4
Steve_OH 4 points ago +4 / -0

So, Aussie here, my uncle lives in airlie beach and you remind me a lot of him. Keep up the fight, patriot!

3
Steve_OH 3 points ago +3 / -0

I saw more ads than story. I hate the current advertising trends of websites these days.

8
Steve_OH 8 points ago +8 / -0

Place spider outside.

Let it soak in radiation.

Let it bite you.

Treat bite.

Profit

1
Steve_OH 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s a special council. Trump was plagued for most of his presidency by the Russia hoax special council. There was no SC called to investigate Hillary or her emails.

3
Steve_OH 3 points ago +4 / -1

Durham supposedly works that way. Silent about his workings and then suddenly drops the hammer on a bunch of people. If he’s dropped this on one, it’s likely more will follow.

15
Steve_OH 15 points ago +15 / -0

IMO the immunity deals were offered while Obama was president and since he was implicated in the emails, he had his loyalists take care of it. DS covers their own. Durham was appointed during Trump’s tenure, so entirely different.

1
Steve_OH 1 point ago +1 / -0

It happens. About 10 years ago I was in Karratha, Western Australia, and a cat 4 was headed right for us and was supposed to make landfall overnight. It ended up fizzling down to a tropical low instead.

2
Steve_OH 2 points ago +2 / -0

The arms that were left was not even comparable to those possessed by most countries.

by Quelle
2
Steve_OH 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a degree in web dev and working on another in software eng. done some C# along the way

2
Steve_OH 2 points ago +2 / -0

Given the message is about ‘clarity’, this doesn’t seem all too clear. Pixelation for days!

1
Steve_OH 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m an Aussie myself, but living abroad. Asked my mum about the 24K students thing and she didn’t think it was real. Then asked my brother, who lives in Melbourne, the same thing. It didn’t happen there either. I’m curious about whether it is as you say, a test.

3
Steve_OH 3 points ago +3 / -0

My wife had to reschedule a doctors visit because of a sinus infection, she gets them every year due to a deviated septum. When she went to see them they hounded her about it being COVID and her need to get the vaccine etc. they bullied her to almost tears, but she didn’t relent because she knew it was just a sinus infection. I imagine this is how they convince a lot of people to get it.

The doctor also said that if it was COVID, she should wait at least 30 days as the shot ‘REACTED POORLY TO COVID ANTIBODIES’ and that this is where a lot of the side effects occur.

2
Steve_OH 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean just as long as it’s legal. I have no intention of allowing like child porn etc. hate speech is subjective and so would not be measured

3
Steve_OH 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because Trump never likes to reveal his moves. He always skirts questions about how he plans to do something as he believes the enemy could then immediately counter it if it’s said. Smart strategy

1
Steve_OH 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s a tenant of their faith to deceive their enemies into believing them to be peaceful, but noting that those who are not of their faith are infidels and that any recourse is justified (rape, death, etc)

1
Steve_OH 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe. I work full time and would likely do it in my limited free time, but I’ll let you know if I get more serious on it. Got any past work I can see?

1
Steve_OH 1 point ago +1 / -0

As a web developer I’ve always toyed with making an alternative video sharing platform with no restrictions (other than maybe an nsfw tag). Would there be any interest if I were to so? It’s obviously a lot of work, and would take a while.

4
Steve_OH 4 points ago +4 / -0

Literally watched that yesterday! Fantastic movie

7
Steve_OH 7 points ago +7 / -0

Did I miss something? Is this really Trump on Gab?

2
Steve_OH 2 points ago +2 / -0

My point is that when you are introducing people to a concept, especially one with which they may have no familiarity, it hurts the credibility when the first article is poorly written and people are far more likely to dismiss the theory or concept entirely.

4
Steve_OH 4 points ago +4 / -0

The article is poorly written, which hurts its credibility. Any other sources?

view more: Next ›