Wait, where were they forced to pay $50m?
Eh, I got it over the holidays last year and it straight up rocked me. I was in bed for five days and was pretty close to going to a hospital. I'm 55, an avid runner and very healthy, never smoked and don't really drink. Zero comorbidities. My wife is 42, zero comorbidities, also a runner and in amazing shape got it at the same time and she was in just as rough shape. My oldest daughter got it, she was fine. Youngest girl got it, and she had to go get special lung treatments because she had childhood asthma.
It effects everyone differently and you can't make a sweeping statement like that and just blow it off for everyone, it's similar to the flu because the flu effects people differently. I get the flu bad every damn year like clockwork, like 7 days in bed with a fever, but my wife gets it and it's just sniffles.
Reading comprehension is important.
Notice that doesn't actually have to do with finances?
FREE SHOES! WOO!
Where did you see anything about finances?
I'm sorry I interrupted your pearl clutching.
ok, and you also have other accounts
So what's the problem with women online?
No it won't, this is blatantly goofy and outside of the law. I mean you can setup a website to say whatever you want, but no one will take it seriously.
This whole movement for class action lawsuits is so silly. Just go get a job and make your own money, no one has gotten rich from these kind of things.
Wow, you have multiple accounts.
Someone in their 20s is an adult.
It's always been two weeks.
Vaers is pretty much entirely ignored now by the CDC since so many people were told to go there and file fake reports.
The sad part is anyone can submit a report to VAERS with no verification right here: https://vaers.hhs.gov/esub/index.jsp
There's been numerous times where I've been listening to a podcast and the host has told people to report events that didn't happen so they could get the CDC attention on how bad the vax is. Which I agree with, but it kind of ruins the whole VAERS idea.
Good luck poopin!
There's not, but that has nothing to do with the post. They were asking if a case can be made and I was walking them down the logistics of why it wouldn't work.
I own a vacation home in the Keys. For a few days out of the month I can't get to the house because the road leading up to it floods over with more than two feet of water. I don't know what the cause is but I'm sure it's not "Climate Change," I'm guessing it has to do with the moon because it's always full moons when that happens. It never happened when I bought the place 20 years ago, and it only started about two years ago.
But, there's an easy fix, I'm building a new road on the high side of the entryway behind the house which never floods over.
Will it air anywhere else? Her videos only get 10 views each.
Which is why YouTube created YouTube Kids which is an app that greatly limits YouTube to curated videos for kids so that doesn't happen.
It's so funny, people watch these then go try it and are like, I SAW 1900 SNUFF FILMS OMG. But it's just clickbait BS that's not inappropriate.
I saw that video, it's a woman telling the story of how she met her girlfriend and had sex with her the first time. The thumbnail is supposed to be a bit shocking. Also, neither of them are young, they're both in their 20s.
So, what's the end game here? Abolish Medicine?
Does it show panic if someone is tweeting at you?
I feel like panic would be him saying something?
This is not how the law works. Not even remotely close. I graduated from law school 25 years ago after leaving the military, but ended up going into Supply Chain management because it was better money to start.
Anyways, I'm going to break all this down:
Hunter Biden's text wouldn't be considered admissible, and if it did happen somehow to be admissible, it would be considered opinion and not fact because Hunter isn't qualified to operate a laptop, let alone diagnosing anything. That's why when you challenge someone's mental stability - like getting help for a parent with Alzheimer's - it doesn't matter what the family thinks, they have to be evaluated by a professional before anything legal can happen.
You would also have to have some form of evidence that DncMsmBc all had evidence and confirmation that Biden was officially diagnosed as mentally unfit and represented him differently. I know we all think that is the case, but it doesn't work that way and it doesn't matter what we think.
Also, you can't just sue the mainstream media, what does that even mean as a defendant? Like CNN, MSNBC, and all their employees? The janitors at the building? Security guards? What about the contractors who maintain things in the buildings like toilets? Them too? Is FOX MSM? What about the US BBC and Al Jazeera offices?
Anyways, let's walk through the nine elements to establish fraud:
(1) a representation of fact: This would be easy because there are a million news articles about Biden being qualified to be President.
(2) its falsity: There would have to be a current diagnosis by a qualified doctor that Biden is mentally unfit to serve as President. We currently don't have that or else he'd already be gone.
(3) its materiality: This is an easy one because we all know the amount the President makes - which would be the best way to approach this from a simple case.
(4) the representer’s knowledge of its falsity or ignorance of its truth: This would be impossible to establish because you would have to show that every employee, or at least all of the managers had confirmation from a doctor that Biden was mentally unfit. This would be thousands and thousands of people.
(5) the representer’s intent that it should be acted upon by the person in the manner reasonably contemplated: This would be easy because you could show they all wanted him to win.
(6) the injured party’s ignorance of its falsity: You would have to prove that voters had no idea Biden was mentally unfit.
(7) the injured party’s reliance on its truth: You could show this because people look to news for the truth and information, etc
(8) the injured party’s right to rely thereon: Same as above, you could show MSM is the place to get news, but the Biden Campaign would disqualify the entire case from this because people don't look to political campaigns for unbiased information from the candidate.
(9) the injured party’s consequent and proximate injury Here you'd have to show how hurt the voters were by Biden being elected, which this would be pretty easy to do.
So, it's not only a long shot, it's pretty impossible to make this case, which I wish wasn't true, but it is.
This is probably the worst example of a proof you could use. Sea to Shining Sea is such a common term, hell it's on my realtor's card and it's one of the mottos of my company too.