American people can have the info. It's being broadcast on one of the largest social media sites in the world.
MSM is composed of privately owned networks. The law protects against government persecution for your words. It does not require that privately owned news companies have to share this information.
We “can” because Tucker is doing this. Without him we wouldn’t. We already shouldve had the info. I understand your side here but you’re not going to goad me into a slide on the thread. You need to see the bigger picture. You’re new here so fair enough but pay attention to what’s going on. Not labeling shill just yet.
While news organizations are a private entity, the so call journalist are suppose to adhere to an ethical standard of their trade.
Freedom of the press. I think an argument could be made that a commercial private entity whose purpose is not to report news consistent with journalistic ethics, but instead in funded for sole purpose of spewing propaganda, is not "the press" at all.
journalist are suppose to adhere to an ethical standard of their trade.
Sure. That doesn't mean they have to research/interview/promote any specific story. Whichever story they choose to write/talk about though should still be within the confines of ethical standards.
Tucker has the freedom to promote it, and he's doing so on one of the most popular social media channels in the world.
Talks/interviews/interaction etc etc should have already occurred and let the public know where the “other side” stands.
Thought you had a 109 day account here. That doesn’t really matter You carry on fren, no offenses intended, we’re just seeing the same thing from opposite sides.
Consider the idea that is being presented here, that the bending the knee to main stream media being the measure of what free speech means is playing the DS game. We do have the free speech that Modeler is pointing out but because we want to play on the same platform the DS has made for us we’re losing, what needs to be done is not work within their system…like what we have done here on this site. MSM silences or censors us, they can do that. What do we do? We make this site. Regarding tucker, the original point of this discussion, if the gov is preventing interviews, that is another issue, they are using influence to push business decisions. Tucker can quit, start his own site, do his own journalism and speak freely….which is EXACTLY what he is doing and is what Modeler is trying to get through to you all. And you say he has something to learn. -_-
It is SHAMEFUL that I see modeler trying to speak and TWO people so far try to shut him down or put him in is place as a new guy. Sounds like he’s been around since r/greatawakening and he’s just trying to share his thoughts against attempts to belittle his opinion by essentially saying he needs to learn more or be quiet.
This is exactly the way I see it. You said the words I didn't find. I'm not sure how we ended up opposing while trying to say the same thing. I misinterpreted the original comment I guess. idk. WWG1WGA NCSWIC
American people can have the info. It's being broadcast on one of the largest social media sites in the world.
MSM is composed of privately owned networks. The law protects against government persecution for your words. It does not require that privately owned news companies have to share this information.
We “can” because Tucker is doing this. Without him we wouldn’t. We already shouldve had the info. I understand your side here but you’re not going to goad me into a slide on the thread. You need to see the bigger picture. You’re new here so fair enough but pay attention to what’s going on. Not labeling shill just yet.
...you can't have the info of something that hasn't happened yet. I'm not sure what you're requiring here.
I've also been here since the beginning of the site, and was part of it when it was still on reddit.
The Code of ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists seem to agree with u/DRan.
While news organizations are a private entity, the so call journalist are suppose to adhere to an ethical standard of their trade.
Freedom of the press. I think an argument could be made that a commercial private entity whose purpose is not to report news consistent with journalistic ethics, but instead in funded for sole purpose of spewing propaganda, is not "the press" at all.
Sure. That doesn't mean they have to research/interview/promote any specific story. Whichever story they choose to write/talk about though should still be within the confines of ethical standards.
Tucker has the freedom to promote it, and he's doing so on one of the most popular social media channels in the world.
Talks/interviews/interaction etc etc should have already occurred and let the public know where the “other side” stands.
Thought you had a 109 day account here. That doesn’t really matter You carry on fren, no offenses intended, we’re just seeing the same thing from opposite sides.
Let’s see how this interview goes.
We don't know if Tucker ever asked Putin to do an interview before.
This account is 109 days old but I've had other accounts.
Consider the idea that is being presented here, that the bending the knee to main stream media being the measure of what free speech means is playing the DS game. We do have the free speech that Modeler is pointing out but because we want to play on the same platform the DS has made for us we’re losing, what needs to be done is not work within their system…like what we have done here on this site. MSM silences or censors us, they can do that. What do we do? We make this site. Regarding tucker, the original point of this discussion, if the gov is preventing interviews, that is another issue, they are using influence to push business decisions. Tucker can quit, start his own site, do his own journalism and speak freely….which is EXACTLY what he is doing and is what Modeler is trying to get through to you all. And you say he has something to learn. -_-
It is SHAMEFUL that I see modeler trying to speak and TWO people so far try to shut him down or put him in is place as a new guy. Sounds like he’s been around since r/greatawakening and he’s just trying to share his thoughts against attempts to belittle his opinion by essentially saying he needs to learn more or be quiet.
This is exactly the way I see it. You said the words I didn't find. I'm not sure how we ended up opposing while trying to say the same thing. I misinterpreted the original comment I guess. idk. WWG1WGA NCSWIC