1
Tallester_Skittles 1 point ago +1 / -0

I sent the link to refraction image, backed it up when I told you what refraction does. Moves the horizon down, artificially. It doesn't explain the point I nailed down about objects being visible well beyond the supposed mathematical limt

1
Tallester_Skittles 1 point ago +1 / -0

You just easily bought onto the deception.

Understanding your optical range while you observe stars is difficult.
But you are still stuck on basic physics and laws of optics.

Here you go. But you aren't ready for this.https://rumble.com/v142kjq-eric-dubay-southern-stars-in-a-stationary-non-spinning-earth.html

1
Tallester_Skittles 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have ignored that I said refraction doesn't explain why you can see beyond the curve.

The curve is a belief, not verifiable. No laser test, no camera, nothing except government provided images of earth from space, nothing that proves anything.

I can send you a video that totally explains southern starts appearing rotation, so what, you won't get it, you won't even watch it. You changed the subject because you can't solve the missing curve problem.

So, misusing the word refraction is not address the main point that debunks all globe and space. No curve. Literally no other points matter.

1
Tallester_Skittles 1 point ago +1 / -0

I schooled over your head, you can only resort to name calling and calling out typos. You're a lost cause, like most

0
Tallester_Skittles 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol, ok. You clearly have no respect for conversation. You kind of articulated some of the points i said but forgot to ever address anything. Just change the subject everytime. Now you want to ignore discussion about why the southern stars appear to support the theory we are in space, on a huge sphere.

I don't ignore anything. You project hard though

0
Tallester_Skittles 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're a dick. I'm not a shill. You're simply cog dis and can't process my words.

-1
Tallester_Skittles -1 points ago +3 / -4

Sad. There's actually a threat. You don't experience health decline, so it must be a fake conspiracy planted so.....what's the point of making content that exposes the dangers of 5G EVEN THOUGH it's safe? Who and why would they create a huge, grass roots, anti 5G movement? It's not profitable.

1
Tallester_Skittles 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wait, so did you disqualify evidence that 5G doesn't cause harm? Or just lack the resources to find content that supports that 5G causes cancer?

1
Tallester_Skittles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine the size the movie deals thrown at him. He should make sure not to take any with backing from the you know whews

-1
Tallester_Skittles -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's the kind of condescending, non inquisitive mindset that has you trapped in their construct you think are your world views.

You aren't ready. You have to learn to teach yourself before you can take this path

1
Tallester_Skittles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Signed with "I"? Was that an attempt at humour?

Remember when you said you're not afraid to challenge your ideas, you lied.

1
Tallester_Skittles 1 point ago +1 / -0

The planes flew over and release radioactive dust. Then they pretend it came from a nuke. The actual test explosions they show the media. The old videos we all have seen....that's a shit ton of TNT.

Read "death object" by Akio Nakatani if you want. It helps not believing in their retarded psy ops

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›