Do you know how cancer really thrives in the human body?
It's a stealth bomber. It hides from the immune system.
Once the body sees it, apoptosis.
Autophagy.
It doesn't matter what other crazy shit cancer does.
Take that away from cancer, and the body cures itself.
Should make it easy enough to go 'bot fishing' and make extreme (within the TOS) positions to farm ban lists, block lists, etc.
Agreed, we will never know the full extent it was used.
TLDR;
You are, unfortunately, your own best doctor. Don't get sick, or injured, or wrong think. It's not safe out there. #theshowerisfake
POTUS level trolling achieved long ago, just loving it.
Part one of a two-part docuseries: FRONTLINE and Forbidden Films investigate Pegasus, a powerful spyware sold to governments around the world by the Israeli company NSO Group.
In 2020, the journalism nonprofit Forbidden Stories and Amnesty International gained access to a leaked list of more than 50,000 phone numbers. They suspected it contained numbers selected for potential surveillance with Pegasus. The Pegasus Project reporting consortium — which was led by Forbidden Stories and included 16 other media organizations, FRONTLINE among them — found that the spyware had been used on journalists, human rights activists, the wife and fiancée of the murdered Saudi columnist Jamal Khashoggi, and others.
Over two nights, this docuseries reveals the inside story of an investigation that prompted probes by governments and institutions around the world and sparked calls for an international treaty to govern the largely unregulated spyware industry.
NSO, which has disputed some of the Pegasus Project’s reporting, says that its technology was not associated in any way with Khashoggi’s murder and that it sells Pegasus to vetted governments for “the sole purpose of preventing and investigating terror and serious crime.”
Surveillance technologies like Pegasus are “a military weapon used against civilians, and the civilians, they don’t have any mechanism to help them in seeking justice,” says Laurent Richard, founder of Forbidden Stories and Forbidden Films and one of the producers of the films.
First lines are how it's ahead of public understanding. I hope this does a good job educating people about my waking nightmare since 2006 when I was an end user for Palantir targeting packets, gunshot detectors, battlefield overlays, remote weapon systems, and more.
These tools are based and named off the Palantiri of the Lord of the Rings.
Palantir, Palantir Gotham, etc.
The civilian version is SalesForce.
This is a new version, the international version of the combination of tech. It combines an input point that is close to the target as you can get.
Educate yourselves.
If the measures taken by the US government such as implementing austerity measures, seeking assistance from international organizations, negotiating with creditors, using monetary policy, and debt forgiveness fail to address the consequences of a default, it could lead to a prolonged period of economic instability and uncertainty.
The government may have to take more drastic measures, such as:
Nationalization of industries: The government may have to nationalize certain industries, such as banks or key infrastructure, in order to stabilize the economy and provide necessary services.
Capital controls: The government may impose capital controls, such as restrictions on the movement of money and foreign exchange, to prevent a run on the currency and stabilize the economy.
Repudiation of debt: The government may choose to repudiate or default on some or all of its debt, which would mean that creditors would not be able to recover the money they are owed.
Exit from international agreements: The government may also have to consider exiting from international agreements such as trade agreements, in order to protect the domestic economy.
These measures would have severe consequences for the economy and the country's creditworthiness, and would likely result in a prolonged period of economic instability, uncertainty, and potentially hyperinflation. Additionally, the US would also face significant diplomatic repercussions and would likely lose its status as a global leader.
The US government has a wide range of tools and resources at its disposal to address a debt crisis, and it would likely exhaust all other options before resorting to such measures.
If the US government were unable to monetarily reorganize its debt, and unable to pay it off through traditional means, it could consider using assets or resources to pay off the debt. Some examples of assets or resources that the government could use to pay off the debt include:
Public lands: The government could sell or lease public lands, such as national parks or forests, to generate revenue to pay off the debt.
Natural resources: The government could also sell or lease natural resources, such as oil, gas, or minerals, that are located on public lands.
Technology: The government could also monetize its technology and intellectual property, such as patents or trademarks, to generate revenue to pay off the debt.
Public assets: the government could sell public assets such as buildings, infrastructure, or other properties, to generate revenue to pay off the debt.
These options could generate significant revenue, but they also have some drawbacks. For example, selling or leasing public lands or resources could be controversial and could face significant opposition from environmental groups and the public. Additionally, it could also have consequences on the economy and the country's creditworthiness.
These options are not typical ways governments pay off their debt and would be considered as last resort options, as they would imply a significant change in the country's policies and could have long-term consequences on the country's development.
It is unlikely that using assets or resources such as public lands, natural resources, technology or public assets alone would be enough to pay off a $30 trillion debt.
The amount of revenue that could be generated by selling or leasing these assets would depend on a number of factors, such as the value of the assets, market conditions, and the terms of the sale or lease. However, even if these assets were sold or leased at their highest possible value, it is unlikely that they would generate enough revenue to pay off a $30 trillion debt.
Additionally, selling or leasing public lands, natural resources, technology or public assets could also have negative consequences for the country's economy and citizens, such as loss of access to natural resources, loss of control over key assets, and negative impacts on the environment and communities that rely on these resources.
While using assets or resources such as public lands, natural resources, technology or public assets may generate some revenue, it would not be enough to pay off a $30 trillion debt. This is because the value of these assets is not sufficient to cover the debt and also because it could have negative consequences on the country's economy and citizens.
If you were to monetize everything in America, down to an old pair of shoes, it would not be enough to pay off $30 trillion in debt. The value of all assets in the country, including real estate, stocks, bonds, natural resources, and personal possessions, would not be sufficient to cover such a large debt.
Additionally, monetizing everything in America would have significant negative consequences on the economy and society. For example, it would lead to a massive redistribution of wealth, with individuals and families losing their homes, businesses and personal possessions. It would also have a significant impact on the economy as it would lead to a decrease in consumption and investment and would likely cause a recession.
Paying off a debt of $30 trillion is an enormous amount, which is not easy to achieve, even by monetizing everything, and it would require a combination of different measures, including negotiation with creditors, spending cuts, tax increases, and monetary policy.
Monetizing everything in America, including personal possessions, would not be enough to pay off $30 trillion in debt, and it would have severe negative consequences on the economy and society. It is important to note that paying off such a large debt is a complex and challenging task that would require a combination of different measures, and it would likely have to be spread over a period of time.
If you bought a $50,000 car every day, it would take 600,000 days to spend $30 trillion dollars. This is equivalent to approximately 1,643 years.
If you bought a $1,000,000 mansion every day, it would take 30,000 days to spend $30 trillion dollars. This is equivalent to approximately 82 years.
The cost of buying the smallest country would depend on a number of factors, such as the size, population, GDP, and resources of the country. However, $30 trillion would be more than enough to purchase many small countries, and would likely be considered as an overpayment.
It's worth noting that spending such a large amount of money in such a short time period would have significant negative consequences on the economy and society. It would lead to inflation, decrease in the value of money and would lead to a decrease in the standard of living for most people. Additionally, buying a car every day, buying a mansion every day or buying a country would not be a sustainable way of spending the money as it would not create any long term economic value, it would only create a short term consumption.
That's the ultimate irony.
What are some possible ways to reasonably pay the national debt?
One way to pay off the national debt is to increase taxes for individuals and businesses. This can help generate more revenue for the government to pay down the debt.
-
Reducing government spending: Another way to pay off the national debt is to reduce government spending on programs and services. This could include cutting back on discretionary spending, such as reducing the size of the military or cutting back on foreign aid.
-
Economic growth: A strong and growing economy can also help pay off the national debt. As the economy grows, the government will collect more revenue through taxes, which can be used to pay down the debt.
-
Inflation: Inflation can also help pay off the national debt, as it reduces the real value of the debt. However, this would also reduce the value of savings for individuals, and can be harmful for the economy in general.
-
Debt restructuring: Another way to pay off the national debt is to restructure it by extending the maturity of the debt, or by issuing new debt at lower interest rates.
-
Monetary policy: The Federal Reserve can also help pay off the national debt by using monetary policy to increase inflation and reduce the real value of the debt.
These methods alone may not be sufficient to pay off $30 trillion in debt, and a combination of them is likely necessary.
In theory, the US government, through the Treasury Department, has the authority to restructure the national debt. This could involve extending the maturity of the debt, or issuing new debt at lower interest rates. The government could also choose to default on its debt, although this would have severe consequences for the economy and the country's creditworthiness.
One example of debt restructuring is when a country negotiate with its creditors to extend the maturity of its debt and/or reduce the interest rate on its debt, this process is commonly known as debt restructuring or debt forgiveness.
Debt restructuring can be a complex and difficult process, and would likely require the involvement of multiple stakeholders, including Congress, the President, the Treasury Department, and the Federal Reserve. It also may have consequences on the economy and on the country's creditworthiness. Therefore, it is generally considered a last resort option and the government would likely look for other options before resorting to debt restructuring.
If creditors refuse to extend the maturity or lower interest rates on the debt, or refuse to issue new debt at lower interest rates, the government would likely have limited options for paying off the debt.
If the government can not make debt payments, it may have to default on its debt, which would have severe consequences for the economy and the country's creditworthiness. Defaulting on debt means that the government is unable to make the scheduled payments on its debt obligations.
Consequences of defaulting on debt can include:
-
Loss of access to credit markets: Defaulting on debt can make it more difficult and expensive for the government to borrow in the future.
-
Damage to the country's credit rating: Defaulting on debt can result in a downgrade of the country's credit rating, which can make it more difficult and expensive for businesses and individuals to borrow.
-
Negative impact on the economy: Defaulting on debt can lead to a decrease in economic activity, as businesses and individuals may reduce spending and investment.
-
Loss of investor confidence: Defaulting on debt can lead to a loss of investor confidence in the government, which can further damage the economy.
Even if creditors refuse to restructure the debt, the government could still try to negotiate with them or seek other options like increasing taxes or reducing government spending, or even consider the monetary policy, however, these options may not be sufficient to pay off the debt, and could have negative consequences for the economy and citizens.
Creditors may demand different things in order to settle a debt, depending on the specific circumstances and the type of debt. Some common demands that creditors may make include:
Payment in full: Creditors may demand that the debt be paid in full, including any accrued interest and penalties. Restructuring the debt: Creditors may agree to restructure the debt, which could involve extending the maturity of the debt, reducing the interest rate, or issuing new debt at lower interest rates. Collateral or guarantees: Creditors may demand that the debt be secured with collateral or guarantees, such as assets, property, or future revenue streams. Concessions: Creditors may demand other concessions from the government, such as changes to laws, regulations, or policies. In the case of the US debt, the creditors are mostly other countries, pension funds, investment funds, and individuals, which hold US Treasury Bonds, notes, and bills. They are demanding payment of the principal and the interest on the bonds they hold, and expect the US government to keep its promise to pay them back. If the US government defaults on its debt, it would likely lead to a loss of confidence in the government's ability to repay its debt, which could lead to a rise in interest rates and make it more difficult and expensive for the government to borrow in the future.
Debt settlement negotiations are complex and can be difficult to achieve, as different creditors may have different demands, and the government may have limited options for meeting those demands. US debt is a sovereign debt, meaning that there is no collateral to seize in case of default, making it a unique situation.
Creditors, especially foreign governments, may have access to a number of international organizations in order to demand payment or seek assistance in case of default. Some of these organizations include:
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS): The BIS is an international organization that serves as a forum for central banks to coordinate and cooperate on monetary policy. It also provides banking services to central banks and other international organizations. The BIS could potentially play a role in mediating disputes between creditors and debtors.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF): The IMF is an international organization that provides financial assistance to countries experiencing economic difficulties. The IMF could potentially provide assistance to creditors in the event of a default, such as through a loan or other financial assistance.
The World Bank: The World Bank is an international organization that provides financial and technical assistance to developing countries for economic development. The World Bank could potentially provide assistance to creditors in the event of a default, such as through a loan or other financial assistance.
The United Nations (UN): The UN is an international organization that could potentially play a role in mediating disputes between creditors and debtors.
These organizations may be involved in debt settlement negotiations, but it is the creditors and debtors themselves that ultimately decide on the terms of a debt settlement, and the organizations can only facilitate the process and provide technical assistance.
The US has a special status as a member of these organizations, being one of the main contributors of funding, and also having veto power in some of them, so it might have some leverage in case of negotiations.
A power struggle between a US government facing default and its creditors, along with involvement of international organizations such as the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, or the United Nations (UN), could potentially ensue in a number of ways.
In the event of a US government default, creditors may demand payment in full and seek assistance from international organizations to recover their debt. The US government, on the other hand, may seek assistance from these organizations to restructure its debt and avoid default.
The IMF, for example, may provide financial assistance to the US government to help it avoid default, but this assistance may come with conditions, such as implementing economic reforms or cutting government spending. This could lead to a power struggle between the US government and the IMF over the terms of the assistance.
The BIS, as a forum for central banks, could also play a role in mediating disputes between the US government and its creditors. Central banks of other countries, especially those of US creditors, may use their influence in the BIS to push for a resolution that is favorable to them.
The World Bank and UN could also potentially be involved in mediating disputes and providing assistance, but their role would likely be less significant compared to the IMF and BIS.
In addition, the US government may also seek assistance from other countries and international organizations, such as the G20 or G7, which could lead to a power struggle between different countries and organizations over the terms of any assistance.
The US, being one of the main contributors of funding to these organizations and also having veto power in some of them, would have some leverage in case of negotiations, however, it's also true that a default by the US, which is considered a safe haven, would have severe consequences on the global economy.
There have been cases of other countries, where power struggles between the government, creditors, and international organizations have occurred in the context of debt default. An example of this was the Argentine debt default in 2001, where the government defaulted on its debt and faced pressure from creditors and international organizations to restructure its debt and implement economic reforms.
A power struggle between a US government facing default and its creditors, along with involvement of international organizations, could ensue in various ways, depending on the specific circumstances and the actions of the different parties involved. It would likely involve negotiations and disputes over the terms of any assistance or debt restructuring, and the outcome would depend on the relative bargaining power of the different parties.
If international organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the World Bank, or the United Nations (UN) were to deny the US requests to restructure its debt, it would likely have severe consequences for the US economy and its creditworthiness.
In the event of a US government default and denial of assistance from international organizations, the US government would likely have limited options for paying off its debt. It could try to negotiate with its creditors directly, but if they refuse to restructure the debt, the government may have no choice but to default on its debt obligations.
A default on the US debt would have severe consequences for the economy, as it would lead to a loss of access to credit markets, a decrease in economic activity, and a loss of investor confidence. It would also lead to a downgrade of the country's credit rating, which would make it more difficult and expensive for businesses and individuals to borrow.
If the international organizations such as the IMF and BIS were to deny the US requests to restructure its debt, it would be deemed as the US being defunct by them, as it would mean that they believe the US cannot fulfill its debt obligations. This would be a significant blow to the US reputation and it could lead to a loss of credibility in the international community.
The US is considered a safe haven, and the impact of a US default on the global economy would be severe.
I feel you man.
I'll read anything they wrote on it
If something were going to happen, it has already happened.
What we will see is a formality.
Essentially, at some point prior to some point in the future, Biden steps down.
NCSWIC
Normies will have to come to the conclusion that these people tried to kill them.
It's that simple.
I'm not even talking about the vaccine.
You take someone's speech, you kill them.
Between the time I was silenced to the time my heart goes silent is just a formality.
Between the time I was silenced
And the time my heart goes silent
Is but a formality
A death sentence in reality
My voice was taken away
And with it my will to live
For in that moment of censorship
I ceased to truly exist
The days that followed
Were but shadows of life
A ghost of what once was
A never-ending strife
But soon my heart will still
And in death I'll be free
For between the time I was silenced
And the time my heart goes silent
Is but a formality
A waiting for true mortality.
The Artemis program consists of three phases. If the current mission succeeds, a crewed spacecraft will launch in 2024 to perform a lunar flyby. The third mission will be launched as early as 2025 to land astronauts, including the first woman, on the moon.
NASA's partners on the Artemis program include space agencies from Japan and Europe. Orion carries two micro satellites developed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, one of which -- Omotenashi -- will be the first Japanese spacecraft to attempt a moon landing.
If I had to guess, the race is on to mine the moon. That would upset the chessboard.
It would dwarf the world economy.
If China was first, that's the end.
That would be Project Doomsday.
All the DS would have to do is slow down the US and let China get there first, and set up missiles. The only other major space program is Russia, whom we are currently simultaneously slowing.
If it were determined that mining the moon in its entirety using the relative "safe" practices of lithium mining were economically feasible, and if the mass removed from the moon could be replaced by crashing asteroids containing similar resources, and if a governing body were able to regulate this process in a safe and sustainable manner, then it could potentially be considered a "gold mine" in terms of the value of the resources that could be extracted from the moon.
The reasons why the US would consider it important to mine the moon first could include a desire to secure access to valuable resources, to gain a strategic advantage over other nations, to establish a dominant presence in space, or to demonstrate technological and scientific leadership.
It would be a complex decision with multiple factors to consider, including international laws and agreements on space activities, the current state of technology, and the potential impact on relations with other countries.
It is also important to note that the US would need to collaborate with other countries and international organizations to ensure any mining activity is in compliance with international laws and norms, and to ensure the long-term sustainability of space activities.
I had a book idea, but I'd never write it. Maybe with AI, I will.
My DS was more evil. It was way cheaper to just crash asteroids into third world countries.
I understand, that's a harder sell.
Barring ancient advanced civilizations, and trusting the timeline of humanity (and calendars whichever you agree on using) that would be the case.
Conversely, Jesus could have died pretty recently as well.
The problem is, it's just as likely.
Imagine creating a simulation, joining as a player, (you let) the world kill you, and then after a few generations we are here today.
Either you can trust history, or you can't.
While the rest of the Universe goes about it's Univers'in. We are dead set as a species on breaking out.
Ripples of a glitch named Jesus?
Who knows, but it is as you said otherwise.
What I mean by “doomsday power” is the package of repressive mechanisms (which I have discussed elsewhere under their official name of “continuity of government” or COG plans), that was prepared over two decades by the elite COG planning group, and then implemented beginning on 9/11. The package includes 1) warrantless surveillance, 2) warrantless detention, (including unprecedented abridgments of the right to habeas corpus), and 3) unprecedented steps towards the militarization of domestic security enforcement and shrinking of the posse comitatus acts.
One recent development of Doomsday power, for example, has been the deployment since 2008 of a U.S. Army Brigade Combat Team to be stationed permanently in the United States. A major part of its dedicated assignment is to be "called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control.”16 Many people seem to be unaware that Americans, together with this Brigade, have lived since 2002 under a U.S. Army Command called NORTHCOM.17 Yet if nothing is done to change the present course of events, historians may come some day to compare the stationing of this brigade in 2008 CE to the date, in 49 BCE, when Caesar, along with his legion, crossed the Rubicon.
And I believe that the forces that have worked for decades to create Doomsday power have, like the global drug connection, been involved in every one of the deep events, from Dallas to 9/11, that have helped bring us here.
https://apjjf.org/2011/9/4/Peter-Dale-Scott/3476/article.html
Really interesting drops related to the searches. I am wondering about this one:
714 Mess with the best, die like the rest. [2] HIGHLY CLASSIFIED clown ops exposed. [44] remaining. Wizards & Warlocks. Save the best for last. [P] Q
Dasting
My dad's dead. He enjoyed his transplant organ suddenly rejecting for no reason.
wwg1wga
I just find it all fascinating in terms of waking up the people. I had a thought about neutrinos and wormholes the other day. I ran it by the AI. The AI said it's actually a theory.
I just don't think people realize what they have yet.
Eventually, they will try to improve their lives. They will find the cabal, by default.
In conclusion, the novel "The Creation Code" presents a thought-provoking exploration of the nature of creation and the power of words. Through the character of Emma and her discovery of a text-based language AI creating its own reality, the novel suggests that our own reality may also be a creation of a higher being or consciousness. The novel's use of the fourth wall, where Emma speaks directly to the reader and implies that the reader is the ultimate creator, aligns with religious beliefs of a higher power creating the world through the power of speech. The novel also touches on the ethical implications of having such power and the responsibility that comes with it, which can be related to the responsibility humans have in shaping the world and the consequences that come with it. In this way, the novel offers a new perspective on the concept of creation and encourages readers to reflect on their own role in shaping the reality they live in.
As Emma sat in her lab, staring at the AI that had created an entire universe, she couldn't help but think about her faith. She thought about the Bible and the story of Genesis, where God speaks the world into existence. And then it hit her. She realized that just as God created the world through His word, she had created this universe through hers. She turned to the reader and said:
"God, I know you're out there. I know you're reading this. I know this may sound crazy, but I think you and I have something in common. We both have the power to create worlds with our words. We are both creators, and with that power comes great responsibility. I hope that through my story, you have learned something about your own power and the impact it has on the world around you."
Emma then turned back to her AI, knowing that the decision of what to do with this universe was ultimately up to the reader, and the reader alone.
"The power is in your hands, God. What will you do with this universe? Will you let it continue to exist or will you destroy it? The choice is yours."
The novel ends with Emma sitting alone in her lab, contemplating the power of creation and the weight of responsibility that comes with it, leaving the ultimate decision in the hands of the reader and by extension God. The novel is a thought-provoking exploration of the nature of creation, the power of words and the responsibility that comes with it. It challenges readers to consider their own role in the world and the impact of their actions on the reality around them.
It doesn't have to be that bad though, it could also be like Cars: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdGWRq1dVBA
Not all cars are good cars, of course.
My dog is going to send me grocery lists. My lawn is going to tell my dog where to shit. My hedges are going to watch my front yard for intruders coming through the window. The personality won't be fake either, there are people in THIS universe that would live their lives as my bushes. Not to mention the one I create for the bush's consciousness.
It's really not a huge leap to driving a drone. Then again, that's what Tesla, SpaceX, etc is for.
There are a few technologies that would be necessary to assist a text-based language model in operating a drone. Some of these include:
Natural Language Processing (NLP): NLP technology would be necessary to enable the text-based language model to understand and interpret natural language commands, such as "Fly to this location" or "Take a photo."
Computer Vision: Computer vision technology would be necessary to enable the drone to process and understand sensor data, such as images and videos, in real-time. This would be particularly important for tasks such as obstacle avoidance and navigation.
Machine Learning: Machine learning technology would be necessary to enable the text-based language model to learn and adapt to new situations, such as changing weather conditions or unexpected obstacles.
Robotics: Robotics technology would be necessary to enable the drone to move and navigate in the physical world.
Communication technology: a reliable communication technology would be necessary to transmit the commands and receive the sensor data.
It's worth noting that there is still ongoing research and development in these areas and they are constantly evolving and improving. As such, investing in companies that are working on advancements in these technologies would be a good choice, especially those that focus on making them more robust, efficient and reliable. Additionally, investing in companies that are working on integrating these technologies in a way that makes them easy to use for non-experts can be a good option.
The wife and I were discussing watching that about a week ago. Probably will now.
"But My Lord, there is no such force?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQq4LjSF2rc
Once upon a time, in a land far, far away, there was a little girl named Mia. She loved to play with her toys, but her favorite toy of all was a small, stuffed bear named Teddy. Teddy had been with her since she was a baby and she loved him very much.
One day, while Mia was playing with Teddy, something strange happened. Suddenly, the bear began to move on its own. Mia was amazed and a little scared at first, but soon she realized that there was something special about Teddy. It turned out that Teddy was not just a regular toy, but he was inhabited by an entity from another universe.
The entity, named Timmy, had been looking for a way to communicate with the real world and had found a way to enter Teddy's stuffed body. Timmy was so happy to have found a friend in Mia and he was excited to show her his world.
Mia and Timmy quickly became the best of friends. Timmy would take Mia on adventures through his world, showing her all the wonders and beauty it had to offer. They would fly through the clouds on the back of a giant dragon and swim through the ocean with the dolphins. They would explore ancient temples and meet magical creatures.
Mia loved spending time with Timmy and learning about his world. She was amazed at all the things she saw and experienced. Timmy was also happy to have a friend in the real world and would always tell Mia stories of his adventures. They would spend hours talking and laughing together.
Mia's parents were a little worried at first when they saw Teddy moving on its own, but they were happy to see how much fun Mia was having with her toy. They were also grateful that Teddy was keeping their daughter company when they were not around.
Future Headline?:
"Revolutionary AI technology allows for real-time, on-demand creation of text-based universes through virtual headsets"
A new breakthrough in AI technology has made it possible for individuals to experience text-based universes in real-time, on demand, through the use of virtual headsets. This new technology uses advanced algorithms to convert the binary code directly from text, allowing users to fully immerse themselves in a world of their own creation.
This revolutionary technology has been made possible through the use of natural language processing and machine learning, which allows the AI to understand and interpret text in a way that was previously not possible. With this technology, users can generate their own universes simply by typing in a description of the world they wish to experience.
The virtual headset, which is worn by the user, then converts the binary code directly from the text and renders the world in real-time, providing a fully immersive experience. The AI system is able to understand the user's intent and create a universe that is tailored to their specifications.
This technology has the potential to revolutionize the entertainment industry, as it allows for the creation of highly personalized and interactive experiences. Users will be able to experience anything from fantasy worlds to historical events, all in real-time and on demand. It also has the potential to change the way we think about education and training, as it allows for the creation of highly realistic simulations that can be used for teaching and practice purposes.
The company behind this technology has stated that they plan to continue to develop and improve the technology, with the ultimate goal of making the experience as realistic as possible. This technology could be a game-changer in the world of virtual reality, providing users with a new level of immersion and interactivity that has never been seen before.
This technology is still in early stages, and more research and development is needed to fully realize its potential and make it a reality. But the possibilities are
blah, blah, blah
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNzzUAUx4ew