Yes, I saw the video of the nurse from Australia telling how they are giving ivermectin to the double vaxxxed and letting the unvaxxxed succumb. They want Australians to think the vaxxx is working. Despicable.
The general population doesn’t know which is the “good” treatment hospital. Keeping this information quiet is complicit. Unfortunately many medical workers are corrupted and/or cowards.
We might have to plan ahead and ask the hospitals what are their SOPs for covid treatment. There are tons of good hospitals out there that don't want to kill people for money.
when I search "ivermectin approved by NIH" with duckduckgo, only links that stated it wasn't approved by NIH or FDA showed up. Thanks for this link! I want to post to FB and say, "for all you people who thought ivermectin was just some right-wing conspiracy theory" :)
I reviewed the one completed study that you can link to. It was a pretty small sample size, with only a marginally better mortality result than the "control" group. I don't know if it was intended to mask the effectiveness of the ivermectin, but they included hydroxychloroquine as part of the treatment of the "control" group! "Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir and azithromycin (HFA) standard treatment protocol were given to the control group as recommended in the "COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 Infection) Guide" prepared by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health." Since when is hydroxychloroquine considered standard treatment? To be a true test of ivermectin, they should have compared it to the standard treatment in U.S. hospitals, or at least a treatment that doesn't include another drug that is controversial, as far as U.S. medical professionals go.
Dr. Bryan Ardis joins Owen Shroyer live in studio to break down how the medical industry in killing more people through toxic treatments and vaccines than the COVID virus itself.
Ok, ya'll I have my first refusal of remdesivir patient, yahoo!! I also saw my first influenza b patient recently. I think it's breaking through the matrix.
So too be clear. The only drug on this table that is EUA is remdesivir. Ivermectin is not EUA. So you can demand it, but they already have that base covered.
That's half true. EUA is for using drugs off-label, or not yet FDA approved, to treat a specific disease when there is no existing available treatment for that disease.
This is also on the NIH website. Obviously big pharma doesn't want us crumb eaters to have it, but how long can they keep withholding the info? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34466270/
It appears that ivermectin falls under the category of "under evaluation", based on there only being one completed study listed, but I could be wrong. That study is highly suspect, if you read through the summary. Hydroxychloroquine was given to the "control" group!
Of course Ivermectin is still under evaluation, because Pfizer has not gotten their expensive version of of ivermectin approved by FDA yet, but it is coming.
Looks like it's only under evaluation per the last column (Comments and Links to Clinical Trials). Though it doesn't say explicitly that it's not approved. Still a win though!
Ok so this takes care of the lungs once the virus has ravaged them, but how about approving HCQ and zinc for knockin out the viral replication? thx NIH!
YES: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/tables/table-2e/
Why does it say updated July 8th?
So they approved this and didn’t tell anyone? Why couldn’t doctors prescribe or pharmacies fill it?
Yes, I saw the video of the nurse from Australia telling how they are giving ivermectin to the double vaxxxed and letting the unvaxxxed succumb. They want Australians to think the vaxxx is working. Despicable.
EUA requires there are no other treatments. Now that they have "full approval...."
The EUA was illegal from the beginning.
They are told they will lose their job.
If you are politically connected, you go to Hospital A. Everybody else goes to Hospital B.
Hospital A = standard of care is Ivermecting, HCQ
Hospital B = standard of care is Remdesivir, Ventilators
See how it works?
Both are "authorized use" standard of care. But two different sets of rules to achieve two different outcomes.
The general population doesn’t know which is the “good” treatment hospital. Keeping this information quiet is complicit. Unfortunately many medical workers are corrupted and/or cowards.
We might have to plan ahead and ask the hospitals what are their SOPs for covid treatment. There are tons of good hospitals out there that don't want to kill people for money.
At the very bottom of the page it says last updated Sept 15th.
Hmmm
archived
https://archive.is/92Jhz
when I search "ivermectin approved by NIH" with duckduckgo, only links that stated it wasn't approved by NIH or FDA showed up. Thanks for this link! I want to post to FB and say, "for all you people who thought ivermectin was just some right-wing conspiracy theory" :)
I reviewed the one completed study that you can link to. It was a pretty small sample size, with only a marginally better mortality result than the "control" group. I don't know if it was intended to mask the effectiveness of the ivermectin, but they included hydroxychloroquine as part of the treatment of the "control" group! "Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir and azithromycin (HFA) standard treatment protocol were given to the control group as recommended in the "COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 Infection) Guide" prepared by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health." Since when is hydroxychloroquine considered standard treatment? To be a true test of ivermectin, they should have compared it to the standard treatment in U.S. hospitals, or at least a treatment that doesn't include another drug that is controversial, as far as U.S. medical professionals go.
I saw that too, and I came to the same conclusion - comparing HCQ to Ivermectin, saying niether does better than the other, and denying both.
But there are lot other studies at c19ivermectin.com
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/
DR. ARDIS: THE MEDICAL INDUSTRY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ‘COVID’ DEATHS, NOT VIRUS https://www.bitchute.com/video/Chf8zg6Fl1fS/
Dr. Bryan Ardis joins Owen Shroyer live in studio to break down how the medical industry in killing more people through toxic treatments and vaccines than the COVID virus itself.
Ok, ya'll I have my first refusal of remdesivir patient, yahoo!! I also saw my first influenza b patient recently. I think it's breaking through the matrix.
Are you a doctor or nurse?
When was the last time you say an influenza patient?
Has influenza been tested for all this time?
I am guessing this is approved only for folks working in NIH /s
So too be clear. The only drug on this table that is EUA is remdesivir. Ivermectin is not EUA. So you can demand it, but they already have that base covered.
EUA is for drugs that are not approved for human consumption. IVM has been approved for humans for a long time.
That's half true. EUA is for using drugs off-label, or not yet FDA approved, to treat a specific disease when there is no existing available treatment for that disease.
Does any clinical trial exist for Remdesivir to be used specifically for Covid19/SARS-CoV-2?
You don't need EUA for off label use. For example HCQ has been off label covid recommended most if this year without an EUA.
Okay. Yeah. You're right. Off-label doesn't need EUA. So the only reason they're preventing it from being used is to make sure people die... Sick.
Nice find. 👍👌👊
And RDV is ONLY EUA'd for COVID. Now it all makes sense.
Is it approved or under evaluation?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/
🙏
It's gotta be under evaluation, because this page says it's "not approved by the FDA for the treatment of any viral infection". https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/
Good enough for me. Clowns can say what they want when it's curing the most populated country on earth.
Wow finally!
Since this drug is already FDA approved this should push it up in line as a approved treatment!
The NIH and the FDA don’t necessarily draw the same conclusion and without more from the FDA I wouldn’t read too much into it
It's got to be the WHO that is directing doctors and hospitals to keep this info hidden. 😡😡😡
NIH does not have the authority to approve drugs
Loved one … Typo 😉
This is also on the NIH website. Obviously big pharma doesn't want us crumb eaters to have it, but how long can they keep withholding the info? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34466270/
It appears that ivermectin falls under the category of "under evaluation", based on there only being one completed study listed, but I could be wrong. That study is highly suspect, if you read through the summary. Hydroxychloroquine was given to the "control" group!
Wow! Thanks for posting this!
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/14627469.html#14628292
Of course Ivermectin is still under evaluation, because Pfizer has not gotten their expensive version of of ivermectin approved by FDA yet, but it is coming.
It says "or under evaluation".
Did I miss something? This isn't clear that it's authorized, right?
Looks like it's only under evaluation per the last column (Comments and Links to Clinical Trials). Though it doesn't say explicitly that it's not approved. Still a win though!
Ok so this takes care of the lungs once the virus has ravaged them, but how about approving HCQ and zinc for knockin out the viral replication? thx NIH!
Ivy knocks out replication too.
I thought it was for the lung infection part and hcq/zinc did that
Loved one…… Typo 😉