime. His execution by the military would explain why, when Q was asked what was in the envelopes, his answer was "Our promise to retaliate." This probably meant white hats would retaliate to any DS retaliation by arresting Cheney and W Bush for 9/11.

An aside: The downplayed fact that John Hinckley Jr. was a Nazi supporter is interesting considering the Bush family has a history of supporting Nazis. If you have not seen the Mr Truthbomb video on Skull & Bones, I highly recommend it. It begins with an explanation of Prescott Bush's financial support of Hitler's war machine: https://rumble.com/v2m64lq-skull-and-bones-the-deep-state-war-series-episode-one-infiltration-from-wit.html

An aside 2: If you'd like to learn more about the Bush family and Neil Bush's criminal involvement in the massive savings & loan scandal of the 80's, watch this round table discussion among journalists and researchers that originally aired on Austin cable access in 1991: https://rumble.com/v2gox42-uncovering-the-shady-connections-of-the-bush-family-an-interview-with-inves.html

An aside 3: Barbara Bush is likely the daughter of Aleister Crowley: https://rumble.com/v1lfcpb--the-bush-crime-family-three-generations-of-treason.html

So we have connections to Nazis, Satanism, presidential assassinations, and mass murder (9/11). Like me, most of you are probably kicking yourselves for being duped by this family for so many decades.

Hillary allowed China to raid her bathroom server which was full of classified info.

Obama gave Iran nuclear secrets.

And that's just scratching the surface.

According to Jack Smith:

Our laws that protect national defense information are critical to the safety and security of the United States, and they must be enforced. Violations of those laws put our country at risk.

Now we all know that before anyone tries to indict a leftist Democrat icon, you have to appease that icon's raging leftist supporters by indicting Trump first. Which brings us to Q 3716:

u/#q3716

This week, both Trump and the DOJ are emphasizing the unsealing of an indictment. Yesterday, when Trump said, "The seal is broken," he was talking directly to Anons. He probably thought he couldn't make the hint more obvious.

The Department of Justice released on Friday an unsealed federal indictment of former President Donald Trump.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-the-full-trump-indictment-on-mishandling-of-classified-documents

Q's posts always play with our assumptions. 3716 had us assuming that the person being indicted would trigger a mass awakening. Maybe instead of the person, it's what the indictment uncovers, like classified info from Trump's Mar-a-Lago stash that proves Obama or Hillary committed treason.

3716 also had us assuming that the first person being indicted would be the same as the first person arrested. In the scenario I'm describing, that doesn't have to be the case. Trump can be indicted, and the information uncovered during discovery can lead to Obama or Hillary being arrested, which will "Verify action and confirm future direction."

Y'all ready for the Summer of Love part Deux?

They will fight but you are ready.

https://twitter.com/realstewpeters/status/1664397291363483648