That's how it failed. Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and Nixon killed it.

1. TPTB want to phase out cash, force through CDBCs to get us to digital IDs and the prison planet, aka digital - or actual - gulag.

Decentralized cryptocurrency is the only tool we have to avoid that, afaik. CBDC's are not decentralized, and are unlikely to be cryptocurrencies at all.

2. Fiat and cash are how the whole thieving, corrupt shitshow survives and thrives: any suggestion to replace with CDBC is fearporn / psyop / distraction / chaos etc

CBDC are not decentralized cryptocurrencies. Your dollar is already almost 100% digital. Banks are already freezing people's bank accounts. Decentralized cryptocurrency cannot be frozen.

3. CDBCs are co-opted cryptos. Cryptos are a scam / trap set up by TPTB. Use catastrophic Black Swans to force through the upheaval. (See Cyber Polygon and Catastrophic Contagion)

You're conflating CBDC and crypto again.

Almost all dollars are digital currently. If the grid goes down, the dollar is not going to save us.

It's possible to have paper notes for crypo as well, using the same system as banks used to issue gold certificates. That's how paper money began circulating.

4. Bait and switch is now possible: move the slaves to CDBC cryptos and digital ID, rollout the surveillance, social credit and control grid, continue with fiat and printing cash. Or crypto. Or not. At that point, all will be moot. They could introduce barter, Monopoly money or no system at all. The slaves would be powerless.

Unlike the dollar and CBDC's, crypto is voluntary. You can't be forced to use it.

There is a reason The Blocksize Wars ended the way they did.

To impose a degree of centralization onto a previously decentralized network

I also don't see any large banks, hedge funds, or intelligent investors placing their bets with Bitcoin Cash.

Let's acknowledge that the point of Bitcoin was to destroy those institutions. They're just embracing the coin with the largest market cap. If Bitcoin weren't hijacked, they would be embracing pure, decentralized, big-blocked Bitcoin.

It was obvious back then that the shady team were the small blockers. The Big Blockers were definitely more liberty focused. As someone who has followed bitcoin since 2010, I can say that those in favor of layer 2 scaling are not the same liberty-loving breed as the OG's.

I'm not recommending that any reader should buy Bitcoin Cash. I'm saying that without a propaganda campaign that changed bitcoin, there'd have been no need to create Bitcoin Cash. Bitcoin Cash is not Bitcoin, however. It's just a copy of what Bitcoin was supposed to be.

Here's a random article about it that even mentions Epstein's name for anyone following along. No idea how accurate it is. https://medium.com/coinmonks/lightning-network-the-trojan-horse-of-the-crypt-industry-f26e3cc8cd46

I actually don't have any. I'm not interested in it to get rich. I'm interested in it because it's the only known hope to the biggest problem the world faces.

That's the thing with bitcoin. It either works or it doesn't. You can't just confiscate it. You can't ban it. You can't do anything about it. Not in theory, at least.

Hard drives have fallen in cost substantially since segwit and will continue to fall into the future. Really not an issue for any serious miner.

Thanks for adding nuance. Back then, during the debate, Lightning Network was pretty universally referred to as a sidechain as opposed to a "second layer" or "off chain."

Blockstream was heavily lobbying for small blocks, iirc. It's been years since I read about Epsteins involvement, but I'm sure you'll find it if you want dig.

Bitcoin Cash (aka just the original Bitcoin as it was designed by Satoshi) has transactions that are instant and fees that are pennies or less without needing another layer.

Just about everything bad happening in the world, all of the wars, child sex trafficking, etc, is funded with printed money. The national debt per taxpayer is $260,000+ because of fiat currency. The powers that be exist because of printed money. There is no earthly hope for freedom while we are being evermore enslaved by their debt-based currency system.

Bitcoin is the only earthly hope that I'm aware of. Do you have any arguments for your hunch that it's designed for theft? Do you have a better idea than crypto for saving the world? Keep in mind we tried gold and it failed.

Years ago, the Bitcoin network became slow and expensive to use. A debate arose over how it should be fixed. One camp was for increasing the block size (allowing more transactions per block on the blockchain). The other camp was for small blocks and using "side chains" to cheaply and quickly process bitcoin transactions. EDIT: off-chain transactions is more accurate than the term sidechain

Coincidentally, a company called Blockstream, funded by Epstein (that's right, funded by Epstein), was developing a system for processing Bitcoin transactions off of the blockchain, using side chains. This system is called the Lightning Network.

Satoshi, the creator of Bitcoin, designed it to have growing block sizes. The more libertarian types in the crypto world (the OG crypto people) were for sticking with Satoshis vision for Bitcoin. But in the end, the noobs fell for the propaganda and Bitcoin was stuck with small blocks, sidechains, and the lightning network.

As a result of the small blockers gaining control of Bitcoin, the big blockers forked the bitcoin blockchain, creating a new bitcoin called Bitcoin Cash. In my opinion, this is what Bitcoin was designed to be, a peer to peer cash system. Cheap, fast transactions.

That's just how I remember it. This happened maybe 6 years ago. Details may be off here or there.

Sounds like a fruitful psychotic episode. Mine concur; the material world is one of quantity, while the higher worlds are qualitative.

When we're high it's easy to just slip into these sorts of thoughts. If we don't have to expend much of our own energy in order to bring ourselves to these thoughts, then who drove us to them? When we're sober, it's fully our choice. We're consciously driving, not slipping away.

That's a good one. The pee pee tapes thing is so ridiculous.

Showing them that the media can't be trusted is the first step.

I've had success with showing that the media was lying and race baiting about all of the police killings of black people. Showing that they were usually justifiable, that unarmed blacks are not disproportionately killed, that there was no reason to believe race played a role, etc. The media doctored 911 calls etc to make whites seem racist.

If 20x will die from Disease X compared to Covid, and if Covid's death rate was .03%, then we can expect 0.6% of those infected with Disease X to die. Boogitiy boogity boogity.

But then again, as virulence increases, contagiousness decreases, generally. So 0.6% dead of a much smaller number infected.

Not really. It either happens or it doesn't.

"If the vaccine was going to kill you, it already has."

U srs?

Myocarditis takes years to kill. Cancer takes years to grow. Etc.

Opposite. He's saying vaxxed gon die

I watched it. It's about a variant that will only affect vaxxed and not unvaxxed. Super interesting, very technical. The guy seems genuine.

He says errybody who's vaxxed is bout to die. He's extremely confident about this. He seems to know his stuff. He's probably wrong. I don't think he's disingenuous though.

I remember the guy saying the timeframe is "weeks"

You sound like the type of person I'd want in my corner in this situation.

When they say no to something you think is right, never acquiesce.

"Doctor, can we try thing?"

• No, In my professional opinion, thing isn't warranted

"I understand, doctor, but I read a study about thing and want to make sure I've tried everything"

• No, we can't do thing

"But doctor, I really think thing is worth trying. It can't hurt, can it? Is the cost the issue?"

Etcetera. You could rehearse with a family member. Just be firm, calm and polite and you're likely to get what you want. Let the doc say no 10 times if you have to. You can also escalate above the doctor's head.

You've probably noticed, but talking to nurses and social workers is not nearly as effective as talking to the doctors.

You're probably not the praying type, but, especially if you reach a moment where you have a strong emotion, cry out to God. I promise you're in exactly the type of situation that can create genuine emotions that can lead to prayers being fulfilled.

You don't think caffeine is an addictive substance??

Wait, being dependent on a drug just to get through daily life could be a bad thing?

"You" are really defending your addiction very strongly.

Caffeine increases cortisol, the "fight or flight" hormone.

I didn't read the article, but obviously we shouldn't be addicted to drugs like caffeine.

Uhhh barely anyone lurks here compared to the Fox audience. This hoax needs to be called out on repeat, everywhere, as often as possible.

There are very many deep sleeping Fox viewers who watched this. Awake people didn't watch the debate at all..

I don't like life.

Yep, familiar feels. Worldly motives have lost power over us. We need new motivation. Duty isn't ideal.

Duty is a burden. But love is not. Duty is only necessary to power actions for which love is lacking. Try to transform dutiful actions into loving actions and you'll live less reluctantly.