Some pretty shocking news here, related to us by the peerless Ed Dowd. This was just days ago. Pretty mind blowing.
The plan seems to be to for a NEW Epidemic, at least in the U.S. if not worldwide.
It will be an Epidemic of "Sudden Death" that they will blame on Long COVID and (amazingly) CLIMATE CHANGE and there could be new LOCKDOWNS.
So the nightmare Climate Change lockdown scenario is getting closer to becoming reality...
This was the main thrust: Dowd has some friend that is a Washington insider and what he's hearing is that they are actively seeking solutions for the "sudden death" issue that is blanketing the news lately. They are keenly aware that a larger section of the public is now becoming aware of the unusually high number of younger and otherwise healthy people dying and they believe it is coming to a head. They need to at least try to calm the rage toward groups like Pfizer and Fauci and try to shift some blame for all this death and dying OFF of the vaccines.
They know they need to deal with it somehow.
Here's another recent interview Ed gave with Alex Newman.
Dowd talks about the MASSIVE Econmic Security and National Security impacts the large amounts of new disability claims and excess death are already having on the country. This will UNDOUBTEDLY be a major thrust for their Declaration of an Epidemic which I expect could come closer to the start of 2024. They will surely use much the same way the pandemic was used in that election year.
To help confirm they are bullding to this, I linked to some of what has been in the news since then, as we all have focused on the Moron-in-Chief's docu-drama
Malone on Vaccinated Data & FDA Disappointment
CDC Identified Issue With COVID Booster
So far we've not heard much about long COVID but it would not be a stretch to think they blame that for much of the Vaccine related symptoms/death. After all, EVERYONE who got a vaccine ended up getting COVID almost to a man.
I'll leave you with one more. A tad more hopeful perhaps (if you watch the whole thing):
In particular, 32:00, 42:00, 56:00 till the end.
Overall more upbeat here. After all, he has been the #1 Doomsayer in terms of the long term trends in data that he's breaking to the world. There is always some light and the end of the tunnel.
Godspeed all.
They Never Thought She Would Lose.
So interesting to see the Lamestream media do something they rarely ever seem to and wind the clock back in a news story. Especially to a time when the Dems had just suffered a SHOCKING defeat, and Trump was preparing to move into the White House. That was a dark time for them, why wouldn't they be loathe to bring it up?
Well, you see, it might HELP to explain just HOW AND WHY Biden seems to have highest level classified documents just LAYING ALL ABOUT his many premises. We know Biden takes classified documents SERIOUSLY: he's said so himself numerous times.
Yes, yes, it must have been that WHIRLWIND period of days leading up to Obama leaving office where people were rushing all around, trying to move so many things out, and all the chaos and disarray that resulted! Surely anyone could see how this ended up CAUSING these numerous procedural "errors" to occur.
😑 Uh-huh.
A few days ago I posted a write-up about a few different things happening. It got tremendous responses and traction and while I'm of course happy about that, MORE IMPORTANTLY I was correct on lot of what I was thinking and predicting might happen. I've even heard the phrase "beginning of the end" used regarding this since then! Not trying to gloat - but rather I'm happy that for just once my tendency to be a touch overly optimistic was warranted.
Let's ask some questions, eh? Bulletin style:
- How did Biden come by these documents? This query COULD have a variety of answers and undoubtedly Biden potentially could've worked alone or had subordinates or others do some things for him.... but, I have a feeling that a directional probe into the where and when about these particular documents (which are of the HIGHEST classification level, and therefore more UNCOMMON than a typical classified doc) will bring into focus OTHER PARTIES AND RELATIONSHIPS far beyond the small time Biden if we have an earnest look into it.
- What was the role of NARA? I am starting to wonder about this. RENEGADE took 30 MILLION(!!!) docs with him after his presidency... and optically, NARA confirmed this and cleared him, saying ALL of that was done properly and according to protocol. Not long after, we got the Chinese restaurant/bowling alley story which had some very interesting links to Q comms and Trump giving some messages - this was signal, not noise, it appears.
- Does some kind of ongoing relationship exist between former OBAMA Admin, NARA, c Dems, foreign governments, etc.?? Obama DID NOT WANT ANY OF THE ANTI-AMERICAN SHIT HE DID FOR 8 YEARS IN SECRET TO BE ANYWHERE TRUMP COULD ACCESS IT. We should assume that. So doesn't it make sense NARA turns its head while the outgoing Admin scatters its mess to the four winds and now we're starting to find out? Maybe in all that shakeup, a real big scumbag like Biden (or Kerry or Pelosi) says to themselves, "Hey my kid is over in X country and knows THEIR INTEL GUYS. Maybe we could make a little scratch, since we're getting rid of them anyway..." And now you have a full-fledged espionage OP starting to foment from this...
- Obama's folks NEVER REALLY LEFT because he was Intel from the get-go, so agencies like FBI etc. would turn a blind eye to this as we are learning they did with the funding of Penn Biden. Now that Twitter Files are coming out, is there ANY CHANCE we will learn of a STATE SECRET SELLING PROGRAM OR OPERATION ACTIVELY GOING ON thru the Trump years, that no one was previously privy to? Could said operation IMPLICATE PEOPLE BEYOND BIDEN?
- Will there or could there be connections to Russiagate? Again a big YES. I have believed for a long time as some others have (like the woman who directed Plot Against The President) that ALL ROADS LEAD TO RUSSIAGATE. We'll return to this again.
Now as many have suggested, it DOES seem clear that [DS] is prepping to cut ties with Biden and back a new horse for 2024. They have a plan.
But so do we, by which I mean TRUMP and the movie makers. I'll try to summarize both in the following passages:
Starting with them....
Undoubtedly, [DS] has begun the move to drop Biden and back someone else. The timing of the leaks and the manner with which they were moved into the Lamestream Media does confirm this.
Think here: when Biden gave his first statements on the docs in Mexico City, the statement he wrote ONLY REFERENCED those docs and gave no reference at all to the other discoveries... which were also made weeks and months ago. It spoke to them as an isolated incident.
Then in the next 48 hours we have at least two additional "discoveries" which created a manufactured issue for the Lamestreamers. After going to bat for him, defending his morality and honor against Trump and stating we should give benefit of the doubt and trust him, that this was different, an "honest mistake".....
Two more sets of docs, at other locations, including embarassingly his home garage.
? Why would that first statement, obviously written for Biden by subordinates and lawyers, FAIL TO MENTION other incidents THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN DISCOVERED AND WERE IN PROGRESS? That makes no sense.
Why look like they are getting "caught" right now, and only leak to the media because the Republicans were going to find this all out anyway instead of clearing up this junk much sooner? Especially when you KNEW YOU WERE GOING AFTER TRUMP FOR THE SAME THING?
By dropping it in this piece wise manner, it ALLOWED the MSM to faithfully disown Biden: We did the best we could for him but this is too much.
The Lamestream will APPEAR justified in their move to become turncoats to Biden. Excuses and reasonings must be given for the sake of APPEARANCES.
So that's what Cabal/[DS] are using it for. Dropping Biden and any kind of turnaround or movement it can possibly spur in the Trump issues. They WILL NOT force Biden, know that, but they WILL give him every needed push in the back to step aside. That's their angle... but a lot can change between now and then, as I said.
Keep in mind that roles have switched here. [DS] is now on DEFENSE; where we've been the last 2 years. TRUMP is on OFFENSE, where he is his absolute BEST. WE dictate the terms of engagement currently.
Okay, now for the good guys (using quotes again to distinguish)
Trump and the Movie Makers LOVE any event in the news where they can force [DS] to pose contorted and end up pointing a finger back at themselves.When Russiagate happened I think Trump, WH and the Q Team all expected a major public outcry for justice.
When none came, I believe they THOROUGHLY changed their strategy and plans; they slowed things down and went back to basics. The hard times of today are part of a larger goal of WAKING PEOPLE UP to pay attention and so you've seen, now a few years on, a bigger public interest and outcry when crimes are exposed.
The Trump camp/movie makers do something else frequently: bring issues that highlight deeper, systemic problems in our Government. Biden and his crimes aren't the exception in D.C. but the rule. And so this document debacle is something EMBLEMATIC of the type of things going on during the reign of the swamp.
There will be then, a circle back around to the Russiagate actors to make them culpable again, this time with an engaged and concerned public. There also will come about, as we saw with House Speaker, a working toward fundamental change in how Classified materials are viewed stored and labeled in Washington to prevent it in the future.
The goal is after all not just to PUNISH THE GUILTY but also to FUNDAMENTALLY REFORM AND PREVENT THE PRACTICE in the future.
Everything for Trump and The WH is a learning tool and a guide; intended to educate and make us want to rebuild the structure to prevent the same corruption in the future. Full stop.
Don't buy the Russiagate premise?
Let Kash tell you what's gonna go down. Watch it happen: the clock is turning back already. Expect some faces that have gone dark for a LONG TIME to start popping up soon.
So where are we going now? I don't know but I can definitely tell you it's going to be ridiculous... Hey, maybe we'll get there in as big a hurry as Joe packed up his stuff with!
Watters has some good points here. Hunter owns the house. On documentation he claimed to be paying $50,000 a month in rent. Miss Chung was a very key helper for the Bidens, even helping with packing up! All of this is going somewhere, its just the direction that is unclear.
How about DOJ's positioning?
Since last Monday we've seen multiple instances of Docs turning up in several locations as well as a Special Counsel assigned to investigate Biden which, according to Mike Davis, he has given complete latitude to investigate into origination and movement of these documents.
Doesn't detract from the FACT that Garland was covering this up. For two months, Garland buried this, through an impending midterm election and UNBELIEVABLY assigned a Special Counsel to investigate TRUMP before he gave his attention to this! THAT, plus the fact that Robert Hur, the counsel now assigned to Biden, was DEEPLY ADVERSARIAL toward Nunes and Patel as second in command under Rosenstein during the Russiagate probe ALL BODES VERY POORLY for Garland.
Oversight Chair James Comer has already issued a memo to Garland in which the appointment of Hur is admonished and questioned outright. The choices are clear for Garland at this point: continue to listen to and play bodyguard for your idiot boss and go down with the ship or get serious and have Hur produce an apolitical and unbiased result out of his investigation.
The reality is that Garland just CAN'T truly follow the threads because they will lead too far up the chain, however. I am starting to believe it will be HIS JOB that runs into jeopardy and comes to a vote for removal. Although he is talking a good game, he and Hur need to be replaced if we are going to get deliverables here even if the go-ahead to look deeper was given in the DoJ scope memo.
Anything final or a clear direction?
Once more, Mike Davis offers some interesting potential avenues.
A Delaware connection? Now we're getting somewhere. I find this HIGHLY CREDIBLE, since after all Hunter was the frontman and legged much of the joint Biden family operations himself. Why else would very expensive lawyers be unearthing all these documents? If Biden didn't send them, and truly did not know of their existence previously, is it possible Hunter is the one who revealed the location(s) of these docs?
If Hunter is somehow implicated as the OG perp in this, doesn't it cover all the bases? Gives Big Biden plausible cover, prevents any ACTUAL criminality from coming to court post-Presidency, and allow Biden to gracefully bow out of the 2024 running while FORCING THE POSITION of necessarily pardoning his son? It checks so many boxes!
I gotta give it to these clowns.. so much covering of asses and lies to bury other lies, its a wonder they don't get dizzy from it! Deep and dark, my friends....
WWG1WGA/Godspeed
I think the idea is, partially, to sacrifice him in order to prevent a deeper look into the practice itself. That is, of illegal removal and storage of classified docs. I think this short clip of Newt and Ingraham talking the other day hints at this... starting to peel back the onion there.
Undoubtedly, the [DS] has begun the move to drop Biden and back someone else. We don't know who that is yet. The timing of the leaks and the manner with which they were moved into the Lamestream Media does confirm this. Think here: when Biden gave his first statements on the docs in Mexico City, the statement he wrote ONLY REFERENCED those docs and gave no reference at all to the other discoveries... which were also made weeks and months ago. It spoke to them as an isolated incident.
Then in the next 48 hours we have at least two additional "discoveries" which created a manufactured issue for the Lamestreamers. After going to bat for him, defending his morality and honor against Trump and stating we should give benefit of the doubt and trust him, that this was different, an "honest mistake"..... Two more sets of docs, at other locations, including embarassingly his home garage.
Why would that first statement, obviously written for Biden by subordinates and lawyers, FAIL TO MENTION other incidents THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN DISCOVERED AND WERE IN PROGRESS? That makes no sense. If they ACTUALLY planned to stay in his corner and continue backing him politically all this would've dropped all at once rather than in parts. In fact, they would've organized Biden and gotten his house in order much sooner, rather than appearing to be doing so and have these issues stumbled upon "already in progress" while Republicans took the House and began investigatory committees on a variety of potential Biden issues. Why look like they are getting "caught" right now, and only leak to the media because the Republicans were going to find this all out anyway instead of clearing up this junk much sooner? Especially when you KNEW YOU WERE GOING AFTER TRUMP FOR THE SAME THING?
By dropping it in this piece wise manner, it ALLOWED the MSM to faithfully disown Biden: "We did the best we could for him but enough is enough! HE DID MUCH WORSE THAN TRUMP and we can't continue to find a defense that is sane for Biden as these leaks and an investigation continue to come."
Therefore, the Lamestream will APPEAR justified in their move to become turncoats to Biden. This is important because Dems and the 4th estate, which they have completely infiltrated and work in tandem with BUT STILL do not completely control, MUST BE SIMPATICO on these decisions when there is a change in the narrative. Therefore, excuses and reasonings must be given for the sake of APPEARANCES.
So that's what Cabal/[DS] are using it for. Dropping Biden and any kind of turnaround or movement it can possibly spur in the Trump issues. I DON'T think Biden or Trump will be indicted, but my guess is if one happens it will be TRUMP and he will be FIRST. Then they will either clear Biden soon after and drop the ones for TRUMP or keep the Biden one open forever while they fight it out with Trump.
I don't think they are going to try this, if they do at all, until much closer to the 2024 election though. We will see if they even have the political capital to do it by then, and if Biden has not, of his own volition, withdrawn himself from contention by then - which is MUCH MORE likely if you ask me. They WILL NOT force him, know that, but they WILL give him every needed push in the back to step aside. That's their angle right now I think... but a lot can change between now and then, as I said.
Keep in mind that roles have switched here. [DS] is now on DEFENSE; where we've been the last 2 years. TRUMP is on OFFENSE, where he is his absolute BEST. So we are the ones now dictating terms of engagement and IT IS THEM who must constantly be able to shift and remain FLUID. Things have completely switched.
What McCarthy and Jordan should and will do (if Trump is running all this as I and others believe) will be to turn this docs issue into an investigation of something much more fundamental. This WHOLE THING will become about:
- How did Biden come by these documents? This query COULD have a variety of answers and undoubtedly Biden potentially could've worked alone or had subordinates or others do some things for him.... but, I have a feeling that a directional probe into the where and when about these particular documents (which are of the HIGHEST classification level, and therefore more UNCOMMON than a typical classified doc) will bring into focus OTHER PARTIES AND RELATIONSHIPS far beyond the small time Biden.
- What was the role of NARA? I am starting to wonder about this. RENEGADE took 30 MILLION(!!!) docs with him after his presidency... and optically, NARA confirmed this and cleared him, saying ALL of that was done properly and according to protocol. Not long after, we got the Chinese restaurant/bowling alley story which had some very interesting links to Q comms and Trump giving some messages - this was signal, not noise, I'm thinking now.
- Some kind of ongoing relationship exists between OBAMA Admin, NARA, certain Dems, foreign governments, etc. Obama DID NOT WANT ANY OF THE ANTI-AMERICAN SHIT HE DID FOR 8 YEARS IN SECRET TO BE ANYWHERE TRUMP COULD ACCESS IT. We should assume that. So doesn't it make sense NARA turns its head while the outgoing Admin scatters its mess to the four winds and now we're starting to find out? Maybe in all that shakeup, a real big scumbag like Biden (or Kerry or Pelosi) says to themselves, "Hey my kid is over in X country and knows THEIR INTEL GUYS. Maybe we could make a little scratch, since we're getting rid of them anyway..." And now you have a full-fledged espionage OP starting to foment from this...
- Obama's folks NEVER REALLY LEFT because he was Intel from the get-go, so agencies like FBI etc. would turn a blind eye to this. As we are learning they did with the funding of Penn Biden. Now that Twitter Files are coming out, is there ANY CHANCE we will learn of a STATE SECRET SELLING PROGRAM OR OPERATION ACTIVELY GOING ON thru the Trump years, that no one was previously privy to? Could said operation IMPLICATE PEOPLE BEYOND BIDEN? I think you know I am guessing Yes to this.
- Will there or could there be connections to Russiagate? Again a big YES. I have believed for a long time as some others have (like the woman who directed Plot Against The President) that ALL ROADS LEAD TO RUSSIAGATE.
- The conspiracy between MANY Obama holdovers in Permanent Washington, enemies of Trump who were actively participating in Russiagate, and TOP BRASS at Counsel, Intel & Pentagon who KNEW BURIAL LOCATIONS all could potentially have exposure here.
So like usual, [DS] ends up EXPOSING THEMSELVES UNINTENTIONALLY by trying to muddy the waters and eliminate Biden to put forward someone who gives them a chance of winning back their power, which is imminently waning.
Our side LOVES STUFF LIKE THIS because it puts [DS] into contorted poses whereby they end up pointing the finger at themselves and declaring their own guilt while Trump can sit by idly and not do a thing.
The Trump camp/movie makers also do something else frequently: bring forth issues that highlight deeper, systemic problems in our Government. Biden and his crimes aren't the exception in D.C. but the rule. And so this document debacle is something EMBLEMATIC of the types of things going on which have led to the reign of the swamp.
When Russiagate happened, when it was exposed and the people who perpetrated it were at least in part outed for all to see I think Trump, WH and the Q Team all expected a major public outcry. When none came, I believe they THOROUGHLY changed their strategy and plans to slow things down and bring it back to basics. The hard times of today are part of a larger goal of WAKING PEOPLE UP to pay attention and so you've seen, now a few years on, a bigger public interest and outcry when crimes are once again exposed.
There will be then, a circle back around to the Russiagate actors to make them culpable again, this time with an engaged and concerned public. There also will come of this document, as we saw with House Speaker, a working toward fundamental change in how Classified materials are viewed stored and labeled in Washington to prevent it in the future. Yet another thing that THE MOVIE MAKERS like to do when the problems we are seeing hit the wire; connect it to an issue in government which is fundamentally broken and in need of reform.
That's my angle on it. This is going to try and affect fundamental rule changes on documents and it's also out there to show us how widespread this kind of selling out our country was among the swamp denizens. Everything for Trump and The WH is a learning tool and a guide; intended to educate and make us want to rebuild the structure to prevent the same corruption in the future. Full stop.
TLDR; Trump is showing us something deeper here. The [DS] are accidentally exposing it when their main concern was parting ways with Biden and trying to show even handed actions between the Trump and Biden issues.
America's Comeback Starts RIGHT NOW.
With those words, Trump gave the signal. To us, the message was that we should pick our heads up. We've reached the bottom and as we move forward, expect the LIES AND CORRUPTION to finally be exposed and shown in the light, and the wins to start once more. Don't worry too much more, Trump said, we are bringing our country back around now. I know its been exhausting and thank you for hanging in there while we did what had to be done; but now you can relax, because we aren't going to let them get any closer to the cliff.
Trump was giving a message to another group at the same time with those words, stated with firmness and clarity I'd never heard in his voice before. This was to the White Hats: the ones behind the scenes, the stagehands and lighting guys and key grips and gaffers who all are helping the movie along as its been playing out. "This is the signal guys; its time to get to work now - we're moving on to the next Act," he indicated. The defense is over, everyone put down your shields and unsheathe your swords; we've survived their onslaught and now its time to ATTACK.
His announcement came too early for any experienced political pundit's liking, it seemed amatuerish to do so soon. Trump BUILT IT UP with his TS posts beforehand so much that even the [DS] knew it would feel like a letdown to us, many hoping that this would FINALLY BE THE DECLAS we've known is coming. Weird things happened that day - a Russian missle landed in Poland that morning and stirred up talk of open warfare beginning. Media members at their desks uttered words like NATO retaliation and World War III.
It seemed like [DS] too was hoping this gambit by Trump was something benign, but they weren't taking any risks if he was going to drop the hammer on them.
Trump, in his usual 5D chess move, fooled us all. He made them panicked, only to breathe a laughing sigh of relief and wave their hands at him. He's getting weaker and weaker, they said to themselves. He's collapsing in on himself after we blew him away in the midterms. He's running out of ammo. The sudden relief of a seemingly lackluster announcement once again caused them to underestimate their opposition.
He fooled us too. A lot of people were coming out to draw their lines in the sand and start to break ranks. How are we going to win 2024 when they just cheated AGAIN? He shouldn't have built it up like that. He seems like he's got no fight left in him. He gave a 'politician' -type speech. He sounded defeated.
We all missed it. He told us what was going to happen and since he did its been getting better and better. From the Twitter Files, to FTX, to the House Speaker vote, the wins have been coming rapidly, each one seemingly BIGGER than the last.
With the revelations of CBS NEWS yesterday regarding a major scandal on Biden's handling of classified documents I have now become almost totally convinced of my theory. That announcement, that day, that moment, those words -- that was the marker. Everything seems have changed and gone in a new, brighter direction since then...
Trump just did an interview with John Solomon of Just the News. He talked about a few things, but mostly it was on Biden's documents - and he straight up told Joe, in the most polite way possible... it looks like you're FUCKED, buddy.
While Jack Smith and Garland fumble around in the dark for anything they can use, anything to possibly put some phony, ridiculous indictment over Trump's head, what just dropped onto Biden is something he will have SERIOUS TROUBLE surviving.
The Federal NARA regulations and the Presidential ones are VERY different - the former is MUCH MORE STRICT, Trump said confidently in his interview. As VP, Joe had NO ABILITY to declassify this stuff - and this was important and actionable info, the type of Top Secret that would have value to foreign baddies building an infiltration pipeline into our Government. So not only has Joe been caught with the murder weapon but now we have a really good narrative with respect to motive.
Hey and wouldn't you know it? This turns up JUST as a Committee is being set up to determine who was involved in this sort of shady business! But these documents bring it TO A WHOLE NEW LEVEL - we were trying to answer the question of whether he was trading on his name for money, a.k.a. influence peddling.
As raunchy as all that seemed, it lacked a key component needed to show the scummy behavior beyond a shadow of a doubt. IT'S ALL TALK. At the bottom, we would've had a hard time TRULY convincing Normie America to impeach & remove a sitting President for a handshake and some flowery words, even when they were directed at a hostile nation.
It's too much like "A Perfect Phone Call." There just isn't something tangible and physical to really prove he works for the bad guys.
But now this pops up. He had no reason to have them, and no reason to take them. Beyond a VERY OBVIOUS ONE that we were ALREADY TRYING TO PROVE AND ESTABLISH. This thing has got some big old legs on it and Joe is about to trip again. Can Joe even spell the word FELONY?
I'm not sure what the best part of it is - MANY NEW AVENUES this information could open up, the connections we might find.. Or the Lamestream Media just hitting the highest soprano note of Hypocrisy in their pathetic and bloviating dismissals of something they called SERIOUS CRIME and NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT just a few months ago.
Some of them have actually had the balls to tell the truth: We trust Joe and we DON'T trust Trump. How does that garbage resonate with America? Any objective person, even if they hated Trump, is supposed to accept that Biden is "honest"? Are ANY politicians thought of as honest by non brainwashed people in this country? Even if you never had heard a WORD about the bank transactions, the laptop, the Ukraine visits, any of it: I don't think "Trump is a LIAR so Joe is MORE trustworthy than others" really has the ring of truthfulness to it.
Jessie Watters explains, in simple terms, that there's a lot of WEIRD SHIT going on here. The lawyers reporting it to NARA, last minute Ukraine trips before leaving office, Biden not asking or knowing what documents they are (getting ahead on the plausible deniability angle?), the Penn Biden Foundation for Chinese massage: you can see there is a LOT underneath this scab. There's a BIG infection bubbling under the surface and lucky for Joe, we just elected some LICENSED corruption specialists to take a look at that nasty thing and heal it. Kash is saying this rings of a coverup, and I've got to agree. They're letting this out to hide something much bigger and worse, that's all too obvious right now.
So we know the MSM is reporting this to SHADE something else. We know this is criminal wrongdoing. We know they had this before the midterm. We know Joe must be VERY hot under the collar, because he's choosing to jump in hot water to likely avoid a boiling we don't yet understand.
We missed something really simple in this though. Something that PROVES we are in control of this, and its part of the movie Trump has set up to play out. When I heard it I was shocked at how easy it was to see, left out in plain sight.
Go to the little clip of Joe with Andrea Mitchell from 2018. At the PENN CENTER where these documents were. Listen to Biden. What does he say?
I have no access to classified documents, on Ukraine or anywhere else. I am no longer being briefed like I was daily, when I was the Vice President for 8 years.
Here's the rub: as VP, Biden had no powers to declassify. Even if he received these documents in a briefing, he COULDN'T hold on to them. So how did they get there? Did someone HAND THEM over to Biden, to help him make a little scratch off them? Where would that lead you? Who had power to declassify and to take documents with them after they were out of office? What did we JUST LEARN in Trump's case, about declassification powers?
This goes UPWARD from Biden, I can almost guarantee it. The [DS] is pulling something very hokey here and in the process, they are going to ADMIT they shirk and bypass the LAW and the rules we're forced to play by. What they keep doing, is referring to Biden as the "President" and applying THAT STANDARD to how you'd frame this legally. They will CONTINUE TO skirt around the fact that he was NOT the President whenever these documents made it out from where they belonged. There is a TOTALLY different standard they are ignoring. Listen to them gnarl up the legal jargon and stretch the truth till the rubber snaps. "Not a good look vs. Legal ramifications. Cooperation versus Obstruction."
Could they be trying to use this as a roundabout way to get some traction and public support to indict Trump? To somehow exonerate Biden of this (because it will unhook him for something way worse underneath this that has not hit the news YET) and then use the same rationale to show why Trump is guilty and should be indicted, by showing a side by side of their 'document mishaps'?
I am not sure as of yet, I can only relay the info we have and offer my opinion. We are ALL missing the fact that Biden told us "he had no access to classified docs" in 2018 when he as VP would NEVER have had that access to these particular ones nor could he keep ANYTHING. The media 🤡 continue to repeat the story as though Biden were PREISDENT from 08-16 and are ignoring the actual consequences he SHOULD face in this scenario, which are FAR WORSE. I am wondering if he even receives Intel briefings now, as POTUS.... there's something fishy about all this that makes me go back and question if he really might NOT BE Commander-in-Chief...
All I can say for sure is Trump gave the signal, and this will NOT be a win for them in the end.
So we all were waiting for the Supreme Court's Monday decision....
Here's a quick overview from a small conservative news network... Just reading the Gateway Pundit, basically.
And, unsuprisingly, it was a No.
This isn't over though! Check out u/catsfive top comment in the stickied post here on GAW.https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqiD2zIW/brunson--certiorari-denied-/
Now check out this article from Salt Lake Tribune. Particularly, Rayland Brunson's comments from last Thursday:
Hello my fabulous patriots and friends. Okay! Here is the deal with tomorrow's decision. The Supreme Court's schedule of posting decisions is always the Monday following conference. So, we won't know anything until Monday! Now, don't think for a second that my brothers and I are not prepared for a denial. We've got plenty of chess pieces still at play and we still have our queen. Through hard knocks we have learned how this political/litigation game works, so keep up the prayers and your letters to the Supreme Court! You count! We love everyone of you! Thank you for your wonderful support!
The Brunson brothers set the stage for a denial because a case like this would inevitably field that result. It's going to take more work and that is OK; its part of the process.
The other side of this is those who have said from the jump that the case is flawed. JustHuman touched on it this morning. About 7 minutes in and not much to say. Whole episode is a great listen, it's about other topics however... he touches on this so quickly, it's funny how a lot of the citizen journalist community has tried to veer away from it even as massive interest forces their hand.
Robert Barnes gave probably the best 2 minutes on what the case is and the dissenting view.
So here's where I'm at on it personally at this point - and feel free to disagree. This Brunson case was a fun little dig when it started and in its defense it has attracted a lot of interest and brought Patriots together. That can't be a bad thing.
But following the denial, we should temper our expectations for any kind of favorable outcome at this point. Even the Brunson's themselves knew that a denial was likely.
Where it succeeded was to call attention to the issue of Title 28 immunity - whereby politicians are not truly legally bound in their Oath of Office. It lets us know that they haven't been taking it seriously and that is legally sound for them... which is morally incorrect to many of us, and not why we vote for them.
Politically it is meritorious. At a time when [Jim Jordan will be heading up a committee on Federal Gov. Weaponization]( and so many other dark deeds of the political and elite classes are being exposed to the public, the case is a sincere plea TO OUR INSTITUTIONS to GIVE ITS PEOPLE some kind of ACTUAL JUSTICE.
However, from a LEGAL perspective this is a round peg jammed over a square hole. There just isn't ANY WAY for the Supreme Court to really look at this issue; its out of the scope of what sorts of things they decide on and enforcement is IMPOSSIBLE.
Its too big and clunky. What the Brunson case was good for was drawing attention to the aforementioned Oath of Office, something the Brunsons have long been interested in (they made a documentary about it years ago) and for jumping the hurdle on who has standing in these Election law cases. For a better chance at a favorable outcome we need to look to the micro:
- Kari Lake's lawsuit is definitely a prime candidate
- Also Garland Favorito in GA
The Brunsons will take next steps, apply for a rehearing in 25 days per the SCOTUS rules. They've said they aren't done and to hang in with them.
What are the possibilities here?
- It was always just a grift and a nothingburger, that got alot of undue praise and support (even the $ kind)
- It was a crucial and careful chess move by the WH to dissuade lame duck Pelosi from messing with Supreme Court at a desperate time for them, when major changes were coming (see: Omnibus fraud)
- it was controlled opposition to make Republican "far right" seem unhinged, frivolous
- It was an opening salvo to a bigger fight, where more carefully constructed cases by Brunsons or others begin to hit SCOTUS docket and actually make progress
- At a time when corruption is being exposed and investigated, calls public attention and drums up focused interest in both how our process of government works and what can and can't be remedied and by whom
I don't have any answers but I DO think on the whole the case is leading us somewhere. What might be most important about it is to show an audience of increasingly insulated and isolated politicians and elites that a great many people in America feel despondent, cheated and defrauded over the 2020 Election and will continue to make noise about it no matter how much the media tries to sell lies about J6.
It tells them that there are many new fresh sets of eyes on them, much the way that the recent House Speaker events have sparked new interest and attention into the mechanisms of our system - and outrage over the derailment of the processes as intended to work. They were able to get away with MUCH because for a long time from the late 90s to early 2010s there was a very low bar - the news media and entertainment technology KEPT people detached and uninterested in their politics, which has long been a staple of American life.
In America, one thing that kept us free from despotic rule for so long was the fact that Americans were ENGAGED and CONCERNED with what went on in their politics for MOST of the country's history since its founding - part of the grift of the last 30-50 years has been the CABAL finding ways to distract us or make us apathetic towards civil engagement.
I can never forget something I heard Jessie Ventura say during a conversation about becoming Governor of Minnesota. He said he knew he could win because his early numbers showed 10% in new voters and that MN people typically have America's highest percent of voters in elections, at 50%. This is the same strategy of Trump, what is sometimes called the silent majority. Personally, it came as a shock to me that half
We never stop to ask, why are we silent? Did someone make us be quiet, or convince us that it didn't matter? If so, who? I think of my mother and father, of the baby boomer generation, who are generally conservative but read and digest only the headlines. Their interests were always geared more towards movie stars like John Wayne or music groups like Aerosmith; that's the interest areas I picked up from them more than any other.
My grandmother was born in the Depression and while never having keen interest in politics beyond her love of John Kennedy, seemed to almost naturally key in on the media when they lied and kept a fairly cynical attitude towards anything she first read or heard. She read the local paper every day until she was too blind, and would leave news on in the background, occasionally relating back what she heard ... like most older folks she was constantly shocked at the changes in the world. More than this, she was always in the know about what government services and things she could receive, and never missed out on any help she could potentially qualify for. She was resourceful and pragmatic in a wonderful way.
What I'm saying is that cases like Brunson are part of a pattern emerging that had long been part of American life, but dissipated in recent times through a variety of factors. The grassroots activism, the silent majority waking up and voicing concerns.... the public interest that it received is part of a re-focus to this crucial issue that we've been forcibly separated from over generations.
The faster we wake up, the more we can soften the blow of hard times ahead. So whatever you think of Brunson and wherever it goes, its ALWAYS good when we're paying attention.
Godspeed.
Yesterday I posted a thread with some background info on both the Brunson SC Case and the House Speaker vote holdup. Increasingly its been noted that both of these things happening at the same time is ... interesting. Possible connections could exist, or perhaps its just fortunate coincedence. The legal remedy the Brunson case suggests of having over 300 members of Congress thrown out is now colliding with McCarthy's nomination to be House Speaker being held up, since NO House Member can be sworn in before a Speaker is elected.
Thus the timing of the Supreme Court deciding whether to hear arguments from the Brunson case today on January 6th combined with an entire branch of our government being "offline" and those members not yet officially having their titles and office is quite a strange coincedence. One must wonder what, if any, ramifications or consequences exist here. Both events independent of each other certainly carry much importance, and sometimes drastic events and changes can occur quite quickly in Washington as we have recently seen.
Many of us are pretty informed about both topics by this point so my goal here is not to beat a dead horse but rather to give you all the skinny on where things are at with the Brunson case, as most of the media has outright ignored it, and limited information has made it out about what is going on currently.
Seems as though the Court did review the case today! Here is a nice update mentioning this and giving a re-read of the brief and outlining the case.
Another good update found from a user on YT. He shows footage of some patriotic citizens who were gathered outside the Supreme Court earlier today to show their support for the case.
The conference at the Supreme Court today will have them looking at a grand total of 430 cases and deciding which ones to take on.
A user on Rumble posted a PRAYER message video featuring Juan O Savin earlier today.
While I didn't hear any updated news during these ladies' discussion, I wanted to send this along in case others would like to actively connect and offer prayers of their own. I will say that it was heartening and humbling reading the earnest prayer messages of many people who are watching and waiting. Coupled with the scenes of those standing outside the highest court today in the second link, I am overwhelmed at the decency and goodness of so many people in our country, who are faithfully standing strong with God and in their plea for justice to be done in His name.
- Whatever results come, we should all take a moment to appreciate that we've been brought together in our faith and hopes for a better world through all that has happened. Despite the chaos and turmoil, the common humanity we are finding as so many of us look to God and one another in the midst of the suffering is something truly special. We are blessed to count ourselves among those who can see things clear-eyed and have found a new togetherness and unity in the Lord and life.
So without further ado here is the result: Nil. We won't know until Monday at the earliest, 9:30AM. This is normal procedure for the Supreme Court. Announcements about which cases will be taken are made then. So in the meantime all, continue to hold the line and pray that we will have a favorable result.
Monday 9:30AM we'll find out. Godspeed!
I know InfoWars and Mr. Stone aren't the most popular or trusted of the bunch and there are decent arguments against them.
However, Roger Stone is a LEGENDARY organizer and platform architect in Republican politics and has had RARE LEVELS of access and experience in Washington D.C. during his lifetime. The INSIGHTS and MAPPING he provides here is SECOND TO NONE.
Simply put, this is what Roger Stone knows better than almost anyone. No one else I've heard has broken it down so well and given clear, logic reasoning for both sides, which leads us to his predictions for next moves and likeliest outcomes. I was very impressed and I think you will be too!
This is the meat and potatoes breakdown. Stone covers just about everything here. Importantly he makes the note that the 'Red Wave' showing up in reality as a 'Pink Drizzle' in part due to McCarthy ignoring and spending to stifle many America First candidates has put him in this position. The Establishment cut off its nose to spite its face and THIS IS THE RESULT THEY DESERVE.
Roger Stone brilliantly elucidates all of the fantastic fuck ups that led McCarthy to where he is and shows how he is basically between a rock and a hard place. McConnell and McCarthy have ALMOST THE SAME voting record. McCarthy losing votes as the rounds continue is a death knell and his only way out would be to work a deal with the Dems; if Dems vote present and reduce the magic number from 218 down to 198, McCarthy theoretically could make it over the hurdle. BUT HE WOULD LOSE VOTES IMMEDIATELY from the Republican side, who would be pressured and shamed by their voters back home if they then cast a vote for McCarthy and colluded in such a plot with Dems. McCarthy's support is VERY WRAPPED UP in elections and campaigns so he would be unable to "sell" Republican colleagues on the idea of working with Jeffries & Dems - they would have the bottom drop out on them.
Stone says despite all this, McCarthy will continue to press and keep his name in the voting despite it being IMPOSSIBLE for him to win now. Although the best and honorable thing to do would be to step aside, Stone says that McCarthy cannot, because his 'owners' in lobbyist groups, Wall Street etc. PAID A LOT OF MONEY TO PUT HIM IN and they want RETURN ON INVESTMENT. He couldn't stop now even if he wanted to.
A look deeper into the tactics and strategy of the 20 dissenters. How they did a flawless job and could break this open and create real change that's good for America. Donalds could be the front runner soon. Lauren Boebert whooped stupid Sean Hannity's ass. Pence and media don't move the needle. Using Trump statement to attack Gaetz and others fell flat on its face. Stone correctly guesses Trump will be put forward; received confirmation from Mar-a Lago that POTUS WOULD CONSIDER SERVING.
This is wonderful stuff folks i hope you take time to check it out! I have to say i normally don't watch much AJ or Infowars but when it comes to this subject and the Demar Hamlin incident they have had good coverage and been on the money lately.
I gave a bullet point breakdown of the major stuff in a different thread if you want to read through it. Didn't want to make this one too long! Too good not to share though.
I really enjoy Gaetz and have for a while now - very excited to see him catch the limelight for a moment right now! We NEED people like him to become our future leaders, once we cull all the McCarthy types.
Godspeed all!
Just a quick thought here:
- The some background for the Brunson Supreme Court case:
"....seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. representatives and 94 U.S. senators who voted to certify the electors to the Electoral College on Jan. 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 presidential election. The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency."
"The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four justices to move the case forward."
"It seems astounding that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as president. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for justices, and thereby open the door to packing the Court."
(Credit Tim Canova, Highland County Press)
- Without electing a Speaker of the House, per the NYT:
"Without a speaker, the United States House of Representatives essentially becomes a useless entity. Because none of its members can be sworn in until a speaker is chosen, there are no lawmakers to respond to an emergency or a crisis, only representatives-elect."
"With no rules adopted, the legislative process cannot move forward; no bills can be passed or resolutions adopted. Lacking a speaker, the House cannot carry out its responsibility for oversight of the federal government or any other entity. The House cannot haul witnesses before committees, and those elected to serve cannot set up operations to help out their constituents. "Returning lawmakers have lost their security clearances to get private briefings from the military and the intelligence agencies because, having not been sworn in, they are not officially members of Congress."
"But legal experts doubted whether any action taken by a House without a speaker — who is second in line to the presidency — could withstand judicial review. For more than 200 years, the House has used provisions from the Constitution and from a 1789 law to form the basis for its order. According to the Revised Statutes of the United States, at the first session of Congress, the body must first swear in a speaker who then administers the oath of office to all members present, previous to entering on any other business."
"This statute, along with a precedent from March 4, 1869, provides that the election of a speaker is the first and highest priority of the House. This precedent was reaffirmed on Jan. 7, 1997, when the clerk ruled that nominations for speaker were of a higher constitutional privilege than a resolution to postpone the election of speaker until an ethics review had run its course."
Would this be THE BEST TIME to "DRAIN THE SWAMP" as they say? During the hold up, when all of these buffoons are not technically "elected" and the body only partially exists in a legal framework?
Maybe looking into the case during this time and/or bridging forward a legal remedy - from the Supreme Court that is - would apply pressure and solve some problems at THE PERFECT MOMENT in Washington.
Maybe if the SC indicates interest (or whatever they decide) could CHANGE how some of these members cast their votes as this sideshow plays on.
Dont know, i guess we shall see. But fortuitous timing for all of it, wouldn't you say?
what are your thoughts?