2
interociter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, interesting, sort of leads in to talking about deltas and inside information.

2
interociter 2 points ago +2 / -0

good q drop, also it's good to have the q and .win links included with all the others, I think.

https://qalerts.app/?n=3662

2
interociter 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is from the comments in the last one, military discharging soldiers who refuse,

Feb 23 2021: "Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA" https://archive.vn/ngV9t

https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/federal-law-prohibits-employers-and-others-from-requiring-vaccination-with-a-covid-19-vaccine-distributed-under-an-eua/

1
interociter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, this one's basically just a copy of the one below, with two extra paragraphs added. Probably not worth including it as another entry,

get covid after vac, "British Government Study Confirms Covid-19 Vaccine Risk: Infections INCREASE in Fortnight after Jab" https://archive.vn/1JT7I

2
interociter 2 points ago +2 / -0

This might be useful for re-posting memes, the site in the post here adds a camoflage layer to images,

https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkd4PY0K/for-those-pedes-who-are-making-m/c/

https://derpa-block.azurewebsites.net/

Thread on applying camo layer to memes,

https://8kun.top/qrmemes/res/606.html#606

Another overlay tool, or just use layers with transparency in gimp or whatever,

http://overlay.imageonline.co/

2
interociter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure on the nested lists; horizontal lines are three dashes "-" or asterisks "*" at the start of a line.


For adding space I usually just leave a period on a line by itself, don't know if there's a way to do it with formatting.

.

Doesn't look great but it does break up the text basically.

1
interociter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Occurred to me also, seems like a great idea. CNN and whatever else still have their tip line addresses, I think? Literally just add /tips to the url if I remember correctly.

3/11 was a big date, Fukushima and Madrid,

https://qalerts.app/?q=3%2F11

totally abusing the search function there but it does mention a few key things.

2
interociter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure how much of this is useful, but there's a big list of articles on the page here. Maybe just add a link to the page itself?

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/whistleblower-reveals-many-pregnancy-complications-following-experimental-covid-injections-vaccine-leaving-a-trail-of-devastated-mothers/

There's an article there saying the Pfizer fact sheet is different for the UK, and says pregnant women shouldn't take the shot. The US one doesn't have that warning.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/unlike-uk-u-s-fda-allows-pregnant-and-lactating-women-to-receive-experimental-pfizer-covid-vaccine/

The article has a link to a copy of the fact sheet, on their site. Section 4.6 is the pregnancy warning. But it's not the current fact sheet.

https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/12/Information_for_healthcare_professionals.pdf

If you search for the title, it shows up on a UK site, and the pdf there is more recent.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19?1=

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/955899/Temporary_Authorisation_HCP_Information_BNT162_6_0_UK_editclean.pdf

The more recent one mentions animal studies, and says no evidence of harm to fetus, etc was found. Still says "should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks".

The FDA fact sheet is already in the end section of the links pages. It mentions an experiment on rats, says data is not sufficient to "inform" risks. Section 11.1.

https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download

2
interociter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok, haven't looked at that one to compare the info at all. Might be worth having multiple articles on some things? Unless they're actually just reprints on a different site or whatever.

1
interociter 1 point ago +1 / -0

oh, ok, didn't catch that. Could be the key, then, getting everyone else to accept the idea of regular shots of whatever gene editing b.s. they come up with. It's a lot more controllable than just releasing plagues every year.

1
interociter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mar 3 2021 " 'Orders of Magnitude Higher Deaths in the Vaccinated': Israel's Vaccine Data Reveals a Frightening Picture" https://archive.vn/lDNt0

First quote in the article is actually an image, might be useful for memes? https://files.catbox.moe/czajju.png

1
interociter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not going to disagree about a second attempt being released, plenty of lethal diseases out there. About the vax though, look up pathogenic priming and antibody-dependent enhancement. If you've had the vaccine, your reaction to the actual virus is worse, and, if you've had the disease, the vaccine can cause auto-immune reactions. With the questions about it affecting the placenta and sperm cells also, creating antibodies against the syncytin-1 sequence, doesn't seem like it's any kind of "key" to The Plan or whatever, to me.

3
interociter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Derek is hilarious, "it's been sitting in a field for twenty years, let's drive it the 800 miles back home.. did not go as planned"

Uncle Tony's Garage is another great one,

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9SzQNYLqsPQGY_nbHogDDw

https://www.dragzine.com/author/tonydefeo/

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›