-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

I think I'm just jaded from calling out posts that don't have any supporting information and getting attacked or banned as a result. Your experience must be different than mine.

1
comlib 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yeah I almost jumped on this one but given how many down votes I'm getting for explaining that a QR code is just text, it's not worth it. Idiots gonna idiot.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

A digital camera does take a picture, and then encodes that picture in one of several compressed image formats. The image formats generally do not contain code. I'm not sure what your point is.

0
comlib 0 points ago +2 / -2

I already read your mind plus all of your bank account information because you read my comment. Or at least that's what people here seem to think a QR code can do.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

I'm getting downvoted because this site's full of idiots who refuse to admit when they're wrong.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

Maybe? None of it really makes sense. Even normies who receive this card and manage to click through the QR code link (because nobody is going to type in that URL directly) will be dumped on an enormous image of text that is in itself completely bonkers. My guess would be this is some mentally ill person spending their own money to share this crazy story. It's kind of sad really.

0
comlib 0 points ago +2 / -2

And to further clarify, the URL next to the QR code is NOT a link to an image of the QR code. As I posted in another comment, it is a link to a giant image of some person's insane story.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

It's hard to understand what you're talking about when you aren't clear what you're talking about. This particular QR code does encode the URL next to it, that is true. That does not mean "the URL is the QR code". They are two separate things.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

The QR code contains the link next to it, which goes to an image of an enormous diatribe by someone who has serious mental issues.

The document is PGP signed for authenticity and posted on IPFS which is basically just a global distributed file dump.

I suspect this person has serious paranoid schizophrenia along with money to share this wide-ranging and bizarre story via these post cards. This seems like a legit attempt by someone to spread this story, like printing it out and mailing it to people or handing it out on a street corner but a lot cheaper.

Here's the opening page (OCR so there's a few glitches in there):

"Intro: This is the truth of Q-anon. Large numbers of billionaires and famous people are part of a secret Cabal that planned 9/11, the 7/7 bombing, and Covid19. They plan all political and media eventsat least 15 years in advance. They tortured me my whole life and are reading my mind. Much of the Q-anon mythology is a reference to my life, the rest was made up by these people.

For some reason they told me about all the future events and toldmethat

Fluvoxamine(Luvox) was the best solution for Covid19, I forgot all of this until recently.

This is what I remember, names of non-famous people have been changed. In most cases when future events were predicted, they were not saidin astraightforward manner. Instead of "x will happen" they would tell a story about x happening in an ambiguous way, or say that someone else had been hypothesizing a thing. They would fuzzy up the grammar of the statement so that they were not literally predicting the thing.

1993: Mark Zuckerberg: Mark Zuckerberg's father came to my bedroom. "Cawamung" had toldme to say racial slursto him, which Idid. MarkZuckerberg then entered the room andhis father left. He said he was going to spy on me and read my mind and torture me. He said the only way to escape was in a military bunker. He said I should try speakinginalow voice in back of my throat because it was more endearing. He said he would see mein 12 years.I said it should be 10 because in theIliadit'susually10 years.He said that at the very end I would remember everything and would have to report it within a small period of time or be damned. "Cawamung" was therefor most of it. Days laterCawamung admitted that hewas working for Zuckerberg and would force me to comply and would not let me escape him. Cawamung suggested that they would insert something in my body to spy on me during a surgery. I said that I would never get surgery.

Soon after the Zuckerberg incident Cawamung told me about Elizabeth Holmes. He summarized the premise of the Theranos company and said it would be a scam and a big failure and she would be like a fake version of Zuckerberg.He told meabout Bernie Madoff, that he would steal a lot of money and how he would be caught. He told that Edward Snowden, an extremely white person whose family had worked for the Federal Government for generations would give away his life and tell the truth about the spying. I deduced that they would still not admit the real spying, the kind that was being done to me.He alsomentioned JohnKiriakou.

Cawamung would constantly psychologically abuse me. He would spy on my every utterance, I had no privacy. I had no room tothink and no one I could trust. He wouldmake mebelieve I was causing events to happen. He would control my emotions by having me walk for long distances and drink soda. He would have me act out committing crimes against other people and then ask me why I was doing those crimes overandover.Hewould have people call me racist and have mesay outrageous things. He would have me practice using a low voice and say things so he could blackmail me.

Cawamung told me that he could change my age on my birth certificate and explained thatafter a certainnumber of yearsthehospitalwould no longer have a record of this. He would have me consent to things like this and make me feel like I was constantly guilty and out of place. I eventually forgot about this event.

Throughout my life people would harass me by asking how old I was. To this day I don't know what myreal age is. It maybe a year older that itsays on my birth certificate.

Soon thereafter there was a surprise party at my place. Brad Pitt, Gwyneth Paltrow, and many other famous people were there. Cawamung was not present."

-4
comlib -4 points ago +2 / -6

A URL is text. A QR code encodes text. That's it.

-5
comlib -5 points ago +1 / -6

That's exactly my point. It's two separate things. Scanning a QR code doesn't do anything but extract the text it contains.

-6
comlib -6 points ago +1 / -7

A QR code is not a URL. A QR code contains arbitrary text which may include a URL. Every URL is suspect. That is nothing to do with QR codes.

-8
comlib -8 points ago +2 / -10

None of this has anything to do with QR codes. A QR code can no more read your data than a URL written on a piece of paper. Scanning a QR code is completely benign unless using software that automatically follows links. I don't know of any such software.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

Exactly the same as any other URL and not at all related to QR codes.

-3
comlib -3 points ago +1 / -4

Then whoever posted that was also wrong.

-8
comlib -8 points ago +4 / -12

A QR code can do nothing of the sort. It's literally just text encoded in a block like a UPC code.

If you're scanning QR codes and blindly clicking on any links they might contain, well that's on you.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

No way there's anything interesting in there if the Democrats voted to release this.

1
comlib 1 point ago +4 / -3

This also isn't even unusual. The Senate was split 53:47 at the time Q made this post. The current vote included 3 Rs with the 50 democrats, 53:47 in favor of advancing the nomination. It was always going to be close, and close with these ratios is going to range from 50:50 to 53:47 or 55:45 really often.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

The answer to this question is always "infinite" because that's how mathematical impossibility works.

If you mean improbable, however, then it's a little more subjective.

0
comlib 0 points ago +3 / -3

I ask for a lot of sources on here and usually don't get anything but abuse in response. While it's true that complex research topics can't be boiled down to a single link, too many folks here present theories and research as though they are provable conclusions. And of course the constant numerological posts trying to tie Q posts in the past to modern occurrences are no better than reinterpreting Nostradamus.

I'll say it right here and right now: The world is full of coincidences, all the time, including many that are shocking or seem impossible but are meaningless. Yes, sometimes you may connect the dots and find a hidden piece of information. Other times, your own confirmation bias will see the pattern whether it exists or not, and then you present it to your friends who don't have the same biases and they look at you like you're nuts.

When someone does post a list of peer-reviewed studies or reputable eyewitness accounts or published and verified documentation, I'm willing to listen. When you start trying to tell me that Q predicted all this, look there's the number 17 and there's the number 33 and here's a 2-year plus 4-month delta if you reverse the time and hash the image filename...you lose me.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

And the truth is somewhere in between. My point is you can draw these connections from almost anyone to almost anyone else because most people on the planet are separated by just a few degrees of separation. In this case, even fewer degrees than usual because they all live in or spend a great deal of time in the DC area, so it's not surprising they work at some of the same places and know some of the same people. I have a cousin whose wife lived in and was on the city council of Racine. Does that mean I'm somehow connected to the global cabal? How many degrees of separation before it's just a coincidence?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›