Keep going, everytiome you write that you admit you've long since lost your position. I know it, you know it.
You think that applies only to me and not to you as well... how many replies deep now?
I didn't say there is no god, I said the existance of god isn't falsifiable - placing it outside the scoipe of science and truth. The role of school is truth, that which can be falsied, but can't be.
We do not teach in school what we believe to be true, because many parts of life are matters of believe and we disagree, religion the prime example. But there is no legitimate disagrreement on math (unless you're a retard marxist) and there's no disagreement on evolution (unless you're purposefully ignorant).
It does not take faith to know that single cell organisms evolved into multi cellualr animals - the evidence for it is abundant and conclusive and is available for anyone to examine at any level of detail you're interested in.
God isn't incompatible with heliocentrism, anor is he incompatible with evolution.
Imagine being presented a quote from one of our greatest founders, and being angered by it. Imagine being indistiguishable from a leftist.
I'm a research scientist. No one had to 'tell me' anything about evolution. It's written evidenced in the data I work with all the time.
You did not come from monkeys, but both you and monkeys came from the same precursor who was less fit for their enviornment than the incremental versions that replaced them across the enviornmental niches both we and monkeys spread.
And guess what? None of that is incompatible with god. Anyone telling you that it's one or the other is as fucking retarded as the clergy that felt heliocentrism was incompatible with god.
Don't call Thomas Jefferson a retard. I guarantee you he was a smarter more considerate man than you.
If it was on purpose they wouldn't have released it in their own country and endured months of embarassment before it finally made it to the world.
Communism is the opposite of a meritocracy. Never ascribe intent to communism that can be better explained by incompetance. These people are masters of spin, of reacting, not acting. They get lots of practice at it. Once it was out it became an issue of, "never let a crisis go to waste", but the release was absolutely an accident.
If it was on purpose, it wouldn't have taken months of political back and forth before democrats figured out which side was more advantageous for them.
People need to learn about negative controls.
You need to run unused masks, you need to run a cotton shirt, before and after being worn. You need to run things to COMPARE against. Nothing in science is ever evaluated in a vacuum, it's always in comparison to something else.
Does HCQ work? Compared to what? (such as doing nothing)
You need a baseline. And you need more than a yes/no. A kid that goes to the bathroom then touches their mask is going to contminate it with a ton of unique bacteria ... but how much. How much matters too. Because kids go to the bathroom and eat with their hands, so mask or no mask, presenece speaks more to hand washing and mask washing than anything else.
But it volume is high relative to other clothing, then it's making the poitn we all actually take from this, that masks are mediums for growth.
That right lies in the explicit restriction of government in denying or establishing of religion. A bill signed to require time for prayer is literal establishment, which violates our rights.
Religion is not the role of government, adn the founding fathers who themselves were all religious recognized this. They saw what happened when governing bodies took a role in religion. You approve today, but the precedant this sets allows for shit you wouldn't approve of tomorrow. That's why government is supposed to completely stay out of it.
Evolution is demonstrateable. Schools teach that which is falsifiable. You can not prove god does not exist, so they do not teach about god. But you can prove that evolution is not true (it simply hasn't been not be done) which why like gravity, math, and grammar, they teach those. By being flasiable, but unfalsified, we arrive at our best picture of truth, and school exists to teach truth as best we know. If 1+1 didn't equal 2, you could show that. Since iot can't be show, we teach that 1+1=2. The same applies to evolution.
If you think evolution has nothing backing it, you're embarassingly wrong and have very poorly informed people bringing you up. There isn't a single line of criticism against evolution that refutes it's premise, despite every prediction that such evidence ought to exist and be easily found.
Right, they are government facilities, this makes them NOT the place for this. The seperation between church and state isn't some modern interpretation from some activist retard liberal judge, it is the explicit original intent of the founders who wrote the constiution.
Religion is on you, the government doesn't exist to touch it in any way. Not to deny it, not to facilitate it, nothing.
Signing a bill is literally in opposition to "shall pass no law..."
They failed protocol at some point. You aren't even making a point.
Morality is not the exclusive domain of theology. How arrogant must you be to think theology has a monopoly on morality. If the founders felt the government had a place using the power of government to empower religion, they wouldn't have explicitly denied the government that role, and repeatedly made their position clear on the matter.
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State
-Thomas Jefferson
Kindly piss off. My government has no business injecting itseld into the domain of religion. Not in denying it, not in supporting it, not in making a space for it, nothing, zero, nada. It passes laws and enforces them. It doesn't decide there needs to be more or less religion in this space or that.
Why not have an adjoined chapel? You don't have to use it if you don't want to.
Looks like him in my video from the 15th. First time I found a shot from an angle he appears.
Decentralized finance
DeSantis signs bill requiring schools to provide loudspeaker use for calls to prayer
Somethings are ok remaining secular.
There's a difference between ending schools teaching secularism, and schools simply being secular. The seperation between chuirch and state is the guard on on both sides. It's tempting to see schools trying to indoctrinate childrten to abandon faith and think to swing the pendulum in the opposite direction, because it makes sense to imagine there being an opposite direction.
But there isn't. There is only one wrong and one direction that both errors fall in: injecting belief. Be that belief in this god, that god, no god, and the dogma that surrounds each competing theocracy. Schools aren't the place for this. And while guard against secular theism is critical, that guard does not take the form of alternative theocracy.
It escaped inside a person.
This is a stupid argument.
Feels like Trump just took a 4 month vacation and is back
It's a bot
No one is talking about qanon in the comments.
And you don't 'keep' seeing posts like that.
Well no shit if you literally post it yourself ffs
Dude was talking about unsolicited shit
I just keep seeing posts like “Why SuperStonk and GME is nothing like Qanon”
No you don't. I haven't seen shit like that in months. Not that there aren't liberals, but there are a ton of conservatives in that sub as well. It stays a-political, mostly.
This is not confirmed. We were never able to verify this. We need to subpoena FB to discover if this was ever actually posted. No one checking this arrived before her pages were scrubbed and locked down.
This is not confirmed. We were never able to verify this. We need to subpoena FB to discover if this was ever actually posted. No one checking this arrived before her pages were scrubbed and locked down.
Interesting. Feb 5th and this is the first I've seen of this. Very interesting