by Quelle
1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

We're entitled to our beliefs. It only becomes a problem if we let them lead us to treat others poorly. God bless.

by Quelle
1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

Roughly 140, FWIW. Likewise to you.

by Quelle
1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've already explained why your understanding is not correct. There is no scriptural backing for the idea that God distinguishes between homosexual immorality and heterosexual immorality. You are superimposing your own belief system on God's word. That is inappropriate. My testimony is that God has forgiven my sins just as He would a penitent heterosexual person. He expected the same humility and repentance of me.

Now here's where my response gets risky, because I don't know you or your history. It's not my intention to falsely accuse you, but to share an observation. The vast majority of heterosexual people have committed fornication - surveys have indicated as many as 95%. My observation is that those who apply special and distinct severity to the sin of homosexual fornication usually do so because they themselves are guilty of fornication and seek to rationalize by saying to themselves "Well, at least I'm not as bad as all those homos." Only you know if this observation applies to you, but it definitely applies to most of the people who agree with you.

by Quelle
1
anon82059 1 point ago +2 / -1

You have no scriptural basis for your opinion that homosexuality is the result of demonic possession.

by Quelle
1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well thank you for that passive-aggressive response, but I don't require your forgiveness. I already have it from Jesus.

by Quelle
2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're not Jesus. You don't have that kind of judgement. You can't see the heart.

by Quelle
2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I believe..." Stop interpolating your opinions into scripture. That's how the faithful are led astray. Truth seekers have no need for such an approach.

As one who has firsthand experience with this topic, I can confirm that your understanding is not the correct one. Your reasoning imposes double standards on God.

by Quelle
3
anon82059 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm struggling to identify where any of those passages define homosexuality as being distinctly more sinful than heterosexual fornication. In fact, fornication is expressly listed alongside in or near each of those passages.

God does not have double standards.

by Quelle
1
anon82059 1 point ago +2 / -1

God bless, fren

1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, he's great on WWI flamethrowers. He's rarely right on anything relevant to today. But he'll insult and ridicule you if you try to point that out.

by Quelle
3
anon82059 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was jokes, friend.

by Quelle
4
anon82059 4 points ago +5 / -1

Your discomfort is fine. The problem is when you start treating people poorly.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was a period of time during the Mastodon days where all kinds of posts on Gab were being lost due to bugs because the Mastodon engine wasn't engineered to scale to match Gab's growth. It happened to me several times. Your mistake was in assuming censorship.

by Quelle
3
anon82059 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm deeply religious and expect I know more about the Bible than you do. I'm also celibate because acting on my sexuality is not compatible with my relationship with Christ. But homosexual fornication is neither more nor less serious of a sin than heterosexual fornication, and I defy you to show me the scripture that says otherwise.

by Quelle
1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't like the guy, but I'm not sure how "luciferian" enters into this picture. Unless those are demon dogs.

by Quelle
8
anon82059 8 points ago +8 / -0

Chill. God is the judge, not you.

by Quelle
0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's not so bad, actually. They're generally better at not using their teeth.

2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

I call BS. Gab doesn't censor anything but violence and porn.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

Saul and Wictor are birds of a feather, with matching plumage of arrogance and pomposity.

4
anon82059 4 points ago +4 / -0

I want to believe, but how does he know it's not just a briefcase?

I don't see the military walking the nuclear football into a crowded venue. Nearby, maybe. Not where it's at risk of being compromised.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +2 / -1

Casuals are using it all the time on my observation. They are using it in context. Therefore, they know exactly what they are saying.

We don't all have to rebel the same way you do.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it comes to it, 100 bricks > 1 gun. Plus, once you've used the bricks, you have a gun. But it's going to have to get a lot worse before those 100 people pick up a brick - "nothing left to lose" worse.

2
anon82059 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't think so, I think it's being used to say FJB with the added sauce of being uncensorable and also mocking the MSM. But people know exactly what it means.

Today, for example, I was watching a YT video, the topic was farming and the guy was talking about how much chemical prices are going up for next year. The comment section was filled with "Let's Go Brandon." People know exactly what it means, and it's being used to blame EVERYTHING on Biden.

7
anon82059 7 points ago +7 / -0

You're right, though Jesus also makes clear that those who are watching for the signs will see it coming. I'd imagine we'll be able to predict with increasing accuracy as the time nears. But we're not there yet, IMO

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›