1
dominickmilford 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good post and consideration OP. The "any and all" portion of that pardon can include anything related to FARA violations and Burisma along with the weapons charges - showing that the gun charges were actually PART IN PARCEL of the setup to do this because of the time frame when they happened and so the pardon would cover much of the illegal foreign $ op.

The people mentioning state crimes have it. Glenn Beck once did a whiteboard of all the crimes committed by Hunter and which states they were in - CT, Nevada, take your pick there have to be 20 or more. Nothing ever pushed along seriously.

Most likely that's all she wrote. No one is going to raise those old ghosts in a Republican led administration. Such blatant faggotry is reserved for Democratic regimes and their flagrant newspeak partners. 🤣

1
dominickmilford 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great post u/FractalizingIron you have definitely set the stage very thoroughly and accurately posited the stakes at hand.

My personal feeling is that Wray is NOT to be trusted, and that all of those calls by Q to [trust "so-and-so"] amounted tothinly veiled disinfo placements by Q for us to consider and conduct later analysis on [just like we are doing now!]

I think in the context of the statement what Q means with that ever critical word Trust is really to trust [said person] to do be on his worst behavior, and do their best job at being a total piece of [DS] slime that will act with impunity and be beyond reproach with the support of the scumbag unelected administrative state [the DS as a government within a government]

That's a long winded way of saying Trust them to act out the part we have prescribed for them. I believe that they are following the breadcrumb trail accordingly and unaware [mostly, or at least they can't pivot in any reasonable sense from the path they are on] of what their effects on the citizenry have wrought.

Trust them to be what they are and in the process red pill the public of America in the most massive way possible.

Biden is of course takes primacy when it comes to this as you very astutely explained. That said, the other malign actors like Garland and Wray fulfilled an important role when it came to erasing trust at specific levels by following their orders with jolly exuberance and unflinchingly carrying the Administration's water for it.

The setup and execution of the entire "Trump operation" (or whatever term you like for it) essentially gave them all the rope they would need to hang themselves and ever so reliably they walked STRAIGHT into the trap beginning with stealing the election for Biden, Bill Barr and Wray refusing to put any effort into investigating the election questions, followed by the fraudulent psy op conducted at J6 and on and on.

Dependable to fulfill their obligations to our mission: i.e. commit to EVERY LAST FOOLISH AND UNLAWFUL ACTION requested by the Biden admin and expected by the Trump team, carving out an indelible record of illegal and unconstitutional behavior unique to anything in prior American history and with so doing creating a cascade of outrage and sympathy in the hearts of the American people, who have a track record since our founding of identifying and standing passionately against injustices by those who hold power.

Trust that they will step into their role and they did so, with merits! 🤣

If Wray is an asset, then I feel it stands to reason that it must be the ENTIRE Biden Admin is in on the game and I just can't bring myself to believe that some like Blinken and Majorkas have been working on our side all along.

Great conversation and post OP, happy to have the opportunity to share my thoughts. Godspeed all and NCSWIC 👍

1
dominickmilford 1 point ago +1 / -0

That isn't up to Wray, whether or not he "rides it out" until 2027. Trump would have to leave him there, or somehow be so hamstrung that he could not fire him and bring in Kash.

Does not compute

3
dominickmilford 3 points ago +5 / -2

The fact that anyone needs to be told that is a little off-putting... c'mon , his DAD would say "I WILL CALL EVERYONE NAMED PATEL"

... because I have a white person's sense of humor, even when it's a tremendous opportunity for my Indian son. BLARP! 🤡

Yeah. Getting ahead of our skis lately ... endless winning will do that of course. 🤣🤣

7
dominickmilford 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is also ironic because very soon both networks will be available for purchase for the price of a Hallmark card. u/#LetTheSinkIn

1
dominickmilford 1 point ago +1 / -0

It appears that the flair is no longer there.

I don't see it, was it removed?

Unless that is the joke...!?!? But that seems too galaxy brain.

1
dominickmilford 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK, I realized I needed more space than the title to fully explain my thoughts around this.

First off I would call myself a Badlands "casual" in terms of keeping up with their stuff... I was MUCH more of a 'Patel Patriot' follower before he set Badlands up.

I think that there are a few folks here who are pretty big into Badlands content... not sure how many casual listeners like myself are around. I ALSO followed Burning Bright's work on Substack before he joined the crew.

I know some people are very hip to the Badlands scene and even clued into some behind the scenes drama, who has [insert personal problem] and all that fun stuff. (I vaguely remember something about a long time female contributor who left?)

I am definitely NOT at that level, so please understand my opinions in context. As I mentioned I followed Patel Patriot but when they announced Badlands Media and started tossing out so many shows it made me dizzy. I thought maybe this wasca bit premature, moving too fast... but I respect the ambition.

Of course now there is like 4x that amount of programming, so what did I know? I have definitely tuned in for full episodes, especially if say a link was stickied here. I probably can't tell you if it was Defected or Eye of the Storm, but...

I guess that was an issue I had with the initial rollout - it felt like different titles but really just different pairings of the same 8 people - and then a **"Special guest" who is just a third member from the roster.**A few truly differentiate themselves, but the lion's share of content seems low on variety despite marketing it the opposite. Again, just my opinion.

With respect to talent there is a pretty clear drop down between the top content creators and the rest of the bunch. Not to be rude but "PGunnels" is a lot more palatable when he is tagging along with 4+ other contributors and confined to his role of reading articles and being playfully chided by the gang. And does he have to be in EVERY other show? Is it just me who feels like that?

The rest of these dudes seem pretty legit. Starting with Jon Herold.. I don't think anyone can deny the indelible mark DEVOLUTION made on the MAGA/Digital Soldier movement. I've heard people say he is a shill; I haven't heard that from anyone important however.

Jon Herold as showrunner and host though... Frequently his role is to keep discussions on topic and moving along. He can seem like a dick sometimes; I don't agree, but I DO think he's a ham. Overall I think he is driven, a hard worker, and more of a reporter than a philosopher or prognosticator.

Zak and Brad both seem like heavy hitters, with a wealth of information from a lifetime of doing this kind of deep dive research. They offer a lot whenever they contribute. Chris Paul is another good one, he brings a lot of passion. He's reliable to add humor to the mix, typically makes strong arguments, more on the topical end, latest news etc.

Ashe is all right, Paul is another very smart one, doesn't want to lead the conversation but makes great contributions when he gets his chances. After this I think we go down a few notches but I admit I may be overlooking someone.

Dont remember much special for Cann, PiP, "Alpha" or most of the rest.... 'RattlerGater' I have no idea, the name is a turn off however. I don't like cryptodude GMONEY at all. Oh and of course Matthew Trump.... ugh, gotta roll your eyes there. 😬

By the way, where is JustHuman? He seems to have disappeared. Seems like there could be a story.

Anyways this leaves Burning Bright, who to me is the BEST of the Badland bunch and I don't think it's close. He is "the narrative guy" but that implies he excels at so much more. He's a deep thinker and an excellent communicator. What's more is that he has the rare IT factor that makes certain people eminently listenable and relatable, even when they present challenging ideas. I don't honestly find that unique, captivating sort of charisma in anyone else on the Badlands team - not meant as an insult either.

In my experience as a reader, he often seeks to challenge you. He delights in exposing a hidden thread that leads to a whole new narrative exposition or reinforces an established one, he is deft at debunking the globalist and leftist notions and their false narratives that they try to sway the public with.

This show is going to be the #1 Badlands program and the one they should've had going all along.

I thought he and JustHuman were fine together in their show but it wasn't made to cater more to one or the other of them. They did work nicely together but this will be something completely different and higher level I believe.

Burning Bright with as little crowd noise or interference as possible is getting their best guy in his element - free to tell the story with no demands or interruptions, bringing in his guest to springboard off of as much or as little as he decides to.

This guy always needed a solo vehicle and I'm excited to see where it goes for him.

All right I spent a long time saying one little thing so this is the sign off. This episode was excellent, btw - and hopefully there's more to come.

0
dominickmilford 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

From what I am reading here it sounds like he is talking about a more involved point and not just stating anything in a general fashion.

This is also over a year old and some of the more damning comprehensive research on the Vax has only been released within the last 6-12 months. (I know that's hard to buy for us as Anons because of how long we have known and suspected but its true; consider that only recently the vax was shelved etc)

He is saying thatbif a pregnant woman has NOT had Covid before he would, in general, reccomend her to get it, but ONLY a one-dose vax not the two part shot most commonly received by Americans - interesting, that last caveat in particular.

Furthermore he IS taking into account natural immunity (so he isn't a Fauci worshiping psychotic), and he says only that he would reccomend it nothing stronger than that. Doctors recommend flu shots every year, some take them and some don't, that's the way I would interpret him.

But he then acknowledges that having no safety or efficacy data that is reliable is antithetical to providing good healthcare and will destroy public trust, which was I think the larger subject at issue in the exchange this was pulled from.

See what Dr. Naomi Wolf says about him. I trust very few anymore, but she has been a consistently reliable whistleblower against this criminal enterprise based on fraudulent medicine from the beginning.

21
dominickmilford 21 points ago +21 / -0

They should collab with Babylon Bee to make some or all of the programming into liberal satire. Think about it - a nightly block of Colbert Report style liberal trolling. That would be so epic!

4
dominickmilford 4 points ago +4 / -0

What is it about this interview?? I have seen long loops of it just like this on YT and people are in the live chat still, like, I have no idea why..

2
dominickmilford 2 points ago +2 / -0

God bless you and keep you friend! Very happy to hear everything is going to work out for y'all.

3
dominickmilford 3 points ago +4 / -1

Ummm, why are they not immediately deploying flashbangs, tear gas grenades and the like against these rioters?

Is that not what they typically do? Judging by the bodycam footage taken from that one fastidious prick zealous officer I thought that the standard procedure for dealing with a crowd of protestors was:

  1. THROW GRENADES INTO THE CROWD as soon as you have made contact with the riotous assembly and are within range. If they do not begin to disperse: CONTINUE TO THROW GRENADES. Do not worry about striking someone with a canister. Continue to monitor the crowd - if they have STILL NOT DISPERSED you are advised to KEEP THROWING THEM DAMN GRENADES. If you are out run up to other agents and borrow theirs. KEEP THROWING!

1a. If the crowd has not dispersed, survey the area and answer the following: Is the crowd somehow barricaded or stuck, preventing retreat? Is the crowd so large that protesters cannot physically move away?

1b. That's just to cover your ass later, in case some ACLU pussy gets involved! Now, what am I gonna tell you to do???

1c. THROW THEM LIKE YOUR PLAYING FUCKING COUNTER STRIKE, OK BIG DAWG?!?!?

  1. If the crowd advances or begins to clamber over stairs and objects, fire into them with your weapon. If they come toward you for any reason, spray their asses with rubber bullets.

  2. Okay hotshot, you've done well to let these rioting urban Jihadists know that they need to respect meh authoriteh Officer Cartman style, but what's that? A few little Hornets are zipping around with their stingers out, trying to form lines and push?

4.NUT UP AND GET INTO THAT FRAY. Borrow any equipment you don't have and think you need - riot shield, baton, taser - and show them why steroids are cool.

  1. REPRISAL. Did the guy next to you just get pushed? BASH THAT SKULL. OMG, BILL FELL DOWN! TASER THAT SCUM. Bonus points for dicks and nipples. Remember to act dramatically, as though you have to let loose with all you got to survive! A few puny Trumpers against your fully armored squad may not ACTUALLY present any threat, but stay on the cagey little bastards. Push them down and zip tie their hands together if they so much as squirm. You are a hero of democracy today my son!

6.If you have down time... you guessed it. GRENADES! FRAG OUT!

Well, I got a little overzealous here for sure, but it sure is pretty STRIKING to watch how they handle a crowd of protestors who are potentially MORE obstinate and uncooperative then any encounter made during J6. It's almost like they shouldn't have started by using force on a large crowd unless they wanted to scale up the violence to control the narrative, or something....

I will find that bodycam footage and post it here, also. You guys know the one ....

5
dominickmilford 5 points ago +5 / -0

LEHMAN IS A HOLD! .... DO NOT SELL BEAR STEARNS! .... I AM SELLING TESLA AT 105$ ITS OVERLEVERED LIKE CRAZY! ... JOE BIDEN IS FULLY COMPETENT .... MY THOUGHTS ON NUCLEAR WAR? IF IT WILL HAPPEN?? WELL, I THINK...

Everyone: ::SHUT THE FUCK UP JIM!::

😅

3
dominickmilford 3 points ago +3 / -0

God, this is such a fuckjob / smear campaign. Is anyone competent enough to scratch their chin and wonder along with me why is it that the House Ethics Committee left this investigation open and only NOW were they ready to release a report?

How long ago did they complete their investigation? How long ago did they stop collecting evidence? It seems like years have passed since Matt Gaetz went on Tucker Carlson's show - when he was still at Fox I mean - and completely denied this entire thing and said that when everything was revealed he would be completely vindicated of any wrongdoing.

Is that perhaps WHY they have decided to DRAG this along until now? Long after the DOJ has closed it's own investigation into the same matter and decided not to charge Gaetz with anything?

The House shared information with DOJ of course because they can't prosecute former Congressman Gaetz themselves...

Oh! But what they CAN do is smear his good name at a specific time of their choosing, like when he is on the cusp of a major political appointment in Washington, they can keep it open and wait until then to release it! Totally ETHICAL.

Did you ever hear the way McCarthy responded about the allegations when he was asked in the media? It sounded like code for good riddance. "Wow, that's a serious charge, he would certainly be in BIG TROUBLE if that turned out to be true! But we will have to wait and see what all the information tell us."

You wonder why Gaetz had it out for ol' Kev-O? Look no FUCKING further. Here is the guy who is setting up to be Speaker after the 2020 Republican victory in the house; a leader of the Republican conference who is purportedly a senior member in leadership - does he stand up for the younger members of his caucus? Does he consider when Matt came to him and pleaded with him to help out?

Already knowing Matt to be a vehement supporter of the Constitution and pushing hard to return to proper House procedures that are germane to what the Constitution calls for? Matt, who has stood up time and again for President Trump? Matt Gaetz who works tirelessly in his role to deliver for his constituents and the America First agenda?

Or maybe something else is going on. Maybe a certain other Congressman who had a brief but rocky time in the House, who was a paraplegic from a tragic car accident, who was friends with Charlie Kirk and also known to Matt Gaetz, maybe someone like that has something to do with the strange disdain McCarthy showed Matt privately and the calm indifference he showed in public?

Did that guy call Kev-O a fucking coke head? Did he say he was doing key bumps in the parking garage? Did he say they had big orgies in Congress that he was invited to but declined? Did he say this was some wild shit and it's just like we thought? does that guy have something to do with it?

Of course all those CRAZY AND BASELESS allegations were denied, what evidence did he have? And soon after some weird photos and videos of him came out and HE WAS THE ONE who had to resign! Haha! Pot calling the kettle black of course!

McCarthy is NOT like that. Just because he punches hand dryers and leaves a dent in them... just because he tried to beat the shit out of Swallfart after leaving the bathroom another time... just because he screamed at Gaetz during the Speaker vote like a psychopath... just because he SLAPPED A DUDE he didn't like on camera while passing him in the hallway... what does THAT prove??!? Fucking psychopath Californian... Nancy in a different skin suit.

Well just like this dog and pony show with Gaetz. It PROVES nothing. He didn't stand up for Matt when he could've and he didn't consider his request to help get the Ethics investigation closed when DOJ had cleared Gaetz. He screwed him. And then he got screwed, too.

This has been sitting there and waiting to spring on him since the drama with McCarthy went down. I think its pitiful and sad that these lowlifes are STILL trying to get PAYBACK for their ass buddy McCarthy - when it was McCarthy who decided to pick a fight with Gaetz and make an enemy in the first place. Turned out to be a really shitty move but oh well.

Pfffff I could say more, about the blackmailer who Don Gaetz (Matt's father) reported after the guy contacted them and said he could make it go away for a cool couple of million $ .... but honestly why is any of this still relevant?

The fucking Democrats have their personal chefs turn up drowned to death in 2 foot deep water right outside their house or a secretary with whom they carried on a sexual relationship with while she was married is dead in their office on Monday morning when they turn the lights on.

There's a little curiosity from the media followed by some excuses that are heavy on feels and light on logic, and the whole goddamn thing blows over like SOMEONE DID NOT DIE AND TURN UP RIGHT BEFORE THEIR FEET. Any SUPPLEMENTAL ETHICS INQUIRIES for that kind of scoundrel non-sense? For a MURDER, compared to... no no I shouldn't equivocate..

Let's get real. If they COULD HAVE gotten Gaetz they would have JUMPED and never looked back. We all know that, he has been a public enemy to them for years now.

This is the hype train trying to derail our agenda by trying to turn us against our most staunch allies who are fighting the swamp to save our country.

If we back out on Gaetz, they will NOT STOP. They will come for EVERY SINGLE MEMBER that Trump appoints to his new administration, mark my words on that.

I am a big Matt Gaetz guy and I have been for years and I CANNOT WAIT until he gets to occupy the big chair and ask what they think of him now.

Don't lose faith in him for one single second!

Godspeed.

4
dominickmilford 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, I did ignore the more practical goals of Russia in my post, thank you for responding and tacking them on.

"The bread basket of the world" and retention of the long-standing access point to the waterway are both significant economic points for Russia and deserve to be mentioned in the overall discussion.

I just thought that when compared to the nexus of malevolent plans for the Ukranian landmass that were/are in play for the U.S., NATO and their stateless corporate overlords, Russia's purely strategic aims are very... plainspoken, I guess would be a word I'd favor to describe them?

Simple and understandable by comparison. Accomplished, possibly, by a return to normal relations with the Ukranian state and its backers.... If the right set of leaders between the three nations were in power, maybe it wouldn't even require an expressly written treaty or the like. It's hard to say though - a lot of damage and destruction has occurred, sadly.

In any case there is no doubt that the West and specifically America had more than one ball rolling with regard to Ukraine. Bio labs, money laundering, resource dominance - it's a place where shadowy things happen and our worst actors from Intel and State seem to all have a connection - not for a second forgetting Hunter Biden and the family at large, who were actively involved and playing a significant role, right up until the time President Trump asked Zelenskyy a harmless question during a quick congratulatory phone call.

I just wanted to call attention to the planned joint venture between the multinationals and the US IC to capture and utilize resources in the Ukranian territory. The corpos grow quarterly profits and rake up billions and we isolate and starve the Russian economy, a win for the statecraft types and neocons who have long planned this within our government. That was a sketch of the original plan at least, who knows where they want to take it now.

We might figure it all out someday but for now I say prayers for an end to hostilities and a de-escalation.

3
dominickmilford 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for this post. Capacity is a major component we all could easily overlook. This is really more shock and awe it would seem, doesn't have the teeth it wants to you think it does

19
dominickmilford 19 points ago +19 / -0

Listen to Mike Benz. The Donbass region in particular is rich with natural gas and Ukraine itself has trillions of dollars worth of minerals and other resources as Lynnsey Graham shared recently, much to his own chagrin.

The contracts to that land were bought up some time ago by BlackRock and many other top multinationals, but now that a rebuilding effort has been planned Halliburton I believe and maybe Royal Dutch Shell are in there as well. It's a whole group of the slime in any case, who had and have extensive plans to begin stripping out the country's resources.

But originally it was about Burisma and using our influence within that corporation to foster partnerships (i.e. sell our globocorpos the rights to the ownership of tracts of land in their possession) and then work through Burisma to make Ukraine a natural gas powerhouse to supply Europe and shut out Russia from a role where it could supply the bulk of European energy.

This was a broad multinational coalition of Western powers lead by our CIA attempting to institute a plan that was decades in the making. The influence campaign to rally support in Ukraine that favored the Western powers hit several snags however, and the corpos holding contracts on land that was gas and mineral rich in the Donbass region did not want Russia to hold sway over that land, nor for Ukraine to cede control of it, despite the will of the Donbass people and their history.

Even as the region became too volatile for Kiev to hold, and all common sense warned that this region was untenable to try and continue exerting control over for Ukraine's government, the US and NATO repeatedly pushed Ukraine to not validate their elections and to continue the endless guerilla warfare in the region.

In the decade leading up to Russia invading to protect the Donbass region's people, who suffered immensely and cost much human life in the constant fighting that Ukraine persisted in carrying out on behalf of the American Intel agencies, there were tons of opportunities to find ways to make peace and negotiate a settlement all sides could be happy with.

But the corporate aims were not to share this region with Russia and to cut them off from powering large parts of Europe by extracting energy from this particular region, so no deals could be reached. We pushed Ukraine on behalf of our corporate masters and they pushed the Donbass on behalf of us.

It's all naked, unabashed greed and a war of choice that we allowed to be funded by removing sanctions on a major Russian pipeline, giving them the revenue to at last finance this military campaign, where they are in part humanitarian in scope, seeking to stop the atrocities carried out by the pro-fascist Ukraine militias over the past decade in Donbass.

Then we carried out covert ops to blow up that same pipeline a couple of years later. We punished Russia by kicking them out of SWIFT, forcing them to return to a gold standard as backing for their currency, the ruble. Ironically this was a major boon for the Russians, as their increased supply of a different commodity (oil/gas) due to a restarted pipeline was well met by demand, pushing gold prices higher due to the relationship it shares with energy prices and sharply increasing the ruble value even as new billions came into Moscow coffers.

Strange indeed, that we helped our supposed enemies finance this war and our Ukranian friends are allowed to be little more than cannon fodder, but the deeper levels of complexity are harder to grasp for anyone not directly keyed in on the inner machinations of foreign policy.

Look to Mike Benz for a more complete explanation, I've just laid out some basics and I hope I was somewhat accurate.

5
dominickmilford 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is a really great clip, powerful words by RFK Jr. He has endured a lot in his life.

More of us need to embrace and understand stoicism and harness the power that living with those tenets can provide. Victimhood is antithetical to stoicism but it prevails today as the most typical response to hardship.

We blame others for our inaction and mistakes, make excuses for ourselves whenever possible so that we don't have to accept or address our shortcomings.

No one is ever the author of their own suffering, no, you were put here by others who meant you harm and if not for them you would've been able to do all the things you didn't accomplish. You were held back by outside forces in the world and you can safely ignore the inner world and anything that happened there when you size up how you got to where you are today.

That's so diametrically opposed to stoicism and the inner strength it demands from those who follow that path. This country was made by tough people who never let themselves succumb to their circumstances and faced every next challenge with a brave face.

We are allowing our country to be unmade by people who desire to be pitied when they are wounded, who want rewards for the punches that life had them take, and use outward expressions of vulnerability and emotion to manipulate the situation to their own advantage. Listen to RFK Jr.

3
dominickmilford 3 points ago +3 / -0

I support the TaQo theory, and further add on:

Also I think our age of consent laws need major overhaul and France and Europe are light years ahead of us. I am currently in a poly thruple with my big old polar bear and Mr. Mongoose. My big bear found me in his social studies 7th grade class. Back then I didn't know I was a Frisky Fox deep down yearning to break free! Mr. Mongoose joined us during my junior year of high school. Our big bear introduced both of us to dozens of other forest creatures and we have lots of fun playdates. We are all very happy and this is completely normal. We love our forest family. HIV+ and on PrEP.

(yes its twisted, but aren't they always, honestly? 😑 )

2
dominickmilford 2 points ago +2 / -0

This has been a Biden DOJ fuckjob and infiltration campaign since it started. Here's the way it goes: someone who is tangentially adjacent to the target, or in plain language a guy who knows a guy who's brother-in-law worked for Gaetz for 3.5 years on his campaign finance team, gets into trouble. Guy gets embroiled in some shady shit: sex trafficking, selling secrets to Russians, a sexual assault, whatever - but the more salacious the better.

"Matthew Colangelo's office, how may I direct your call?"

"Where is he? I gotta talk to him now. Just came across the wire - this is huge."

"Sir, Mr. Colangelo is taking his lunch in his office and requested he not be disturbed. He has appointments for the rest of today and no availab-"

"Sweetie do you know who you're speaking to? This is something he is going to want to run up the chain - I'm talking MAIN JUSTICE. We got-"

beep

"Matthew Colangelo, to whom am I speaking?"

"A fellow servant of justice and friendly Floridian, who just happens to have some information on a recent indictment you may find.... useful."

"Tom?"

"Who else you son of a gun. You ever start folding your towels like a grown up?"

Literally, that's how this happens. When you're a target, eyes and ears everywhere are looking out for any way to get to you. Sometimes a buddy from Princeton calls an office and informs them of something they just learned.

Maybe that person gets a big promotion for bringing it to the attention of Main Justice. Maybe he celebrates with some new co-workers and lets something out of his mouth he might regret later.

Maybe a third comrade within earshot picks up the message. Maybe later when he's sitting and waiting on his coke dealer's couch he tells a story. Maybe that dealer has a personal friend who can do something with that information. Maybe he hands it over, either at no cost or perhaps for a little scratch on the front end and promises of more on the back to a guy like Alford.

Now Alford has his own scheme running that he needs to get financing for. He makes contact with the family of the official that the perp used to work for and tries to blackmail the guy over some wrongdoing of his son the official.

That's how shit like this all happens and I'm not even joking but the problem here is that it has no connection to reality, so the real criminals get reported to the Feds.

Meanwhile the investigation of the perp gets word and tries to make a deal in exchange for cooperation on this thing. You're a scumbag right? Just testify against your old boss and tell us what we need to hear; give us the girl and get her to corroborate your story, and any witnesses or associates of yours willing to play ball. We'll help you out.

What the investigators don't realize is someone is playing their game but on the black market and he is ren steps ahead of them. He's already reached the family and made demands in exchange for his help in making it disappear.

What neither one anticipated was that they were dealing with innocent honest folks even though they are wealthy in private life. They've already gone to the media and the local cops to tell their story.

A significant part of this thing, in my opinion, would've been trying to get a FISA onto Gaetz and then they could spy on MAGA. Why not?!? They did it to a sitting President, w7hat's a sitting Congressman by comparison?

2
dominickmilford 2 points ago +2 / -0

This gave me an idea for another song that will pair nicely with Tom Homan's southern border and the wonderful agents who patrol it vigilantly.

DROWNING POOL

Let the bodies hit the...

::metal growl:: BORRRRRR-DERRRRR!

.... Well, admittedly, not quite sure how the rest of the song lyrics will slot in, but that one post-chorus part really did the job nicely!

https://youtu.be/04F4xlWSFh0?si=VocxuW11O4DWqiwt

Something's got to give.... waaaaaah!

(Is it actually "now!" right there? Ah well, anyways!)

4
dominickmilford 4 points ago +4 / -0

I must say that I love your choices in music..

Oh and in Border Czars, as well. Tricky a bit, those ones. 😎

view more: Next ›