If you look at my post history, you’ll see that I’m...skeptical of Q. But I hope that, regardless of your political leanings comparing or contrasting with mine, you’re feeling better soon.
So he’s pissed off all the Never-Trumpers and the Trump supporters, both.
In the word’s of Iron Man, “Not a great plan.”
Why does this get downvoted? I’m genuinely curious. It’s not because you disagree with the sentiment expressed in the post but rather because you disagree with what you think is the sentiment behind the post, right?
But at least there’s still Dr. Seuss. Right? Right????
Now, now. Cheryl just loves the smell of her own farts. “Thaaaaaaaanks!”
Edit: Although that big-ass half panel opening allows so much of the good stuff to waft out.
Couldn’t this as easily be posted on a board making fun of y’all?
Is there anything that could happen to convince you to the contrary? And if any detractors read this, could he say anything (realistic) to convert you to the Q?
Do you believe it’s possible that the Q plan is real but L Lin is off his rocker? I think the man has had a break from reality and needs help.
Edit: Got some real Linsanity in here, I guess.
That ain’t all they have.
Nope, that’s it. TraffickCam, I think (after a cursory Google search).
When a photo goes up on Backpage or Craigslist or whatever, there’s a way to trace it if the girl looks to be in distress.
What’s that group to which you send in photos of your hotel rooms?
Ironically, some mostly peaceful fires would warm things up.
r/choosingbeggars reference, I hope?
(From elsewhere discussing the study...)
The researchers said that their findings did not show that the virus couldn’t be passed on by asymptomatic carriers, and they didn’t suggest that their findings were generalisable.
They said that strict measures—such as mask wearing, hand washing, social distancing, and lockdown—were successful in reducing the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan and that asymptomatic people in Wuhan may have low viral loads. This means that the finding cannot be applied to countries where outbreaks have not been successfully brought under control.
Fujian Song, from UEA’s Norwich Medical School, who collaborated with colleagues in Wuhan on the research, said: “The asymptomatic cases identified in the screening programme were truly asymptomatic, as none of them showed clinical symptoms before or during their follow-up isolation.” But, he added, “there is plenty of evidence elsewhere showing that people infected with covid-19 may be temporarily asymptomatic and infectious, before going on to develop symptoms.”
Using antibody testing, the researchers found that almost two thirds of the asymptomatic cases had previously had covid-19. “With the centralised isolation and treatment of all covid-19 cases during the lockdown period in Wuhan, the risk of residents being infected in the community has been greatly reduced. When susceptible residents are exposed to a low dose of virus, they may tend to be asymptomatic as a result of their own immunity,” wrote the authors.
Song said, “It is very important to say that these asymptomatic cases were identified shortly after the relaxation of a very stringent lockdown in Wuhan that lasted more than 70 days. By then, the epidemic in Wuhan had been effectively brought under control. It is too early to be complacent, because of the existence of asymptomatic positive cases and high level of susceptibility in residents in Wuhan.”
It was a solid D-team effort.
Calm down.
I maxed out my yearlies to DJT all four years and gave plenty more through the office.
Before you get nasty, while we’re circling our conservative wagons, best make sure you aren’t shooting into the damn circle.
Put out some bullshit about unity, healing, deTrumping the country and the need to move on? But they just so hate this guy that nobody even thought about pumping the brakes.
You think the good guys forced the Dems to embarrass themselves in that way? Jedi mind tricks? (hand wave “You will ask for, receive permission to call witnesses, and then decide an account already part of the record will suffice.” hand wave)
“Not enough time! We need it now! RIGHT NOW!!1!!1!!one!!”
No, representatives need immunity for their votes and speech made in the course of their office’s duties. Else, look for everyone to try to throw everyone from the other side in jail every two to four years.
They were in such a rush to get this guy that they put a slap-dash impeachment article.
Candidly, if they were smarter, they would have gone after him for dereliction of duty rather than incitement because that’s just fucking insane—even to laypersons.
Out of curiosity, and with personal information redacted (obviously), what did you say in your GameStop email?