I'm familiar. There was a modernization of it that was implemented.

I've been along the ride for Q since it first came about, so I've watched it evolve, but with all the jargon tossed around I'm not quite sure what specific talking 4am talking points you're referring to.

I will say that the runners of said media likely have a vested interest in what gets broadcasted in terms of how they, personally, will be affected by political decisions.

I wouldn’t go as far as to call it state run though.

Fact is that he's still free to broadcast on another platform without persecution.

Fact is that he's still free to broadcast on another platform without persecution.

should have already occurred

We don't know if Tucker ever asked Putin to do an interview before.

This account is 109 days old but I've had other accounts.

Not really, because television broadcasters are not open to the public (other than public access channels)

Ah I see you. Hah yes the irony is very strong.

And?

We already shouldve had the info

...you can't have the info of something that hasn't happened yet. I'm not sure what you're requiring here.

I've also been here since the beginning of the site, and was part of it when it was still on reddit.

I'm not sure what's the irony here...

How does this apply, exactly?

MSM outlets are private entities. They're not marketing themselves as public forums.

I might! And that would be within anyone's right to do so! It doesn't mean my free speech is being taken away if that happens though.

Either way, it's pretty easy to just make a new username. It wouldn't be the first time.

American people can have the info. It's being broadcast on one of the largest social media sites in the world.

MSM is composed of privately owned networks. The law protects against government persecution for your words. It does not require that privately owned news companies have to share this information.

I’ve been in the site since about its inception. I’m pretty comfortable here, thanks 😊

The MSM is composed of privately owned networks. They don’t have to show anything that they don’t want to.

Is someone blocking/suppressing here? It looks like it's being allowed to stream on twitter

How would the press get ahold of that information though without the company themselves letting people know?

So, the people who distributed and administered the shot, realized they gave saline, and worked to inform the people and correct it?

Im asking because leafy greens offer nutrients that will help charge your body up when you are sick, so it might be good to add some to your diet to feel better

What reason do I have to believe that placebos were given, beyond “it’s possible that it happened”?

Like, I get that it could happen, but what reasoning is there to believe that it did?

No that’s specifically what I was offering. It was a way to show my honesty and in turn help prove what I’m saying. If you’d like I can show my bank records, but normally people don’t have a way that the other person can disprove it. It’s an easy claim to make as a way to disregard the other’s stance

But yeah, that’s normally how people react. You can have an honest discussion without resorting to some petty “shill” call. Why is it so hard to believe that I'm being sincere?

It’s not really that funny. Accusing someone of being a shill is a common response on this site when a person shares an unpopular stance. It has nothing to do with me, only what I wrote and how you feel about it.

Basically, I’m calling you out on the fact that you’re assuming that I’m only shilling, and not being honest with you, just because I’m sharing something that you don’t agree with.

I’m offering to give you whatever proof you need that I’m being frank with you, and I don’t know what that is yet. You would have to tell me, because I don’t inherently know what your needs are. Do you have anything that would suffice?

In the past, I’ve gone on WhatsApp/discord with others to have a more frank, casual discussion where we can talk more at ease. Dunno if that’s what you’d be comfortable with though.

Mm it probably won’t but okay

I suppose you need calibrating then!

Just because someone disagrees with you, doesn’t mean they’re being paid to do so.

I’m happy to prove it to you as well! However, historically, nobody takes me up on this offer, they only ignore me because they’re more comfortable assuming I’m just a shill.

But if there’s anything I can provide for you I’m happy to do so!