Maybe the UFO whistleblowing isn't really about UFO's. Maybe it's about lifting the veil of secrecy that has allowed 70 years of illicit transferal of nuclear secrets and material.
TLDR: The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 created a legal iron curtain between Congress and our military-industrial complex, aka the Deep State, which allowed them to operate under zero scrutiny. This barrier was fundamentally unconstitutional, but was tolerated because of Cold War era sentiments around national security.
Here's Tucker's interview on X: http://tinyurl.com/59jcutdu
At the 15:40 mark in the interview, Grusch explains how the vague wording in Section 51 of the Atomic Energy Act not only blocks congressional oversight of DOE and DOD activities related to possible UFO's, but also to activities involving physical material considered to have radioactive properties. Materials like Uranium transferred by Hillary Clinton to Canada.
TUCKER: What about the executive? Do you believe they withheld information from sitting presidents?
GRUSCH: Yeah it's funny you ask that. So the executive was initially involved in the secrecy on the UAP topic. They transposed the Manhattan project secrecy construct onto this eventually, and then they formed the Atomic Energy Act, what was the McMahon Act of '46, then the Atomic Energy Act of '54, and they purposely diluted the definition of "special nuclear material", if you actually read Section 51 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 it says "Besides normal nuclear material, we can also protect stuff that is similar," and it's a very broad definition. And that's basically the justification for the secrecy on this topic, is the material that we recover sometimes does have radioactive properties, and so they legally and gymnastically twisted the public law to justify the secrecy.
What he just explained is exactly why the Q level of security clearance was created within the Department of Energy. The definition of "special nuclear material" --a deliberately vague description-- triggers a secrecy clause which restricts visibility outside of the DOE, specifically the representatives of the US citizenry.
Here's an accurate and thorough explanation of Q clearance from Wikipedia:
Q clearance or Q access authorization is the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) security clearance required to access Top Secret Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, and National Security Information, as well as Secret Restricted Data. Restricted Data (RD) is defined in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and covers nuclear weapons and related materials.
Let's consider post# 39. Note the question: "Why wasn't Congress notified?"
Now post 199. Note the question: "Why was the Iran deal kept from Congress and placed at the highest level of classification? Meaning, a United States Senator could NOT review the deal but other foreign powers could."
And finally, how the DOE's secrecy laws relate to the UFO question:
Is it possible that this whistleblower is a white hate op who's baiting the public with sensational UFO talk, then leads the public toward facts about Hillary, U1, and Iran?
It is possible this guy is baiting the public. I am trusting Tucker to have vetted the guy as best he could. He seems to be honest and truthful.
Having said that, the guy is a long term intelligence bureaucrat. He references mostly democrats throughout his interview. Not necessarily a bad thing but makes it seem like he was closer to them than Republicans. Not that it matters, they are all the same. Just pointing it out.
It is clear the DOD has gotten far too much control ever since the atom bombs. Were atom bomb drops the original 911?
What I mean by this is that the faked 911 had one major purpose and intent. It was used to pass the Patriot Act, which wiped out the privacy rights of all US Citizens. In my opinion, it has been used to allow the IC to eavesdrop on anyone, atanytime, for any reason. This secret information on people is then used to blackmail them and control them. It is used on all "leaders" or "people of influence." Think not just politicians, but CEOs, celebrities, church leaders, community leaders, anyone with power and influence.
Were the atom bombs dropped in part to create the Department of Energy? Just as 911 was used to create the Patriot Act?
Maybe, maybe not. If the Pearl Harbor attack was known in advance, and all aircraft carriers were sent out to sea, and the attack was used to gain citizen support to enter a second world War, then maybe the "history as we knew it" about the atom bombs is different too. Maybe they were used for reasons other than ending the war against Japan. Maybe both.
There is a reason that Oppenheimer came out this year. Maybe it's to create fear of another nuclear attack. Maybe the DOE is worried about being regulated or dismantled and they need some nuclear fear porn right now.
Things to ponder.
Thanks for the well-reasoned comment. I 100% agree. Yesterday I was just wondering how we could've been lied to about our reasons for using atom bombs on Japan. We've always been told it was because a land invasion would be costly in human lives, but 1) We don't know that for certain, and 2) Historians are a major pipeline of the elites' lies.
I now suspect the real reason was the DS needed to show the world the horror of nuclear weapons on a human population because the resulting fear dictated global geopolitical policy for the next 50 years. Without witnessing those bombs and their fallout, world citizens wouldn't have tolerated Russia's land grab of Eastern Europe or the US proxy wars in Korea or Vietnam. They also wouldn't tolerate the unconstitutionality of the Atomic Energy Act of '54. So in other words, I arrived at the exact same suspicion you're describing.
Also, I believe the Oppenheimer movie was made for the same reason many historical films are: To re-energize the public's belief in fake history. I believe the Nazis already had the bomb and shared it with the US as part of a deal. This is why the US army did not test the uranium bomb before dropping it on Hiroshima; the nazis already tested it. The purpose of providing the bomb to the US would've been to set the stage of the cold war with Russia, which was explained in Sum of All Fears.
Where are you getting the whole “uranium bomb wasn’t tested before being dropped on Hiroshima” thing from?
It's a fact. The first ever atomic bomb test was Project Trinity on July 16th 1945, which used a plutonium bomb. No further tests occurred before the bombing of Hiroshima on Agust 6th 1945, which used a uranium bomb.
The first atomic bomb ever detonated in war used a nuclear material that was never officially tested. At least according to the history we've been given.
I'm feeling pretty stupid now. You're absolutely right. When I read Uranium I thought nuclear.
This crow sure is tasty!
It's understandable because the truth on this doesn't compute for anyone on first glance.
Has Tucker been vetted? By whom.
That's a good question and I agree with you.
Tucker and Elon have done many things to help, but I am not all in on them either.
Arturia wisely points out in the comments: "most will get stuck on ALIENZ~!". And Mister_Winston, I love how you've framed the context of this post.
I would encourage people reading this post to set the non-terrestrial intelligence element aside on this subject and focus on the executive order and intelligence community side of this topic, specifically what you can extrapolate from the data.
In 1947, the National Security Act was created and the result was the creation of a State within the State.
As Grusch points out, The Atomic Energy Act of 54 created a new compartment within that State within a State. The most classified data in the U.S. government resides with the Dept. of Energy.
Think logically about these two facts, even if it leads you to areas that may seem preposterously big and/or crazy.
A senior analyst (and my professional mentor) who has spent his entire life with a certain agency that has a very large presence in Utah once told me:
"Novel energy concepts are more tightly controlled than anything else. The government is less concerned about people knowing that there's been non-human life coming here for thousands of years than they are about the public learning of free or nearly free energy technologies."
On its face, that statement seems ridiculous. But think about it. The government could give you limited disclosure (and in many ways, they already have) by telling you that non-human intelligences are interacting with the planet and just leaving it at that. But you have two big problems (if you're a corrupt government or breakaway civilization) if your citizens get access to free energy:
You lose an immensely powerful control mechanism if your average person can take a box that's smaller than a beer keg, buy some land in the middle of nowhere, and have unlimited energy to heat and light his home, purify water and run basic farming equipment. That's true freedom. Can't be having that.
The density of some of these power generation technologies is such that some young, mediocre genius hillbilly could blow up his county by doing a little tinkering in his backyard.
Bringing things back around: This is just a component of the bigger picture. The National Security Act and the Atomic Energy Act allowed for the creation of a hidden, unaccountable and extremely well funded core of our government. Over the decades, that State has been expanded into the private sector for increased secrecy (Intellectual property is easier to keep secret than government documents) and at this point, the tail is wagging the dog.
One of the simplest, but most brilliant concepts is Richard Dolan's proposed "Breakaway Civilization". The idea that the people with access to advanced offworld tech and possibly the off worlders behind that tech, would inevitably self isolated. Now tie this concept to the powerful, insanely rich and ancient families that we know has enormous sway over world events.
Yes, the concept of non-human intelligence being here is the biggest story in the history of human civilization. But we need to understand the power structure that was built around that fact if we want to have a chance at living free, sovereign lives.
Excellent elaboration. Thank you.
The disparity in the advancement of technology between varying sectors like energy and everything else does not make sense. We're relying on coal, chemical fuel, and 2000 year old heating methods while instantly communicating with people on the other side of the planet in 4k images. Something is not right.
Energy is control. If you tell the world you've found a way to fuel your car with free hydrogen created through simple electrolysis, you'd end up whacked by the CIA within a week.
Joseph Farrell has spoken often about the Nazis pursuit of torsion physics. He said they had three goals: 1) A weapon. 2) Propulsion. 3) Zero point energy. Any government achieving this would inevitably become a breakaway civilization, and my personal opinion is that they did achieve it.
EDIT: This is absolutely true: "Novel energy concepts are more tightly controlled than anything else. The government is less concerned about people knowing that there's been non-human life coming here for thousands of years than they are about the public learning of free or nearly free energy technologies."
Next stop: Antarctica.
great post and logic behind it. that said the part about q clearance could be another attempt to discredit the plan.
Same thing with the JFK stuff. Its a catch all for decades of crimes after the fact, meant to cover it up.
According to the MJ12 document (https://files.catbox.moe/ja65mf.pdf) Majestic 12 began life in 1947 to conceal information about et's and UFOs. Then in 2011, they were taken over by white hats and are working on disclosure. The process is slow because if the information is dangerous in the wrong hands. MJ12 references Q quite a bit, supports them as legitimate, but says they are a different operation with different goals. But MJ12 says they are responsible for most of the coverup in the past.
It's quite possible 3 Mile Island was a false flag. Look at the response to it. That and the "Russian's are going to nuke us" terrified everybody about nuclear anything.
I believe 3 Mile Island was a false flag because they made a Hollywood movie about it starring Jack Lemon. Anything from Hollywood is intended to keep you asleep.
Born in the 50ies heard that the Russians were coming we practice getting school desk. They showed up in 2020, oh wait, that’s what the news media said. Putin and the Russians aren’t the boogie men we the United States government, the new media are the boogie men.
All this drama for some demons and angels with spacecrafts?
We aren't alone. Other planets have life. In fact the universe is teeming with life, even the space station is covered in bacteria that live in space.
Good post Mr. Winston.
I mentioned this in the Tucker video post earlier today about Tucker asking him that question and the guy answering like you wrote above.
My comment from other post,..
"At 15:40 mark, Tucker asked if they actually held information from sitting Presidents, and in a roundabout explanation, he basically said yes, but doesn't come right out and says yes. I'm wondering if Tucker was trying to hint that they kept things from Trump when he was President."
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rmXXN21w/tucker-episode-51-with-ufo-whist/c/
Interesting, and so are the follow up comments.
My first post here, I had to turn off my blockers to gain access. Not sure what that means but it might mean something.
Possibly, but most will get stuck on ALIENZ~!