id like to agree with you but coordinated destruction is indeed an art form. For example, you could go out tomorrow morning and do your best to be as destructive as you could possibly be. It wouldn't be long before youre in jail, and a national news story for your acts. Hillary on the other hand, has been on a nonstop crime spree of epic proportions for her entire adult life. She's been in the zone for 40 fucking years. That takes skill. and determination. Not everyone can build the killdozer after all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bo9Vu_X6lKw
also, idk if its really her or not but she wasn't the hideous creature she is today back then. Thats not to suggest she was beautiful or anything but a lifetime of eating babies and out blackmailing the blackmailers takes a toll on your physical appearance. The face is an expression of the soul.
The Hillary of today might be no more important than Lightfoot or Levine, but to say that historically she was a nobody like them is silly. She has a trail of dead bodies following her. Possibly the biggest list of them in American politics. Its easier to confirm Clinton body count than Putin body count. Was Hillary a puppet? To a degree yes. She sought to always serve her own personal interests, and indeed had to become someones puppet to achieve maximum effectiveness in that regard. But that doesn't discount the blackmail archive she was the sole proprietor of. She had a web of underlings under her thumb powerful enough to assassinate Kennedy # 2, Seth rich, Michael Hastings, etc. You don't need charisma or personality when you have videos of kid fuckers.
Ok so, I've been into bitcoin and crypto since early 2012 roughly. When I said I didn't learn anything new, its because literally everything said by the buffoons was already known to me. That being the case, ive already engaged in debates about some of the specifics with other crypto people long ago. My conclusion is that these guys are grifting cock suckers, that will say anything on their podcast to keep viewership up and keep the money rolling in. That includes bullshit like Epstein being part of bitcoin genesis or that "when you all find out who made bitcoin like I know who made it, you're gonna sell it!"
Yeah right, that faggot definitely knows the secret creator of bitcoin wink wink lmao.
oh I wasn't suggesting I liked her or that these are admirable accomplishments. Just pointing out that she doesn't get nearly enough credit for being the monster she is. Which must suck for her, because recognition and her legacy are probably the only things that really ever mattered to her, and both of those will rest in the ash heap of history, where they belong. Imagine being so close to becoming first woman president. She would have made history books until the end of time. Now shell be just a footnote lmao.
Most people won’t admit it but Hillary was a fuckin badass most of her life. Check her list of accomplishments as a woman: bribery, blackmail, assassinations, weapons trafficking, drug dealing, human trafficking, espionage. It goes on and on and on. She almost usurped our armed forces and executive branch lmao. Her true life is 10x more epic than her public portrayal. Most women on earth couldn’t accomplish a single one of Hillary’s feats, yet Hillary was a leader in them all for decades. Divine intervention seems like the only way she was stopped.
In this comment section: People who don't understand bitcoin.
Why do people listen to these buffoons? There was 0 substance in anything they said. Just vague connections being pointed to. They cannot explain WHY bitcoin is going to zero on Monday but they warn you it will lmao.
Reading this was interesting. There will be people here who bash me for this but you should start researching Austin Steinbart. His explanation of things aligns with the way you see it, except its Quantum computing giving the good guys control- not particle accelerators.
There are plenty of people who think you're insane because you follow Q.
there's plenty of evidence supporting CGI for those willing to look. Speculating about how they made the holes in the buildings isnt necessary because like I keep saying, the planes demonstrably fail to adhere to basic physics principals. All physical objects in our universe follow the same laws of physics. It is not possible to violate these laws. So anything you witness doing so, has to be fake.
Explain to me how a Boeing 767 exhibits radar data traveling at 590mph at 800 ft altitude? I dont know how much you know about wind resistance and air frame rigidity but I promise you if you look into it, you will see that something doesn't add up.
No, CGI on the live broadcasts is what makes sense. All the live broadcast views clearly show 0 deceleration on the plane. That is Physically impossible with colliding objects. Every floor of the wtc was 4” thick concrete poured onto a thick gauge corrugated steel pan, supported by thick steel trusses, connecting thick steel core columns to thick steel perimeter columns. Pretending that an aluminum dart is capable of penetrating a steel and concrete lattice while showing 0 debris and 0 deceleration is retarded. It is cartoon physics, because it’s a cartoon.
I dont really want to debate the legitimacy of specific videos. There is no need to because you can observe the planes defying the laws of physics. Explain how that is occurring if the crashes were real. Can an aluminum balloon penetrate a steel/concrete wall without deceleration or debris? For every action equal opposite reaction. Imagine the plane was stationary and you hit it with the tower at 560mph. What would happen? What would you see? Nvm the fact that a plane cannot fly at that altitude at that speed. Use your brain. Things clearly dont add up here.
youre an idiot. there is no vantage point for millions of people to have had a view of the twin towers. People who watch TV aren't eyewitnesses. You trust CNNs 9/11 broadcast and call me fucktarded. The irony must be lost on you.
Im not sure of your point exactly but yes, the human mind works in funny ways. Memories from traumatic and stressful event are often completely unreliable. Add in some MKultra mockingbird media, and you have people remembering all sorts of shit that isnt real or accurate.
would you mind pointing me to where I can watch some of these amateur home videos of the plane approaching or crashing? ;) its a trick question of course but I do wish you luck in finding these videos for me. the most famous one, and probably the one you are remembering is this:
watch it again knowing what you know now. tell me if anything seems suspect to you. as for hologram vs cgi- the TV footage is confirmed CGI (at least in my opinion). Its been broken down pretty well and duplicated by special effects artists.
aren't these people so silly? They talk about adrenochrome harvesting and Q predicting the future (time travel?) like these are everyday normal things and then exhibit incredulity at the idea of UFOs, DEWs and weaponized holograms. The day someone can adequately explain the nose in / nose out video, ill change my mind back to believing in cartoon planes.
Oh no. What ever shall I do? I think you’ve convinced me to sell it all so I can buy silver from J.P. Morgan desk. Do one of those buffoons have a silver link I can try?