1
Toasted420 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, that would require people to understand that the machines are rigged. Unfortunately, a lot of people don't quite understand that yet.

  1. There are more registered republicans in California than in any other state.
  2. We've successfully put Newsom's recall on the ballot at least once.
  3. One of the times we put forth the signatures for recall to the registrar's office they just took the signatures and claimed it wasn't enough with no explanation.
  4. 2018 Newsom v Cox for CA governor, Cox won that election. Votes were changed in the middle of the night just like in 2020 Trump election.
  5. There are multiple secession movements, which would require some amount of federal support.
  6. I don't think you quite realize the amount of "federal support" the CA government has historically had. ALL of that obamacare money ultimately went into revamping CA state healthcare system, as CA was considered the "model." So when obamacare failed, CA still had a really nice organized online health care comparison system, and still does, all at the federal tax payers expense.
5
Toasted420 5 points ago +5 / -0

Newsom v Cox was a fraud in 2020. We voted to recall Newsom 3 times. California is the testing ground for the rest of their bullshit. Voting machines were "tested" in California before they were in every state. There are more registered republicans in California than in any other state.

5
Toasted420 5 points ago +5 / -0

Shoe-leather. Where they should be looking.

2
Toasted420 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understand. I get what you're saying. However, don't you think that is counter to the separation of powers? The Vice President/President-of-the-Senate is the one who counts the votes. So it doesn't make sense for Congress to try to pass some shit to tell the vice president what he/she can or cannot do. Vice President should count how they want to count. Pence is a fruit loop, and fucked up for sure.

1
Toasted420 1 point ago +2 / -1

They cannot alter the constitution without amendment. It clearly states in the 12th amendment "the president of the senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted:" it doesn't say that the vice president should refuse certificates and voters like what happened in 2020.