The NIH and the FDA don’t necessarily draw the same conclusion and without more from the FDA I wouldn’t read too much into it
They were already getting caught doing this at the time with H1N1, he was probably referring to that
Yeah robert o young is a quack
If there's no 'immune response' they put more heavy metals and toxins in it until there is one.
Yeah I remember it first being mentioned by a doctor in Sydney back in 2020. I thought ‘but it’s not HCQ, I’m sceptical’.
At the time Ivermectin was being described here in Australia as a ‘hair lice drug’.
pine needle tea as well (supposedly)
supposedly pine needle tea helps and prevents the spread of mutant RNA. Of course take that with a grain of salt but hey seems like it’s a pretty low-risk thing to do that’s worth a try.
I don’t believe that this is really so unusual despite what the media and politicians will have you think.
Real people agree and disagree on a lot of things irrespective of which ‘side’ they are on.
Besides, it’s all a psychological/propaganda tactic anyway, anything that vested interests want you to think is ‘bad’ will just persuade those of influence (journalists, politicians, media personalities etc.) to program you to associate those ‘subversive’ views with the ‘wrong’ side of ‘politics’.
It’s a lot like sport with partisan politics being the most exciting game in the world.
vaccine hesitancy has always (historically) been associated with hippies, and freedom of choice is a libertarian issue (which is often unfairly associated with the right wing)
it's the new Eureka Rebellion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Rebellion