Appreciate your opinion on this. I find it interesting that the vast majority of “rebuttals” against popular posts do not actually address nor contend against the substance of the post, but seem to merely consist of straw mans, anecdotes, deflections, etc. I find that to be rather interesting.
Thanks for you opinion on this matter. I’ve noticed that most rebuttals against highly upvoted posts aren’t actual rebuttals. Just a lot of straw mans, anecdotes, pseudo-rebuttals, etc.
Thanks for your comment. How would explain that a popular highly upvoted post has a disproportionate ratio of comments against it and/or it’s author to comments in favor of it?
Anyone have link or screenshot of the new safe space rules?
I think he missed this part:
The body is resilient and there’s is no need to obsess over these.”
You..doubled down..on your delusional projections..
That’s how we know you’re cornered. You ran out of cheap tricks so your program errors into a loop. Fucking hilarious.
Lmao you switched to projection real fast after I called you out, shill. So predictable. You’re all the same. Same cheap tricks. Same cowardly retreats. Same low IQ. Same bullshit.
Every.
Damned.
Time.
sigh
Since you’re having trouble keeping track of your own argument (shill, much?):
You’re alleging that viruses cause covids/flus and that I’m a “dumbass” for pointing out the fact that no evidence exists of such a causal link.
I did not refute the existence of viruses.
Then, I asked you to provide evidence of your claim that viruses cause covids/flus. You reacted with a straw man (“…causal link that viruses exist?”) like a low IQ shill would.
Lmao
That text was there before. You simply overlooked it. Even though I quoted it to you, you still ignored it..so I then italicized it for others who may struggle with comprehension.
It’s only “extreme” if you disregard this part:
The body is resilient and there’s is no need to obsess over these.”
The body is resilient and there’s is no need to obsess over these.”
Also, no one mentioned hell although I imagine that God would question why you chose chemicals, GMOs, poisons, etc. when He literally provided everything but the relatively small amount of labor involved in catching/gathering (or paying/trading labor for) His natural food-medicines.
Please, link a single study that shows the causal link you are preaching. I’ll wait. Just one. I don’t mean a fake study that uses inaccurate statistical models—and pretends that somehow that the model produces empirical experimental data—or a phony quantitative “test” such as PCR.
I’m waiting.
The body is resilient and there’s is no need to obsess over these.”
The www.nih.gov search engine searches many medical libraries, not just at NIH. It’s the place to search for medical science.
Another straw man! Shills never attack the actual argument with a logical counter argument. They instead make a similar sounding but easily assailable argument—the straw man—and assail it instead while pretending that they’ve succeeded. In effect, you’re arguing with yourself.
Yet another straw man..
Shill or bot? Perhaps, a shill employing scripts and or bots?
If you are a shill, I’m curious what it pays and if the job fulfills you.
Again, not judging here. Just genuinely curious as you people/bots show up whenever someone speaks truth and science to the fascist Pharma idols.
Again, another pseudo-rebuttal but this time with a straw man ensemble and you still haven’t offered anything. Very shilly.
Only poisonous meat and dairy that come from poisoned/stressed “feedlot” livestock are..poisonous. Consuming meat and dairy from naturally raised, pastured or grass-fed livestock is highly beneficial to one’s health. Read more at www.nih.gov (use the search bar at the top).
False. I’ve done the research and I will prove it.
For a quick and easy rundown:
Go to www.nih.gov and in the search bar at the top, type in the word “inflammation” and enter it. This will query the entire library of medicine and many other libraries. Read the studies in the resulting list. If you come across a study that is paywalled, grab the DOI number and enter it at sci-hub.se to unlock. If you have trouble viewing on mobile, tap the “save” button for the pdf.
Then go back to www.nih.gov and search for “oxidative stress” and read the studies in the list.
Then search for any disease followed by “inflammation”. Read those studies.
Then search for any disease followed by “oxidative stress”. Read those studies.
Then pick any of The Five Things followed by “inflammation”. Read those studies. Repeat for the other four things.
Then pick any of The Five Things followed by “oxidative stress”. Read those studies and then repeat for the other four things.
Once you’ve done this, you’ll be on sure footing about The Five Things. The more of the studies you read of each of those queries, the more you will understand about the body being an intelligent system with error feedback loops and resulting auto adjustments that prefers an equilibrium state known as homeostasis. When in homeostasis, it is highly adaptive and well-resourced to handle infections, toxins and injuries. When it’s not in homeostasis, infections, toxins and injuries can overload the system resulting in a plethora of “diseases” which as mentioned are merely symptoms (of underlying inflammation and oxidative stress). To enable homeostasis, The Five Things must be well managed. Almost every “disease” results from mismanagement of one or more of them.
Of course, there are levels of toxin exposure and injuries that can overload any system which of course should be avoided and there are infections that can result from serious injuries, say a bear attack, that can overload even optimally functioning systems.
P.S. I noticed that you didn’t offer anything at all in your pseudo-rebuttal. Are you a shill or a bot? I’m not judging, just genuinely curious.
Could probably also just wait until the next flu season.
Also:
“Long covid” is a euphemism for “mystery injection injury”
@9:15: “White male…white hispanic male”
Lmao “white hispanic male” bahahaha
Testing.
Edit: should we see our own Pepe?
Raw milk appears to be safe when proper procedures are in place and also appears to protect against allergies and asthma.
Raw milk producers with high levels of hygiene and safety
Excerpt:
“The aim of this paper is to describe practices that have been developed for safe raw milk production. The German Vorzugsmilch is a federally regulated programme for legal raw milk production that was established already in the 1930s to provide raw milk with high hygienic standards controlled for zoonotic diseases to consumers. The Raw Milk Institute is a non-profit organisation established in California that has developed a voluntary safe raw milk programme in North America. RAWMI has developed a risk analysis and management system for raw milk dairy farmers to assist farmers in making individually tailored solutions for various production systems. In British Colombia, Canada, small herd share farms have employed good manufacturing practices, a risk management approach and performed monthly samples for pathogens and indicator bacteria to demonstrate safety and consistency. The major components of the raw milk systems applied, and the results of regular milk microbial indicator bacteria are presented. For the German system, the results from standard monthly pathogen tests are compared to zoonotic pathogen tests from other milk sources. The overall results indicate that raw milk can be produced with a high level of hygiene and safety in various systems.”
—
Raw Cow’s Milk and Its Protective Effect on Allergies and Asthma
Excerpt:
“Living on a farm and having contact with rural exposures have been proposed as one of the most promising ways to be protected against allergy and asthma development. There is a significant body of epidemiological evidence that consumption of raw milk in childhood and adulthood in farm but also nonfarm populations can be one of the most effective protective factors.”
—
Raw Cow’s Milk Prevents the Development of Airway Inflammation in a Murine House Dust Mite-Induced Asthma Model
Excerpt:
“Raw milk prevented both HDM-induced AHR and pulmonary eosinophilic inflammation, whereas heated raw milk did not. Both milk types suppressed the Th2-polarizing chemokine CCL17 in lung homogenates and reduced lung Th2 and Th17 cell frequency. IL-4 and IL-13 production after ex vivo restimulation of lung T cells with HDM was also reduced by both milk types. However, local IL-5 and IL-13 concentrations were only suppressed by raw milk. These findings support the asthma-protective capacity of raw cow’s milk and show the importance of reduced local type 2 cytokine levels. Heated raw milk did not show an asthma-protective effect, which indicates the involvement of heat-sensitive components. Besides causal evidence, this study provides the basis for further mechanistic studies.”
—
Raw Milk-Induced Protection against Food Allergic Symptoms in Mice Is Accompanied by Shifts in Microbial Community Structure
Excerpt:
“The mechanism underlying the allergy-protective effects of raw cow’s milk is still unknown, but the modulation of the gut microbiome may play a role.”
—
Direct Inhibition of the Allergic Effector Response by Raw Cow’s Milk—An Extensive In Vitro Assessment
Excerpt:
“In conclusion, we demonstrate a direct inhibition of the allergic effector response by raw cow’s milk. Next, to the already described capacity to modulate T cell responses, the present study shows that raw cow’s milk is also able to directly influence mast cell activation. Mast cell activation was not affected by heated raw milk and shop milk, supporting the current evidence for a loss of allergy protection after milk processing and more specifically, after heat treatment.”