3
simon_says 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've not been a Q follower. So this was a good primer for an uninformed person, such as myself. Thanks for the tip, u/catsifve.

2
simon_says 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where two or more are gathered...

It's as good as done, u/ceegeegee. What are you planning to wear on your first day? Gotta look sharp!

3
simon_says 3 points ago +3 / -0

I followed up with Mary today:

--

Mary,

It’s me again, “Simon.” I’ll try not to exhaust you.

I want you to consider the narrative “gap” in The Hammer story as it has been told. Consider The Whistleblower Tapes: thereon, you’ve got Blixseth saying that The Hammer “goes through billions of password combinations per minute.” So that’s what the public understands about The Hammer. It cycles through password combinations.

But that’s not correct. The Hammer doesn’t cycle through password combinations. It “hammers” through the solution space of private asymmetric encryption keys. (Hence, the name. The Hammer.)

This is not merely a point of abstruse technological precision. If it were only that, I wouldn’t be writing to you. It’s much more.

The Whistleblower Tapes reveal that all of the foreign embassies situated within the United Stated had their encryption keys compromised. How does cycling through passwords relate to that? As the story is being told, there is no apparent connection.

Now, if you understand that the first fruits of The Hammer are private asymmetric encryption keys, then it all makes sense. Our government aimed The Hammer at the communication sessions of each embassy here – which it can do, given the capabilities of the NSA. And The Hammer located their respective keys, which is exactly what it is designed to do. It’s not surprising that their keys were compromised. It's the direct result of the operation of The Hammer.

You need to augment your telling of The Hammer story to include: (1) an accurate description of what it is The Hammer does; (2) the NSA’s tapping of our core Internet infrastructure at undisclosed “access points” (this is a long-admitted fact); and (3) the implications of all of this. Otherwise no one will really understand our state of compromise.

I’m happy to assist by writing, or discussing, or via any other avenue you may find helpful.

My best regards,

-“Simon”

3
simon_says 3 points ago +3 / -0

I really need to update everyone on this. I agree that it's hard to find an honest judge - and such a judge will likely not be located. That said, the government produced arguments that makes it very difficult to rule in their favor.

2
simon_says 2 points ago +3 / -1

Linked to in connection with a comment of mine in this post:

https://greatawakening.win/p/16aT3ByqiD/my-recent-communication-with-mar/

6
simon_says 6 points ago +6 / -0

This has surfaced in the last few weeks:

https://greatawakening.win/p/16aT3D7Vwv/

Her real name recently came to light in the Dominion-Lindell pleadings: Mary Fanning Kirchhoefer.

There have long been rumors that she is a former CIA asset. I think that is entirely likely. Although I don't necessarily think that means her motives are impure in this matter.

There's more I could say here, but I'll save it for another time. For now, I'll just say that it's wise to keep our eyes open to all possibilities.

6
simon_says 6 points ago +7 / -1

Briefly:

(1) Fox News ran a story on this exactly once and never again. I think the powers-that-be came down on them hard and told them: Never again.

(2) Dennis is alive. He has been under a gag order ("protective order") that prevents him from speaking/testifying. The basis of the order is the state secret privilege. Mike Lindell is in federal court in Nevada right now, trying to have the gag order lifted, so he can bring the Hammer and Scorecard data (and Montgomery's testimony) to the American public, and also to use that information to defend himself in the suit Dominion brought against him for defamation.

15
simon_says 15 points ago +15 / -0

BTW - Here's a link to access the Whistleblower Tapes.

Link: https://soundcloud.com/david-broyles-327307388

Scroll down on the page; there's a total of five audio files - you'll see them.

17
simon_says 17 points ago +17 / -0

Thank you.

We'll see how it goes. I'm happy to help her out in any way I can. I hope she reaches back out to me to follow up. I promise I'll let you know, should that come to pass.

1
simon_says 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link: https://soundcloud.com/david-broyles-327307388

(Scroll down to find the links to the audio files, five in all.)

I'm happy to post this, will do that in a minute.

9
simon_says 9 points ago +9 / -0

In the recent past, reached out to Mary Fanning (of The American Report) to discuss some topics related to Hammer and Scorecard. Today, I followed up with another communication. And then it occured to me, that it may be of interest to you folks here:

--

Mary,

I recently sent you a brief outline “connecting the dots” interspersed between Hammer and Scorecard and Italy-Did-It. I write to you here on a different aspect of the Hammer and Scorecard topic.

First off – thank you for bringing the Whistleblower Tapes to the American public. I have listened to each of them multiple times. And I noticed some unconnected dots that I thought I’d connect for you.

You may recall from The Tapes that at one point Arpaio and Blixseth refer to Obama’s birth certificate. And they say – without justification – that the birth certificate issue and The Hammer issue are “sort of the same thing.” But they don’t say how they are connected and what makes them the same. Given how they characterized The Hammer, I don’t think they actually understood how they are connected.

The Hammer locates a “target” server’s private asymmetric encryption key – in part, through brute computational force. It uses computational power to exhaust the solution space until it finds the sought-after key. I could explain – slowly and understandably – what that means, should it interest you, but the bottom line is this: possession of a “target server’s” private asymmetric key permits the possessor to eavesdrop on all thought-to-be-secure communications with that target server.

If you have Bank of America’s private asymmetric key, you can decrypt all communication to and from Bank of America. If you have the private asymmetric key used by the email server at NYU, you can decrypt all communication to and from that server. And so on.

Consider this: the NSA stores all of the IP packets ever communicated via our domestic Internet infrastructure. So, if it is interested in a particular communication session, it can retrieve the packets constituting that communication session, send them – in proper sequence and on a one-by-one basis – to The Hammer, which will decrypt the contents of each packet, and then the whole communication session can be eavesdropped upon.

So, Mary, want to know what this has to do with Obama’s birth certificate? Here’s what. You use the Hammer to find the private asymmetric encryption key for the servers operating the Department of Health for Hawaii. Then you use the NSA’s capabilities to “replay” the communication session by which one of its system administrators logged into the server. The outcome? You literally see the system administrator’s login credentials – i.e., his or her username and password. So you just use that to login, and then issue Obama a birth certificate.

You’re not really “hacking” anything in the traditional sense. You’re just watching the administrators login, and then using their credentials. That’s how they exfiltrated all of that Bank of America data that is referred to in The Tapes. That’s how they compromised the Florida voting database that they mentioned in The Tapes. They can repeat that exploit on any target system, as long as it is in the USA.

The word needs to get out. And to do that, it requires someone who can explain in – simple terms – what the Hammer really is, and what the consequences of it falling into the wrong hands really is. I’m here to help, should that be of interest.

My sincere admiration, gratitude and regards, -“Simon”

5
simon_says 5 points ago +5 / -0

For those who are interested, Nino Rodriguez Truthed earlier today that he is posting an interview with Larry Klayman later this week.

Larry Klayman is the attorney for Dennis Montgomery (among other clients); Dennis is the creator of The Hammer and of Scorecard; Hammer and Scorecard interoperate to decrypt "secure" voting data, alter it, and re-introduce into the voting system.

I have no idea if these topics will come up. There are many topics to raise with Mr. Klayman. In any event, the show may very well prove to be interesting. I think the show will initially be posted on Nino's private site. But it'll make its way to Rumble, rapidly.

1
simon_says 1 point ago +1 / -0

You've not overshared, friend. Not at all. You've shared just enough to make me all the more interested.

Miracles? I want to share notes.

Atonement? I want to ask a few questions - the topic has slipped past my comprehension in certain regards. It's not just the Penal Substitution theory - it's more encompassing. Which is not your duty to resolve. But I'd like to bend your ear.

Jesus stood at your door and knocked. And you answered. I'd like to talk about that, as there's nothing more important or interesting.

Godspeed, friend.

1
simon_says 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tremendous.

I will be back at you with a cogent response, but wanted to just blast a word at your for now. Please know that I am particularly curious about the Atonement. I wouldn't mind picking your brain on the topic, if you don't mind, either.

Thank you for such a responsive, understandable, personal reply. You're really one of a kind.

3
simon_says 3 points ago +3 / -0

Another one comes armed with puns! :-)

And, yes, that's one of the points I'm reaching and illustrating here. Although we won't get all the way there in the next Part. But we'll get far enough for me to move on to Series III. And that'll make people happy, I suspect.

Thanks for reading - I know the topic seems dissociated from anything relevant. But I promise it's not.

2
simon_says 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I found out the God I didn't believe in the Orthodox also don't." <-- I'd love to hear more about that. If you're comfortable elaborating?

2
simon_says 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is rather spectacular. May I ask: did you attend Catholic school?

1
simon_says 1 point ago +1 / -0

And, I hasten to add, thank you for reading. This material is neither fun nor immediately rewarding. You're a soldier!

2
simon_says 2 points ago +2 / -0

Foundations are built without recognition. We lay groundwork. And then: bam! It's upon us.

:-)

2
simon_says 2 points ago +2 / -0

One more Part like this and then...

(I know this is exhausting.)

1
simon_says 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could do that... do you prefer a podcast format?

Thank you for reading. I know it's taxing!

2
simon_says 2 points ago +2 / -0

User name definitely checks out in your case.

Thanks for hanging in with me. I'm grateful and humbled.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›