It’s becoming clear now what the white hats have been doing right along & how we are ready now for the rapid fire stage. Early on, I sensed something odd with some of the traitors, James Comey in particular but also others. Gaps in their twitter feeds & other comments, gave us clues, back in the day when we thought justice was always just 2 weeks away. We might have been wrong about the timing but that doesn’t mean we were wrong, otherwise.

Consider the possibility that, Instead of enjoying whatever early wins there were, the white hats preferred to keep these early wins private so that they could be leveraged for the kill in the end game. Yes, I know it was very frustrating for us, but we are warriors we can take the beating for the sake of the long term win for country & for humanity as a whole.

There is this not so good trait in humanity where people often like to “go along with the crowd” Some people are more that way than others & it’s not always a bad trait either. Either way, everyone on this board here, at one point or another realized we can’t just “go along” with the corruption in the world, anymore. Unlike us, there are people like James Comey, not to give him excuses but he seems to have a higher tolerance for what he will go along with. Not only that but, he may have been tempted by all the fringe benefits. The bottom line, though, was that he knows exactly what happens to those that don’t go along. He’s a big guy & I certainly would not want to meet him alone in a jail cell but a single bullet can take him down just like the rest of us. That’s how the cabal keeps all its minions & puppets in line, they all know it and we all know it.

This is what keeps them there in the swamp. Swamp creatures don’t like the swamp, they are just stuck there. If they are offered a viable rope they will take it. That rope could even be an offer to be in a safe prison cell where swamp henchmen can’t get him. I would bet Comey took the deal. In fact, I thought so back here https://greatawakening.win/p/12igTcA2sd/anyone-see-james-comey-or-lisa-p/c/ This was back when the resident just got into perceived power & we all knew the white hats were doing things behind the scenes that would be apparent in 2 weeks. Now we realize it was important to keep that perception of just 2 week going in order for Q to approach the key black hats, the right way so they, um, cooperate. IDK if ‘flip’ is the right word here but if they co operate they will get a much lighter sentence. Everyone knows about this. I think it’s obvious that Jim Comey is one key black hat. Just by pulling that thread the right way whole cabal might unwind. In order that the other black hats don’t know, (which is both for his own safety & for the white hat plan to work) they tell him to chirp out black hat crap now & then which was what he was doing right along.

The seashells, though, was different. Remember that that came out in reply to a white hat? I think it was Trump himself, wasn’t it? That was his cue. The white hats (imho) told him to reply with that threat, that way, from North Carolina no less. He’ll get convicted of a crime less than treason (That’s his part of the deal) and the white hats will have a way to start this whole huge RICO case outside of DC with James Comey giving helpful witness to everything. This, imho, is where we are now. I think this phase began when Pam Bondi was fired. She was the sacrificial lioness that no black hat would ever dream that he would fire. She took shots aimed at Trump & was adept at keeping the swamp at bay. Too adept though. (Anyone capable of being confirmed by the Senate is already too compromised for the real work at hand) The phase of just taking hits is finally past & the shields are replaced with cannons.

1st Swalwell is expelled, then Rep Luna launches into expelling a few more, Then Rep Mace a few more still. House clearing begins with the lower pieces 1st (They must be 2 white hats working on cue ) By the time their ammo is exhausted, Todd Blanche resumes fire.

IDK how many suits are going. They were obviously being worked on while Pam took shots. Now with cannons all loaded the swamp won’t be able to even count the losses before the next cannon ball goes off. Now I get it that THIS is the reason the white hats did not take earlier wins. They turned those early wins into extra ammo for this round. Comey is one of them. He alone will bring down ½ of DC but DC is not the only ball in play & all the balls are linked.

We are now in phase rapid fire & tbh I got that clue from this guy right here: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASZaW1mHX/remember-that-godfather-scene-wh/c/ He seemed to always know things that only Trump could possibly know ;) Meanwhile the swamp doesn’t have any more black op countries or groups to pull off a distraction. Iran is checkmated (they just haven’t admitted it yet.) Terrorist groups they support are out of cash. Besides them, Trump has a deal or something or another going with NK, China & etc. Even the body language of King of UK, who came here to say nothing, tell the story that he knows who runs the show now. ( Israel is still at large, but they can't do anything now & we all know there's something waiting for them at the end, idk what)

I think this is the rapid fire stage, by the time these lawsuits are done the swamp won’t know what hit it. We will be down to a very slim House & Senate by then. Trump will be able to get those EO confirmed into laws before the swamp can scratch its proverbial ass

I was just speaking to someone who is 1/2 Iranian. At some point, I asked her about her cousins in Iran. She told me that as far as she knows they are still alive. Then she asked me to pray for them to have internet. She went on to say that: "If we have internet we will crush the regime"

So I am passing that prayer request on to you all as well. You know what to do. If anyone reading this can get word to Elon Musk, there is something that he in particular can do. On behalf of her relatives I thank you all. <3

I have to be honest. I was a little set back when the 2 most visible & most beautiful cabinet members got such an unfair barrage of attacks & had to be scrapped...... I had to wonder, was this a major blow to Trump's plan OR WERE THEIR HIRED TO BE DISPOSABLE DISTRACTIONS from the get go?

Maybe Trump intentionally put them in the limelight knowing they would get attacked. If the swamp is spending all it's ammunition trying the destroy the decoys that gives cover to the ones really doing the work behind the scenes, the real work is protected. Todd was Trumps' personal lawyer. That means they talk to each other. Maybe he's been getting the real work done behind the scenes to be released upon Bondi's dismissal. (The fact that she was friends with the one who bang banged fang fang, makes me wonder about her. Maybe the deep state had a false sense of security with her at the helm.) Having her there served 2 purposes. To give the black hats this false security & to provide a distraction to protect the real work that Todd & others have been doing.

I understand there's been work going on about the electioneering. This really has to be brought to light before the midterms Maduro's in jail but when will he testify??? Maybe all these things have been undercover until Bondi's dismissal...

Could be, just some thoughts.

I know Iran mines crypto so if that operation was blown up that could cause the crypto spike by why the precious at the same time?? I'm just trying to backwards engineer what's going on.

Yes, I still have my FB account & as Q told us never to leave the battlefield I still try to make some points now & then. My old friends are deeply on the left & some seem to be extremely & almost belligerently so.

I usually post to a selective audience where I exclude some (30 or 40) who I sense are shills or what not, but occasionally post to all. 1st of all, when I post to all I get a LOT more replies (so those 30 or 40 accounts somehow trigger many more responses from my other 1000 to 2000 FB friends -That sounds like a FB bias in itself but there's something more blatant)

I have an old friend deeply on the left who has quite an exposure in the world, leads workshops & etc. I've seen her lead crowds of several 100's (in person) etc etc. We were just engaged in a debate on a thread I posted. I took care to carefully craft each of my replies to try to reach her - long story) Luckily she replied to the 1st of my well thought out replies but I noted that my reply was - somehow - already deleted from the subthread. (It's still not there - I have refreshed several times but luckily she must have seen it before it was gone & replied anyways.) Again, I took my time to make a well crafted reply but this time I saved it just in case. I checked back later AND THIS SECOND REPLY WAS ALSO ALREADY GONE!!!! Since I had saved it I reposed it, no problem & she replied again. Next time, before I replied, I changed the audience to take those 30 or 40 shill names out and lo & behold my 3rd reply is still there! It's been almost a day now.

So I am assuming that FB gives some people a priority sort of access where they can delete things on other people accounts & I would bet that they watch the high profile types of people (like my friend) to make sure they stay brainwashed as long as possible. I just want to report this because, many of us think that the while hats watch this site & I also have the sense that Zuckerberg promised Trump that he wouldn't put his finger on the scale anymore but I am here to tell you that someone is. I can't say it's Zuckerberg himself but he has the power to find out & to stop it.

Thank you white hats wherever you are & to quote our favorite president:

Thank you for your attention to this matter!

Q told us to stay in the battle ground & so I stayed in Bernie groups & leftist like groups as much as I could stomach. I use to glance at them once in a while to see what they were saying, slowly commenting or liking a few things in a careful way. In the beginning I got thrown out of a lot of them, so I became more & more careful & cryptic, in how I said things. I stopped trying to make an obvious point but just tried to get people to question or doubt.

Of course, I only did this once in a while when I had the stomach for their crap, but I stayed in the battle ground as much as I could tolerate.

Slowly in time I noticed, I wasn't the only with my sort of opinions... First of all, back in the vax wars they lost about half of their own true believers. I would bet they replaced them with bots & shills. Now after the Bondi testimony & Epstein dump, I think they have lost so many they just can't maintain the facade anymore.

Check out the comments on this supposed progressive page: https://www.facebook.com/Progressives4DemRep/posts/pfbid02wUBYbbEPUX95GqugLg1WzYZxqA4A6mXSTXCq6LJfXgoVHy6XJDpRcdCgYUQYb1f3l

============READ THE COMMENTS--------------

If you don't have Fake book you can open it in a private browser

Someone confused by the the left crap pointed this out:

This week, ICE abducted a 17 year old at the Target where he worked. They threw him to the ground and handcuffed him as bystanders watched in horror. Even though he kept telling them he was a US citizen, nothing deterred their aggression. They finally let him go, throwing him from their car in front of a Walmart a few blocks away, bleeding and sobbing.

IDK if it's true or not but it could be. I replied with an event when police misidentified me and also treated me pretty bad until they realize they made a mistake, long story. (I was trying to point out that accidents happen. If there's flaws it is important to point them out. Joe Rogan criticizing ICE https://archive.is/aRIB5 doesn't make him a black hat all of a sudden. Mistakes DO happen. It's great if people point out flaws. Remember to love everyone regardless. What the real black hats want is that we keep fighting each other

(I believe that ICE's 'more rough' approach is unfortunately they only way to deal with the problem at hand & that there isn't a "gentler" way to do what needs to be done in the time that it has to be done. Some good people will be roughed up for wrong reasons. Give them a kind hand if they need one. (I of course, do not mean Renee Good, she was obviously a black hat but there will be a few people here, in the confused crowd who will suffer some inappropriate responses) Be kind & loving. It's the only way to win this & when we win it's a win for everyone.

Someone confused by the the left crap pointed this out:

This week, ICE abducted a 17 year old at the Target where he worked. They threw him to the ground and handcuffed him as bystanders watched in horror. Even though he kept telling them he was a US citizen, nothing deterred their aggression. They finally let him go, throwing him from their car in front of a Walmart a few blocks away, bleeding and sobbing.

IDK if it's true or not but it could be. I replied with an event when police misidentified me and also treated me pretty bad until they realize they made a mistake, long story. (I was trying to point out that accidents happen. If there's flaws it is important to point them out. Joe Rogan criticizing ICE https://archive.is/aRIB5 doesn't make him a black hat all of a sudden. Mistakes DO happen. It's great if people point out flaws. Remember to love everyone regardless. What the real black hats want is that we keep fighting each other

(I believe that ICE's 'more rough' approach is unfortunately they only way to deal with the problem at hand & that there isn't a "gentler" way to do what needs to be done in the time that it has to be done. Some good people will be roughed up for wrong reasons. Give them a kind hand if they need one. (I of course, do not mean Renee Good, she was obviously a black hat but there will be a few people here, in the confused crowd who will suffer some inappropriate responses) Be kind & loving. It's the only way to win this & when we win it's a win for everyone.

How plausible do you think Boron cold fusion could be?

9:04 AM I'd need to search for current information on boron fusion research to give you an informed answer, since this is an active area of scientific development.

boron fusion energy research 10 results

To clarify terminology first: when you say "boron cold fusion," I assume you mean proton-boron (p-B11 or hydrogen-boron) fusion, which is distinct from the discredited "cold fusion" claims from the 1980s. Proton-boron fusion is legitimate fusion physics, just much harder to achieve than deuterium-tritium fusion.

Here's my assessment of its plausibility:

The appeal is clear: Proton-boron fusion produces only charged particles (alpha particles/helium nuclei) with minimal neutron production Wikipedia , avoiding the radioactive waste and neutron damage problems of conventional deuterium-tritium fusion. The fuel is also abundant and non-radioactive.

The fundamental challenge: Proton-boron fusion requires much higher temperatures than deuterium-tritium reactions to be triggered thermodynamically Frontiers , which is why most fusion research has historically focused on D-T. The reaction cross-section is also lower even at those extreme temperatures.

Recent progress is genuine but limited:

TAE Technologies achieved the first hydrogen-boron fusion in a magnetically confined plasma in 2023 TAE Technologies TAE Technologies , a meaningful milestone Laser-based experiments at Ecole Polytechnique achieved about 80 million fusion reactions in 1.5 nanoseconds in 2013 Fusenet Alpha particle production has increased by 8 orders of magnitude over 20 years Frontiers in various experimental approaches Reality check: These reactions did not produce net energy PR Newswire . Companies like TAE expect to demonstrate net energy "around mid-decade" on future reactors, but that's still speculative.

My assessment: Proton-boron fusion is scientifically plausible but faces extreme engineering challenges that make it considerably harder than already-difficult D-T fusion. The non-thermal laser-driven approaches being explored could potentially bypass some thermal equilibrium limitations, but we're still very far from practical energy generation. It's a long-shot bet that could pay off spectacularly if the physics works out, but D-T fusion will almost certainly come first if either succeeds commercially.

You wrote: Companies like TAE expect to demonstrate net energy "around mid-decade"

Today is 12/23/2025 That sounds like mid decade to me! So I am assuming that your TAE Technologies is ready with a viable product by now. I would like to get one for my car. Would you know where I can buy one. Thank you

9:09 AM You're absolutely right to call me out on that timing! Let me search for current information about TAE Technologies' actual progress.

TAE Technologies 2025 progress net energy 10 results

Ha! You got me. I appreciate you catching that sloppy phrasing on my part. Let me correct the record based on what's actually happening now:

Reality check for December 2025:

TAE has NOT achieved net energy yet. Here's where they actually are:

In April 2025, they achieved stable plasma at 70+ million degrees Celsius with their "Norm" reactor - a significant technical milestone Their next reactor, Copernicus, is expected to demonstrate net energy generation before the end of the decade Wikipedia (so by 2029-2030) Their first prototype power plant, Da Vinci, is targeted for the early 2030s Wikipedia So no, you cannot buy one for your car! In fact:

They haven't achieved net energy yet Even when they do, the first demonstration will be a massive experimental facility A commercial power plant is targeted for the early 2030s at the earliest These will be grid-scale power plants, not portable car engines The physics of fusion reactors pretty much guarantees they'll never fit in a car - they require massive magnets, vacuum chambers, and support systems. Even if fusion succeeds commercially, it'll power the electric grid that charges your car, not sit under your hood.

I should have been clearer initially: "mid-decade" in their 2023-2024 statements meant around 2025-2026 for certain milestones, but they've since pushed the net energy demonstration timeline to "before 2030." Sorry for the confusion!

Some put their goals way ahead, others way behind since there is really no way to predict how their research will go. Are there ways to discern what is really going on inside their company by other ways in which those associated with the company are acting? Does their stock prices show any hints or things that their scientists may be doing?

9:13 AM That's a sharp question about reading between the lines! Let me search for information about TAE's current status and any market signals.

TAE Technologies stock publicly traded 10 results

Wow, this just got very interesting! There's actually a major development happening right now:

TAE just announced a merger with Trump Media (DJT) three days ago - December 18, 2025. This is breaking news that creates exactly the kind of market signals you're asking about:

What this tells us:

The merger is an all-stock transaction valued at over $6 billion, with TAE and TMTG shareholders each owning approximately 50% of the combined company Fusenet . This means TAE will become publicly traded through the merger.

Reading between the lines:

TAE is seeking public capital - After 25+ years and $1.3 billion in private funding, they're now pursuing a path to public markets. This could signal either (a) they're confident enough to face public scrutiny, or (b) they need more capital than private investors are willing to provide. The Trump connection is... unusual - Trump Media isn't exactly a traditional fusion energy partner. TMTG brings $3.1 billion in financial assets and direct access to public markets Fusenet , but this partnership is more about access to capital and public trading than technical synergy. Timing matters - They're doing this NOW, in late 2025, right when they originally said they'd demonstrate net energy "around mid-decade." The fact that they're announcing a merger rather than a breakthrough is telling. Private market pricing - Before the merger news, TAE shares were trading on secondary markets at around $40-47 per share. The merger values them at $53.89 per share - a premium, but not a spectacular one. What this suggests about their actual progress:

The merger announcement doesn't mention any recent breakthrough or net energy achievement. If they'd actually hit net energy, that would be the headline, not a Trump Media merger. This suggests they're still in the "need more runway" phase rather than the "we've proven it works" phase.

So to answer your original question: the market signal here is mixed. They've raised serious money and have credible backers, but they're seeking a somewhat unconventional path to public markets rather than announcing scientific breakthroughs.

hmmm As I contemplate it I see a 3rd possible scenario.... In a certain way Donald Trump & Cold Fusion are quite similar in the way the public looks at them. Some thumb their nose at both, other's praise both. I, secretly, know a scientist that works in a different aspect of cold fusion & I know he has to do so, somewhat covertly because if the science community knows he is working on it he could lose all his other grants in everything else! In a similar way, those that are behind Trump & the work he engages in has to be a little tight lipped at time because they could be attacked publicly (For instance Elon Musk's business was being literally attacked until he pretended to disagree with Trump on something) So anyways, in this way they are similar.

My thought is that they may work together to bounce the hatred directed at them, back at those that throw them hate. It is my belief that DJT's stock is being covertly shorted because there are some very wealthy that need to short DJT stock in order to hinder Trump's efforts (For instance some will have a lot more to lose if Trump achieves his agenda that the little they may lose by shorting his stock ) However, if that is really the case, it is a double edged sword because some sort of unexpected event, like a merger with TAE might be more than they can handle in shorting stock. ESPECIALLY IF, TAE actually already has a breakthrough but want to time the release of is in order to trigger MOASS for DJT, which would yield them,, all plenty of money to boost their success way ahead of schedule & help DJT & company as well

Show more 9:27 AM You're proposing a really interesting strategic scenario - essentially that TAE and Trump Media might be coordinating to create a short squeeze while simultaneously revealing a fusion breakthrough. That's creative thinking, and I can see why the pieces might seem to fit together that way.

Let me offer some thoughts on the plausibility:

What makes sense in your scenario:

The stigma is real - You're absolutely right that "cold fusion" (even legitimate aneutronic fusion like p-B11) carries baggage from the Pons-Fleischmann debacle. Your scientist friend's experience rings true - fusion researchers often avoid the term entirely. DJT stock dynamics - Trump Media's stock has been volatile and likely does face various market pressures. The company has had relatively modest operational revenues compared to its market cap, making it potentially vulnerable. Timing as strategy - Companies do sometimes hold back announcements for strategic reasons, particularly around financing events. Where I'd pump the brakes:

Scientific breakthroughs are hard to hide - Achieving net energy from fusion would require extensive testing, verification, and likely peer review. The scientific team would know, equipment vendors would know, energy measurements would be recorded. Keeping something that significant secret while negotiating a $6 billion merger would be extraordinarily difficult and likely illegal (material non-disclosure in M&A). The technical gap is still enormous - TAE's last announced milestone (April 2025) was achieving 70+ million degree plasma stability. That's impressive but still far from net energy. The leap from "stable hot plasma" to "net energy gain" involves solving multiple extremely difficult problems. It's unlikely they'd jump from one to the other silently in 8 months. Regulatory and legal constraints - Public company mergers involve extensive due diligence, SEC filings, and legal obligations. Deliberately timing a breakthrough announcement to trigger a short squeeze while concealing it during merger negotiations could constitute securities fraud. The scientific community would notice - If TAE had achieved net energy fusion, there would likely be indirect signals: unusual energy consumption patterns at their facility, supply chain movements, key personnel behavior changes, or leaks from the hundreds of people who'd need to be involved. My assessment:

I think the more mundane explanation is more likely: TAE has made genuine technical progress, needs substantial additional capital to reach their goals, and found an unconventional but willing partner in Trump Media who has cash and access to public markets. The merger itself might provide protection against certain kinds of market pressure (as you suggest), but I'd be surprised if there's a hidden breakthrough.

That said - science occasionally surprises us! And if you're right, it would be one of the most spectacular coordinated announcements in corporate and scientific history. I just wouldn't bet the farm on it based on the available evidence.

What does your scientist friend think about TAE's approach specifically? Is the field viewing their recent progress as genuinely promising?

Oh I haven't spoken to him in years, sorry. Last we talked was 2017. Even though there are similarities as I discussed, He seemed to be strongly anti-Trump at the time which made it had to have any meaningful conversation afterwards.

In the unlikely event that there is any truth to my speculation, when would you expect them to make any new announcement? A 2nd thought it that maybe, instead of a breakthrough, they made secret plans for Elon Musk to, seemingly out of the blue announce buying a very significant amount of shares in TAE, enough to cause DJT MOASS

In either of those 2 scenarios, at what time would you expect this to happed? What is the earliest, what is the latest?

9:38 AM That's an interesting exercise in timing analysis. Let me think through the mechanics and constraints:

If there were a coordinated announcement strategy, key timing factors would be:

Merger completion timeline - The TAE-TMTG merger was just announced December 18, 2025. Typical SPAC-style mergers take 3-6 months to close, requiring shareholder votes, regulatory approvals, and SEC review. So we're probably looking at Q2 2026 at the earliest for the merger to actually complete. Short interest considerations - For a short squeeze to be maximally effective, you'd want: High short interest built up (takes weeks/months) The stock to be publicly traded (post-merger) Announcement timing when shorts are most exposed Strategic windows: Earliest: Late January/February 2026 - Could announce before merger closes to boost shareholder approval votes, but this seems too rushed and potentially problematic legally Most likely (if your scenario were true): March-May 2026 - Right around or shortly after merger completion when the combined entity is trading publicly Latest: Q3 2026 - Any longer and you lose momentum from the merger announcement buzz For the Elon Musk scenario specifically:

Musk buying a large stake would trigger SEC filing requirements (Schedule 13D) within 10 days of crossing 5% ownership. This would be public information and couldn't really be a surprise. However, he could build up to just under 5% quietly, then cross the threshold with a big announcement.

The timing would likely be:

Post-merger only - Makes no sense to buy into DJT before the merger Shortly after trading begins - Within 2-4 weeks of the combined company going public Possibly coordinated with a technical milestone announcement from TAE My honest assessment:

If I were forced to bet on when we'd see the next significant announcement (whether it's what you're speculating or just normal corporate updates), I'd guess:

Earliest: February 2026 (merger progress update) Most likely: April-June 2026 (post-merger completion, possible technical update) Latest meaningful window: September 2026 (after that, the narrative would need refreshing) But again - I think routine corporate and technical updates are far more likely than the coordinated scenarios you're imagining. The simpler explanation is usually correct, and fusion is just genuinely hard!

Would be fascinating to revisit this conversation in 6 months though

-----continued in 1st comment------------