That 50k is aside the dominion digital fuckery
Wrong. They already hired those faggots.
This is a posting for a maid to make their beds for them.
Let her save you!
Hear me out.
"Daughter, I read online that Biden pressured Ukraine to fire a top prosecutor, was that true?"
Make her do her own research trying to debunk you. To save you.
She trusted randos more than she trusted her (future) husband.
That's a teaching moment for you, gotta do better next time. But on the other hand, some things can't be fixed.
Lacks a control
This needs to be compared against a "regular" vaccine. Are these "foreign bodies" normal, or not? Obviously the assumption is not, but to make that claim, a negative control must be included to compare against.
The lack of scientific rigor on both sides is infuriating.
With one share you're better off keeping it with your broker.
Just buy another share(s) direct through CS. Some retard redditor mowed 12 lawns to buy another share, so clearly there's no excuse :)
Good? No
https://communities.win/c/WSBets exists, but it's not frequented so you and I are in the same boat
Physical certificates aren't the requirement. The float is administered by computershare. All share not directly held, are held by the DTCC, which are then via the DTCC associated with this broker or that on the DTCC's books, and this investor or that, on the brokerage's books.
By direct registering, and simply transfering from your broker, those shares stop being associated with the broker, with the DTCC, and CS moves them to you directly.
You don't need the physical certificate.
(And the physical printing was stopped because GS asked them to as they work out a new physical system, but that's just an aside)
Some, all, whatever.
I sent half, but that's because I want to play both sides of the NFT and maintain pressure through the MOASS. Of course, all new shares are being bought through CS, so it hasn't been half for a while now.
The pros of sending all is that it really hammers the pressure faster
The pros of sending a portion is that it's currently a long process, and retaining some is security against MOASS tomorrow. It also allows you to sell through your broker, which is both more convenient, as well as necessary if you don't want to sell through CS and thereby relieve pressure by doing so - if CS holds the float but no CS share is ever sold (only those still held in brokerages) then MOASS won't end until every share outside CS finds a buyer. If CS holds the float and then half are sold from there, then the scenario returns to DTCC having the room to lie and play their tricks again.
CS shares are for igniting the rocket, brokerages are for selling -- so you might thing fuck it, why transfer then. Let everyone else carry the burden, I'll just mooch. But then there's the NFT thing.
CS shares are guaranteed the NFT. All other shares are entitled to it, and your broker has to go out and get it (at whatever the cost) but it'll be the CS shares dictating the price they sell their NFTs for. As I said, I want to play both sides of the NFT dividend.
So that's my reply to your innocent offhand 3 word question.
Call your brokerage and state verbatum that that you want to execute a DNS transfer OUT of some or all of your shares to their designated registrar. That's it. You don't even need an existing CS account setup.
CS will mail you info to login and set up your acocunt with them. Of course, if you already have a CS account via direct purchases, you can let your broker know and they'll mark that on their form.
You could also fill out and mail in the form yourself, but you really are better off just calling in. At this point, all the reps know the procedure. THERE ARE NO ONLINE WAYS TO DO THIS and that really ought to be all you need to know about the utility of this process, and why it's worthy the agony of a phone call.
Computershare, the direct registrar for Gamestop (among other stocks)
If you know, you know, if you don't you're months behind on the rabbit hole
Transfer over for direct registration and you get the shares out of the DTCC
I hope they do. I can't wait for them to realize that money printing is still fiat if the coin is denominated a bajillion times greater than it's market value in materials.
Money is toxic, no one wants to hold it
Through CS
It means if you don't own GME, you're not gonna make it.
And if you haven't direct registered with CS, you're going to miss out on the NFT fun.
Yes. And famously, you can indict a ham sanwhich.
Off by a factor of 100 would mean instead of 15k in a year, it would be 1.5 million. ~200 million in the US have been vaccinated, so a ~0.75% adverse reaction rate, rather than the absurd 0.0075% rate that was nonsensical.
Indictments mean nothing, NOTHING
yup
And those bio weapons aren't for the US/Military, they are for private citizens / elite cabal
100% The only reason to do gain of function is for bioweapons. The naive can be convinced otherwise, and routinely are, but no one at the top signs of on those because they are hoping to fend off a future outbreak. zero protective measures have ever come from gain of function. All the studies are about "how deadly is it if we do x" and never about how to then combat x.
It happened at the top because these two were exposed to the data, and exposed to the politics in direct conflict with the data.
Your average normie never sees an ounce of data, and so only hears the politics, so I wouldn't say it's happening. But it's definately an article to download and show for someone on the fence.
That one line about making decisions on politics rather than data is all they should need to read. If one decision is untrustworthy and politically motivated, they institution loses all credibility.
And credibility is the foundation for believe in the normies. "Well the FDA said...."
Oh I'm sure they have. But as you note, if it was all a lie then they were unknowingly complicit is some soul crushing approvals and advisories. I don't think they are there yet. That's hard to accept. It's going to take a lot of research and investigation before they are ready to accept that possibility themselves, let alone try and publish literal heresy supporting it.
These higher up positions are political, even if you're an honest scientist filling them. You have to have political skills. So they know they lose nothing extolling the vaccine if it buys them the necessary capital to have additional boosters pushed back on.
The whole article is littered with reasonings that even the staunchest pro covid vax supporter can get behind. "The boosters are more effective used on the unvaccinated" comes to mind in particular.
Their goal is to convince the world not to pursue endless rounds of boosters, (and I think this articles makes the case for it, if it would ever be reported on) while pushing back on the vaccinations, even if they are already there, can come later.
No, they just encountered their higher ups suddenly not caring about the data when it suddenly doesn't support their agenda, but haven't made the connection that it was NEVER about facts and data, and that the string pullers only bothered with fraudulent studies in the beginning to get the ball rolling.
It's their first red pill guys. There's no evidence boosters would make any difference, and it runs counter to the 'data' they all completely agree on. And yet their bosses are still pushing the boosters. "wha, that makes no sense though!?"
They don't get why facts and data "stopped" mattering all of a sudden so they wrote this article. They think data before was totally legit, but suddenly the data stopped mattering. What they don't get is that facts and data never mattered, and all the data they relied on previously was fraudulent. The elites just got tired of waiting for the fraudiulent bullshit studies to get massaged into higher up hands and said to hell with facts just do it.
But they aren't there yet. Baby's first red pill.
As for the cushing support of vaccines, you need to understand that's a requirment any time you're about to say something heretical in science. If you want your disagreement to be taken seriously, you always have to lead by praising everything else you're NOT about to criticize. "Listen everyone, we aren't crazy anti-covid vaxxers, we just think the boosters aren't supported by the data so we shouldn't push them for purely political reasons"
Welcome to the bastardization of science my frens
Even if not, paper from different locals are going to have different sources. Think bamboo fibers, but isotope just means extra neutrons, which as a small percentage represent is as true for carbon and oxygen as it is for uranium.
Could just mean they did version of carrbon dating. But they weren't after the date, just classifying into lot groups, and noting where the anomolies fall (likely in a single lot, printed elsewhere)