Bullets spin, which causes a slight tendency to drift horizontally over distance. If you calculate out what speed the coriolis would require, you see that the idea of a balloon slowly floating upwards would be ludicrous under that condition -- it would be out of sight and miles away within a matter of tens of seconds.
No!
Go back to the timing thing. Even IF NESARA is something that will be implemented, you have no clue when or how that will happen.
You could luck out and get it perfect or this could persist economically for another 10 years.
First time watching - very odd the only cut scene is right before m1 comes into the picture. It shows Biden with his face through the whole video, then cuts to the back of Biden (?) and the first view of m1.
Like I said, I haven't kept up with this but assumed it was probably legit from the posts on here. After watching it, I wonder why that cut is in there. That makes it more suspect imo.
Ya never know, it could keep going potentially up to a thousand or more but the timing is to the point of being questionable now and we've missed most the major gains at this point, so I wouldn't risk it personally. Could pay off well, but it definitely wouldnt be a long term hold and flipping comes with its own risks.
I like the username, what I don't like is your blind spot on this topic!
Her calling them out is exactly what you would expect from a controlled opposition failsafe. If the push for overt communism fails from the far left, they need controlled opposition to it to rise up and take control of the movement in a way that will take it back in the direction preferred (Crenshaw, Gabbard, etc.) Uncertainty is the only unacceptable scenario in this type of mapping.
I get it. People can be convincing but still not in your best interest. Add to that the amount of pushing she's getting from MAGA-adjacent types with questionable origin and you have the most likely explanation: she is being set up to be a less extreme leftist populist who can take over for the extreme left and run the movement if they fail.
I think you're right, which is why I think some portion of the endless shilling for her on the .wins is not organic (though a lot of it probably stems from people who listen to Rogan, etc.)
It's relatively obvious she's the fall back if the ultra far leftist agenda backfires, but people think she's attractive so they cling to the few good things she says and ignore the 90% that's completely against their own interests!
Your screenname is msmcontrolsnarrative and now you're fooled by a "pretty face" that acts as controlled op.
Tulsi on the issues:
-End fossil fuels by 2050 and ban fracking
-Free college and healthcare (communism)
-Ban "assault weapons" and universal background checks
-Pro abortion and protect against gender identity discrimination
-Pushes the fake race nonsense
-Pushes fake new age nonsense
Yes, she wants less military conflicts and calls out social media -- WOW, that's like saying Romney is good because he wanted less taxes once.
If you consider those policies "loving your country," then your idea of love must be a sadistic one.
A lot better than "if-if-if-iffff" by Barack Obama.