4
colinsackorpick 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think this is Project Looking Glass. Although It's a very technical document, Commander McDonnell does an outstanding job of explaining the inner workings of the Project at the Monroe Institute in layman's terms.

On Page 14, Section 19:

Thus, as the almost continuous 'clickout' pattern establishes itself in continuous phase at speeds below Planck's Distance but before reaching the state of total rest, human consciousness passes through the looking glass of time-space after the fashion of ***Alice beginning her journey into wonderland.


Hmmmmm...... where have we heard that before?

2
colinsackorpick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting logo-- "The rooster is associated with the ancient Greek and Roman god of healing and medicine, Aesculapius. The ancient Greeks believed that the rooster's crowing at dawn drove away the evil disease-spreading demons from the temples so that it could be a place of healing."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_Medical_Department_(United_States)

1
colinsackorpick 1 point ago +3 / -2

This is a board fuckwit. You don't own space here. Go to Reddit and "preside" over a post there.

1
colinsackorpick 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yes, and take your shitty attitude with you Fuckwit.

4
colinsackorpick 4 points ago +4 / -0

Chinese New Year began on February 12th. This year is the year of the Ox.

Not sure if that means anything.

1
colinsackorpick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does the second post refer to an assassination attempt?

5
colinsackorpick 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's not his Damn niece. That's his Damn victim.

9
colinsackorpick 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's got to be on his time, not ours. Good Night and GOD bless.

3
colinsackorpick 3 points ago +3 / -0

If Dan did that intentionally....it's a masterpiece.

2
colinsackorpick 2 points ago +3 / -1

Absolute Truth. You should use their words against them like "sources say" and "a source close to (fill in the blank)" and how about "an anonymous source" and "the whistleblower said". They are so full of shit.

8
colinsackorpick 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well yes, it's going to be a gut punch of the hardest kind. The real truth is so hard to believe it has to be leaked like a pitosin IV to induce labor.

They won't want to believe that FDR was secretly involving the U.S. in WWII and setting up Pearl Harbor while lying about it. They sure don't want to know that Mr. Kent smuggled the evidence out of the American consulate and Joe Kennedy (of THE Kennedy's who was the U.S. envoy to Great Britain at the time) had him arrested in England before he could get back to the states. Then Joe stripped him of his diplomatic immunity and the Brits sent him off to prison.

What about Herbert Hoover prolonging WWI by 3 1/2 years -- he took tax payer dollars and fed the German aggressors.

Then there's good ole Gerald Ford....he made sure the Warren Commission got absolutely no significant evidence regarding JFK's assassination whatsoever.

We've had 45 Presidents (notice who I left out....) 7 have been assassinated, attempts were made to kill another 4 Presidents, (5 if you count the recent attempt on Trump but I'm not including it because I've only seen it from one news outlet) And 2 more hounded by Impeachment --one of which resigned. That's 13 out 45 (28%) Presidents that "someone" needed to get rid of real bad.

1
colinsackorpick 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think that's likely-- just because Trump could've pardoned him and given him asylum in the U.S.A. but he didn't.

Think about this for a minute-- if every intelligence agency on the planet truly wants Assange dead.....why isn't he dead? Although he complained a lot about being in hiding....he actually was the safest man on Earth. In the UK.

1
colinsackorpick 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I meant two separate things. I should have been more clear. The link was for a theory (not mine) about why Assange may not be the hero we have been lead to believe he is.

The Q post seems pretty relevant to the last two weeks along with posts 699 and 700

Sorry about the confusion.

1
colinsackorpick 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I meant two separate things. I should have been more clear. The link was for a theory (not mine) about why Assange may not be the hero we have been lead to believe he is.

The Q post seems pretty relevant to the last two weeks along with posts 699 and 700

Sorry about the confusion.

2
colinsackorpick 2 points ago +2 / -0

yeah, I noticed that too. Unsmiling stuck with me. I don't even know what to do with it but it stuck with me.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›