1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Rawls 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was nothing spiritual about the drops.

I noticed the Christian and Biblical references, but I thought they were shallow.

The reason I say it wasn't spiritual was because it played to pride, and hate for much of mankind, and base things like that —wanting to feel superior, wanting to feel more knowledgeable, wanting to vanquish your enemies and see them suffer. That was what it promised. It never described a better world, it just described evil, and evil thoughts. Read this forum — it's all hate.

I'm a Buddhist, but my family were Quakers.

My gran saved children, for real. She went into Gypsy camps and taught the kids to read, back when the Gypsies were pariahs even worse than now, and no one cared about them

That to me is being a Christian. But she refused even to be called a Christian, because she thought it sounded arrogant to claim any similarity to Christ.

Q just feeds egos. And Anons just talk about being good people.

No Anon ever saved a single child.

1
Rawls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some of them. They seem to be illiterate almagams of bad Hollywood movie dialogue and rewarmed conspiracies like the Protocols and the Turkish Deep State. They also seemed to be deliberately vague and open—ended, in fact they were nearly all phrased as questions. Which is like the worst cold-reading trick by a sideshow fortune teller imaginable.

-2
Rawls -2 points ago +2 / -4

Yes, he looks foolish.

He also looks treacherous and duplicitous.

Evidence that he is foolish is not good evidence that he is not a fool.

It could be, but the parsimonious explanation is that he is a fool.

0
Rawls 0 points ago +2 / -2

Flynn suggests there is a plan. Therefore there is a plan.

Flynn says there is no plan. Therefore there is a plan.

Trump will win re election, therefore we will be proven right.

Trump lost the election, therefore we are proven right.

You must see the problem. Your theory is impervious to evidence.

1
Rawls 1 point ago +1 / -0

“I am aware of a large scale global military operation, but it is being kept secret“.

You see the problem.

1
Rawls 1 point ago +1 / -0

And what information are you basing that on?

1
Rawls 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know. So why assume that there is a covert operation which thousands or millions are being informed of, including you?

That seems absurd on its face.

1
Rawls 1 point ago +1 / -0

And how many children will be saved by reading all that?

Surely it would be better just to devote those hours to a charity.

I'm struggling with how being a digital soldier is any different to playing a video game where you get to be the hero.

Have any of you Anons saved any child?

Or is it just something you like to fantasise about?

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
1
Rawls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes.

They make money from vlogs, so it's profitable to give people the content they want. You won't make much money saying that Hillary Clinton obviously hasn't been arrested, and there is no reason to think she ever will be.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0