I don't believe Trump has stated that. In the CPAC speech he said that he endorsed the vaccine, recommended it, and is confident in it, but that it was a choice and that he agrees with those who don't want to take it too.
I'm not going to take it. It's for the sick and old people dying of the Wu Flu. Neither Trump or the government has recommended universal vaccination.
That's mainly something Fauci has been pushing, saying that we need 90% vaccination for "herd immunity", probably because he knows that 90% vaccination is impossible. Another way to sabotage the vaccine.
How is your belief in internet randos not blind trust? Unless you have direct knowledge of the vaccine you have to trust someone.
And if we compare the sources, your position comes from unverifiable internet randos and mine comes from a trust in Trump and the military.
The government funded the creation of the vaccine with $10 Billion, could scrutinize it to their heart's desire, and the military has micromanaged its storage and distribution from government warehouses.
But noooo, they have no idea what is in the vaccines and they are unknowingly going to kill us all.
I have another theory: Your sources are a load of crap and we should trust Trump and the military instead of internet randos.
So my theory is that shuffling your feet in socks against the carpet and then touching a doorknob will produce a static shock. I want to test my theory. Why would I need 30 or 100 people to do that?
This isn't medicine. Not all studies need large amounts of people with different immune systems. After five people do it we can probably say it's good evidence that we are conductive.
It may be a scam, but the person in the video has crap arguments. He argues that because the scientific study only had five people, it's a scam. He says that a scientific study needs 100 people minimum. He is literally just making things up as his arguments against this.
How many people do I have to punch in the face to prove that being punched in the face hurts?
Who has proved themselves more to you, Trump and the military, or the anonymous people claiming that the vaccine that they are sponsoring and managing is bad and is going to kill everyone?
Clearly, you should believe Trump and not anonymous internet randos who could be DS shills parroting misinformation.
The vaccines are not meant for you. They meant for the old and sick people dying of the Wu Flu, which is used by the DS to justify the endless lockdowns.
DS agents like Fauci are pushing the need for "90% vaccination", because they know that we can never reach that number. It's another way to sabotage Trump's attempt to save us.
The Army's COVID-19 vaccine is aimed at targeting the flu and common cold:
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/coronavirus/article245665350.html
Army COVID-19 vaccine may produce a side benefit: Cure for the common cold
The vaccine that Modjarrad and his team are working on would target not just COVID-19, but also other coronavirus-related illnesses, including several variants of the common cold.
It is also possible that the current Covid-19 vaccine can block against the common cold, and that Trump has cured us of it:
https://www.nwahomepage.com/news/could-the-covid-19-vaccine-prevent-the-common-cold/
FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — Could the COVID-19 vaccine lessen your chances of getting the common cold?
It’s a theory brought up during recent Board of Health meetings in Fayetteville. Dr. Gary Berner is a member of the board and he said it is something to keep an eye on. “There is just a couple very, very small reports that there is some crossover of antibodies from the common cold version of the coronavirus to the pandemic causing version of the coronavirus,” he said. “I don’t think we can make any bold claims on that but I think it’s an interesting theory.”
Anytime you make the slightest variation in treatment and then shoot it into someone's blood, you have to retest it because biology is complicated, and you never know.
Is that why the seasonal flu vaccines have to go through a 10 year testing period before reaching the public?
What's your definition of "rushed" technology? According to the official story they have been studying DNA vaccines for at least 25 years. It was tested on animals in the 1990's and has prior human testing.
Studied for at least 25 years:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03626-1
“A lot went into the mRNA platform that we have today,” says immunologist Akiko Iwasaki at the Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, who has worked on nucleic-acid vaccines — those based on lengths of DNA or RNA — for more than two decades. The basic research on DNA vaccines began at least 25 years ago, and RNA vaccines have benefited from 10–15 years of strong research, she says, some aimed at developing cancer vaccines. The approach has matured just at the right time; five years ago, the RNA technology would not have been ready.
Animal testing in the 1990's:
Before messenger RNA was a multibillion-dollar idea, it was a scientific backwater. And for the Hungarian-born scientist behind a key mRNA discovery, it was a career dead-end. Katalin Karikó spent the 1990s collecting rejections. Her work, attempting to harness the power of mRNA to fight disease, was too far-fetched for government grants, corporate funding, and even support from her own colleagues.....In 1990, researchers at the University of Wisconsin managed to make it work in mice. Karikó wanted to go further.
The first mRNA vaccine tested on humans was a Rabies vaccine in 2017:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28754494/
"Vaccines based on mRNA coding for antigens have been shown to be safe and immunogenic in preclinical models. We aimed to report results of the first-in-human proof-of-concept clinical trial in healthy adults of a prophylactic mRNA-based vaccine encoding rabies virus glycoprotein (CV7201)."
I'm trying to reconcile Trump's recommendation to take the vaccine with the theory that the vaccine is bad. Have Lin Wood and General Flynn or Sydney Powell said anything negative about the vaccine? No. No one who seems more directly connected to the Q project has criticized the vaccine.
Maybe the DS can't stop the vaccine, doesn't have as much control of the government and media anymore, and can only try to discredit it through alternative channels. Maybe they never wanted a vaccine or a cure and wanted to push out the lockdowns for years on end. You don't know that the vaccine is bad. All of our beliefs come from someone else, and someone may have manipulated you into you thinking that vaccine = bad so maybe Trump = bad. That is exactly what the bad people would want you to think if Trump and the vaccine were good.
Maybe Trump deserves to go down in history as a savior for this, and you have fed into the DS lies and fear mongering and are trying to stand in the way of that.
At the end of it do you think they want to rule over millions of skeptics and Trump supporters who were skeptical of authority and refused to listen to MSM and government lies?
If that depopulation plan were true, they would still want to take us out first before that mass depopulation part, which might come later with later vaccines and viruses.
Well maybe that's your problem. You aren't listening to Trump and are judging this based on other sources.