I feel like there's a bit more to unpack here, but it would be more rational, to me at least, if these "lizards" were humans who viewed them as a higher race, as "Dragons", who are the "rightful owners and predators" of mankind.
Dragons are one of the few common myths that are tied into older cultures from around the world. Moreover, dragons are generally revered as powerful and of great worth, particularly in European mythology, which (I believe, I'm not exactly immersed in the world history of dragons) is where the tales of dragons amassing and hoarding wealth originated.
But I can't, without tangible proof, say that any of these elites are literal "lizards". I could very easily believe that this is how they view themselves, however.
(On a side note, I'm getting kind of concerned about the anime, One Piece. It's known to incorporate and adapt a lot of mythos and history from different cultures around the world, but the more that I've seen "behind the veil", the correlations that I see that hint toward the truth that Q seems to be trying to show us.
Of particular note, there is a class of people known as the "Celestial Dragons". They are the "rulers from on high", literally, and the descendants of the founders of the World Government. The Celestial Dragons see themselves as literally above human. They are free to enslave, rape, and kill anyone they so desire, and anyone who dares to look at them the wrong way can be declared as criminal and executed. At one point, I had thought that they were mere caricatures of the elites, but now, if anything, they seem to understate the elites.
It could be that I'm subconsciously relating the term "lizards" to Dragons because of the Celestial Dragons, but I do feel like there is enough separate history to support the conclusion anyway.)
Okay, so? Either donate or don't. What does him asking for donations have to do with anything that he had to say? If you bailed at the first opportunity, then you can't actually answer that question.
It's not like he put a gun to your head and demanded your bank account, after all.
For something like this? I would think that they would have safeguards in place, such as actually vetting the buyer as being "in the know", and if they aren't? Well, then they just get a rug and splatter red dye on it. Otherwise, if they did fall for the trap, and you tried to report or publicize it? Well unless you had some significant power backing you, then that would be a good way to get yourself and your family killed, and for your kids to end up as "rugs", themselves.
It would destroy Wayfair if it got out that they were advertising and selling blood-splatter rugs with actual, human blood, especially if the blood on the rugs could be tied back to missing children, Nevermind if it got out that Wayfair was actively selling children through their online store. And if Wayfair went down, then it would leave loose ends that expose more than they want to be exposed, for something that could be pretty easily prevented with due diligence on their part.
At what point can we expect a kid's show about anthropomorphic food, where the main characters are a male hotdog and a female pizza?
I mean, they think that we're stupid. That we're sheep. That we're cattle. Right? So why wouldn't they be so blatant?
The "zombie" fungi of society.
Cordyceps is an invasive parasite that infects a host and twists it to its own needs and benefits, forcing it to act in the way that the fungi desires, until the host is dead. Even then, the fungi often has a use for the carcass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjKjaCvXdf4&bpctr=1613107131
This is the body cam footage. His hair and tattoos are present throughout, although his tattoos seem to have faded from the reference used in this video.
The images here have a lower resolution and quality, and the lighting blends it all together. I wouldn't say that his death was falsified based on this video alone.
It is literally just "some offensive word". It has bad implications and can be derogatory, definitely, but it's not your place or your right to censure people, nor is it the hill to die on at this point in time. Not when there are other things that are so much worse, and not when censorship of any kind only causes divisions and controversy. Personally, I find the term "Walnut Sauce" to be much, much more disgusting in this day and age.
Did you even read what I said, or did you just skim through and cherrypick it? It certainly didn't take you much time to consider a response.
So, let me get something straight. The information asserted by Q and anons is controversial on the level that it will topple societies, economies, religions, and cultures, if it's ever properly revealed and prosecuted in the light of day. Hundreds, thousands of world leaders and public figures, from lowly actors to the Pope and the Queen of England, are actively associated with and accused of being rapists, torturers, cannibals, devoted satan worshippers, and literal child eaters who wear shoes of leather tanned from the skins of the children that they've consumed.
Assuming that this all makes it to the light of day, there is going to be mass chaos, without even a guarantee of a stable religion to turn to... and you're concerned about some racial slur? Get some perspective. We're talking about baby farms and industrial adrenochrome production. Literal human livestock. For all of the talk of "Suicide Weekend", that's something that will only truly occur after the storm hits, and not before.
And you're going to get hung up on a mere word, and assume the right to tell people what they can and cannot say? Really? Is that what this issue is about?
Offensive words will never be the worst thing in the world. I don't even know why this is stickied. I would think that the people here should have at least a minor understanding that there are worse things by now, rather than turning on each other.
It would have been better for him to say nothing at all, and to just carry on about his business, rather than to attempt to sort his viewers into tribes, and then tell one of those tribes to piss off. That was a stupid move on his part, because he doesn't need to carry on Q rhetoric to be relevant, he just chose to make an issue of it anyway.
(Some light spoilers in the first paragraph; nothing specific, but a general topic concerning some of the world building.)
Later into the story, the manga seems to read more as a criticism of the livestock industry. The kids in these "orphanages" are "higher quality", but there are other facilities for "low quality children" that seem to be modeled after the criticisms of the living conditions of livestock animals.
My interpretation while reading it was that the story was written this way to make a political statement, using human children to dramatic effect. That was about a year and a half before I'd heard of Q, and longer still before I'd heard of adrenochrome and child harvesting - something that I'd never even considered to be true until actually looking into it for myself. This was the first show that I'd thought of after learning about that, and it put a few other aspects of the story in a different light as well.
Japan has a long history of myths that depict demons killing and eating humans, and some of their legends are quite dark and brutal. But then you get more recent shows (such as Tokyo Ghoul, Bleach, Slayers, D. Gray-Man, Attack on Titan, and so on) there seems to be more focus now on depicting stories of humans (or human derivatives or humanoids) consuming other humans, as though there's a statement to be made. On the other hand, stories such as One Piece have arcs that seem to showcase striking analogies to the current state of society, with a decent level of depth if you know what you're looking at.
With this in mind, Japan has become a topic that I've been curious about lately. Where do they fit into all of this evil, if at all? Is Japan independent of it? Were they caught up by Germany and later the US around WWII? Or are there any indications that they're involved in something else? I've heard very little about Asia's place in the shadows, and most of it is concerning China.
From what little mentions that I've heard about Japan in relation to all of this, the Japanese people seem to love America more than some Americans do. At the same time, however, some of their media makes almost blatant statements and references, as though they're trying to bring something to the light, or else to normalize it - such as in the case of The Promised Neverland, a story that's built around the idea of children being raised as cattle for consumption.
Can't You Answer The Question Without Being Condescending? Is There A Reason For You To Antagonize Someone Who Is Unsure About What's Going On And What This All Means? Is That Really The Impression That You Want People To Take Away From This Community?
Don't You Realize That Everybody Doesn't Know What You Know, And That An Arbitrary Map With Planes On It Doesn't Mean Much If You Don't Know The Standard Baselines?
No, they don't, but that's not a clock in the first place. Look at it. It should have four slots for digits - two for hours, two for minutes. It's distinctly visible that the "minute" section only has one digit slot available to it. I'm not sure what that's used for, but it's not there to tell time.
I don't really know the historical context behind Gematria itself, other than it being something of a religiously symbolic cypher. From what I do understand, though, words and phrases that have the same value are often meant to have similar connotations.
I'll note that "Messiah", "Encoding Decoded", "God Date Code", "Behold Light", and "Decode The End" all have the same value as "Luck" and "Do It Q". For a religious and symbolic cypher, those phrases all being related in any way, let alone being called upon specifically by Trump in his Farewell Address, seems to be rather significant, given the context of the way that Q works, and the current time and situation.
Doesn't, or didn't Depp dress up as Jack Sparrow and visit children's hospitals? He was involved in kid's movies. Can anyone who could do that, and then go home and partake of a chemical harvested from the blood of tortured children even be called human any more?
I can say one thing with certainty. Rush Limbaugh was a better man than you could ever hope to be. The fact that you would act so disgracefully following his death is what makes this fact so clear. You should be ashamed of yourself, trying to cite "viagra" and CNN as a foundation for such baseless and evil accusations, now, when millions are mourning his death, rather than at literally any other time.
Much, much more substantial evidence is going to be needed before you can even begin to attempt to make such heavy accusations against a great man like Rush Limbaugh.